published Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

Ron Ramsey breaks committee tie on judge elections bill

NASHVILLE — Republican Senate Speaker Ron Ramsey on Tuesday was forced to rescue a bill requiring competitive elections for state appellate judges and Supreme Court justices by casting a tie-breaking vote in committee.

The GOP-run Senate Judiciary Committee had deadlocked 4-4 on the bill when Ramsey rushed into the meeting to break the tie and advance the bill, favored by many Republicans.

Currently, appellate and Supreme Court judges are initially appointed. They later come before voters on what is called a “retention” ballot in which voters make a yes or no decision on whether to keep the judge.

Ramsey said in a news release he took the unusual move of breaking the tie — the last time he did so was in 2009 — because he believes the Tennessee Constitution is unambiguous in its proscription that all judges “shall be elected.”

“It is clear that we need judicial reform in Tennessee,” Ramsey said. “I don’t necessarily think that electing judges is best for the state in the long term but the constitution is the constitution and the constitution clearly states that judges shall be elected.”

Bill opponents say the current method, known as the Tennessee Plan, meets constitutional muster. Requiring competitive elections would result in multi-million dollar political campaigns largely funded by special interests interested in court rulings, they argue.

Republican Gov. Bill Haslam also supports the current method of electing appellate judges, saying he doesn’t think they should go through the same expensive, bruising process he did.

Before Ramsey stepped in, the bill was in danger of failing. Four Republicans, including Sen. Mike Bell, R-Riceville, voted yes. Three Democrats and one Republican, Sen. Doug Overbey, R-Maryville, voted no. Sen. Ken Yager, R-Harriman, abstained.

Read more in tomorrow’s Times Free Press.

about Andy Sher...

Andy Sher is a Nashville-based staff writer covering Tennessee state government and politics for the Times Free Press. A Washington correspondent from 1999-2005 for the Times Free Press, Andy previously headed up state Capitol coverage for The Chattanooga Times, worked as a state Capitol reporter for The Nashville Banner and was a contributor to The Tennessee Journal, among other publications. Andy worked for 17 years at The Chattanooga Times covering police, health care, county government, ...

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
TonyGottlieb said...

The Retention Election Statute TCA 17-4-101 et seq. is blatantly unconstitutional because it provides that the Governor shall make appointments to fill a “vacancy” for both the eight year term and any unexpired term occasioned by death or otherwise in direct violation of the Constitutional provisions which require that all “vacancies” for the full term and the unexpired term be filled by an election (see Article VI Section 3, 4 and Article VII Section 4, 5). In other words the Legislature has “no power” to give the Governor the power to appoint Judges to fill a “vacancy” because the Constitution “directs” that all “vacancies” be filled by an election by the people. The Supreme Court has never ruled on the aforesaid claim.

March 31, 2011 at 1:08 p.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.