published Sunday, March 4th, 2012

Limbaugh

about Clay Bennett...

The son of a career army officer, Bennett led a nomadic life, attending ten different schools before graduating in 1980 from the University of North Alabama with degrees in Art and History. After brief stints as a staff artist at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Fayetteville (NC) Times, he went on to serve as the editorial cartoonist for the St. Petersburg Times (1981-1994) and The Christian Science Monitor (1997-2007), before joining the staff of the ...

201
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
NGAdad said...

Let us pray.

Lord, you most certainly have need for a duo, the other half being Andrew Breitbart, ... in hell. Amen

March 4, 2012 at 3:13 a.m.
NGAdad said...

P.S. maybe, Lord, the wholly misogamy trio summed up by Santorum, forgive me using that word. In Reagan's name... God bless America.

March 4, 2012 at 3:16 a.m.
ricardo said...

It's pretty telling that he only apologized after some of his sponsors pulled advertising from his show. He will say anything to make a buck, but this time he went too far.

March 4, 2012 at 7:10 a.m.
Jack_Dennis said...

Wow. Southpaws out in force today. Spewing more hate than the dreaded right. But they're oh so enlightened.

March 4, 2012 at 7:37 a.m.
ITguy said...

Will any of the conservatives defend Limbaugh, or will you just continue to attack liberals? Limbaugh has been spewing hate for over 20 years, and Republicans almost never denounce him. Why is that? They either agree with him, or they are afraid of him. I doubt that any posters on here have reason to fear him, so let hear it. Either defend him or renounce him.

March 4, 2012 at 7:57 a.m.
riverman said...

Actually I agree with Bennett on this one. Rush used to be a very effective voice for Conservatism but his star started descending many years ago until he is now an embarrassment to the Republican Party. I find it somewhat amusing that he considers himself the voice of conservative values as he has been married 4 times, was a Vietnam era draft dodger and is a convicted drug abuser.

March 4, 2012 at 8:01 a.m.
davisss13 said...

The old vent for the outhouse. Good one Clay.

March 4, 2012 at 8:08 a.m.
davisss13 said...

NGAdad said... Let us pray. Lord, you most certainly have need for a duo, the other half being Andrew Breitbart, ... in hell. Amen

Typical US Republican Christian. Bloodthirsty, heartless and cold-blooded. I cannot imagine how many you have driven from the faith or from even considering it. I bet you favor global religious war and even torture.

March 4, 2012 at 8:13 a.m.
davisss13 said...

he has been married 4 times

I was not aware of this.

March 4, 2012 at 8:15 a.m.
rolando said...

itguy said, "Limbaugh has been spewing hate for over 20 years, and Republicans almost never denounce him. Why is that?

For the same reason Bennett never denounces The Obama...or any other LibProg for that matter.

March 4, 2012 at 8:15 a.m.
shifarobe said...

Limbaugh had no need to apologize. POOR, POOR Georgetown law student whining about all the poor law students having to spend as much as $1000 a school year on protection. LOL. You people are cracked. How AMAZINGLY EMBARRASSING to get up before Congress and talk about how much sex you NEED to have and about the high cost of protection. CLOSE YOUR LEGS, Skank! You can get condoms for FREE from the D.C. health department where Georgetown is located. This is pure politics. IT guy you're an ignorant fool. I make it a point to listen to all the talk shows around from both sides of the aile. Limbuagh is a very strong conservative who makes his point affectively. Hate? you mean like calling for the death the president like Democrats did for GWB? See the problem with y'all is that you label anyone who DOES NOT agree with you as a hater or hate speech. You're dumb and predictable.

Hate like NGDad on here saying Limbaugh and Breitbart should be in hell? Or, Maxine Waters saying the GOP can go straight to hell?

Keep it up Rush, Mark Levine, and all the rest. You know you're doing a great job when people on this forum are foaming at the mouth!

March 4, 2012 at 8:22 a.m.
MTJohn said...

Rush Limbaugh: the latest prophetic voice in the great theological debate about contraception!

March 4, 2012 at 8:28 a.m.
MTJohn said...

shifarobe said...Keep it up Rush, Mark Levine, and all the rest. You know you're doing a great job when people on this forum are foaming at the mouth!

Yes, you are, Shifarobe. You obviously do not know what Sandra Fluke said in her testimony and I doubt that Limbaugh does, either.

March 4, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.
miraweb said...

One line from the apology stood out: "I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke."

While it is very hard for anyone to see what he said as anything but a highly personal attack, I believe him.

To Rush and the political analysts (and some on this forum) people are not real people. They are symbols, trends, ratings points, and message.

Rush is, however, a serial offender. Why he still has a job is a mystery.

March 4, 2012 at 8:32 a.m.
Jack_Dennis said...

ITguy: You mean the way lefties denounce Bill Maher? Like that?

March 4, 2012 at 8:39 a.m.
MTJohn said...

miraweb said...Rush is, however, a serial offender. Why he still has a job is a mystery.

No mystery. He still has a job because he still has an audience. It's a scary thought that we have so many citizens who think they have "intelligence on loan from god".

March 4, 2012 at 8:44 a.m.
davisss13 said...

shifarobe said... Limbaugh had no need to apologize.

Stay the course, wingnut. Lose a generation of women voters.

March 4, 2012 at 8:47 a.m.
davisss13 said...

Jack_Dennis said... ITguy: You mean the way lefties denounce Bill Maher? Like that?

Bill Maher is not a Democrat, he is a libertarian. Rush Limbaugh is a Republican icon.

Do you really see no difference?

March 4, 2012 at 8:50 a.m.
davisss13 said...

miraweb said... One line from the apology stood out: "I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke."While it is very hard for anyone to see what he said as anything but a highly personal attack, I believe him.

I have no idea how you can draw that conclusion.

Why he still has a job is a mystery.

Because he is a GOP flamethrower who can be counted on to whip up a lynch mob in minutes.

March 4, 2012 at 8:52 a.m.
jesse said...

rush is a foul mouthed pig and makes the right look bad every time he pulls one of his rants! i'm sure he dosn't like the taste of crow!

that being said i have seen far worse taking place on this forum on a daily basis!

March 4, 2012 at 8:53 a.m.
rick1 said...

The liberals are all upset over Limbaugh's comment, yet where was Bennett's cartoon and your outrage when Ed Schultz called Laura Ingraham a "right wing slut and talk slut" on his radio program? Where was your outrage when liberals were making crude comments about Michelle Bachman and Sara Palin and and her daughters?

You liberals are nothing but a bunch of hypocrites

March 4, 2012 at 9:10 a.m.
j2403 said...

OK IT Guy - What DO you call a young single woman who has sex outside of marriage, over and over and over? Rush nailed it. She is a Slut. And the nerve to want me to pay for her birth control. Who paid for mine? Me! Yeah, Obama, I'm sure her parents are really proud of her telling the entire world what their little girl is. Good God people.Wake up! Maybe Rush should have used another word but good grief, if I had done what she is doing, I would have been labeled the same. Of course, that was a few years ago when people had some sense of morals. Hang in there Rush!

March 4, 2012 at 9:10 a.m.
mymy said...

The Democrat’s token abused college coed is actually a 30 year-old hardcore women’s rights activist. This was all just a big dishonest Democrat ploy to take the attention off of Barack Obama’s assault on religious freedom along with many other issues. It figures.

March 4, 2012 at 9:11 a.m.
lkeithlu said...

Since studies have shown that 90-95% of adults in the past three generations had sex outside of marriage that must mean that only 5-10% of the US population are conservatives.

March 4, 2012 at 9:15 a.m.
davisss13 said...

rick1 said... You liberals are nothing but a bunch of hypocrites

Praise Jesus and use the Southern Strategy. Praise Jesus then use Atwater/Rove campaign tactics.

You so-called 'Christian' GOPers are obscene. I bet you even support torturing suspects for information.

March 4, 2012 at 9:20 a.m.
blackwater48 said...

RUSH LIMBAUGH IS AN IDIOT AND I HAVE PROOF

RNC Communications Director Boss Limbaugh has made a very comfortable living being uncomfortably absurd. There is an illusive advertising algorithm, which correlates outrageous behavior to higher ratings, which, in turn, manifests itself in higher ad revenue.

Limbaugh didn’t discover the formula but he has nearly perfected it. He did, however, cross the line by calling a 30-year-old Georgetown University law student a slut and a prostitute.

Maybe he was only trying to insinuate that Sandra Fluke was being promiscuous.

Ms. Fluke was selected by Democrats to testify about the female student’s experience in attending a Catholic Jesuit University that accepts students of all faiths. That was what Sandra Fluke planned to tell Issa’s Committee.

Limbaugh obviously doesn’t know that doctors prescribe birth control pills or that 15% of hormonal birth control is prescribed for medical reasons other than contraception. I guess little Rushie skipped class that day. He believes women take birth control pills each time they have sex so they don’t get pregnant. Boss thinks the more sex they have the more pills they need.

He assumes birth control pills work the same way Viagra works for him, but women take one birth control pill every day. Doesn’t matter if they have sex 100 times or once or not at all.

While attacking Ms. Fluke, Boss complained about how often Georgetown coeds in general but Fluke in particular are having sex. That’s why he was so over the moon in his outrage. That’s why he called Fluke a SLUT and a PROSTITUTE.

Don’t believe me? Here’s Limbaugh in his own clueless words:

“Miss Fluke, have you ever heard of not having sex? Have you ever heard of not having sex so often?”

“Not one person said (to Ms. Fluke), ‘Did you ever think about backing off the amount of sex that you have?’

“The women in her law school program are having so much sex they are going broke buying birth control pills.”

“Thirty years old, a student at Georgetown Law, who admits to having so much sex she can’t afford her birth control pills anymore.”

“Four out of ten coeds are having so much sex that it’s hard to make ends meet if they have to pay for their own contraception.”

“It’s no different than if somebody knocked on my door, that I don’t know, and said, ‘You know what? I’m out of money. I can’t afford birth control pills and I’m supposed to have sex with three guys tonight.”

It’s no wonder so many of you wing nuts and tea baggers are clueless. Don’t believe everything you hear on Rush or Fox or anywhere else for that matter. Find out for yourself. You will become more knowledgeable, less constipated, and better prepared to post on this site!

Here’s a tip for all you neocons with you hair on fire and nothing to put it out with but a half empty glass of water:

Get your comedy from Fox and your news from Comedy Central.

March 4, 2012 at 9:21 a.m.
alprova said...

