published Sunday, March 4th, 2012

State's growth threatened

The hard-earned wisdom of local municipal governments, here and elsewhere across Tennessee and other states, is that sensible zoning and development standards typically improve property values, quality of life and general prosperity of all residents. And they do so without infringing on traditional and long respected property rights. Alas, some reactionary right-wing diehards in the Legislature are seeking to block the authority of local governments -- the governments closest to their constituents-- to keep such standards in place.

Acting apparently in league with the bottom rung of developers who care little about the long-term consequences of haphazard development, they've introduced a stack of bills in the Legislature aimed at destroying both the most common zoning standards, and the most popular means of improving growth, construction and land-use regulations. Tennessee's counties, cities and towns can't continue to properly grow and evolve if these errant lawmakers get their way.

Zoning targeted

The legislators pushing these varied bills -- there are more than half a dozen -- claim to be protecting individual property rights. That's a gross distortion. They would effectively undo more than 70 years of settled law in Tennessee on ordinary zoning rules.

Current zoning laws, for instance, already grandfather in existing uses of land. One proposed revision would turn the law upside down in order to vest unrestricted use of annexed land in perpetuity -- even if such land has been unused for allowed purposes for many years. That would directly harm a range of neighboring land-owners and denigrate the common good.

Under present law, if a municipality -- say, Soddy-Daisy, Collegedale or Chattanooga -- annexes land used for a factory or horse farm, those uses are grandfathered in as they exist until they are closed by the owner. If annexed land zoned for those uses is already idle and unused for those purposes, it may be rezoned after a specified period.

Going backwards fast

But under the proposed change, that process would be destroyed. For example, if Signal Mountain annexed land containing an old coal strip-mine -- such abandoned mines are common on Waldens Ridge -- it could never prohibit a new strip mine on that land through a rezoning unless the landowner agreed -- even if the old strip mine had been abandoned for many decades, and neighborhoods surrounding it have been built.

Another bill would take that kind of retrograde land-use abuse a step further. It would allow the rebuilding of a previous structure that would not conform to a new zoning standard. That would also disallow the application of newer and safer building, electrical and sewer codes.

Another bill would even expand the right to non-conforming uses to contiguous land held under common ownership.

Still another bill would allow erection of non-conforming on-site signs and billboards for such non-conforming structures that are rebuilt on land that municipalities would otherwise rezone. So new and ugly misuse of once-idle land could continue forever. That truly would be an outrage.

Renaissance would fade

Another bill would prevent local governments from uniformly applying widely approved rezoning overlays for designated areas that are undergoing broad redevelopment plans. Under these rules, a single objecting landowner of one of the abandoned factories and overgrown lots that blighted the city's downtown riverfront just two decades ago could have single-handedly held up the city's valuable riverfront renaissance. The rezoning and rehabilitation of the Southside and South Broad Street areas here might never occur under these rules.

Such proposed legislation is not just myopic and unreasonable: It is a stick of the eye of the vast majority of citizens in Tennessee's cities and towns who have embraced urban renewal and orderly suburban and urban growth. Worse, it is apparently motivated by a handful of developers who objected to metro Nashville's efforts to advance the city's progressive growth.

And it is stupidly abetted by a handful of lawmakers who are in thrall to a small minority of people who mistakenly fear that orderly development unreasonably threatens their personal property rights, though it does no such thing.

In reality, these bills would give a small fraction of landowners enormous new rights to which none of us are entitled. And it would do so at the clear risk of reversing our broad and popular progress.

Broad progress jeopardized

As Tennessee's towns and counties grow in population and congestion, standards that foster urban services and amenities are required. They broadly serve to protect and promote safer, sounder, greener and more visually appealing development. And they certainly attract the forward-looking companies that bring our communities good jobs with good family wages, and a higher quality of life.

Tennessee has been enjoying the fruits of progressive growth for decades. Wise zoning and land-use planning has served as an integral element of our economic development and job prospects.

The state needs to continue this sort of orderly and progressively smarter growth.

But unless the Legislature's Republican leaders can rein in reactionary lawmakers who would pervert good government and jeopardize our advancement, low-rung developers and people afraid of wise growth will wreck our progress. And Tennessee will lose its allure -- and its promise.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
timbo said...

Harry Austin ...............BULL CRAP......Another socialist view from the left wings propagandist . Harry, why don't we do away with the bill rights. All1 has to do look at the abuse of eminent domain to see how wrong he is . His elitist attitude can be seen the term low rung developers ." His arrogance and allegiance to the power structure never disappoints . .

March 4, 2012 at 10:09 a.m.
joneses said...

This is a typical disgusting pathetic liberal article to try and convince people that more government intrusion is a good thing. You see, these liberals have to have the government tell them what to do because they are so intellectual they cannot think for themselves. They think intellectualism is sitting around discussing how more government control is a good thing. These liberals are so helpless if they got stuck on a broken escalator they would have to wait for someone to rescue them. Pathetic

March 5, 2012 at 6:10 a.m.
taxusless said...

According to these guys, the more they can abuse the citizens with no recourse the better government is. Sounds kind of like the way DC has be runnning the past four years? I guess anyone, to them, who does not believe in taxation without representation is a criminal. Does anyone remember what happened in Boston? 47 other states cannot annex your property without a referendum, yet these good ol boys want to take it at will. Would we be someting so terribly worng by allowing our citizens of a 10th amendment state acturally have the same rights as they do in a state like California? Wow! That would be a shame!

March 10, 2013 at 5:40 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.