Hamilton County: Boydston files for diversion in theft

Thursday, June 4, 2009


By:
Monica Mercer (Contact)

PDF: Boydston petition

Article: Boydston files for diversion in theft

Article: Hamilton County: Boydston trial on shoplifting charge possible, attorney says

Article: Hamilton County: Boydston seeks diversion in theft case

Article:Hamilton County: Board member may see trial for $32 worth of items

PDF: Complaint affidavit against Janice Boydston

Article:Hamilton Couty: Boydston ready to go to court in theft case, lawyer says

Article:Hamilton County: School board member appears in court on shoplifting charge

Article:Hamilton County: School board member’s shoplifting case continued

Article:Hamilton County: School board member faces shoplifting charge

Article: Hamilton County School Board member Boydston says mistakenly put store items in purse

More than 40 people have written letters on behalf of a Hamilton County school board member facing prosecution on a shoplifting charge, but Janice Boydston’s defense attorney has chosen not to file them publicly.

“I just figured that these people wrote personal letters to the judge and did not expect them to be made available to the public,” attorney Sam Robinson, who’s representing Ms. Boydston, said Wednesday. “These are people who are and are not community leaders who support Janice Boydston’s innocence in this case.”

Mr. Robinson said he would not disclose the names of any of the letter writers.

Ms. Boydston is charged with one count of misdemeanor theft under $500, stemming from her arrest last summer for allegedly shoplifting about $32 worth of items from the Lookout Valley Wal-Mart.

The letters accompany her application, filed Wednesday, for an alternative form of sentencing. She is asking for “pretrial diversion” in the case and, if Hamilton County Judge Rebecca Stern grants it, the veteran school board member will not have to admit any guilt in the incident.

Any evidence of Ms. Boydston’s prosecution also will be expunged from her record after one year, meaning that background checks never will show it.

But there “have to be consequences” in the case, according to Hamilton County District Attorney Bill Hall.

Mr. Hall said in April that the only resolution he was considering at the time was “guilty diversion,” which is similar to pretrial diversion but requires a defendant to admit guilt.

Mr. Hall could not be reached Wednesday for comment.

It is possible that Judge Stern could agree with Mr. Hall’s opinion, meaning that Ms. Boydston eventually will stand trial for the misdemeanor crime — a crime that usually involves no jail time and typically is resolved without a jury.

“Ms. Boydston does not plan on admitting guilt now or ever,” Mr. Robinson said in April. “She maintains her innocence.”

The allegedly stolen items included a cosmetics case, a scented candle and a package of shoe inserts, according to testimony at a preliminary court hearing last fall. A Wal-Mart employee testified that she saw Ms. Boydston deliberately put the items in her purse.

Ms. Boydston has pointed out that she paid for about $85 worth of groceries during the same shopping trip.

Subscribe Here!
Chattanooga Roller Girls ready for first "bout" next month