Ah yes...a compilation of the kind of crap that Rush Limbaugh spews forth and that 20 million people have clung to in agreement with over the years;

"What does it say about the college co-ed Susan Fluke who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex -- what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She's having so much sex she can't afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex." -Rush Limbaugh, referring to Sandra Fluke, a student at Georgetown Law School who was denied the right to speak at a congressional hearing on contraception hearing, in which she planned to discuss a friend of hers who needed contraception to prevent the growth of cysts, February 29, 2012

"A Georgetown coed told Nancy Pelosi's hearing that the women in her law school program are having so much sex they're going broke, so you and I should have to pay for their birth control. So what would you call that? I called it what it is. So, I'm offering a compromise today: I will buy all of the women at Georgetown University as much aspirin to put between their knees as they want. ... So Miss Fluke and the rest of you feminazis, here's the deal. If we are going to pay for your contraceptives and thus pay for you to have sex, we want something. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch." -Rush Limbaugh, March 1, 2012

"It doesn't look like Michelle Obama follows her own nutritionary dietary advice. And then we hear that she's out eating ribs at 1500 calories a serving with 141 grams of fat ... No, I'm trying to say that our first lady does not project the image of women that you might see on the cover of the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue or of a woman Alex Rodriguez might date every six months or what have you." –Rush Limbaugh, Feb. 21, 2011

"These were highly civil comments for crying out loud. I mean, people are going nuts. USA Today, the Politico. And some people were suggesting that my comments were below the belt. Well, take a look at some pictures. Given where she wears her belts. I mean, she wears them high up there around the bust line. Isn't just about everything about her below the belt when you look at the fashion sense she has?" –Rush Limbaugh, after being criticized for making derogatory comments about First Lady Michelle Obama's weight, Feb. 22, 2011

(To be cont.)

March 4, 2012 at 9:22 a.m.
MTJohn said...

j2403 said...OK IT Guy - What DO you call a young single woman who has sex outside of marriage, over and over and over? Rush nailed it. She is a Slut.

Please read her testimony and tell me the basis for concluding that she is a young, single who is having sex outside of marriage, over and over and over.

The simple fact is that Rush ascribed to Sandra Fluke words that were not even close to anything that she said. Then, he based his rant on those words. Another example of the advocates for Christian values who have no comprehension of "Thou shalt not bear false witness against the neighbor!"

In retrospect, it's a good thing that Rush did not know how to pronounce her name or he would have had to "apologize" for a more colorful rant.

March 4, 2012 at 9:23 a.m.
Reardon said...

Hey Clay -- you're the kettle calling the pot black?

March 4, 2012 at 9:24 a.m.
davisss13 said...

j2403 said... OK IT Guy - What DO you call a young single woman who has sex outside of marriage, over and over and over? Rush nailed it. She is a Slut.

I encourage you degenerates to scream this as often and as loud as possible.

March 4, 2012 at 9:24 a.m.
alprova said...

(Cont.)

"What Mr. Loughner knows is that he has the full support of a major political party in this country . . . he knows that . . . the Democrat party is attempting to find anybody but him to blame. He knows if he plays his cards right, he's just a victim. . . . This guy clearly understands he’s getting all the attention and he understands he's got a political party doing everything it can, plus a local sheriff doing everything that they can to make sure he's not convicted of murder –- but something lesser." --Rush Limbaugh on Arizona shooter Jared Loughner, Jan. 11, 2011

"As far as the media's concerned, Mrs. Obama deserves this. Look at the sordid past. Look at our slave past, look at the discriminatory past. It's only fair that people of color get their taste of the wealth of America too." --Rush Limbaugh, claiming the media is allowing Michelle Obama to take a vacation "That cracker made a lot of African-American millionaires." --Rush Limbaugh, on the death of longtime New York Yankees owner George Steinbrenner, July 13, 2010

"[Obama] wouldn't have been voted president if he weren't black. Somebody asked me over the weekend why does somebody earn a lot of money have a lot of money, because she's black. It was Oprah. No, it can't be. Yes, it is. There’s a lot of guilt out there, show we're not racists, we'll make this person wealthy and big and famous and so forth.... If Obama weren't black he'd be a tour guide in Honolulu or he'd be teaching Saul Alinsky constitutional law or lecturing on it in Chicago." --Rush Limbaugh, July 6, 2010

"When do we ask the Sierra Club to pick up the tab for this leak?" --Rush Limbaugh, blaming the oil spill in the Gulf on the Sierra Club, arguing that the environmental group had driven oil producers off the land to more high-risk situations offshore, Rush Limbaugh, May 17, 2010

"The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and left out there. It's natural. It's as natural as the ocean water is." --Rush Limbaugh, on the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, May 3, 2010

"Guess what? Faisal Shahzad is a registered Democrat. I wonder if his SUV had an Obama sticker on it." --Rush Limbaugh, lying about the failed Times Square car bomber, who was not registered to vote, May 4, 2010

(To be cont.)

March 4, 2012 at 9:25 a.m.
davisss13 said...

'False witness' is a core value of the Republican party.

March 4, 2012 at 9:27 a.m.
Jack_Dennis said...

Wonder if Laura Ingraham got a call from the messiah after being called a slut by Ed Schulltz? Hmmm?

March 4, 2012 at 9:27 a.m.
MTJohn said...

There is a simple solution to this whole debate - it's called single payer.

March 4, 2012 at 9:28 a.m.
alprova said...

(cont.)

"What better way to head off more oil drilling, nuclear plants, than by blowing up a rig? I'm just noting the timing, here." --Rush Limbaugh, suggesting that "environmentalist whackos" deliberately blew up the oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico that created one of the biggest environmental disasters in U.S. history to stop offshore oil drilling, April 29, 2010

"Our political correct society is acting like some giant insult's taken place by calling a bunch of people who are retards, retards...There's going to be a retard summit at the White House." --Rush Limbaugh, on his Feb. 3, 2010 radio show, referring to Chief of Staff Rham Emanuel's remark calling the idea of liberal groups running health care-related ads against Democratic lawmakers "f**king retarded".

"I'm a huge supporter of women. What I'm not is a supporter of liberalism. Feminism is what I oppose. Feminism has led women astray. I love the women's movement — especially when walking behind it." --Rush Limbaugh, responding to criticism that he is sexist and defending his selection as one of the judges at the 2010 Miss America Pageant, "Fox News' Fox & Friends," February 3, 2010

"We've already donated to Haiti. It's called the U.S. income tax." --Rush Limbaugh, discouraging donations to relief efforts in Haiti after the devastating earthquake, Jan. 13, 2010

"This will play right into Obama's hands. He's humanitarian, compassionate. They'll use this to burnish their, shall we say, 'credibility' with the black community -- in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It's made-to-order for them. That's why he couldn't wait to get out there, could not wait to get out there." --Rush Limbaugh, on Haiti earthquake relief, Jan. 13, 2010

"Obama's got a health care logo that's right out of Adolf Hitler's playbook ... Adolf Hitler, like Barack Obama, also ruled by dictate." --Rush Limbaugh, Aug. 6, 2009

"Exercise freaks ... are the ones putting stress on the health care system." --Rush Limbaugh, June 12, 2009

"The phony soldiers." --Rush Limbaugh, on U.S. service members who support withdrawal from Iraq

"He discusses his service in Iraq, the wounds he suffered there, and he says to me in this ad, 'Until you have the guts to call me a 'phony soldier' to my face, stop telling lies about my service.' You know, this is such a blatant use of a valiant combat veteran, lying to him about what I said, then strapping those lies to his belt, sending him out via the media in a TV ad to walk into as many people as he can walk into." --Rush Limbaugh, denouncing an ad by VoteVets.org featuring Iraq war veteran Brian McGough by likening him to a suicide bomber

"Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it." --Rush Limbaugh, Jan. 19, 2007

(To be cont.)

March 4, 2012 at 9:29 a.m.
shifarobe said...

You're are ignorant. Rush Limbuagh continually blasts the Republican establisment. He is a conservative icon, not a Republican icon. YOU ARE HYPOCRITES on the left. Rush Limbuagh's comments are mild compared to the pure hate tossed out daily by lefties like Bill Maher. LOL

Hey, Cerberus, otherwise known as Alprova, Every one of those comments by Limbaugh is dead on. LOL

March 4, 2012 at 9:31 a.m.
alprova said...

(cont.)

"He is exaggerating the effects of the disease. He's moving all around and shaking and it's purely an act. ... This is really shameless of Michael J. Fox. Either he didn't take his medication or he's acting." --Rush Limbaugh, on an ad by Michael J. Fox endorsing Claire McCaskill for Senate for supporting embryonic stem cell research (Watch video)

"And don't forget, Sherrod Brown is black. There's a racial component here, too. And now, the newspaper that I'm reading all this from is The New York Times, and they, of course, don't mention that." --Rush Limbaugh, on the 2006 Ohio Senate primary race involving then-Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), who is white.

"This is no different than what happens at the Skull and Bones initiation...I'm talking about people having a good time, these people, you ever heard of emotional release? You ever heard of the need to blow some steam off?" --Rush Limbaugh, on the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal.

"Too many whites are getting away with drug use...Too many whites are getting away with drug sales...The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them, and send them up the river, too." --Rush Limbaugh, in 1995

"I am addicted to prescription pain medication." --Rush Limbaugh, in 2003

"Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society." --Rush Limbaugh

"We're not sexists, we're chauvinists -- we're male chauvinist pigs, and we're happy to be because we think that's what men were destined to be. We think that's what women want." --Rush Limbaugh

"She comes to me when she wants to be fed. And after I feed her -- guess what -- she's off to wherever she wants to be in the house, until the next time she gets hungry. She's smart enough to know she can't feed herself. She's actually a very smart cat. She gets loved. She gets adoration. She gets petted. She gets fed. And she doesn't have to do anything for it, which is why I say this cat's taught me more about women, than anything my whole life." --Rush Limbaugh, on his cat

"She sounds like a screeching ex-wife." --Rush Limbaugh, on Sen. Hillary Clinton

"I've been racking my brain. I've been trying to figure out how Bob Dole's luggage got on my airplane...I told the doctor, I said, 'Look, I'm worried about the next election.' ... A misunderstanding." --Rush Limbaugh, after he was detained by custom officials for possessing Viagra with a prescription made out in someone else's name

"They oughtta change Black History Month to Black Progress Month and start measuring it." --Rush Limbaugh as a form of reparations for "our slave past," Aug. 6, 2010

March 4, 2012 at 9:32 a.m.
joneses said...

Hey you pathetic liberals. Rush apologized so this stupid biased cartoon and discussion are meaningless. I bet Rush apologizing and admitting he was wrong really pisses you liberals off. I am still waiting on Clinton's apology for how he treated this country with his adulterous affair with Monica Lewinsky. Where was your outrage about that? Another fine example of liberal hypocrisy. I guess I will have a long wait for Clinton's apology or even him admitting he was wrong.

March 4, 2012 at 9:34 a.m.
Oz said...

The apology was issued yesterday.

For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke.

I think it is absolutely absurd that during these very serious political times, we are discussing personal sexual recreational activities before members of Congress. I personally do not agree that American citizens should pay for these social activities. What happened to personal responsibility and accountability? Where do we draw the line? If this is accepted as the norm, what will follow? Will we be debating if taxpayers should pay for new sneakers for all students that are interested in running to keep fit?In my monologue, I posited that it is not our business whatsoever to know what is going on in anyone's bedroom nor do I think it is a topic that should reach a Presidential level.

My choice of words was not the best, and in the attempt to be humorous, I created a national stir. I sincerely apologize to Ms. Fluke for the insulting word choices.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/03/03/a_statement_from_rush

March 4, 2012 at 9:39 a.m.
dougmusn said...

