SITE MAP  |  MOBILE  |  EMAILS  |  SUBSCRIBE  | ARCHIVES  |  CONTACT US  |  ADVERTISE  |  PROMOTIONS  |  SUBMIT EVENTS  |  FEEDBACK  |  PLACE AN AD  |  RSS FEEDS
Friday, June 20, 2008 , 12:01 a.m.

Washington: GOP drills Democrats over offshore oil wells

TimesFreePress Audio
Lamar Alexander

WASHINGTON — All week long, Republicans in Congress — including those from Tennessee and Georgia — have hammered their Democratic colleagues for their opposition on environmental grounds to drilling for oil off the nation’s coastlines.

In floor speeches, news conferences and appearances at energy-related events, local Republicans have been outspoken in their support for offshore drilling, saying it would help satisfy the country’s demand for oil while research on alternative fuels continues.

“Our friends on the Democratic side seem to have forgotten half of the law of supply and demand,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn. “We have to find more, as well as use less. Republicans are ready to do both. Democrats are not. They’re not willing to find more oil.”

Democrats, however, siding with environmentalists, say the drilling would produce only small amounts of oil, and they prefer to tout conservation strategies instead.

“Despite what President Bush, John McCain and their friends in the oil industry claim, we cannot drill our way out of this problem,” said Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. “They want to feed our addiction to oil; Democrats want to end it.”

Both parties have seized onto $4-a-gallon gas as a major talking point, with the election less than five months away.

In making their stand for offshore drilling, Republicans are siding with President Bush and presumptive GOP presidential nominee John McCain, who in recent days also have called for ending a ban on the practice.

Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, has said he opposes offshore drilling.

Chris Ford, with the Tennessee Conservation Voters, said any oil output from offshore drilling would take a minimum of 10 years to reach the market. His organization met with several Tennessee lawmakers in Washington this week, including Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Rep. Lincoln Davis, D-Tenn., to discuss environmental issues.

“We’re concerned about gas prices, but offshore drilling isn’t necessarily going to provide the benefits that people say it will,” Mr. Ford said.

But Sen. Corker said drilling could help provide a bridge in energy supply until alternative fuels become viable. He has noted that Republican Florida Gov. Charlie Crist and Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., who formerly opposed opening up Florida’s coasts to oil exploration, now are more receptive to the idea.

“Freeing up domestic oil production in the U.S. will send an important signal to the markets and should be part of our efforts to move our country toward energy security,” Sen. Corker said.

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., twice in recent weeks has taken to the Senate floor to read letters from his constituents about rising gas prices.

“There is nothing that I want that would in any way endanger the pristine beaches in my state or the coastal regions of any other state, but we now have the technology in place to ensure that never happens,” he said.

Rep. Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., in a recent e-mail that he sent to media outlets, wrote that Democrats are hurting the American economy by not allowing domestic oil production.

“We need representatives in Congress who will vote for more energy supply,” he wrote. “Americans know we can solve the problem of high gas prices, but we have to decide that we’re serious about doing it and increase the supply of U.S. energy.”

Comments

I can't believe that people are buying Bush/McCain's argument that lifting the restrictions on drilling offshore (supported by both Bush/McCain) and in the ANWR (supported by Bush) would actually have an impact on today's oil prices.

Beyond the fact that it will be some time (at least several years) before that oil would hit the market, the estimated amount of oil available would only replace our imports for approximately four years. So, lifting the ban would have NO impact on current pricing and would likely be a drop in the bucket in the future -- not to mention that there's no guarantee that oil drilled in the U.S. would remain in the U.S.

I know that we can't turn away from petroleum overnight, but we need to work on renewables, not tap the last of our untapped reserves. If we do, and we continue to blow through oil at the rate we do now, what will our kids do? Levitate to school, work and their vacations on the then ecologically damaged Gulf beaches?


0 of 0 people found this comment useful.
By: Anonymous Name | Username: LP | On: June 20, 2008 at 10:46 a.m.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Posted comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. To view complete guidelines for submitting content, comments and feedback, click here.

Share and Enjoy...

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Subscribe Here!
Labor Day activities spotlighted

TOP HOMES

TOP JOBS
DIRECTORIES
BRIDAL | TRAVEL
Search:
Site | Archives | Web
Community: News | Correspondents
© Copyright, permissions and privacy policy Copyright ©2008, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.