SITE MAP  |  MOBILE  |  EMAILS  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  ARCHIVES  |  CONTACT US  |  ADVERTISE  |  PROMOTIONS  |  SUBMIT EVENTS  |  FEEDBACK  |  PLACE AN AD  |  RSS FEEDS
Home » News » Local/Regional News Chattanooga: Mixed fuel ...
Thursday, April 24, 2008

Chattanooga: Mixed fuel for your tank

Included in this article:      4 Comments     Audio     
TimesFreePress Audio
Kelly Tiller

Benton top ethanol source

As gas prices keep rising, retailers profits pinched

Six months ago, ethanol was hard to come by in Chattanooga. Now motorists don’t have to look far to find gasoline blended with the corn-based fuel.

“Now 75 percent of gas in Chattanooga has ethanol,” said Ross Benton, president of Benton Oil Co., which is distributing E10 gas containing 10 percent ethanol.

The push for ethanol is at a fever pitch as political leaders nationwide look for domestic replacements for foreign oil. President George W. Bush signed the Energy Independence and Security Act in 2007, which mandates that all gas consumed in 2014 contain 10 percent ethanol.

The Tennessee Department of Agriculture requires labels on every pump in the state that contains ethanol, said Randy Jennings, biofuels administrator for the department. It’s an alert to consumers, he said, but the risk to vehicles is negligible, the fuel economy is nearly identical and the gas blend burns cleaner.

Still, some people question whether corn-based ethanol is a responsible choice.

“The production of corn ethanol is subsidized by state and federal governments to the tune of more than $6 billion a year,” said Dr. David Pemental, a Cornell University professor and outspoken opponent of ethanol use. “The subsidies for a gallon of ethanol are more than 90 times the subsidies for a gallon of gasoline.”

Staff Photo by Dan Henry -- Soddy-Daisy resident Neville Lewis carries a gas tank he just filled to his fishing boat while at the On The Run Mobil gasoline station off Hixson Pike. The Mobil station switched over to carrying ethanol-blended gasoline just over a month ago.

Dr. Pemental argues there are a variety of concerns about ethanol:

* Corn production causes massive soil erosion.

* More than 1,700 gallons of water are required to produce 1 gallon of ethanol.

* If the entire U.S. corn crop were used for ethanol, it would fill only 7 percent of the country’s need for gas.

* Growing, harvesting and delivering corn to ethanol refineries requires nearly as much fuel and energy as the end product produces.

* The prices of meat and dairy products have risen sharply because supplies of corn, used for livestock feed, are being pinched by ethanol production.

On the other side of the argument, proponents of ethanol say the technology for making it is improving all the time, according to data from the Renewable Fuels Association, the ethanol industry’s trade association. And using corn to make ethanol is not the main reason for rising food prices, association spokesman Matt Hartwig said.

“It is indeed true that corn prices are higher, but the major culprit is energy prices,” he said.

Cows, chickens and other livestock feed on corn, so when the price of corn rises with demand so does the price of meat, eggs and milk, Mr. Hartwig said.

“The price of crude oil has twice the impact compared to the price of corn. Plain and simple: Corn prices are not the sole reason, or even the major reason, for marginally higher prices on the grocery aisle today,” he said.

Mr. Hartwig said poor harvests and global demand for corn also have contributed to higher prices.

The Renewable Fuels Association cites studies that show ethanol producers over the last five years have reduced their water use nearly 27 percent, reduced electricity use nearly 16 percent and reduced total energy use nearly 22 percent.

A SWITCH

The position of the Sierra Club, a national environmental group, is that corn-based ethanol has laid a good foundation for other plant-based fuels such as switch grass and wood-based fuels. Both are being studied in Tennessee and Georgia, said Josh Dorner, a Sierra Club spokesman.

“There are a lot of problems with the way we are producing corn ethanol,” Mr. Dorner said. “Other sources are not as wasteful and lend to a more efficient process.”

Switch grass, which has been propped up with aggressive studies at the University of Tennessee, can be regrown every year after it’s mown down, Mr. Dorner said. Corn, however, must be replanted, depleting the soil and contributing to fertilizer run-off, he said.

About 720 acres of the grass have been planted in Tennessee, including a farm in Bradley County and another in Polk County, said Dr. Kelly Tiller, director of external operations at UT’s office of bioenergy.

“Corn has been the first generation in technology,” Dr. Tiller said. “There are other new generations, a second and third generation, that will allow us create a more sustainable form of biofuel.”

Using a variety of sources, including corn, probably is a better solution, said Dr. Tiller.

Mr. Hartwig agreed.

“Frankly, we are going to need everything we can to solve our energy crisis,” he said. “We’re just laying the foundation for the future.”

TRUCKING AHEAD

Mr. Jennings said the Tennessee Department of Agriculture steers clear of politicized arguments, but the agency, with the help of federal grants, is encouraging more gasoline stations to sell ethanol. The gas blend creates less pollution and could reduce fuel prices, he said.

Along with E10, the only other type of ethanol-blended gas now available is E85, which uses 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gas. Any car can run on E10, but E85 only runs on specialized Flex Fuel vehicles. There is no E85 pump in the Chattanooga area, he said.