Shifarobe:

Limbaugh had no need to apologize. POOR, POOR Georgetown law student whining about all the poor law students having to spend as much as $1000 a school year on protection. LOL. You people are cracked. How AMAZINGLY EMBARRASSING to get up before Congress and talk about how much sex you NEED to have and about the high cost of protection. CLOSE YOUR LEGS, Skank!

Why you hate over half the population escapes me but I will not dwell on that.

I will, however, try to insert some truth into this discussion and reinforce a point Ms. Fluke was trying to make: IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT SEX! Contraception, including oral, topical, intravaginal and intrauterine products is useful for many conditions troubling women who remain completely abstinent. These include but are not limited to:

Acne PCOS (polycystic ovarian syndrome) Dysmenorrhea (wickedly painful periods) Dysfunctional uterine bleeding Hypermenorrhea (heavy uterine bleeding) PMDD (Premenstrual dysphoric disorder) Rape

I am sorry if you are troubled when these products also prevent a pregnancy. Giving women control over the size of their family also profoundly helps poverty and malnutrition, REDUCES abortion and allows women to more fully recover from rigors of pregnancy instead of just being 'breeders'.

Giving equal time to men, Viagra (in different dosages) also is used for HAPE (high altitude pulmonary edema) and pulmonary hypertension.

As I am a resident of Virginia, I will leave the forum with only one further question to ponder: if the new ultrasound law mandates a procedure a woman does not request and the doctor does not wish to do, should we send the bill to the State Legislature? If so, is this the best use of limited health care dollars?

March 4, 2012 at 9:41 a.m.
alprova said...

shifarobe wrote: "Hey, Cerberus, otherwise known as Alprova, Every one of those comments by Limbaugh is dead on. LOL"

It is not I that you have to convince of a thing.

When your Earthly body gives up on you and you stand in judgment before God, you're going to have to convince Him that your comments and those that were spewed by Rush Limbaugh are "dead on."

Good luck with that.

March 4, 2012 at 9:44 a.m.
jjmez said...

davisss13 said... NGAdad said... Let us pray. Lord, you most certainly have need for a duo, the other half being Andrew Breitbart, ... in hell. Amen

Typical US Republican Christian. Bloodthirsty, heartless and cold-blooded. I cannot imagine how many you have driven from the faith or from even considering it. I bet you favor global religious war and even torture.

I think you misunderstood NGAdad. The rest of us got it and LOAO!! With hysterical laughter. We took it that NGAdad was saying the Lord had sent Breitbart to hell, in his favorite pair of gasoling drawers, no doubt, and now perhaps Limbaugh will follow. Still LOAO!!

He/she was suggesting

March 4, 2012 at 9:48 a.m.
MTJohn said...

JonRoss said...If Sandra Fluke wants free birth control paid for by taxpayers, which is what happens with the nationalized healthcare we are descending into now, then WE, the taxpayer should have a say in when and/or if she ever becomes pregnant.

If that is the argument, JonRoss, as taxpayers, let's make a deal. I will be happy to pay for the contraceptive pills and you can pay for all of the ob-gyn services required by women who do not use them.

March 4, 2012 at 9:56 a.m.
davisss13 said...

Rush apologized so this stupid biased cartoon and discussion are meaningless.

I'm sure women say... under 40 would disagree with you.

March 4, 2012 at 10:02 a.m.
davisss13 said...

JonRoss said... Rush was correct in his assessment of Sandra Fluke.

You have -0- honor or decency. I bet you even claim to be a Christian.

her crimes

Well there's your problem, you have no understanding of basic definitions.

March 4, 2012 at 10:04 a.m.
jjmez said...

Miss Fluke actually went before Congress to speak on behalf of a friend who suffers from Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and must take birth control pills for medical reasons other than to prevent a pregnancy. Yes, birth control can be used for medical reason other than sex and preventing pregnancy or, as Rushie Limbaugh prefer to call women "sluts" and "prostitutes" because they're "having so much sex that they can't afford B'control". Because her friend's insurance did not cover birth control contraceptives, not even for life and health threatening medical reasons, she was forced to pay for themm out of her own pocket, which can be very expensive. It got to the point where she could no longer pay for the pills and she was forced to stop taking them. Which led to her having to surgery to have her ovary removed.

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, excerpt:

**Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common hormonal disorder among women of reproductive age. The name of the condition comes from the appearance of the ovaries in most, but not all, women with the disorder — enlarged and containing numerous small cysts located along the outer edge of each ovary (polycystic appearance).

Infrequent or prolonged menstrual periods, excess hair growth, acne and obesity can all occur in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. In adolescents, infrequent or absent menstruation may signal the condition. In women past adolescence, difficulty becoming pregnant or unexplained weight gain may be the first sign.

The exact cause of polycystic ovary syndrome is unknown. Early diagnosis and treatment may reduce the risk of long-term complications, such as type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

complications caused by PCOS:

Type 2 diabetes High blood pressure Cholesterol and lipid abnormalities, such as elevated triglycerides or low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, the "good" cholesterol Elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a cardiovascular disease marker Metabolic syndrome, a cluster of signs and symptoms that indicate a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular disease Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, a severe liver inflammation caused by fat accumulation in the liver Sleep apnea Abnormal uterine bleeding Cancer of the uterine lining (endometrial cancer), caused by exposure to continuous high levels of estrogen Gestational diabetes or pregnancy-induced high blood pressure, if you do become pregnant

Possible First line of treatment:

If you're not trying to become pregnant, your doctor may recommend low-dose birth control pills that contain a combination of synthetic estrogen and progesterone.

March 4, 2012 at 10:04 a.m.
davisss13 said...

My choice of words was not the best, and in the attempt to be humorous, I created a national stir. I sincerely apologize to Ms. Fluke for the insulting word choices.

Take your apology and shove it.

March 4, 2012 at 10:05 a.m.
davisss13 said...

JonRoss said... If Sandra Fluke wants free birth control paid for by taxpayers, which is what happens with the nationalized healthcare we are descending into now, then WE, the taxpayer should have a say in when and/or if she ever becomes pregnant.

One step away from Limbaugh and a short jog to a stubby little mustache.

March 4, 2012 at 10:06 a.m.
davisss13 said...

They have not flinched in their drive to control the Holy Roman Catholic Church.

(shakes head)

No kidding? Damn, you are as dishonest as can be. You filthy GD culture warriors won't be happy until your favorite religion dictates federal policy and enslaves the whole country.

March 4, 2012 at 10:09 a.m.
MTJohn said...

JonRoss said...Birth control is freely available to anyone wanting it now.

I presume you mean abstinence.

JonRoss said...If the ProgDems and Obama have the power to destroy people of faith, they can surely excercise that power to control your vagina.

You obviously are channeling Rush. The only persons engaged in the debate about women's health care who have expressed any controlling vaginas are advocates, many of them male, for "family values".

March 4, 2012 at 10:10 a.m.
davisss13 said...

"JonRoss said... Birth control is freely available to anyone wanting it now. The only issue is if the ProgDems and Obama want to squash all freedoms in this country, including religious freedoms. So I don't understand your point. If the ProgDems and Obama have the power to destroy people of faith, they can surely excercise that power to control your vagina."

You are a lying sack of crap. Republicans want to dictate our lives from the cradle to the grave whether we like it or not. Take your situational religion, ethics and morals and shove them.

March 4, 2012 at 10:12 a.m.
jjmez said...

JohnRoss said... If the ProgDems and Obama have the power to destroy people of faith, they can surely excercise that power to control your vagina.

Looks like those PEOPLE OF FAITH are destroying themselves. For sure, J.Ross, no truly loving God would possibly claim them. They're imposters/hypocrits. Hopefully the real PEOPLE OF FAITH will soon take a stand and kick these fakes back into that fiery HELL! from which they've come. Along with Breitbert, of course.

March 4, 2012 at 10:14 a.m.
davisss13 said...

JonRoss said... I'm sorry, but were you directing that comment to me ?

Absolutely. You are a blowhard culture warrior.

I would think you meant to direct your vitriol toward Barack Hussien Obama.

Hardly. Although I certainly don't agree with everything president Obama has done I do know he's not a filthy GD culture warrior or religious manipulator like 99% of the Republican party.

That is coming from someone who voted GOP many times before 9/11.

March 4, 2012 at 10:15 a.m.
davisss13 said...

JonRoss said... Well are we not testy today ? I am no proposing that the American people have a say in the way Sandra Fluke uses her vagina. I am saying the ProgDems and Obama want to dictate to people of faith how they spend their money. So the comparison to Hitler probably more fits Barack Obama than the American people.

Not even close. It's another 'war on Christianity' bs line to whip up the rage of GOP zealots across the country. You try to wrap it the small governemtn spew but it's a filthy lie.

March 4, 2012 at 10:17 a.m.
davisss13 said...

JonRoss said... mtjohn and daviss - you make me smile : )

You make me want to vomit.

March 4, 2012 at 10:28 a.m.
alprova said...

JohnRoss wrote: "Because we know that common whores usually don't spend $65,000 a year for law school. But then again..."

If you were to take just 11 minutes of your time to look at both sides of the issue, and view her testimony for yourself, you might discover that Miss Fluke attends Georgetown University as the result of being awarded a scholarship.

If the rest of you ignorant people were to also take the time to view Sandra Fluke's testimony, you might discover some other important facts that play into this issue, such as the fact that she offered her activism credentials up-front when she introduced herself. There was never any secret about the reason she was there. Conservatives have their activists too, and plenty of them.

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/40007_Video-_Sandra_Flukes_Testimony_That_Drove_the_Right_Wing_Crazy

Birth control pills are not just prescribed for the purpose of preventing pregnancy. They are also prescribed for the prevention and treatment of ovarian cysts.

I have a niece who has been prescribed birth control pills for that very reason. She is married and thanks to those birth control pills, she was able to delay the removal of her ovaries, until she was able to conceive one of the most wonderful and beautiful children ever to grace our extended family.

I will never, ever understand why it is that people will so blindly take the word of any politician or other political mouthpiece like Rush Limbaugh, without spending the time necessary to arrive at an educated and unbiased opinion about an issue, in order to then arrive at the truth.

Apology or not, Rush Limbaugh was in total ignorance of the facts about what her testimony was all about when he opened his mouth about Sandra Fluke.

To only apologize for his selection of words is an extremely hollow apology, in my opinion. He was wrong from start to finish.

In regard to other comparisons that others have offered in here, had I been remotely aware that any woman had been publicly been called a "slut," my denouncement would be the same, regardless of who said it. Today was the first time I had ever heard of the Laura Ingraham incident. I'm sure that I'm not alone.

Even Rush Limbaugh, who stands atop the mountain of talk show hosts, has only an audience of about one-sixth of the entire United States population.

It is unrealistic to expect that every liberal, or conservative for that matter, is in a position to denounce what they are not aware of occurring.

Those kind of arguments are always baseless.

March 4, 2012 at 10:36 a.m.
jjmez said...

Sinclair Lewis: "When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.

The above was written by Sinclair Lewis title IT CAN'T HAPPEN HERE in 1935 as fascism was sweeping across Europe and he felt it may become a threat in the U.S.

