published Wednesday, March 9th, 2011

Legislation targets pets in drivers’ laps

NASHVILLE — Tennessee motorists would risk getting ticketed for letting pets sit in their laps while driving under a local lawmaker’s bill that passed the House Transportation Committee on Tuesday.

Rep. Jim Cobb, R-Spring City, said his bill was intended to curb accidents, citing the story of a Nashville traffic fatality related to him by a former legislative secretary.

“One of her best friends was killed and the animal she was with was killed,” Cobb said. “She was trying to maintain the dog while it was crawling around the vehicle.”

Earlier, Cobb had Transportation Committee members amend the bill, which originally would have required any animal riding in the front portion of a vehicle be restrained by a harness, box, crate or passenger.

Cobb called the original version “ridiculous,” saying the bill as drafted went too far.

Earlier, Rep. John Tidwell, D-New Johnsonville, said he thought the bill even with the amendment was over-reaching.

“I guess you know I’m the most rural of all of us up here, and a couple of things I’ve never done politically is vote against dogs and against children,” he said.

It was then that Cobb related the story of the woman who had been killed. The bill was approved on a voice vote and now goes to the House Budget Subcommittee.

In other committee action, a bill sponsored by Rep. Vince Dean, R-East Ridge, that would let the state Transportation Department sell advertising on its HELP trucks ran into extensive questions from another Hamilton County lawmaker and was delayed.

Using wrecker services as an example, Rep. Richard Floyd, R-Chattanooga, said smaller companies could be put at an economic disadvantage. He noted “those vehicles belong to the taxpayers and also 6.3 million Tennessee people.”

Dean said his bill is based on a Georgia law that appears to have worked without complaints. It would also raise $1 million in revenue for the department, he said. Dean told Floyd he would postpone the bill for several weeks.

about Andy Sher...

Andy Sher is a Nashville-based staff writer covering Tennessee state government and politics for the Times Free Press. A Washington correspondent from 1999-2005 for the Times Free Press, Andy previously headed up state Capitol coverage for The Chattanooga Times, worked as a state Capitol reporter for The Nashville Banner and was a contributor to The Tennessee Journal, among other publications. Andy worked for 17 years at The Chattanooga Times covering police, health care, county government, ...

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
fairmon said...

I agree there should be no advertising on government vehicles or other property. The issue would be with what can be advertised? However, Not allowing advertising on municipal vehicles doesn't jive with Some government entities owning competing businesses such as Chattanooga owning two golf courses, a pharmacy, a hotel, a marina etc. etc. Why would the state prevent allowing and charging for advertising but allow ownership of businesses that compete with the private sector?

June 15, 2012 at 4:40 a.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.