“There aren’t many E85 pumps in the state right now, maybe just 12 in all of Tennessee,” Mr. Jennings said. “We’re encouraging a greater network of those,” particularly along the interstate corridors, he said.

E10 gas might cause some motorists to see a reduction in fuel economy, but Mr. Jennings estimates the loss is around 2 percent, which he insisted hardly is noticeable.

“Consumers should know that we have inspectors that pull roughly 8,000 samples of fuel all across the state every year,” Mr. Jennings said. “We’re concerned about ethanol blends, and we’re doing everything we can to make sure it’s safe for vehicles.”

4 Comments

Show/Hide Comments

The Rest Of The Story...

Regardless of what is printed here, my mileage -- and that of everyone I have talked to -- has dropped 10 percent, both city and highway. That's two to three miles per gallon less for the 4-wheelers, five per gallon less for the bikes.

There is significantly less energy in gasohol than in straight gasoline -- less energy equals lower mileage. Period. Tie that into the higher cost of gasohol and all savings disappear.

The true answer is to allow our own domestic supplies of crude oil to be developed -- wherever they may lie -- and kept for USA use ONLY. Refineries MUST be built here to process this oil.

Username: rollo | On: April 24, 2008 at 12:53 a.m.
Did you find this comment to be useful? Yes | No
1 of 2 people found this comment useful.

Ethanol contains 30% less energy per gallon than gasoline. So right off the bat, you lose 3% for a 90/10 gasoline-ethanol blend. This is simple physics. Beyond that, ethanol could impact your fuel system, causing further degradation over time, but this would be more likely at higher concentrations.

Ethanol releases 20% less CO2 per gallon than gasoline, yet provides 30% less energy. So the same amount of driving for an ethanol-fueled vehicle, you'll actually put MORE CO2 into the atmosphere. Someone call Al Gore before it's too late.

Also, corn is a lousy fuel source. Ethanol production took up about 1/3 of our domestic crop last year without meeting a significant fraction of our energy needs, driving up worldwide food prices in the process. Cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass would be cheaper and be better for the environment.

In the longer term, plug-in hybrid vehicles (powered by nuclear, solar, and wind, in that order) are the answer, perhaps with switchgrass-based ethanol in place of gasoline for trips that exceed the battery capacity of these vehicles. Better mass transit and urban planning would also help immensely.

Username: bill76 | On: April 24, 2008 at 8:46 a.m.
Did you find this comment to be useful? Yes | No
0 of 1 people found this comment useful.

It's too bad that the author (Crisp) chose to use the one outlier (and that's using the term loosely) in Pimental to quote statistics about corn ethanol. Pimental is so far off from all (like 17) other analyses that have been performed in past and recent years that there's a collection of comments noting how far. If you really want to get educated as to how far off he is, try either of these links:
< http://eerc.ra.utk.edu/etcfc/docs/pr/Arg... >
< http://eerc.ra.utk.edu/etcfc/docs/pr/Mic... >

True, we have to make a switch to using non-food based resources to produce the fuel, and we must learn how to use less petroleum as well (if you think that's hogwash watch oil prices escalate over the next five years), but as Tiller points out, this is a first step in a decades-long transition. Does any of you expect to be driving a fuel cell vehicle in the next 20 years? Don't hold your breath. The technology has made lots of advances but it is still a long way off.

Meanwhile, what fuel do you want to use when a gallon of petroleum cost $10+? First generation ethanol and biodiesel are laying the groundwork for the 2nd and 3rd generation biofuels. Algae to biodiesel and biomass to cellulosic ethanol are what we need to focus on, and that transition is already underway (for both).

The primary driver in the price of food going up worldwide is demand (think those climbing the economic scale in India and China that are moving to more beef/chicken/pork-based diets) and the secondary driver is oil prices. What has caused rice and wheat prices to go through the roof? It has nothing to do with biofuels (the prime driver for increasing wheat prices last year was the drought in Australia where much wheat is produced).

Additionally, Americans need to realize that we cannot drill our way out of this problem. Look up how much oil and NG the new (much-hyped) Tupi field off the coast of Brazil (8 billion barrels) is really adding to the world supply -- it's not a drop in the bucket compared to what Saudi Arabia has alone. We are using this precious resource too quickly (yes, it's a great resource, we are just misusing/overusing it). Wait until Tata's new Nano (the sub-1,000 rupi car) hits the streets of India: ther oil consumption is going to go sky high.

Keep reading (beyond newspaper writers that do little homework to determine what is worthy data) and you might just come around to see the big picture.

Username: jgoverly | On: April 25, 2008 at 7:07 p.m.
Did you find this comment to be useful? Yes | No
0 of 0 people found this comment useful.

The mileage in my vehicle drops over 20% when using ethanol garbage gas. Will someone in Chattanooga please start selling real gas again???

Username: captaincaveman | On: June 20, 2008 at 3:19 p.m.
Did you find this comment to be useful? Yes | No
0 of 0 people found this comment useful.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Posted comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. To view complete guidelines for submitting content, comments and feedback, click here.

Only In Tomorrow's TimesFreePress
Stacy London
advertisement
Featured Business
advertisement
advertisement

© Copyright, permissions and privacy policy Copyright ©2008, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.