published Thursday, May 12th, 2011

School system’s troubles

If there has been any doubt about the depth of the split on the county school board and the effect of the County Commission’s malicious meddling in the elected school board’s business, the matter should be clear by now. The reactionary faction of the County Commission effectively ran off former Superintendent Jesse Register in 2006 by refusing adequate funding until he left. And now its proxies on the county school board — expanded to a presumed 5-4 margin in the last school board elections — appear to have finally run off his successor, Dr. Jim Scales, the merged system’s first black superintendent, with essentially the same fiscal choke-hold, and the use of unofficial back channel negotiations.

Dr. Scales’ announcement Tuesday of his decision to accept a buy-out offer on his contract confirms both the back-stabbing of Scales, and the continuing implicit support of the Fred Skillern-led faction of the County Commission that has long worked in league with its school board counterparts to turn back the clock for county schools to the old two-tiered, city-county division.

No vote to negotiate

Dr. Scales said Wednesday that the negotiations which resulted in the buyout offer — a figure which may reach $260,000, plus pension benefits — were begun in February by the school board’s attorney, Scott Bennett, at the behest of one or more school board members. It is glaringly notable, however, that the school board never officially voted to begin negotiations for a buyout of Scales’ contract.

That raises concern about the authority on which the negotiations were initiated. Normally, the school board has to vote on matters of policy and business matters. School board members also are obligated under the state’s Open Meetings and Records Act, the Sunshine Law, not to confer or deliberate on pending school board decisions or votes except in scheduled open meetings.

Sunshine law vs. secrecy

Dr. Scales and school board member Linda Mosley confirmed to this page Wednesday that the school board had never voted to begin buyout negotiations with Scales. Indeed, Mosley, a former board chairman, and board member Chip Baker said they were not aware of the negotiations. Mosely said that she knew only that board member Mike Evatt had talked to the school board attorney, Scott Bennett, about the apparent sentiment of several school board members who wanted Scales to leave.

Bennett told this page Wednesday afternoon that it was board chairman Everett Fairchild who asked him to approach Scales’ attorney to inquire whether Scales would be open to negotiations to buy out his contract. Bennett would not comment on his discussions with other board members regarding the issue, but he insisted it was appropriate for the chairman to ask him to make the inquiry, especially given the board’s obvious division.

Scales, for his part, said he did not question the inquiry about a buyout, and the lack of a board vote, because he had realized the negative effect of the division over his administration on the school system. “This is a great school system — and could be a fantastic school system — if we had the right kind of support,” he said.

Mosley, Baker and board members Jeffrey Wilson and George Ricks had previously resisted efforts by Evatt, Fairchild and Rhonda Thurman and David Testerman to force Scales to leave. It’s not clear where board member Joe Galloway stands on the issue of a buyout of Scales’ contract, which runs to 2012.

A harsh shift

Efforts to push Scales out took root after Evatt, Testerman and Galloway were elected to the school board last September, shifting the weight of the school board’s majority away from Scales’ favor.

It’s an open question as to whether Fairchild initiated the move toward negotiations on his own, or whether other anti-Scales members had agreed on that action in private discussions in violation of the Sunshine Law. Bennett noted, however, that even if the move had violated provisions of the Sunshine Law, a newly passed state law requires a 15-day public notice of a proposal to effect a buy-out of a school superintendent’s or director’s contract.

That law, he said, essentially cures the effect of a possible Sunshine Law violation because the public is duly alerted to the result. The buyout resolution must be placed at the top of the subsequent meeting’s agenda, and the board’s meeting must be held at its customary time and place. The meeting for the vote on buying out Scales’ contract is scheduled for May 26.

Reprehensible conduct

Whether or not that cures a possible violation of the Sunshine Law, a secret agreement among four or five school board members to pursue negotiations for a buyout without duly informing the other board members suggests reprehensible conduct and blatant disregard for the spirit of the Sunshine Law, as well as evidence of a severe rift on the board.

The latter is no surprise. Several of the anti-Scales faction have long wanted to roll back some of the programs that Register put in place, and that Scales maintained, to help elevate urban schools and boost achievement of black students. Those members have long favored current assistant superintendent Rick Smith for the superintendent’s job, and they may now put him in that job. Their regressive sentiments are shared by Skillern and other County Commission members under his influence.

Mosley rightly finds the surprise of the announcement and the secret negotiations “totally disgusting.” She and Baker further raised the issues of where the money for the buyout would come from, and whether or how a search for a new superintendent would be conducted if a vote to buy out Scales’ contract succeeds.

Concerns over search, budget

Both are serious concerns. The school system is facing a $14 million deficit. Scales had drawn up a balanced budget, but the commission has mysteriously put it on hold, a move supported by Rhonda Thurman, who suggests leaving budget issues for a new superintendent. Reports were also floated Wednesday that a county commissioner has already promised money for the buyout, and more money for the school system if Scales leaves and Smith takes over, albeit initially as an interim. Some school board members, moreover, seem troublesomely eager to avoid a search for a highly qualified superintendent.

None of this is good. The divisive politics and the County Commission’s continuing negative influence over the elected school board and the system’s operation are wrong on their face, and exceedingly counter-productive.

The county’s school system — just 14 years past the merger of the former racially divided city and county school systems — needs vigorous support for a superintendent and curriculum that are fair to all students and that broadly elevate student achievement. This county cannot afford the drag of a backward school system that tolerates racism and a two-tiered achievement policy. That would be a disaster for the county’s future economic development prospects, and for far too many of our children.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
crow1033 said...


May 12, 2011 at 8:23 a.m.
Leaf said...

The most nasty politics and the most incompetent management seems to always be in education. I wonder why that is?

May 12, 2011 at 12:41 p.m.
chet123 said...

Because you have people on school board with barely more than a high school education giving orders....dont matter who hamilton county get as superentendent...there are people who never will be satisfied...until they get someone from Soddy-Daisy....a member of their pact...or one of the good ole boys......Jesse Register is glad to be gone....hes during great in Nashville......chattanooga have back-wood people trying to run a school systems.....politic need to be taken out of it....

May 26, 2011 at 8:48 a.m.
timbo said...

Chet123, why do you hate Soddy-Daisy so much? You might want to clean up your grammar a little bit before you start name calling. We people from Soddy-Daisy, the highest achieving school in the system, think that the downtown schools need to emulate us not the other way around. Try being a little original next time instead of basically repeating your diatribe on Soddy-Daisy in every comment.

Leaf, you are right. Except for this year, when the school board was 8-1 all the time was just as you described. Nasty and incompetent. Scales was especially incompetent. Thank goodness it has changed for the better.

June 14, 2011 at 4:08 p.m.
ranger1 said...

i think we should go back when the city and county schools was apart we did better that way also we could do this put everyone back in house and find cheaper ins. for everyone because i dont see how we save by out sourses everyone

June 21, 2011 at 5:28 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.