published Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

Mayor, judge at odds over pet store case

Mayor Ron Littlefield and City Court Judge Sherry Paty are in dispute about whether they spoke to each other in a conference call involving the case between the Pet Company at Hamilton Place and the city’s animal control division.

Judge Paty sparked the dispute Monday when she ordered a mistrial in the case and stepped down from the case due to a July 1 e-mail from the mayor and a subsequent open letter he wrote July 22 urging her to order restitution for McKamey Animal Care and Adoption Center, which handles the city’s animal control.

“I really need to talk with you about this situation,” the e-mail from Mr. Littlefield reads. “We must not leave the McKamey Center holding the bag for all the expenses associated with the Pet Company’s unacceptable conditions.”

At the end of the e-mail, Mr. Littlefield wrote that “I do not trust” the Pet Company.

Judge Paty said, “It is absolutely inappropriate to contact a judge in an ex parte manner, where there are no attorneys present, to try to influence the outcome of a case. Especially when the city is a party to the case, and he is the highest elected official in the state.”

  • photo
    Staff File Photo by Jake Daniels/Chattanooga Times Free Press Judge Sherry Paty asks questions of McKamey attorney Mark Litchford during the hearing where she heard arguments from the Pet Company and McKamey about restitution.

She emphasized that she did not respond to the e-mail, but said the mayor’s involvement had tainted the integrity of her ruling, necessitating her stepping down from the case.

Her decision means the case, which began June 15 when the city raided the Pet Company on grounds of animal cruelty, may have to start “at ground zero,” according to McKamey Executive Director Karen Walsh.

Judge Paty said that she has requested that the Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts select a judge from another jurisdiction to preside over the case.

McKamey and city workers seized 84 animals during the June raid. The store was slapped with violations that included a nonworking air-conditioning system, filthy cages and inadequate watering of dogs that led to dehydration.

The city wanted the store’s license revoked, but Judge Paty ruled that it could reopen — but must bring in all new animals — if it took care of the violations.

Afterward, McKamey officials asked for about $40,000 to reimburse them for the care of the animals, which were sent to other Pet Company stores.

Mr. Littlefield said Judge Paty’s office arranged a conference call with his office after the e-mail was sent, and that he, Judge Paty and attorneys on both sides in the case convened July 7 to discuss “how the case should proceed.”

“I was absolutely trying to persuade her not to leave the McKamey holding the bag for the costs associated with this, because the company was basically getting a free ride,” the mayor said.

Judge Paty acknowledged that a conference call took place, but said it was between the attorneys and herself and, if Mr. Littlefield was present, he never involved himself in the conversation.

McKamey attorney Mark Litchford confirmed that he, Mr. Littlefield, the mayor’s administrative assistant Marie Chinery and Ms. Walsh were all present at the mayor’s office during the call, and that Judge Paty and Pet Company attorney Andy Pippinger were part of the call but from other locations.

Ms. Walsh said Mr. Littlefield and Judge Paty directly addressed each other at the time, but the judge denied any conversation with the mayor.

“He may have said something, but the attorneys were handling the conference,” she said.

Richard Beeland, the mayor’s spokesman, said there is no recording of the conversation, and that the mayor’s office never records phone calls.

Mr. Littlefield said he never crossed the boundaries between legislative and judicial powers.

“I’ve dealt with city judges for 40 years, and none of my actions would be considered out of the realm of what’s acceptable,” he said.

He said he has regularly written letters to judges about cases, even federal judges.

Judge Paty said she was stunned that the mayor admitted to writing judges during pending lawsuits.

“I think any judge would tell you that’s improper,” she said.

Continue reading by following these links to related stories:

Article: Mayor sounds off on pet store

Article: $40,000 tab for pet care

Article: State to rule on pet seizure

Article: 22 Pet Company dogs have parasite

Article: Pet store scrutiny continues

Article: Pet Company facing license suspension

Article: Pet store animals taken to McKamey after months of complaints

7
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
docspop said...

The Mayor should be held financially responsible for the cost of a new trial. Why should the tax payers be stuck with this problem. He should have kept his nose out of it and quit trying to have control of everything that goes on in Chattanooga. Sure hope they get enough signatures for the petition soon. Docspop

July 27, 2010 at 9:19 a.m.
dcruncher said...

REALLY? How blatantly corrupt can you be, Littlefield?? You should be thrown out of office on these grounds alone!! There's something called the separation of powers that keeps the executives out of the judicial system. Somebody with money, please sue the mayor for his blatant interference with our judicial system! Everyone needs to sign the petition so he can't continue to remain in our political system after his term is up in 3 yrs.

July 27, 2010 at 10:16 a.m.
moonpie said...

If Mr. Littlefield didn't know this was over the bounds or does not think this was improper, only God knows what else he thinks is OK.

Ignorance and denial are not adequate excuses.

July 27, 2010 at 11:11 a.m.
harrystatel said...

"At the end of the e-mail, Mr. Littlefield wrote that “I do not trust” the Pet Company."

Congratulations Ron, now you know how taxpayers feel about you and your administration.

How about a "Spay and Neuter" program for City Hall?

July 27, 2010 at 11:34 a.m.
MountainJoe said...

Sounds like a great idea to me, harry!

July 27, 2010 at 2:02 p.m.

Littlefield should be fired for stupidity for leaving a paper trail. Letters and emails? C'mon, Blogo wasn't that stupid.

July 27, 2010 at 2:42 p.m.
JasonMcG said...

So, lets get this right Littlefield freely admits to trying to sway and alter the outcome of a trial's verdict so that the Pet Co. is found guilty and another private enterprise, McKamey, can be awarded $40,000 in the trials outcome? McKamey can't be awarded anything if the Pet Co. is not found guilty, so clearly the Mayor was pushing for a pre-packaged guilty verdict.

If this would have been a trial by jury case the mayor would already be in handcuffs for jury and verdict tampering.

Yes, there were clearly horrible things going on at the Pet Co. with the treatment of the animals and they need to be accountable, but so does the Mayor's office because this clearly reveals a pattern of vindictive prosecution and tampering with trial outcomes, and it's doubtful that this is the first case in which Littlefield has overstepped the legal bounds in an attempt try to alter a verdict.

This is an absolute jackass move on the part of the Mayor as his interference with the judicial system has now made things even worse for most of these animals that were rescued.

I keep wondering when the Feds will step up and start the second dance, Tenn. Waltz II, and finally round up the remaining bad apples in public office they missed that spilled all over the dance floor and crawled into the woodwork like cockroaches last time.

July 27, 2010 at 3:22 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.