We are presently experiencing some of its harmful tell-tale symptoms: extreme nationalism (you're either with us or against us), the disdain of human rights, unprecedented secrecy, military supremacy over domestic needs, fraudulent elections, suppression of labor power and the protection and strengthening of corporate power, using religion to manipulate public opinion, controlled mass media, the use of torture, hatred of intellectuals and the list goes on.

Mike Huckabee once gave a stump speech to destroy our defining document and bring it into alignment with the Holy Bible. Soon we will be persecuted for not being the right form of Christian.

Remember even Adolph Hitler considered himself a Christian.

March 4, 2012 at 10:39 a.m.
davisss13 said...

"JonRoss said.. I am trying to process this davey. You imply those who oppose the ProgDem / Obamist moves to control the faith based community as Hitler. Then you get mad because someome calls you on it. "

My bad. I called you a Nazi. My apology to the forum. It doesn't happen very often.

But like the Nazis and all other totalitarians obsessed with attaining power, you degenerates in the GOP, including the FAITH-BASED, do want to control everyone, no exceptions, and dictate what we are allowed to do, according to your purely situational religion... from the cradle to the grave. And you are using religious manipulation to do so.

Progressives/Obama do not want to control faith-based. I would like them to make sure YOU don't inflict your so-called 'Christian morals' on everyone else.

March 4, 2012 at 10:40 a.m.
alprova said...

JohnRoss wrote: "Birth control is freely available to anyone wanting it now"

You're wrong. Sources of free birth control do not begin to meet the demand and they are disappearing one by one. Conservatives are doing their level best to shut-down facilities that cater strictly to women's health, such as Planned Parenthood and others.

March 4, 2012 at 10:42 a.m.
davisss13 said...

JonRoss said... I love you daviss.

Great, another Larry Craig.

March 4, 2012 at 10:45 a.m.
alprova said...

JohnRoss wrote: "SOMEONE is paying for the education of a Prog/Dem tool. Would a conservative student been awarded a scholarship ? Absolutely not."

Your ignorance has no boundaries, does it?

Georgetown is the nation's oldest Catholic and Jesuit University. How many conservatives do you think attend that school each year?

Would it surprise you to learn that more than half of the students who attend the college receive scholarships, student loans, and other types of financial aid?

From the Georgetown website:

"An undergraduate applicant's ability to pay tuition is not a criteria for admission. In 1978, Georgetown began its historic commitment to meet the financial need of every undergraduate who merits admission. The University works to provide eligible students 100 percent of their demonstrated financial need through scholarships, loans and other forms of assistance. Our practices mean that every eligible undergraduate student, once accepted, can afford to enroll. Each year over half of Georgetown undergraduates receive some form of financial assistance."

March 4, 2012 at 10:54 a.m.
jjmez said...

JohnRoss said... SOMEONE is paying for the education of a Prog/Dem tool. Would a conservative student been awarded a scholarship ? Absolutely not.

Are you really so filled with hate or are you just so naive? Scholarships aren't awarded based on whether someone is a liberal or a conservative. Such full scholarships are more often awarded based on grad point averages. You know, just like those scouts go out and scout for NBA and NFL players? The only difference is Miss Flukes scholarship was most certainly based on her having scored high academically rather than athletically.

Old boy rushie sure knows how to pick his audience. No wonder he's so popular with so many right wingnuts. They're simply clueless.

March 4, 2012 at 11:13 a.m.
alprova said...

JohnRoss wrote: "No you are not alone. Everyone who heavily uses CNN and NPR as news sources have not heard the vicious attacks on Laura. It was reported by FOX and laughed about on MSNBC."

Well that argument just fell apart.

I check in with Fox News several times per day and have for years. In addition to that, I also read CNN, Matt Drudge, MSNBC, USA Today, and ABC News.

I haven't been to the NPR website in about six months, if my memory serves me correct.

I looked up when it was that George Shultz attacked Laura Ingraham. It was on or about the 25th of May, 2011. I was in the hospital for a week with my first stroke and kinda out of it. The conservative outrage from it must have passed by the time I got back home.

March 4, 2012 at 11:13 a.m.
alprova said...

JohnRoss wrote: "So...not only has she requested Georgetown to educate her but also provide an active sex life ? That appears to be what she is saying. Do you disagree ?"

I have no idea how old you are, but I'm quite sure that you had a sex life at one time in your life too. How many aspirin have you put between your legs?

Sex is a natural desire and a natural act for most normal people. Expecting young people to practice abstinence is totally unrealistic and I don't buy for a second that conservatives are any more chaste than liberals are.

You folks just seem to have more money to spend for rubbers.

March 4, 2012 at 11:21 a.m.
dude_abides said...

Every day, behind that door, another conservative opinion is born. It then makes it's way through the system to the conservative think tank.

March 4, 2012 at 11:22 a.m.
alprova said...

JohnRoss wrote: "Admission and thus scholarships are not awarded randomly was you all suggest. To be admitted you must exhibit a Prog/Dem leaning."

You're arguments are becoming absurd.

"And where are the conservative students on campus that oppose this power grab by the Obama regime ? They dare not speak up at the risk of being attacked by lefties, students and faculty."

I have a perfect explanation for that.

I find that younger generations these days have a much better head on their shoulders. They are far better educated than their parents, for the most part. They are not prone to being ignorant about things like politics.

Now on the other hand, you are a perfect example of someone who is woefully uneducated and knee-deep in ignorance. You're proud of being ignorant. Even when faced with it, you still wallow in it. There is no hope for you.

There is however, hope for our young people, who are definitely much more level-headed, and not prone to offering unsubstantiated opinions. They take time to weigh all sides of an issue.

March 4, 2012 at 11:31 a.m.
miraweb said...

Rush's "common man" persona is just part of his act as well. His grandfather was an ambassador. His father a lawyer and a figher pilot in WWII (Rush skipped Vietnam), and his uncle was appointed a judge by Reagan, his cousin was appointed a judge by George W and his brother is a lawyer, as well.

March 4, 2012 at 11:32 a.m.
BigRidgePatriot said...

That's pretty funny, coming from The Wart. His drawing studio is probably in an outhouse too!

March 4, 2012 at 11:37 a.m.
moonpie said...

I think Santorum got this one right, about Rush. Rush is an entertainer. He definitely illustrates with absurdity. Sometimes it's hard to tell that his devoted listeners know the difference.

To me, his apology sounded sincere, and he accurately described his schtick. His apology was appropriate.

March 4, 2012 at 11:38 a.m.
BigRidgePatriot said...

dude_abides said... "Every day, behind that door, another conservative opinion is born"

Unlike the door to The Wart's studio, where an original thought has yet to surface.

March 4, 2012 at 11:39 a.m.
jjmez said...

moonpie said... To me, his apology sounded sincere, and he accurately described his schtick. His apology was appropriate

Rush only apologized after some of his sponsors started to pull the plug with their adveristing on his show. His apology was all about Rush and his riches. The apology wasn't sincere. He attacked Fluke for days. Repeating the same hate over and over, then only apologized after he realized his adverising sponsors were backing away from him. Now, tell us just how sincere was that apology again?

March 4, 2012 at 11:44 a.m.
mountainlaurel said...

JonRoss said: “I am saying the ProgDems and Obama want to dictate to people of faith how they spend their money. So the comparison to Hitler probably more fits Barack Obama than the American people.”

I believe the facts show that it’s the other way around, JonRoss. For starters, this issue is not about a religious organization using it’s own money to operate its own programs – such programs been exempted. This issue is about religious organizations that have branched out and established organizations that are serving the public and benefiting from public monies, which means the rights of the general public is involved. Is it fair to the general public that their money be used to further the goals of a religious organization? Personally, I don’t think so. If the religious organization involved is not willing to agree to some kind of reasonable compromise, then I don’t think they are entitled to benefit from public monies. And what about the rights of the employees who may or may not share their employer’s religious views in regard to contraception? Is it appropriate for an employer to impose his/her religious views about contraception on his/her employees? The point is that President Obama is trying to balance the rights of everyone involved, which is what all responsible lawmakers should be doing.

March 4, 2012 at 11:45 a.m.
miraweb said...

Here is a statement from a former advertiser, David Friend, CEO of Carbonite:

"No one with daughters the age of Sandra Fluke, and I have two, could possibly abide the insult and abuse heaped upon this courageous and well-intentioned young lady. Mr. Limbaugh, with his highly personal attacks on Miss Fluke, overstepped any reasonable bounds of decency.

"Even though Mr. Limbaugh has now issued an apology, we have nonetheless decided to withdraw our advertising from his show. We hope that our action, along with the other advertisers who have already withdrawn their ads, will ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse."

 and continuing:

"As an advertiser, we do not have control over a show’s editorial content or what they say on air. Carbonite does not endorse the opinions of the shows or their hosts.

"However, the outcry over Limbaugh is the worst we’ve ever seen. I have scheduled a face-to-face meeting next week with Limbaugh during which I will impress upon him that his comments were offensive to many of our customers and employees alike."

March 4, 2012 at 11:45 a.m.
stanleyyelnats said...

What I find interesting about Republicans is they wrap themselves in Christianity (Read Sermon on the Mount)and simultaneously spew forth an abundance of HATE.

Certainly not the language of Jesus. Republicans have managed to morph the message of Jesus into something completely unrecognizable as a Christian message.

The Beatitudes 1And seeing the multitudes, He went up on a mountain, and when He was seated His disciples came to Him. 2Then He opened His mouth and taught them, saying: 3"Blessed are the poor in spirit, For theirs is the kingdom of heaven. 4Blessed are those who mourn, For they shall be comforted. 5Blessed are the meek, For they shall inherit the earth. 6Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, For they shall be filled. 7Blessed are the merciful, For they shall obtain mercy. 8Blessed are the pure in heart, For they shall see God. 9Blessed are the peacemakers, For they shall be called sons of God. 10Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, For theirs is the kingdom of heaven. 11"Blessed are you when they revile and persecute you, and say all kinds of evil against you falsely for My sake. 12Rejoice and be exceedingly glad, for great is your reward in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Why don't you Republicans simply 'fess up to what you are.

Click to read more

March 4, 2012 at 11:51 a.m.
jjmez said...

JonRoss said... And Sandra Fluke is asking that money once used for scholarships be diverted to birth control, unless overall funding is increased.

Oh LAWD!! Where do they get these types. Rushie et al must dig deep into the bottom of the barrel to dig y'all up.

Scholarships come from many sources. Scholarships are made up of a variety of sources. They mostly come from private donors and many companies. If you're studying to become a mechanical engineer, you may qualify for a full scholarship from Boeing, Norththrop etc. Who in turn might have contracts with NASA, the military, a major airline service. If you're studying to become a an attorney, some well established law firm you might qualify for a full scholarship paid for by that law firm. There are private scholarships for nurses, doctors, teachers. My in-law received a full four year scholarship at a University to become a veternarian. They're all private scholarships and have nothing to do with the federal government. dah!

March 4, 2012 at 11:55 a.m.
miraweb said...

One more quote:

"Boehner comes out and says Rush’s language was inappropriate. Using the salad fork for your entrée, that’s inappropriate. Not this stuff."

"And it was depressing because what it indicates is that the Republican leaders are afraid of Rush Limbaugh. They want to bomb Iran, but they’re afraid of Rush Limbaugh."

