published Thursday, September 15th, 2011

More 'free' stimulus money for solar panels

BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee is one of the latest local businesses to use money from the federal "stimulus" to install solar panels on one of its buildings -- and who can fault the company for accepting "free money" from Washington to do that?

BlueCross has put the big solar power system atop the Gateway Building on West M.L. King Boulevard.

The company will pay about $210,000 for the project, but taxpayers will pay even more: An additional $243,000 for the project is coming from the "stimulus" through the Tennessee Solar Institute, and hundreds of thousands more dollars will be provided through federal and state tax credits and other government aid.

Again, we do not fault well-respected and economically important BlueCross for making use of money that the government provided to help the company reduce its energy costs.

But the government assistance distorts the free market by underwriting the cost of the solar panels and requiring taxpayers to help fund the operations of a private business.

On a related note, despite Washington's massive aid to the solar power industry, there have been multiple bankruptcies in recent weeks of heavily subsidized solar power companies. Solyndra, a California company, got half a billion dollars in federal loan guarantees -- but recently declared bankruptcy, leaving taxpayers with the bill. More than 1,000 of its workers will lose their jobs. And there was apparently very little oversight of Solyndra while it was receiving all that money. The FBI has now launched an investigation of the company in the wake of its bankruptcy.

"The FBI raid further underscores that Solyndra was a bad bet from the beginning and put taxpayers at unnecessary risk," U.S. Reps. Fred Upton of Michigan and Cliff Stearns of Florida noted in a statement. "Irresponsibly choosing winners and losers on projects like Solyndra is a perilous and often doomed method to create jobs."

That is exactly right. Government should not be subsidizing either alternative energy such as wind and solar or traditional energy such as oil and natural gas. Individuals and businesses alike should pick -- and pay for -- energy according to its true free-market cost, without government distortion.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
conservative said...

I agree, and isn't it extraordinarily hypocritical for Obamboozler and lieberals to push for subsidies for rich corporations?

September 15, 2011 at 7:50 a.m.
nucanuck said...

Why should the US develope alternative energy solutions when we can just buy the new important technologies of the 21st century from the Chinese? They engineer and manufacture, we consume.

Who has the better strategy?

September 15, 2011 at 10:40 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.