During Republican presidential debates, Ron Paul isn’t placed near the perennial frontrunners or flavors of the week. It’s a symptom of a career-long problem: He doesn’t get much press.
In Chattanooga, a black-and-white, block-lettered billboard hits the issue head on: “Why the media blackout of Ron Paul?”
“How do you explain it?” mused Mike Machaskee, a Hixson resident and Realtor with Keller Williams who donated $500 to the Paul campaign. “Even when he was polling third nationally, he got the least amount of coverage out of anybody.”
But lately, Machaskee, other Chattanoogans and — more importantly for now — Iowa Republican voters are taking Paul very seriously. So seriously, in fact, that few would be surprised if he finished a strong second, or even won, the Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses.
“Not only does his message resonate, but so does his integrity,” Machaskee said. “All of us are starving for someone with the integrity to stand up to special interests.”
The 76-year-old Texas congressman’s potential is evident in recent Iowa statewide polls that show him in or near second place, trailing former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and in a virtual tie with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.
Paul’s strength also is apparent anecdotally — he draws big, diverse crowds, like one recently in the small northeastern Iowa town of Waverly.
People in the audience at the community library shoehorned themselves into the meeting room, listening intently to the libertarian Republican presidential candidate, as have people in meeting halls and college auditoriums all over the state.
They were sympathetic to his no-frills message of dramatically smaller government and a scaled-back foreign policy — a message he’s long preached, but one that now has wide mainstream appeal. And they appreciate how he’s engaging Gingrich, accusing the front-runner of “serial hypocrisy.”
Paul draws no big cheers; his audiences are serious and polite. They applauded in Waverly when he told them that the U.S. government can’t possibly continue spending at its current pace because the world economy is on the brink of chaos.
“The solution is that we have to decide what we want from our government,” Paul said.
Paul is tapping a grass-roots groundswell that’s been apparent since early 2009, when the tea party movement mushroomed as conservatives grew frustrated with big government. They were particularly alarmed about annual federal deficits that topped $1 trillion for the first time, as well as the 2010 law requiring nearly everyone to obtain health care coverage by 2014.
They feel disconnected from Washington, angry at the gridlocked Congress, and see radical change as the only hope for progress. They are a diverse group.
“The system is not working,” said Reed Mick, a Waverly financial sales consultant.
“Paul has both wisdom and the right strategy. He predicted our economic problems long before anyone else,” added Jill Ellsworth, a massage therapist in Grimes, Iowa.
Kris Ante, a stay-at-home mother of four from Story City, Iowa, sees endless wars, potential new conflicts, and wants a more sensible foreign policy.
“We have to stop being the world’s policemen,” she said.
Paul’s most enthusiastic base is young people; he drew a standing-room-only crowd of more than 1,000 people at Iowa State University in Ames on Dec. 8.
“He reminds me of my grandfather. We need that type of person,” said Kaitlin Little, a Tripoli, Iowa, high school student.
Chad Cline, an information-tech worker from Altoona, Iowa, voted for Obama in 2008, lured by the candidate’s promise of change, but now he’s disillusioned.
“He was going to bring the troops home and spend less,” Cline recalled. “He really hasn’t fulfilled the later part of that promise. Paul not only has a plan, but also an idea of how to enact that plan.”
During his visits around Iowa, Paul describes that plan like a professor lecturing a class. When he’s done, Paul says thank you and leaves without the usual hand-clasping and picture-taking common at these events.
For 25 minutes, he describes his vision. He talks about his plan to cut $1 trillion from the federal budget. He rips the Federal Reserve System as dishonest and unconstitutional.
Sometimes Paul strays far from mainstream political dialogue. He laments how 1913 was a terrible year — that was the year the federal income tax and the Federal Reserve were established. He lauds the Austrian school of economics, which emphasizes lower taxes and less government, while criticizing easy credit.
Chattanooga Times Free Press staff writer Chris Carroll contributed to this story.