-- Conservative Commentator George Will

Source: ABC News

March 4, 2012 at 11:55 a.m.
shifarobe said...

OH, are the poor angry vagninas mad because their humping time is being threatened by not enough protection given to them for free. Limbaugh does use absurdity to prove his point, and you leftists are the ones who don't know the difference.

Oh, horse manure dougy boy! This is all a MASSIVE, HUGE distraction by the left wing media, OBUTTFACE and the Democrap Party to distract from OBUTTFACE'S bad #'s and bad job. I don't hate anyone, dougy boy. Liars, phonies and frauds need to be pointed out. OBUTTFACE is trying to bill himself as the defender of women. Poor, poor, poor oppressed college women in this country. I bleed for them. BOO HOO HOOO. Some women around the world are treated like dog meat, and you whine about the fact that you're not getting birth control for free and you can't get enough because of it. LOL

March 4, 2012 at 12:05 p.m.
jjmez said...

alprova said... Sex is a natural desire and a natural act for most normal people. Expecting young people to practice abstinence is totally unrealistic and I don't buy for a second that conservatives are any more chaste than liberals are.

You folks just seem to have more money to spend for rubbers

Believe me, they're not. They just like to stay in the closet with their little extra curricular activities. They and their offsprings have abortions, use b'control the same as anyone seeking either or both in the general population.

There was a study done a few years ago on Red States verses Blue and they found people from so-called Red AKA conservative states were most likely to access porn and pornographic materials on the Internet.

March 4, 2012 at 12:09 p.m.
davisss13 said...

Gives a whole new meaning to 'the south shall rise agin'.

March 4, 2012 at 12:24 p.m.
jjmez said...

shifarobe said... Oh, horse manure dougy boy! This is all a MASSIVE, HUGE distraction by the left wing media, OBUTTFACE and the Democrap Party to distract from OBUTTFACE'S bad #'s and bad job. I don't hate anyone, dougy boy. Liars, phonies and frauds need to be pointed out. OBUTTFACE is trying to bill himself as the defender of women. Poor, poor, poor oppressed college women in this country. I bleed for them. BOO HOO HOOO. Some women around the world are treated like dog meat, and you whine about the fact that you're not getting birth control for free and you can't get enough because of it. LOL

If what you say is true, old boy rushie and his kind are doing all the work for those lefties. Are you saying or implying Rushieez is actually a librul hiding in GOP drag? :? He's sure being instrumental in sinking the GOP ship.

March 4, 2012 at 12:26 p.m.
davisss13 said...

shifarobe

YEEEEEE HAW!

March 4, 2012 at 12:26 p.m.
klugermann said...

"OBUTTFACE". I get it... it's a conjunction of the words 'Obama' and 'Buttface'. You are quite the witty character, aren't you? How darned clever you are! You should really put a trademark on that one!

Good work, shifarobe. Keep 'em coming. In fact, I really encourage you to start posting your own opinion blog - or become a phone-in regular on national talk-radio shows. Because every time guys like you, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh open your mouths, or place your pudgy little fingers on the keyboard, you help pile up the votes for the other side. Awesome work!

March 4, 2012 at 12:31 p.m.
tipper said...

I see JonRoss is back to polishing his head and admiring his skull tatoos.

March 4, 2012 at 12:38 p.m.
miraweb said...

Exactly the political problem: everytime a Shifarobe posts a rant, another thoughtful vote is lost.

Rush's outburst also blew up an emerging GOP strategy that was starting to get a little traction (religious independence) and made the issue completely toxic.
No surprise the Blunt amendment was just dropped.

It also successfully tied concerns about women's health issues with health care reform. Half the country is now paying attention to the real provisions in health care reform rather than the bogey-man rhetoric the insurance industry prefers.

Thanks Rush! And thanks, shifa!

March 4, 2012 at 12:41 p.m.
BigRidgePatriot said...

Now that Obama has ensured that all the horny people can afford to have worry free sex without condoms I suppose we can expect a big uptick in venereal disease... the next crisis for Obama to save us from.

March 4, 2012 at 1:01 p.m.
miraweb said...

Very 1913 of you, BRP.

Margaret Sanger had to face that logic in 1914 when birth control literature was considered 'obscene'.

The Supreme Court finally decided married couples could legally choose birth control if they wanted 1965 (and 1972 for unmarried couples).

Do try to keep up, dear.

March 4, 2012 at 1:16 p.m.
klugermann said...

That's right, BigRidge. Excellent point about VD and how the Pill is all about worry-free sex. Good job. You're obviously a very intelligent man with tremendous depth of background on the subject. Care to share with us who you'll be voting for? We're all very interested in knowling exactly who it is that people with your vast intellect are supporting.

March 4, 2012 at 1:17 p.m.
Livn4life said...

Thanks to all for the legitimacy you continue to give negativity. It gets the ink, it gets the ire(have bit o Irish blood in me meself). But ultimately it shows how grossly divided we are as a nation. Anyone on either side of the spectrum who is not concerned about that proves the pitiful shape this formerly wonderful nation really is in. Keep it coming y'all. We sure are not making progress.

March 4, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.
moonpie said...

jjmez,

I'll grant you that Rush deserves a lot of skepticism. You may be absolutely correct in saying he is not really sorry and would not have done this without economic pressure. (I don't know of any time Rush has apologized due to public pressure.... there may be examples, but I'm just not aware of them.)

Practicing in the theatre of the absurd, though, sometimes you do need feedback to know when you've crossed the line. Sometimes it takes seeing your actions through someone else's eyes (and sponsorship) before you truly reflect.

I certainly respect your point of view and can't say you're wrong.

The apology was appropriate in text and tone, for me. For others it will not be enough. It seemed sincere, to me. He's certainly not sorry for the point he was trying to make.... just the tactic he used to make it.

I guess we'll all have to be our own judges on that.

I'm not naive enough to believe this event will prevent future thoughtless, misogynistic or mean-spirited rants.

If I really cared what Rush thought, I'd listen to his show. But I don't read the Onion, either. Fake news is just not my thing.

March 4, 2012 at 1:38 p.m.
John_Proctor said...

nooga;

you left out "Kenyan" and "Nazi" or didn't you get the memo from BeckerHead and Limpballs? If you are going to name call, don't omit any of their favorites even if they are contradictions in terms and facts.

March 4, 2012 at 1:51 p.m.
jjmez said...

moonpie said... jjmez, I'll grant you that Rush deserves a lot of skepticism. You may be absolutely correct in saying he is not really sorry and would not have done this without economic pressure. (I don't know of any time Rush has apologized due to public pressure.... there may be examples, but I'm just not aware of them.)

He's not caving now to public pressure. It's the thought of losing his primary source of income that's got him rambling off some lame apology. He might just have to give up that private jet and other goodies.

March 4, 2012 at 2:03 p.m.
klugermann said...

I think with all of the sarcasm here, we're losing track of who's who... When posting, please identify yourselves as either "Rightwingnutjob" or "Elite Demoncrat Socialist". This will make it much easier for us to sort through the comments. If you choose to not include this information, we will assume that you have not yet obtained your voter photo-id card. Thank you for your cooperation.

March 4, 2012 at 2:04 p.m.
jjmez said...

BigRidgePatriot said... Now that Obama has ensured that all the horny people can afford to have worry free sex without condoms I suppose we can expect a big uptick in venereal disease

Actually veneral diseases, VD, were rampant long before birth control pills. I guess you think all those individuals who contracted the diseases got them from sitting on a toilet? LOL

March 4, 2012 at 2:08 p.m.
hambone said...

If what Limbaugh said was an apology.

Then 9/11 was a series of airline accidents!

March 4, 2012 at 2:30 p.m.
MTJohn said...

JonRoss said...

So...not only has she requested Georgetown to educate her but also provide an active sex life ? That appears to be what she is saying. Do you disagree ?

Of course I disagree because there isn't anything in her testimony that could possibly be even mis-construed to say that. Limbaugh completely fabricated what he said she said. And, as you have clearly demonstrated, facts are meaningless who really want to believe the deception before the lies are even spoken.

March 4, 2012 at 2:31 p.m.
hambone said...

The best thing I can say about Rush Limbaugh is that so far in 4 Marriages he has not produced any OFFSPRING!

I sure hope his young wife doesn't miss HER pills !

March 4, 2012 at 2:56 p.m.
alprova said...

hambone wrote: "I sure hope his young wife doesn't miss HER pills !"

Rush Limbaugh goes through each day of his married life with the full knowledge that if it were not for his many millions, the woman wearing his ring wouldn't give him the time of day.

He and Newt Gingrich must be running some kind of a contest.

March 4, 2012 at 3:21 p.m.
dude_abides said...

Rush Limbaugh, the spokesperson for republican lovers.

Hey BW48, I guess if the female ditto heads (both of them) have twins in their lineage they have to spend twice as much on birth control, just to make sure! He's probably confused BCPs with RU-486, which he's seen women eat like M&M's after just bumping into him.

March 4, 2012 at 3:41 p.m.
mountainlaurel said...

MTJohn said to JonRoss: “Of course I disagree because there isn't anything in her testimony that could possibly be even mis-construed to say that. Limbaugh completely fabricated what he said she said.”

I believe JonRoss has already demonstrated he’s not really interested in Ms. Fluke’s actual testimony, MTJohn. Personally, I think her testimony shows she is a lot more knowledgeable about the issues than most U.S. lawmakers:

“How can Congress consider the Fortenberry, Rubio, and Blunt legislation that would allow even more employers and institutions to refuse contraceptive coverage and then respond that the non-profit clinics should step up to take care of the resulting medical crisis, particularly when so many legislators are attempting to defund those very same clinics?"

"These denials of contraceptive coverage impact real people. In the worst cases, women who need this medication for other medical reasons suffer dire consequences. A friend of mine, for example, has polycystic ovarian syndrome and has to take prescription birth control to stop cysts from growing on her ovaries. . . under Sen. Blunt’s. . . Sen. Rubio’s . . . or Rep. Fortenberry’s bill, there’s no requirement that an exception be made for such medical needs."

In sixty-five percent of cases, our female students were interrogated by insurance representatives and university medical staff about why they needed these prescriptions and whether they were lying about their symptoms. For my friend, and 20% of women in her situation, she never got the insurance company to cover her prescription, despite verification of her illness from her doctor."

"Perhaps you think my friend’s tragic story is rare. It’s not. . . One student told us that she knew birth control wasn’t covered. . . so when she was raped, she didn’t go to the doctor even to be examined or tested for sexually transmitted infections because she thought insurance wasn’t going to cover something like that, something that was related to a woman’s reproductive health."

“Conservative Catholic organizations have been asking: what did we expect when we enrolled at a Catholic school? We can only answer that we expected women to be treated equally, to not have our school create untenable burdens. . . We expected that our schools would live up to the Jesuit creed of cura personalis, to care for the whole person, by meeting all of our medical needs."

"We expected that when 94% of students opposed the policy, the university would respect our choices regarding insurance students pay for completely unsubsidized by the university. . . We resent that, in the 21st century, anyone thinks it’s acceptable to ask us to make this choice simply because we are women."

http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/statement-Congress-letterhead-2nd%20hearing.pdf

March 4, 2012 at 3:46 p.m.
BigRidgePatriot said...

