published Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

Kentucky jury rules against penis amputation patient

SHELBYVILLE, Ky. — A jury today ruled against a Kentucky truck driver who sued his urologist claiming the doctor amputated part of his penis without his consent.

The six-man, six-woman jury deliberated briefly before coming back with the verdict in the lawsuit filed by 64-year-old Phillip Seaton, and his wife, Deborah, in Shelby County Circuit Court.

The jury ruled unanimously against the claim that Dr. John Patterson of Frankfort had failed to exercise proper care. It ruled 10-2 against the claim that Seaton hadn’t consented to the amputation.

Jurors were told that Seaton had gone to Patterson seeking a circumcision in 2007, but the doctor decided to amputate part of the organ after he found potentially deadly cancer during surgery.

Seaton, who had been seeking up to $16 million in damages for “loss of service, love and affection,” declined to comment after the verdict.

The Seatons’ attorney, Kevin George, said in closing arguments, “Phillip has changed. He was mutilated. His manhood was taken.”

George said he planned to appeal the decision on the grounds that a doctor is allowed to change a consent for surgery only if there is a danger of imminent death.

“There was no emergency, no reason to do it,” George said of the amputation.

Patterson said after the verdict, “I think we’re feeling pretty good.” He declined to say more about the highly publicized case, calling one reporter who tried to question him “a member of the tabloid press.”

“We feel like justice was done,” the doctor’s attorney, Clay Robinson, said. He said that it is difficult for doctors to overcome the negative effects of being sued even if a jury rules in their favor.

Connect with the Times Free Press on Facebook

about Associated Press...

The Associated Press

1
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
chiyote said...

So, as much as I really care about what happened to some guys sickly wang, the real story is the sentence in the second to the last paragraph "Tabloid Press." Even somewhat ironic mentioning this sentence in a story written for this same aim. I'm disappointed that with the rise of new media, comes the rise in sensational attention seeking articles, that satisfy no news benefit. Has yellow journalism returned?

August 24, 2011 at 5:54 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.