published Wednesday, June 1st, 2011

Global warming’s challenge

Though Republicans’ anti-environment wing still seems loath to acknowledge it, the consensus on climate change has become virtually undeniable.

It’s not just the documentable rise in recent decades of rising temperatures and the severe weather events linked to global warming — unusually fierce storms, unquenchable droughts, vast wildfires, prolonged deluges, historic snowmelt and flooding, and retreating glaciers and rising coastal waters.

It’s also the convincing science that connects increasingly alarming weather patterns with the build-up of billions of tons of heat-trapping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere — gases formed by the burning of fossil fuels and the deforestation of the earth’s largest forest systems, which have long served as carbon sinks.

A recent report by the National Academy of Sciences clearly states the connection: “Climate change is occurring, is very likely caused primarily by the emission of greenhouse gases from human activities, and poses significant risks for a range of human and natural systems.”

As the atmosphere warms, scientists see it pulling more warm moisture into the air, creating more volatile storms and unstable weather patterns, and driving these conditions further north into previously stable areas. The recent historic flooding in the Mississippi river basin, for example, was aggravated by heavy rains on record deep snow packs that were melting earlier than normal, along with unusually heavy rains in the lower parts of the river basin. Tennessee’s extremely wet spring fed directly into the dynamics of that rain-on-snow flooding. At the same time, Texas was unusually parched and plagued in virtually every county by record wildfires. The early melt of deep snowpacks is now spawning unusually heavy flooding in Montana.

Other continents now regularly experience similar unstable patterns. Australia’s extreme weather has become legend. Russia joined the list with an epic heat wave and unyielding wildfires last year.

Rapid glacier melt in the Himalayas now regularly spawns ever-heavier floods along the vast rivers it feeds, from Pakistan to the west of India to Bangladesh on India’s eastern border. Island nations everywhere, but especially the low islands in the Indian Ocean, fear being swamped by rising oceans and polar glacier melt.

The incremental changes in growing seasons, the changes in sustainable crops, flora and fauna, and animal migrations are similarly, and depressingly, documented. Vast and growing dead zones and coral die-off in the earth’s precious oceans provide other evidence.

Political denial, however, seems nowhere so evident as in the United States, where Republicans, quite strangely, have unreasonably made political weapons of environmental issues, as if denial of studiously documented climate change has become their political badge of honor. Thus Republicans in Congress not only lambaste EPA rules and the Clean Water and Clean Air acts; they also aggressively urge more intensive drilling and mining for fossil fuels. They eschew energy efficiency initiatives and ridicule its advocates, while lampooning a more rational approach to international accords to restrain global warming.

The political aspect of their denial is apparent: Some of the richest political lobbies, the source of so many big campaign contributions, are those of the petroleum, gas and coal industries.

That linkage notwithstanding, politicians’ larger interests should be the national interest in a sustainable economy and a healthier populace. Growing the nation’s renewable energy industries and nurturing the civic responsibility of reducing our appetite for fossil fuels makes good economic sense for the future. They should be paramount. Germany and China, for instance, are racing ahead in solar energy — an industry initially created in America — while American solar companies move abroad to find a more welcome investment climate.

Regrettably, congressional Republicans have made it clear that they will not enact programs to reduce global warming. With Washington’s inaction, it will remain virtually impossible for the United Nations to reach a binding international accord. That’s a sad testament to a narrow national political vision, but it leaves state governments, cities and individuals plenty of elbow room to initiate energy efficiency programs on their own.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
librul said...

Well, there you go. A concise, carefully written expose' of the problem and a blatant, in-your-face example of the idiocy that has paralyzed our ability to address it.

June 1, 2011 at 10:37 a.m.
Walden said...

The other view from a noted Physicist at Princeton... This is a very even handed take on the other side's view (link below). Read the whole thing.

June 1, 2011 at 10:49 a.m.
nucanuck said...

Some will always pick and choose when they will or won't believe the weight of scientific evidence. Seldom have the cosequences of mis-directed belief been so potentially dire for life on our planet.

June 1, 2011 at 5:25 p.m.
Rickaroo said...

It amazes me how so many non-scientists like L4F profess to be so profoundly knowledgeable about global warming that they can proclaim without any doubts whatsoever that "global warming is a lie." I am not a scientist and I cannot claim to know with any degree of certainty whether human-caused global warming is for real or not. But it is one issue on which we all ought to want to try to ascertain the facts as much as possible and act accordingly, based on pure science and not our particular political beliefs or ideologies.

I would love nothing more than to think that human induced global warming is somehow just a left wing conspiracy, that our planet is only doing what comes naturally, with its warming and cooling cycles, and we might as well just get used to it and go along for the ride. But the overwhelming preponderance of evidence from UNBIASED climate scientists continues to show that human caused global warming is for real and that it is happening even faster than at first predicted. I know that people like L4F will never be persuaded to believe it because they are too hung up on their ideologies to even consider the possibility that it is really happening. It is sad and idiotic that we have to contend with not only religious fundamentalists who deny science but right wing ideologues who deny it as well, all because their beliefs or political persuasions override their quest for the unadulterated truth. We will most likely experience a doomsday in the near future but not one brought about by some grandaddy god in the sky; rather it will come about because we have to contend with so many bassackward thinking people who prevent us from taking critical action on matters of such dire importance. Our own collective stupidity will be our undoing.

June 1, 2011 at 6:25 p.m.
SavartiTN said...

I am a scientist and it IS happening. However, if some large corporation would like to pay me hundreds of thousands to dollars to say otherwise, I might be glad to oblige. Just call my elected representatives to arrange it, okay?

June 3, 2011 at 1:52 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.