SITE MAP  |  MOBILE  |  EMAILS  |  SUBSCRIBE  | ARCHIVES  |  CONTACT US  |  ADVERTISE  |  PROMOTIONS  |  SUBMIT EVENTS  |  FEEDBACK  |  PLACE AN AD  |  RSS FEEDS
Saturday, Sept. 20, 2008 , 12:01 a.m.

TRA’s Roberson proposes only 4.3 percent increase for Tennessee-American rate hike

NASHVILLE — A state regulator is aiming a hose at Tennessee-American Water Co.’s request for a 21.7 percent increase in Chattanoogans’ water rates, arguing the water company deserves only a fifth of the $7.64 million increase it is seeking.

Tennessee Regulatory Authority Director Eddie Roberson’s proposal on how to handle the rate case came in the form of an eight-page motion to two fellow regulatory authority directors who serve with him on the three-person panel hearing the matter.

Mr. Roberson, who is chairman of the rate petition hearing, said the water company should only be allowed to increase existing rates by $1.6 million.

Regulatory authority directors will begin deliberating Monday on the motion, made public on the authority’s Web site Friday, said spokeswoman Jessica Johnson. The motion could be amended or passed as is. Action requires approval by two of the three members, she said.

John Watson, Tennessee-American Water Co. president, said company officials “are very disappointed with the motion made by Chairman Roberson.”

“The proposed motion is inconsistent with past positions taken by the TRA (Tennessee Regulatory Authority) and, if adopted, we do not believe the decision is in the long-term best interest of our customers or the water system,” Mr. Watson said.

Mr. Roberson’s motion calls for allowing Tennessee-American to impose only a 4.37 percent rate increase on its residential, industrial and commercial customers in Chattanooga, Fort Oglethorpe and Catoosa County in Georgia.

But the motion would require a 12.77 percent rate increase for Signal Mountain and Walden’s Ridge customers.

Tennessee-American, which supplies water wholesale to Signal Mountain, Walden’s Ridge, Catoosa and Fort Oglethorpe, Ga., under contract, had not sought any increase at all in those communities.

Mr. Roberson’s motion goes against arguments or requests by Tennessee-American on a number of key points, ranging from how much money the company can earn now under existing rates to how much profit it should be able to generate for its corporate parent, investor-owned American Water Works Co.

Article: Tennessee Valley Authority power cheaper, more reliable, but operating costs still above average

PDF: TVA Inspector General Report

Article: Water rates for Signal, Walden’s Ridge to go up

Article: Tennessee: Regulators limit water company’s court cost recovery

PDF: Tennessee-American Water Rates

PDF: Water rate ruling

Article: Tennessee-American gets only fraction of rate increase

Article: TRA’s Roberson proposes only 4.3 percent increase for Tennessee-American rate hike

Article: Chattanooga: Final pleas made in water rate case

Article: Chattanoogan: Soaring costs hurt water utilities

Article: Hamilton County: Brooks seeks help for small utiliti

Article: Consultant challenges 'management audit' of Tennessee-American

Article: Chattanooga: Soaring costs hurt utilities

Article: Tennessee-American Water company increases differ

Article: Tennessee: $2 million battle over water rates

Article: Tennessee: Water rate hearing concludes today

Article: Tennessee: Water rate hike opponents address County Commission

Article: Chattanooga: Walden’s Ridge water service questioned

Article: Chattanooga: Water rate hearings begin

PDF: Tennessee American Water letter

Article:Chattanooga: McCormick calls for 'prudent decision' on water rate hike

Article: Groups join water rate hike fight

Article: Water in Chattanooga is pricey

PDF: Read the Allen & Hoshall June 2008 rate survey. It does not include Tennessee-American's average residential rates, but the company in its March 14 rate increase petition says the current average is $19.39.

Article: Tennessee: Full-fledged rate local rate hearing may be last

Article: Chattanooga: Group makes waves over water rate hike

PDF: Re: Filing

PDF: Supplemental Response and Objections

Article: City, state want water rates set 'correctly,' not quickly

PDF: Order from the Tennessee regulatory authority in Tennessee-American water rate case

Article: Tennessee Regulatory Authority limited in scope of power

Article: State, city won’t use disputed consultant in Tennessee-American rate case

Article: Resume in water company case removed from Web

Article: Water rate hike won’t immediately trickle down to municipalities

Article: Hamilton County Commission unanimously opposes water rate hike

Video: Water issues discussed

PDF: Delivering Service (from Tennessee-American)

PDF: IPO Filing

Article: Water rate hike protest planned

PDF: County auditor report on local water utilities

Article: Water rate hike makes waves with lawmakers

PDF: Tennessee-American Water's filing

Article: Tennessee-American Water seeks highest rate hike in history

Tennessee-American’s request for a rate increase, which follows a 12.3 percent hike approved by a different Tennessee Regulatory Authority panel last year, has been opposed by the Tennessee Attorney General’s Consumer Advocate and Protection Division as well as the city of Chattanooga and the Chattanooga Manufacturers Association.

Mr. Roberson’s motion seeks to slash the $1.6 million Tennessee-American wants to charge ratepayers for its costs of hiring lawyers and experts to push this year’s increase, as well as its costs for battling the state, city and manufacturers in last year’s rate request. Mr. Roberson wants to cut the figure to about $580,000.

Ryan McGehee, an assistant state attorney general, said Friday that officials were still reviewing Mr. Roberson’s motion.

“We look forward to the hearing on Monday and the TRA’s deliberation of the proof presented by the Consumer Advocate which requested a rate reduction for TAWC (water company) ratepayers of around $1.5 million.”

He declined further comment, and Chattanooga attorney Rick Hitchcock, who is on the city’s legal team, said he had no comment.

Chattanooga Manufacturers Association President Ray Childers said he would prefer the cut in existing rates sought by the consumer advocate, but Mr. Roberson’s motion doesn’t look all that bad to him.

“Even though I’d like to have seen it lower or no increase at all — I’d have to say that given the testimony and circumstances I think it (Mr. Roberson’s motion) would be a fair and reasonable result.”

Comments

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Posted comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. To view complete guidelines for submitting content, comments and feedback, click here.

Share This...

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

TOP HOMES

TOP JOBS
DIRECTORIES
BRIDAL | TRAVEL
Search:
Site | Archives | Web
Community: News | Correspondents
© Copyright, permissions and privacy policy Copyright ©2008, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.