SITE MAP  |  MOBILE  |  EMAILS  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  ARCHIVES  |  CONTACT US  |  ADVERTISE  |  PROMOTIONS  |  SUBMIT EVENTS  |  FEEDBACK  |  PLACE AN AD  |  RSS FEEDS
Home » News » Latest News » Chattanooga: Cost totals ...
Thursday, July 31, 2008

Chattanooga: Cost totals $73,228 to reprint election ballots


By: Tom Faure
Included in this article:      1 Comment    

The Hamilton County Commission likely will pay $73,228 to print ballots for the Aug. 7 elections, including about 216,000 ballots that must be reprinted after their initial versions had mistakes.

At a meeting today, the County Commission set the ballot-cost item on its agenda for its meeting on Aug. 6. The ballots already have been ordered and are being printed.

Last month, county election officials had to reprint 140,000 ballots for the county’s Aug. 7 election after the U.S. Senate race was omitted from both Democratic and Republican ballots. Officials then discovered they had to reprint about 50,000 GOP ballots because the name of Teresa Sheppard of Luttrell, Tenn., a primary challenger to U.S. Rep. Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., accidentally was left off during the first reprinting.

At the time of the printing error, county Election Administrator Bud Knowles said paper ballots cost about 17 or 18 cents apiece. At that rate, the 50,000 ballots would cost between $8,500 and $9,000 and 140,000 ballots would cost between $23,800 and $25,200.

According to an invoice attached to today’s resolution, the Mid-West Printing Co. of Sapulpa, Okla., reprinted all 71,500 GOP ballots for a total of $16,502.50. The second print run for the 140,000 ballots amounted to $22,936.50, according to the invoice.

The print run of the original ballots cost $30,445.50.

With freight costs, the total money spent on Aug. 7 election ballots will total $73,228.01, records show.

For complete coverage, read tomorrow’s Chattanooga Times Free Press.

1 Comment

If any of the "inaccurate ballots" were used by early voters, the vote count will be inaccurate. According to a quote published in the www.chattanoogan.com, Bud Knowels stated that some early voters had cast their votes on the inaccurate ballots. The number of "inaccurate ballots" totaled 3030. If this is the case, the 3030 re-votes should take place to reflect an accurate vote count; and the first 3030 original "inaccurate ballots" should be replaced with 3030 revised "accurate and complete ballots" that now, apparently exist.

Username: JustUs | On: August 2, 2008 at 6:31 p.m.
Did you find this comment to be useful? Yes | No
0 of 0 people found this comment useful.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Posted comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. To view complete guidelines for submitting content, comments and feedback, click here.

Only In Tomorrow's TimesFreePress
Tech Talk
Shop
Search Local Items

Classifieds/Place and Ad
Search Local Items

Jobs
Enter keyword or select from below..
Homes
Search for your home...
Cars
Search for your car...
Find a Business

© Copyright, permissions and privacy policy Copyright ©2008, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.