published Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

Give Obama new debt limit power, GOP leader says

  • photo
    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington on Tuesday. (AP)

By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON — With compromise talks at a vituperative standstill, Senate Republicans unexpectedly offered Tuesday to hand President Barack Obama new powers to avert a first-ever government default threatened for Aug. 2.

Under a proposal outlined by Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Obama could request increases of up to $2.5 trillion in the government’s borrowing authority in three separate installments over the next year, as long as he simultaneously proposed spending cuts of greater size.

The debt limit increases would take effect unless blocked by Congress under special rules that would require speedy action — and even then Obama could exercise his authority to veto such legislation. Significantly, the president’s spending cuts would be debated under normal procedures, with no guarantee they ever come to a final vote.

In essence, McConnell’s proposal would greatly enhance Obama’s authority to avoid a default, while also virtually absolving Republicans of responsibility if one occurred.

At the same time, it would allow Republican lawmakers to avoid having to support an increase in the debt limit, something many of them find odious.

“Republicans will choose a path that actually reflects the will of the people, which is to do the responsible thing and ensure the government doesn’t default on its obligations,” McConnell said in a speech on the Senate floor. He also excoriated the administration for seeking tax increases along with spending cuts as part of an agreement to raise the debt limit.

His plan drew criticism from GOP presidential contender Newt Gingrich, who quickly tweeted it was “an irresponsible surrender to big government, big deficits and continued overspending.”

There was no immediate response to the GOP proposal from the White House, where Obama hosted his third meeting in as many days with congressional leaders struggling to avert a financial crisis.

The talks have revolved around attempts to meet Republican demands for deficit cuts at least as large as any increase in the debt limit. Negotiators have grown testy in recent days as Obama and Democrats pushed for higher tax revenue as part of the deal, a line Republicans say they will not cross.

It was unclear whether McConnell’s proposal could show the White House and congressional leaders of both parties a way out of a deadlock that Obama and others said threatened calamitous results for an economy still struggling to recover from the worst recession in decades.

It would obligate Obama to outline deep spending cuts, something Republicans have been trying to force him to do for months without much success.

Reductions as large as $2.5 trillion would almost certainly affect domestic programs seen as important by Democratic constituencies and by rank-and-file lawmakers, possibly including Medicare and Medicaid. Even if the cuts never took effect, Republicans would be able to call for votes, while identifying them as sponsored by the White House.

Any such proposals could also be used by Republicans in the 2012 campaigns, if only to blunt attacks made by Democrats.

The White House talks have been aimed at producing a compromise to cut projected deficits by trillions of dollars over the next decade while renewing the Treasury’s authority to resume borrowing.

The government reached its current $14.3 trillion borrowing limit several weeks ago, and Treasury officials have been relying on accounting maneuvers to continue to pay the nation’s bills without additional borrowing.

While Obama and Republicans maneuvered for political position, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said during the day that the two parties’ debate over deficit reduction “should not be tied to the debt ceiling.”

“America’s good name and credit are just too important to be held hostage to Washington gridlock,” he said in a speech a few miles away from the nation’s financial center of Wall Street.

Bloomberg’s concern echoed similar expressions by Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and neither McConnell nor House Speaker John Boehner has disputed the assertion that a default could bring disaster to the economy that is growing so slowly that unemployment stands at 9.2 percent nationally.

Still, in remarks made before McConnell unveiled his proposal, Boehner said bluntly of the president, “This debt limit increase is his problem and I think it’s time for him to lead by putting his plan on the table — something that the Congress can pass.”

Boehner noted he had been telling the White House for months there are “no tax increases on the table” as part of the debt reduction talks.

In back-channel talks with the White House last week, officials say Boehner and Obama discussed the possibility of a huge $4 trillion deal in which Democrats accepted cuts in Medicare, Medicaid and perhaps Social Security and the GOP supported an end to certain tax breaks in anticipation of sweeping tax reform legislation before the elections.

But House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., and other conservatives objected to White House demands for $1 trillion in new revenue. Boehner issued a statement Saturday backing away from the larger deal.

McConnell’s Senate speech was particularly pointed when he spoke of Obama, whose defeat in 2012 he has called his top political priority.

“Rather than find a way to bring government back to the people, the administration has committed itself to protecting the size and scope of government at the cost of job creation, economy growth and America’s status in the global economy,” he said.

Under his proposal, the debt limit would rise by $100 billion as soon as Obama requested the first of the three increases envisioned.

Officials have said that the government normally borrows about $125 billion a month to finance operations, meaning Obama could avoid a default for a brief period of time simply by asking for it.

————

Associated Press writers Andrew Taylor, Laurie Kellman, Ben Feller, Julie Pace and Erica Werner contributed to this report.

7
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
chioK_V said...

McConnell’s proposal would greatly enhance Obama’s authority to avoid a default, while also virtually absolving Republicans of responsibility if one occurred.

The above sentence tells it all. Therein lies the trap. The GOP trying slither away on their bellies and avoid blame.

July 13, 2011 at 7:13 a.m.
fairmon said...

It appears both parties are playing politics with a very serious issue. Why do republicans object to reducing or eliminating tax loop holes? Why are democrats so adamant that non-essential spending not be reduced? Both parties threaten loss of the safety net for the elderly, children and disabled and below poverty level incomes. There is tremendous spending other than these areas on which many depend. Grants, incentives, subsidies are primarily vote buying and favor showing.

The behavior of both parties lead one to ask is this the cream of the crop? If it is the milk is sour. America needs jobs that don't require college or unique skills that pay decent wages. Millions now considered dependent could, would and prefer to provide for themselves if they had the opportunity. Ameircans can and would make trinkets, gadgets and other low cost goods better than those imported.

It is time, as many are advocating, to overhaul and simplify the tax system. 11 million words of tax codes is ridiculous. The IRS and filers can't interpret all of them. What would be wrong with a no exceptions 20% or less rate on all businesses. What would be wrong with an adjusted no exceptions personal rates. Filing and enforcement now cost the equivalent of 22.5 cents of every dollar collected. Why not enable people to file taxes on a post card? A tax table showing zero for those at and below the poverty level. Gradually increase to 50% for those at one million or more.

July 13, 2011 at 8:01 a.m.
hambone said...

What McConnell is saying is " We just can't beat Obama, he has got the people and the facts on his side and we can't deal with that"

July 13, 2011 at 9:39 a.m.
EaTn said...

The right-wingers had a tiger by the tail on the debt showdown and are pleading for Obama to help them turn it loose without losing an arm (and wealthy tax incentives). I think this issue should come down to millions not getting checks and see how it gets moved to the front burner in a hurry.

July 13, 2011 at 11:36 a.m.
chioK_V said...

Just wait til all those seniors and old retired veterans get their dander up and go marching to Washington. Talk about a revolution!!

July 13, 2011 at 2:05 p.m.
Selah said...

Republicans can't have it bothe ways...keep tax cuts for the rich...do not raise debt ceiling...They are destroying our econonmy for their own monetary gain. The poor and middle class still out give the rich and famous in a crisis. Pathetic Republicans. I will not waste another vote on a Republican...not again!!! Gay marriage continues to be made law and abortions continue to go on...while the Republicans try to make more and more Money...Pure GREED...is that a SIN?

July 13, 2011 at 3:06 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.