Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
Easy123, Bible is better than sal alinskys rules for radicals Obama is using. Alinsky was a marxist and in 2008 Obama admitted he admired his teachings. So what are you, a marxist too? Just asking.
Saul Alinsky was not a Marxist/socialist/communist. That fact is well documented. The only people that claim that are Fox News and Tea Party people. Anyone that claims that is a liar and ignorant to facts.
You can be skeptical of a source all you want but that doesn't mean those feelings are warranted or true. I'm sure you believe that Fox News is reliable.
And I'm not a Marxist. I hate labels like that. Some issues I'm liberal, others I'm conservative or libertarian, etc. I believe that logic and reason should be your guide, not religion or politics.
Easy your remark about sal alinsky is laughable. Rules for radicals is just that, Marxism. I didn't say you were a marxist I was just asking.What do you know about fox news since you get all your talking points from MSNBC. Just who documented that alinsky was not marxist, msnbc, Obama, Van JOnes,etc?
I don't watch MSNBC, Fox, CNN or any big news channel. I use the Internet. And all my talking points are my own. I don't derive them from anyone else or change my views to suite that of a tv channel or political party.
Pointing out your stupidity is not name calling. You are either illiterate, blind, or stupid if you are not aware that Wikipedia has citations and references in the pages they provide.
Hi, Easy! Just wanted you to know that I am flagging Ken Orr's posts when he delves into fecal matters. It's disgusting. I already warned him I would do this.
Thanks for your kind message, Easy! Just met a couple from Australia-after beating around the bush we found friends with similar beliefs! They are moored here with us in Key West. They would love your posts I think!
Thanks for the link! I have seen various ways of documenting this, but this one was new to me. BTW, what I am reading from CPAC is making my heart glad. The conservatives have learned absolutely nothing from the last two elections. That Coulter, Santorum and Palin starred and Christie was excluded was very revealing.
Easy123, Bible is better than sal alinskys rules for radicals Obama is using. Alinsky was a marxist and in 2008 Obama admitted he admired his teachings. So what are you, a marxist too? Just asking.
Easy I don't trust your links of NYtimes. They haven't told the truth in years.
Saul Alinsky was not a Marxist/socialist/communist. That fact is well documented. The only people that claim that are Fox News and Tea Party people. Anyone that claims that is a liar and ignorant to facts.
You can be skeptical of a source all you want but that doesn't mean those feelings are warranted or true. I'm sure you believe that Fox News is reliable.
And I'm not a Marxist. I hate labels like that. Some issues I'm liberal, others I'm conservative or libertarian, etc. I believe that logic and reason should be your guide, not religion or politics.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/groupcfa/
Chattanooga Freethought Association www.chattanoogafreethoughtassociation...>
Easy your remark about sal alinsky is laughable. Rules for radicals is just that, Marxism. I didn't say you were a marxist I was just asking.What do you know about fox news since you get all your talking points from MSNBC. Just who documented that alinsky was not marxist, msnbc, Obama, Van JOnes,etc?
Read this:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
Saul Alinsky - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He documented it himself.
I don't watch MSNBC, Fox, CNN or any big news channel. I use the Internet. And all my talking points are my own. I don't derive them from anyone else or change my views to suite that of a tv channel or political party.
wikipedia is a joke.
It has references. But I guess you're too stupid to know that. You don't believe facts. You make things up and accept them as truth.
there you go with name calling again.
Pointing out your stupidity is not name calling. You are either illiterate, blind, or stupid if you are not aware that Wikipedia has citations and references in the pages they provide.
Really! Not name calling? I see very well What you are all about.
Name calling would be like: dummy, idiot, stupid (as a noun), etc.
I don't really care what you see. And I don't care that you are offended because you think I called you a name.
offended? your rants just define the kind of person you are.
As do yours.
Thanks for your persistence in the face of so much garbage. It exhausts me sometimes.....
Hi, Easy! Just wanted you to know that I am flagging Ken Orr's posts when he delves into fecal matters. It's disgusting. I already warned him I would do this.
Thanks for your kind message, Easy! Just met a couple from Australia-after beating around the bush we found friends with similar beliefs! They are moored here with us in Key West. They would love your posts I think!
Thanks for the link! I have seen various ways of documenting this, but this one was new to me. BTW, what I am reading from CPAC is making my heart glad. The conservatives have learned absolutely nothing from the last two elections. That Coulter, Santorum and Palin starred and Christie was excluded was very revealing.
Oh, dear-I just insulted Maxie's manhood and it went right over his head (so to speak)
Or login with:
New Account