SITE MAP  |  MOBILE  |  EMAILS  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  ARCHIVES  |  CONTACT US  |  ADVERTISE  |  PROMOTIONS  |  SUBMIT EVENTS  |  FEEDBACK  |  PLACE AN AD  |  RSS FEEDS
Home » News » Local/Regional News UT cuts 3 ...
Tuesday, June 2, 2009

UT cuts 3 vice presidents, more could come

Included in this article:      1 Comment    

The University of Tennessee could have a leaner system administration before next fall, since officials may eliminate three top positions and decrease the number of vice presidents by half.

With the cuts, the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga will be taking on more administrative responsibility and receive some of the $5 million in expected system savings, officials said.

“I think there are things the campuses should do that the system is doing now,” said UT interim President Jan Simek.

There is no set amount yet for how much the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga might receive from the savings, officials said.

The board of trustees will vote on the proposed administrative cuts at its annual meeting this month. Starting July 1, UT campuses could be taking over responsibilities for items such as motor pools, purchasing and printing.

“I don’t know why (these functions) were at the system level to begin with,” Dr. Simek said. “It is my intention to push all that to the campus level.”

Officials at UTC did not respond to requests for a comment about what effects the changes could have on the campus.

In a new administrative structure, only seven vice presidents will remain: for agriculture, for academic affairs, for public relations, for diversity, for development, executive vice president for research and vice president and chief executive officer.

The positions of vice president for information technology, for science and technology and for operations would be cut.

However, officials said two of the people holding the terminated jobs have been moved to new positions. The current vice president for operations, Sylvia Davis, could be laid off, they said.

Officials said they were unsure whether the support staff for the three positions would be laid off or shuffled to other positions in the system.

“This has been a very difficult process,” said Dr. Simek. “It is difficult more than anything because we are dealing with people.”

Four positions will have the words “vice president” removed from their name but those who hold the jobs will not receive pay cuts. By removing part of the jobs’ titles, Dr. Simek said, the system would be able to offer a lower salary to future candidates when the jobs become vacant.

He said the move was not a “magic trick” to give the illusion of fewer vice presidents.

“We will be able to hire new people at a different level,” he said. “We don’t have to pay the same.”

After hearing Dr. Simek’s proposal to cut UT administration costs, board members said it was a good first step toward trimming system costs.

“It is a start in the right direction,” said UT board Vice Chairman Jim Murphy. “I am pleased Jan has been able to do this.”

Andrea Loughry, a UT trustee, called the proposed cuts “a move in the right direction.”

“This is something we as a board have asked for quite some time,” she said.

She said board members would discuss the potential of further systems cuts at a meeting set for August, when board members and administrators plan to discuss the future role of the system.

“I think we need to look at best practices,” she said.

Dr. Simek told board members Monday that he also wants to examine moving the administration of men’s and women’s athletics to the Knoxville campus. There now are two athletic positions in the system administration.

He said he also wants board members to think about merging the duties of the vice president for diversity into the human resources office.

“I am more than happy to go further” with these cuts, Dr. Simek said.

1 Comment

I am very surprised the university would cut the vice presidents of science & technology and information technology, and yet retain vice presidents of public relations and diversity. The university seems to be throwing in the towel for competing in this technology driven era. As an out of state alumna, I feel this retreat from emphasis on the importance of technology is a disservice to current students.

Username: ecsully | On: June 2, 2009 at 11:49 a.m.
Did you find this comment to be useful? Yes | No
0 of 0 people found this comment useful.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Posted comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. To view complete guidelines for submitting content, comments and feedback, click here.

Only In Tomorrow's TimesFreePress
Minimum drinking age gets wide support, even among teens
Featured Business

© Copyright, permissions and privacy policy Copyright ©2008, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.