Wait a minute, let me make sure I got this right, do all you claybots think that because I don't think the government should be supplying birth control That I am against birth control?

If so, what a bunch of dimwits.

March 4, 2012 at 4:21 p.m.
dude_abides said...

No, BRP, we are actually totally unconcerned what you think about anything, ever.

Did you buy that Hitler painting that was on sale in your redneck of the woods last weekend?

March 4, 2012 at 5:39 p.m.
macropetala8 said...

hambone said...

The best thing I can say about Rush Limbaugh is that so far in 4 Marriages he has not produced any OFFSPRING!

I sure hope his young wife doesn't miss HER pills !

She probably doesn't need any b'control until that young stud muffin comes around to clean the pool. LOL! 'Cause someone so filled with hate as rushie has got to be impotent. Both in the brain and that itsy bitsy weenie. That daily and endless hate he spews out, like Breitbert, has got to take its toll, eventually.

March 4, 2012 at 6:09 p.m.
miraweb said...

The real irony is the organization that write's Rush's paychecks, Clear Channel, has been part of Bain Capital since 2008. Yeah, that Bain Capital . . .

link

March 4, 2012 at 6:24 p.m.
blackwater48 said...

THINK OF AS AN ANOTHER ECONOMIC INDICATOR

In summation, for three consecutive days on his nationally syndicated radio program, Boss Limbaugh lied about Sandra Fluke's testimony before congressional legislators, demonstrated stunning ignorance of how birth control pills work, and wrapped it all up by accusing Ms. Fluke of being a slut and a prostitute.

Then, when 3 or 4 advertisers pulled out of Rush Limbaugh (fill in your own joke here) Rush issued a hollow apology about the language he used to describe Ms. Fluke.

The Obama Economy must be booming.

March 4, 2012 at 6:30 p.m.
miraweb said...

Here is a short list of some of the Bain donors to the Romney SuperPac:

Edward Conard $1,000,000

Domenic Ferrante $250,000

John Connaughton $250,000

Steven Barnes $125,000

Mrs. Steven Barnes $125,000

Paul Edgerly $500,000

Sandra Egerly $500,000

Stephen Zide $250,000

Plus the direct campaign contributions from Bain employees: $1,400,000

Sources:

Romney Superpac Donations

Romney Pacs Analysis

March 4, 2012 at 6:38 p.m.
acerigger said...

Rush' wife don't need contraceptives. When he starts gettin' "frisky",she just sends him down to one of the islands where there's plenty of little boys(or girls)to play with.

March 4, 2012 at 6:55 p.m.
Jemmy said...

shifarobe said "OH, are the poor angry vagninas mad because their humping time is being threatened by not enough protection given to them for free. Limbaugh does use absurdity to prove his point, and you leftists are the ones who don't know the difference."

Wow, you seem to really hate women, man. I hope you're not married, but somehow I doubt it.

March 4, 2012 at 7:32 p.m.
dude_abides said...

tu_fizzle in the hizzle, ya'll. You must've especially enjoyed Bush's pronunciation of the word nuclear, working, as you did, as an atomic scientist. Are you sure you worked at Oak Ridge... and not as a roadie for the Oak Ridge Boys?

March 4, 2012 at 8:31 p.m.
alprova said...

If anyone is interested in understanding where tu_quoque fell short in her claim that birth control pills are not prescribed for ovarian cysts, plus a list of many more real medical conditions, click on the link at the bottom of the page she cited;

See Also: Combination birth control pills

On the page that comes up, then click on the link following the text on that page titled: Why it's done

There you will read a myriad of medical maladies that combination birth control pills address.

It's all there in black and white, by the very same source that tu_quoque cited to "prove" that "liberal" assertions that the pills prescribed for medical reasons is a "lie" and "b.s."

Oops.

March 4, 2012 at 8:49 p.m.
acerigger said...

I noticed that the number of comments to Clays 'toons have really increased in the past few weeks. Congratulations Clay!(and thanks for making people think,whether they want to or not)lol

March 4, 2012 at 9:08 p.m.
John_Proctor said...

Alprova, these pills have been prescribed for several gynecological conditions since they first came on the market. I remember a number of girls in our high school getting prescriptions for them by claiming to have irregular periods. Many of them were "good Catholic girls" and, yes, their parents (or boyfriends?) paid for them as insurance did not cover them, at least not at first. This was in the early 1960's when they were first available.

Citing facts in this forum tends to disturb the more Prozac-needy posters so keep up the fire.

March 4, 2012 at 9:20 p.m.
dude_abides said...

yeah, al... I thought tu_'s attack was kind of abstruse. It's radiation sickness manifest as anguished befuddlement. Not to mention the shedding of eyebrow hairs on the keyboard.

March 4, 2012 at 9:28 p.m.
jjmez said...

tu_quoque said... Why didn’t you copy and paste the whole section on treatments. Its very much business as usual that you Libtards will lie to accomplish your ends and this B.S. about needing only birth control pills for the treatment is just that … B.S.

Because it wasn't necessary to print more. As I was referring to the reason Miss Fluke spoke before a congressional committee on behalf of her friend. And the fact that b'control can be prescribed for more than just having sex and to prevent a pregnancy. dah! You've added nothing here, turqKY. In fact, the link you provided proved true what I've already said and more. THANKS!! :-) Although my reference came from a different source, your link only validated what I'd already said. daaaahhhhhh! Birth Control pills are one of many ways to treat Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. However it is one of the first lines of defense considered by many doctors in treating the Syndrome before going on to other perhaps other major choices, especially surgery.

Anyways, more GOOD NEWS! According to the Miami Herald A 7Th sponsor has pulled the advertising plug from old boy rushbumpkins. He may have to give up that private jet, though. :(

NEW YORK -- A flower company is the seventh advertiser to pull its ads from conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh's radio program in reaction to his derogatory comments about a law student who testified about birth control policy.

ProFlowers said Sunday on its Facebook page that it has suspended advertising on Limbaugh's program because his comments about Georgetown University student Sandra Fluke "went beyond political discourse to a personal attack and do not reflect our values as a company."

The six other advertisers that say they have pulled ads from his show are mortgage lender Quicken Loans, mattress retailers Sleep Train and Sleep Number, software maker Citrix Systems Inc., online data backup service provider Carbonite and online legal document services company LegalZoom.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/04/2675108/a-7th-advertiser-pulls-out-of.html#storylink=cpy

March 4, 2012 at 9:43 p.m.
shifarobe said...

No, jemmy, I love women, but I know a phony and lefty media setup when I see one. Is that your ideal woman? A woman who whines that someone else should pay for her protection as she screws around? That's not a woman, that's a slut. Feminism has taught women they can be slobs just like men are. That's equality for you. I have a great relationship with my wife. I respect her and she respects me. She respects her body and also thinks fluke is a slut.

March 4, 2012 at 10:31 p.m.
jjmez said...

tu_qirky, you're really coming unglued. There's nothing in what I posted that has been truncated. Your desperation to defend a drug addict and an idiot such as Limbaugh speaks volumes to your own character and belief system. You both need help.

My post was one example in many based on why Miss Fluke spoke before a congressional committee. Anyone with even the sense of a roach knows there's always more than one option in treatment for any illness. Everyone with heart trouble doesn't necessarily need a heart transplant, dah! Where birth control pills may work for one individual suffering with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome they don't work for everyone. However, that was never the point anyway. The point was b'control obvious worked for Miss Fluke's friend.

People like you are simply amazing. No wonder it's so easy for the likes of Rush to drag you along. The point is, tu_q, birth control pills can be used for a variety of causes and not just to prevent a pregnancy. What is so difficult about that for you and rushie to understand? Miss Fluke described one incident in many where birth control pills are used for something other than pregnancy prevention.

Now, please! Go take a breather before just totally explode on all their pent up anger and hate.

March 4, 2012 at 10:46 p.m.
alprova said...

Sigh...Next Ms. Forever Alone will whine that she was in no manner defending Rush Limbaugh. Every time she is cornered, she runs away from her words.

The fact still remains that it is quite standard for medical professionals to prescribe birth control pills for many legitimate medical conditions that women suffer. Birth control pills are a very inexpensive treatment compared to surgery.

And as I pointed out in an earlier post, the prescribing of birth control pills actually led to the very much desired conception of a child by my niece, who previously was unable to conceive and who was additionally suffering horribly with the pain of ovarian cysts.

Ms. Forever Alone, you and I are through conversing and debating, but you will never be allowed to pass off your brand of "truth" in this forum.

From what I have seen, you haven't secured one ally among the many people who frequent this forum, save for one.

You and Rolando deserve each other.

March 4, 2012 at 10:48 p.m.
mountainlaurel said...

JJimez said: "Anyways, more GOOD NEWS! According to the Miami Herald A 7Th sponsor has pulled the advertising plug from old boy rushbumpkins."

I suspect the sponsors took the time to read Ms. Fluke's testimony, and noted that Limbaugh had lied to his viewers about her testimony. Mark Kleiman at Reality Base Community says when it comes to lying Limbaugh just can’t help himself, and I believe he's right. Limbaugh seems almost incapable of telling the truth, which I suppose makes him a habitual liar:

“Even when he can’t stand the heat and has to pretend to apologize, Rush Limbaugh can’t – or won’t – stop lying.

Today he said he was sorry for having called law student Sandra Fluke a “slut” and a “prostitute” for telling Congress that women needed access to contraception. But even as he did so, Limbaugh repeated the central lie in his original rants: that Fluke had somehow made her sexual activity a matter of public discourse.”

“But in fact Fluke did no such thing. Fluke’s testimony never mentions her own situation at all. Nor does it mention, even by implication or euphemism, anyone’s sexual activity. It’s most memorable anecdote is the one about a woman – a lesbian, who doesn’t have to worry about getting pregnant unless she’s raped – who lost an ovary because her health plan wouldn’t cover the birth-control pills she needed to control her ovarian cysts; the plan administrators refused to believe that she needed them for what she in fact needed them for. Their terror – actually, the terror of the Catholic Church – that someone, somewhere, might be getting laid, did this woman irreparable damage. That’s what Fluke’s testimony was about. It was only Limbaugh who chose to fixate on the sexual aspect.”

“What should be astounding, but isn’t, is how many of the people discussing this affair have accepted Limbaugh’s false premise that Sandra Fluke brought up the subject of sex, and therefore can’t complain if her sexuality became the matter of coarse jest. She didn’t; old Limp-d--k did. But the sort of people who plan to vote for Mitt Romney this fall are so immune to reality that they’re happy to join in Limbaugh’s projection of his own preoccupation with sex onto their common political opponents.”

http://www.samefacts.com/2012/03/watching-conservatives/he-cant-help-it/

March 4, 2012 at 10:55 p.m.
alprova said...

Sigh...

March 4, 2012 at 11:04 p.m.
AndrewLohr said...

Defend Limbaugh? He's often right and often entertaining, and often uses exaggeration to expose some absurdity. If he's sometimes nasty, the party of Maureen Dowd and Paul Krugman and Tom Teepen and Clay Bennett is utterly hypocritical to say so. Rush's attitude comes across to me as, I wish they'd learn. Liberals' attitude comes across as, Those people are worthless. Ol' Jesus denounced the latter attitude and practiced the former (He was always saying, Repent.)

