published Thursday, July 30th, 2009

Officer reprimanded for allegedly choking suspect


by Jacqueline Koch
Audio clip

Christopher Pugh

Audio clip

Jonathan Bryant

Although a police supervisor was given only a written reprimand for allegedly choking a handcuffed suspect, Chattanooga police Chief Freeman Cooper said he does not consider any discipline to be light.

"I don't look at the discipline as being a slap on the wrist," the chief said. "A police officer's goal is to go through his or her career without any type of discipline."

Chief Cooper ordered that Sgt. Jonathan Bryant be given a written reprimand after an investigation determined he improperly used force and failed to fill out a use-of-force form.

The Chattanooga Police Department internal affairs division investigated Sgt. Bryant, a fugitive division supervisor, after receiving a complaint that the sergeant choked a man on June 30 after the man was handcuffed and seated in the back of a patrol car.

Capt. Mike Mathis, head of internal affairs, recommended that the allegations against Sgt. Bryant be sustained, according to the internal affairs case recommendation.

"The Chattanooga Police Department does not 'teach' any officer to place their hands around the throat of a suspect," Capt. Mathis wrote. "To the contrary, the Chattanooga Police Department teaches 'not' to take such an action because this type of action can cause 'death.'"

Chief Cooper said many factors are considered when determining discipline. In Sgt. Bryant's case, he took into account that another officer reported the incident and not the man who allegedly was choked. The victim's story also varied when interviewed two separate times by police, Chief Cooper said.

Sgt. Bryant did not have a history of sustained violations, according to his file.

He did not return messages seeking comment Thursday afternoon.

"Jonathan Bryant is a good police officer and has been a good supervisor, and he just made a bad choice in this incident," Chief Cooper said.

The fugitive division was serving a warrant on Christopher Pugh on June 30, and officers found him inside Harry's convenience store at 4301 Norcross Road. They handcuffed him in the store and led him to a patrol car.

Sgt. Bryant told internal affairs investigators that once Mr. Pugh was in the patrol car, the officer placed his hand on Mr. Pugh's neck to prevent him from spitting, according to an internal affairs investigation report.

"I squeezed hard enough to get his attention and hopefully he wouldn't spit," Sgt. Bryant told investigators.

PDF: Letter of reprimand

POLICY ON USING FORCE

"Officers shall, except in exigent circumstances, use only the equipment and/or techniques for which he or she is trained and certified by the department."

Source: Chattanooga Police Department

Mr. Pugh was cooperative until handcuffs were placed on his wrists and he was pushed into the patrol car, at which time he became verbally aggressive and resistant, Sgt. Bryant told investigators.

Mr. Pugh cleared his throat as though he was about to spit, Sgt. Bryant said, but did not make any verbal threats about doing so. The sergeant said he placed his hand around Mr. Pugh's neck for a "few seconds" and that Mr. Pugh never lost consciousness.

Mr. Pugh told internal affairs investigators he was being verbally combative while being escorted to the patrol car. When he was seated in the car, Sgt. Bryant reached in, grabbed him by his Adam's apple and squeezed for 30 to 45 seconds until he couldn't breathe, Mr. Pugh told investigators.

It was "enough to where I could feel my eyes watering, to where I'm needing breath," Mr. Pugh told investigators, adding that he was choked again but didn't see who did it.

The car in which the incident occurred did not have video surveillance.

In connection with the June 30 incident, Mr. Pugh pleaded guilty in Hamilton County General Sessions Court on July 9 to assault on police, civil rights intimidation, driving on a revoked license and criminal impersonation.

3
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
franksmith said...

Moral of the story:

Don't break the law and a warrant will not be issued for you therefore the Fugitive Division would not be looking for you.

Don't run that mouth after you are arrested.

And for God Sakes don't try and spit on an officer!

Great job to the officer.

July 30, 2009 at 8:27 a.m.
enufisenuf said...

I wonder if I put my hands around the cops neck would Cooper just give me a written warning?

July 30, 2009 at 8:58 a.m.
itsObvious said...

Was the only reason this charge was sustained is because a fellow officer reported it? The other reports of abuse were likely reported by civilians and that's why the prior accusations of abuse were not sustain by internal affairs. Most accusations reported by civilians aren't sustain unless there's a suspicion the civilian might take legal action or they have legal representation. That's the real reason most people resort to suing, because they already know that's the only way to get the depts. attention.

July 30, 2009 at 2:16 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.