90-95% of Americans fornicate, so fornication is normal? And everyone but Jesus Christ has sinned, so sin is normal? No, a widespread problem is--a problem. ("Jesus is normal. The rest of us are weird"--me.)

15-20% of contraceptives are prescribed for noncontraceptive reasons, so we all need to pay for all contraceptives? Tail wagging the dog there.

10:40am "Progressives/Obama do not want to control faith based." So why do they tell some faith based who oppose contraceptives to give away contraceptives? Wasn't the "wall of separation between church and state" supposed to protect the Church from state interference? If you want a university or a hospital to give away contraceptives (which, wasn't Sandra Fluke saying?, cost money), go ahead and start one, or attend or support one that does, or give them away yourself near one that doesn't.

March 4, 2012 at 11:06 p.m.
mountainlaurel said...

AndrewLorh said: "So why do they tell some faith based who oppose contraceptives to give away contraceptives? Wasn't the "wall of separation between church and state" supposed to protect the Church from state interference?

But the facts show that it’s the other way around, AndrewLohr. This issue is not about a religious organization using it’s own money to operate its own programs – these programs been exempted. This issue is about religious organizations that have branched out and established hospitals, colleges and other organizations that are serving the public and benefiting from public monies, which means the rights of the general public are involved. Is it fair to the general public that their money be used to further the goals of a religious organization?

I certainly don’t think so. If the religious organization involved is not willing to agree to some kind of reasonable compromise, then I don’t think they are entitled to benefit from public monies. And what about the rights of the employees who may or may not share their employer’s religious views in regard to contraception? Is it appropriate for an employer to impose his/her religious views about contraception on his/her employees? The point is that President Obama is trying to balance the rights of everyone involved, which is what all responsible lawmakers should be doing.

March 4, 2012 at 11:16 p.m.
AndrewLohr said...

And while I have your attention, here's what I think Newt Gingrich should say for himself (along with what he does say). I have him sorta endorse contraceptives and utterly denounce forcing groups that oppose them to give them away, tho contraceptives are not a main point. http://voices.yahoo.com/video/newt-gingrich-chattanooga-stump-speech-11028766.html?cat=9

March 4, 2012 at 11:18 p.m.
Cojee said...

I am not a FemiNazi. I am not even a feminist. But I agree with my grandmother, who would've been 110 yrs old this year. She said, "I LOVE MEN. It's JERKS I can't stand." Limbaugh is a first-class, AAA, blue-ribbon jerk whose remarks would have been unthinkably indecent 50 years ago. SHAME, SHAME, SHAME! And if you let him go uncensured, YOU are equally guilty. Conditions such as ovarian cysts and dysmenorrhea are not immoral, nor are they our fault. You men dishonor the very women who bore and nursed you!

March 4, 2012 at 11:31 p.m.
Cojee said...

I have feared women and LOVED MEN for all of my 66 years. TO YOU JERKS: You complain when our ovarian cysts are too painful for sex. You complain about our PMS. You complain about our menstrual cramps... and that "Romper Room" is closed one week of every four. You never want to take "no" for an answer when we say you're not someone we want to have sex with. Your worst nightmare is when your girlfriend tells you she's pregnant, but you don't want to take half the responsibility and you howl if we choose abortion (which I have done twice and would do again without regret), while from the other side of your mouth you brag to the guys about your virility. Then when we finally (!!!!) come to the end of our "Curse," you complain about our hot flashes, night sweats, mood swings, and irregular periods. NOW you want to deny us the one thing that can alleviate ALL -- yes, ALL -- of these symptoms and can even reduce our periods to 4 times a year: contraceptives. Maybe the manufacturers should call them something else. Maybe we women should form something called The LLBB, "The Lysistrata/Lorena Bobbitt Brigade." LET'S BREED IT OUT! I refuse to have sex with any man who isn't nonviolent, sweet, compassionate, gentle, sympathetic, understanding, and supportive. I'm too old for it to matter in my reproduction, but I hope younger women will decide the same. However, there will always be rape by the aggressive, selfish ones, won't there? Here again, those contraceptives come in SO handy, and then all you have to worry about is STDs etc. -- easily cured in the USA with penicillin and/or lice-killer, and righteous anger.

March 4, 2012 at 11:32 p.m.
MTJohn said...

AndrewLohr said...90-95% of Americans fornicate, so fornication is normal?

...and Rush Limbaugh is the prophet for marital fidelity?????????

March 4, 2012 at 11:32 p.m.
mountainlaurel said...

AndrewLohr said: "Here's what I think Newt Gingrich should say for himself . . . contraceptives are not a main point."

But contraceptives are the main point, AndrewLohr. Who are you trying to kid?

Lots of Christians – including the Catholic Church - are opposed to the death penalty practice for religious reasons, but I’ve haven’t heard Newt Gingrich or any other lawmaker demand the death penalty practice be discontinued because a majority of Christian taxpayers are being forced to pay for something that goes against their religious beliefs.

Lots of Christians - including the Catholic Church - are opposed to unjust wars and/or pre-emptive wars for religious reasons, but I’ve haven’t heard Newt Gingrich or any other lawmaker demand these wars and/or pre-emptive wars be discontinued because a majority of Christians taxpayers are being forced to pay for something that goes against their religious beliefs.

March 4, 2012 at 11:48 p.m.
alprova said...

tu_quoque wrote: "I in no way denied the fact individual drugs can be used for several diseases and many diseases can be treated by several different drugs."

Go back and read what you copied and pasted. Not one of those medications listed was for the treatment of ovarian cysts. I see treatments for regulation of menstrual cycles, to help a woman ovulate, and to inhibit the growth of hair.

The only alternative to combination birth control pills to slow or stop ovarian cysts is one of a couple surgical procedures.

"If other pills would have served then the issue of her not getting the birth control was without merit and there was not an indication that she tried others and if they did not work."

For one good reason. The medications cited on that particular page are not for the treatment of ovarian cysts. They are treatments for other conditions. READ THE ARTICLE.

"I have to say this also sound like a lie as why would she use birth control pills if she was seeking to conceive."

OMG. Are you even a woman?

The cysts were preventing her from conceiving. Her doctor put her on the pills to reduce and ultimately eliminate the forming of the painful cysts. Once that had been accomplished over a period of nearly a year, she was taken off the pills. She conceived within a month. Her ovaries were removed following the birth of her child.

Believe what you wish. Your opinion is totally irrelevant.

"Even if she was delaying the conception the birth control pills would primarily be used for that purposed and not the cysts."

You truly don't have a clue, do you?

"When she chose to conceive she would have switched to a different drug so that would prove that the birth control pills were not her only option and denial of them would have not affected her treatment of the cysts."

I suppose that your research into the subject by viewing one web page filled with irrelevant medications used for other medical conditions and not ovarian cysts, now makes you an expert on the prescribed use of birth control pills.

Did you even read the content on that page you cited? READ IT.

"When exactly are you going to start not responding to my posts?"

When you stop posting nothing short of moronic replies to others.

Based on this latest response, I'm doubting very much now that you are a woman. I have no doubt that you want to be one. Your ignorance on this subject -- one that any educated woman should know at least something about, astounds me.

You can't even cite evidence that even begins to support your quickly researched position. Clearly, you didn't read what you posted.

Sooner or later, you'll get tired of being cyber-slapped around. I've got to hand it to you; You are nothing if not resilient in your ability to do the tango with waffles strapped to your feet.

March 5, 2012 at 12:33 a.m.
acerigger said...

Tu quoque (play /tuːˈkwoʊkwiː/),[1] (Latin for "you, too" or "you, also") or the appeal to hypocrisy, is a logical fallacy that attempts to discredit the opponent's position by asserting his failure to act consistently in accordance with that position; it attempts to show that a criticism or objection applies equally to the person making it. This dismisses someone's point of view based on criticism of the person's inconsistency, and not the position presented.[2] Thus, it is a form of the ad hominem argument.[3]wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

March 5, 2012 at 1:08 a.m.
alprova said...

tu_quoque wrote: "This debate is about the government requiring citizens or their organizations to spend their own money on something that is contrary to their religious beliefs."

That's fine and dandy so long as those with religious beliefs do not attempt to impose their beliefs on those who have differing beliefs.

The minute that those with certain religious beliefs go public, so to speak, their rights to impose their religious beliefs on the public that they employ or serve, go out the window.

Churches are and always have been exempt. When churches branch out and go into business, there is no exemption, nor should there be.

March 5, 2012 at 1:39 a.m.
ITguy said...

acerigger, so in other words tu_quoque means "I know you are, but what am I?"

March 5, 2012 at 6:26 a.m.
MTJohn said...

tu_quoque said...MountainBrush:As always you are completely baffled about the details of this debate and you are confusing apples with oranges.

Since you are the one who posted this, TQ, I suspect that MountainLaurel will understand that this comment, although intended otherwise, is a complement.

March 5, 2012 at 7:29 a.m.
alprova said...

Rush Limbaugh may well be responsible for a huge Republican loss come November.

When this controversy started over contraception, it was initiated as an attack on the President. An attempt by the Department of Health and Human Services to require employers, regardless of religious affiliation to furnish their employees with contraceptives as part of any offered benefit package, was met with resistance by the Catholic Church.

When the controversy escalated, the President weighed in with a counter offer to have insurance companies pay the tab. This seemed to pacify most of the groups that had objected earlier.

Rush Limbaugh's totally ignorant statements about Sandra Fluke's testimony went viral. This culture war that they started as an alleged afront by the President to religious freedom, took a detour down a dark road that the Republicans never wanted to travel. It has backfired on them, big time.

Rush Limbaugh has lost eight sponsors so far. Republicans are condemning the man right and left for his words and his lack of a true apology. He still thinks he was right.

Is this the beginning of the end of Rush Limbaugh? Probably not. But he will eventually regret the attack on Sandra Fluke for quite some time, that is if the man has a shred of conscience.

I'm not convinced that he does.

March 5, 2012 at 8:16 a.m.
MTJohn said...

alprova said...Is this the beginning of the end of Rush Limbaugh? Probably not. But he will eventually regret the attack on Sandra Fluke for quite some time, that is if the man has a shred of conscience.

I'm not convinced that he does.

I'm not convinced that Limbaugh has a conscience, either. I'm also not convinced that he actually believes half of his own bloviations. I am convinced that he has been smart enough to figure out how to leverage the corporate interests of Clear Channel against the deceptions that his audience wants to hear as "truth" for significant personal gain. I am also convinced that he does not care that achieving the interests of his employer will cause significant harm to most of his audience.

March 5, 2012 at 8:31 a.m.
ibshame said...

The REAL REASON FOR LIMBAUGH'S APOLOGY:

Clear Channel is responsible for broadcasting Rush Limbaugh's show across the nation. Clear Channel is partly owned by Bain Capital. Bain Capital has been linked to Mitt Romney. The VERY LAST thing Mitt Romney needs on his plate right now is trying to comment on the use of the words "slut" and "prostitute" as descriptions of a young lady whose only "CRIME" was to testify before Congress. Romney stumbled over his stance on the Blunt Amendment changing it within an hour of his first comment when interviewed and it's no doubt he has already stumbled over the Limbaugh incident by saying "he would not have used those words." The question then becomes what words would he have used?

Romney can't afford anymore screw-ups when it comes to these kind of issues. He's already running behind President Obama in a head to head match-up and he was supposedly the one candidate the Repubs were banking on to beat President Obama. It's doubtful he will beat President Obama but Romney definitely can't afford the kind of trouble Rush Limbaugh has brought and laid at his feet.

So what does Romney do? He uses the substantial influence he still has with Bain Capital for Bain to put the pressure on Clear Channel. Either get that blowhard Limbaugh to issue an apology or he's off the air. They can say he issued it because of the advertisers pulling out to save face but the REAL reason is because the connection between Bain Capital and Mitt Romney is still very clear in people's minds and it's just a matter of time before the connection is made to Clear Channel and then to Limbaugh. The VERY LAST THING Mitt Romney needs right now is trying to justify a vile comment like the one Limbaugh has made.

As for Limbaugh this may be the beginning of the end for him. Maybe all that Oxycontin he's taken over the years has clouded his brain but he's on the short road to nowhere. Maybe he can take his millions and buy his own communications network and then he can continue as Beck has done to spew his lies and nonsense to his faithful followers.

March 5, 2012 at 8:38 a.m.
chet123 said...

HA HA HA HA....JUST CALL ME THE PROPHET!!!.....I HAVE ALWAYS SAID RUSH LIMBAUGH WAS "HEAD" OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY....ITS SO FUNNY WASHING THE REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN ALONG WITH FOX NEWS DEFEND RUSH LIMBAUGH HA HA HA...SO FUNNY

REPUBLICAN MEN ARE COWARDS AND WOMEN ARE AUNTIE TOMS(THEY BENIFITED FROM LIBERALISM) ....THEY ARE BUTT KISSERS FOR THE RICH AND GREEDY ....I HATE TO SAY IT BUT I MUST..."I TOLD YOU SO"!!!!! HA HA HA HA HA

March 5, 2012 at 8:43 a.m.
mountainlaurel said...

Tu_quo_que said: “As always you are completely baffled about the details of this debate and you are confusing apples with oranges. This debate is about the government requiring citizens or their organizations to spend their own money on something that is contrary to their religious beliefs.”

So tell us, Wisest of the Wise Oompa Loompas, where does the money the U.S. government spends on all of these other activities that are contrary to a taxpayer’s religious beliefs come from if it doesn’t come from the wallets of the taxpayers?

Also, what did Ms. Fluck mean when she told Congress: “We expected that when 94% of students opposed the policy, the university would respect our choices regarding insurance students pay for completely unsubsidized by the university?”

March 5, 2012 at 9:13 a.m.
whatsnottaken said...

Real men don't listen to Limbaugh ... of Hannity ... or Madow ... or Schultz ... or Beck. Real men don't need talking heads to tell their heads how to talk. The weak minded need these blowhards to give them something to blog about. Thank God, Clay is there for the rest of us.

March 5, 2012 at 9:29 a.m.
mountainlaurel said...

Ibeshame said: “Romney stumbled over his stance on the Blunt Amendment changing it within an hour of his first comment . . .it's no doubt he has already stumbled over the Limbaugh incident by saying "he would not have used those words." The question then becomes what words would he have used?”

With Romoney, I’d say this depends upon which way the wind is blowing, Ibshame.

For example, when the Big Limbaugh Wind was blowing Romoney said: "I'll just say this, which is, it's not the language I would have used.”

BUT when the New Hampshire Debate Winds were blowing Romoney said: “I would totally and completely oppose any effort to ban contraception,” “Contraception: It’s working just fine, just leave it alone.”

March 5, 2012 at 10:02 a.m.
BigRidgePatriot said...

After the shameless parasites get their contraception paid for, what will they demand next? They are already getting enough support from the federal government to enjoy a standard of living that is higher than 1/2 the people on this planet.

They did not even know they were "entitled" to free birth control, until the demokrat leadership found another thing to give away in a time when there is no money to be giving anything away. Oooo! I can have free contraception? I LOVE Baraka Obama! He is my hero! I wonder what he will be giving me tomorrow!

Rumor has it that there is a crescent shaped tattoo strategically located just above Fluke’s naughty bits.

March 5, 2012 at 12:26 p.m.
MTJohn said...

BigRidgePatriot said...After the shameless parasites get their contraception paid for, what will they demand next?

BRP - the way we practice capitalism in this country, the shameless parasites are at the top of the food chain. And, what ever those parasites have demanded from you, you have already conceded. Did that also include your soul????

March 5, 2012 at 12:47 p.m.
ibshame said...

"BigRidgePatriot said... I LOVE Baraka Obama! He is my hero! I wonder what he will be giving me tomorrow!"

There are times when one has to consider whether or not it's even worth the trouble to try to explain some things or just let the diatribe continue because in the long run none of this is really about anything other than Repubs trying to make sure Barack Obama is a one-term President. And the only way to do that is to throw out everything that has happened in this country over the past 12 years and put the blame for all the negative on the shoulders of one man who was not even in office when the majority of the trouble started in this country. So far he's been blamed for the run-away debt, the loss of jobs, the failing housing market, the gasoline prices, the problems between Iran and Israel, the war in Afghanistan, the problems in Iraq and the list goes on and on. The really funny thing is that in all of the debates Repubs have held over the last few months not one mention has been made of the former Republican President,George W. Bush.

If Barack Obama is responsible for all the negative things that have happened to this country then where are all the GLOWING ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF GEORGE W. BUSH? When are the candidates who are running now going to start telling the American People about the great economy , the millions of jobs that were created under Bush, the glorius fact the man who was responsible for 9/11, Osama Bin Laden, was caught and killed, the Wall Street games where investors bundled bad mortgages to sell but then they betted against those mortgages and made billions while the housing market went bust, and last but certainly not least how the Banks' Greed made some banks "too big to fail" so Bush had to come up with a plan to bail them out.

Those were the glory days and what better way to return to those days than to put someone in the White House who will take the country back to those days?

March 5, 2012 at 1:08 p.m.
timbo said...

ibshame.... That was great advice. I really don't care how we get rid of this socialist, just so he is gone. I won't argue about Bush. He was awful and not conservative. The problem is that Obama is much worse. His "solutions" are doubling down on every dumb thing Bush did and then throwing in some dumb stuff of his own. Health care, deficit spending, stupid environmental hog wash.. etc.etc.. also make him worse.

Just the fact you pinkos that post on this site with your SOP answers right of the Democrat web site is enough to see that whatever you suggest to Republicans is bogus.

So keep talking about Bush and whining about how it isn't little Obama's fault and he just needs another 4 years to make sure we can never fix the problem.

By the way, Limbaugh should of told them all to go to hell. If this student didn't want to be criticized she should have stayed out of the spotlight. The Democrats used her. It was her own fault. No one deserves free birth control. Either you pay for it or keep your panties on. Why do I have to pay for your bad judgement?

I know, free viagra for all men. How do you feel about paying for that?

March 5, 2012 at 1:20 p.m.
mountainlaurel said...

Whatsnottaken said: "Real men don't listen to Limbaugh . . . Real men don't need talking heads to tell their heads how to talk. The weak minded need these blowhards to give them something to blog about."

But Republicans have worshipped Lord Limbaugh since ancient media times, WNT. Weak-minded presidential candidates like Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich are terrified of what would occur if they spoke up and said that Lord Limbaugh is a false idol. Only Paul The Brave has shown the courage to tell it like it is about the Republican Idol of Lies and Media Trash.

March 5, 2012 at 1:53 p.m.
fairmon said...

Lock the door and flush both Limbaugh and Fluke away. Limbaugh is a fat egotistical loud mouth ass that is interested only in ratings.

Q:Has anyone checked on the actual cost of the daily pill.

It appears both exaggerated when making their comments.

Did she mean $300 per year or $3,000 over three years. I would pay for her daily pill for pregnancy prevention myself to keep from spawning another like her. I wonder why the infamous friend didn't accompany her.

Again it would be a good move to have a separate government welfare program that made any and all pregnancy prevention available and easily accessible. This should include sterilization for males or females. It would be the only welfare program that actually had a positive return on investment unless there were too many pay off jobs for unnecessary government administrative positions.

March 5, 2012 at 2:41 p.m.
jjmez said...

@mountainlaurel said.. “What should be astounding, but isn’t, is how many of the people discussing this affair have accepted Limbaugh’s false premise that Sandra Fluke brought up the subject of sex, and therefore can’t complain if her sexuality became the matter of coarse jest. She didn’t; old Limp-d--k did. But the sort of people who plan to vote for Mitt Romney this fall are so immune to reality that they’re happy to join in Limbaugh’s projection


Yeah, both Limpbaugh and Breitbart know how to play to the ignorant side of their followers. They're diehard followers still believe the lies Breitbart told about Ms. Sherrod, although the lie Breitbart used about the farmer wwas debunked by the farmer's wife when she came and spoke in defense of Ms. Sherrod. To this day there are still followers of Breitbart who continue to regurgitate and run with the originally lies Breitbart spread about Ms. Sherrod.

March 5, 2012 at 2:52 p.m.
fairmon said...

Limbaugh is just mad because even with his money he can't score with a woman. Men should support providing birth control if in fact, as some claim, it makes women more promiscous or vulnerable to seduction. Heck it may even allow some to be more aggressive and over come their suppressed desires. Confirming a woman practices good preganancy prevention and an exam confirming no disease, let's make that free also, takes a lot of cause for concern off of a man. Give her a morning after pill, show her your health card and find a place. Doesn't get much better than that.

March 5, 2012 at 2:55 p.m.
ibshame said...

"timbo said...

By the way, Limbaugh should of told them all to go to hell. If this student didn't want to be criticized she should have stayed out of the spotlight. The Democrats used her. It was her own fault. No one deserves free birth control. Either you pay for it or keep your panties on. Why do I have to pay for your bad judgement?

I know, free viagra for all men. How do you feel about paying for that?"

Say a man goes to a doctor with a problem brought on by taking viagra and now the purpose he took the pill for is over and done with but he's still in a "ready state" and has been for the past 12 hrs. So,the doctor recommends some medical procedure because not to do anything at all could cause some real physical harm. Nine out of 10 times this man's insurance company is going to pick up part of the tab because it is a medical necessity for him to have the surgery.

Suppose his employer says the only reason he wants the surgery is so he can continue to have sex and they see that as morally offensive because in their opinion he's too old to be having sex for procreation but rather simply for pleasure. Is it fair for this person to be denied a medical procedure that could help cure his problem because someone thinks he shouldn't be having sex, or he wouldn't have this problem if he had not been trying to have sex at his age?

Birth control pills are used not only for the purpose of contraception, but they are used for a variety of medical treatments that have nothing to do with the person as you say "keeping their panties on." Sandra Fluke was trying to explain this to those who would listen. It had nothing to do with how much sex she was having or her roommate or any other woman entitled to effective medical treatments.

March 5, 2012 at 3:29 p.m.
potcat said...

If he is still in the "ready state", he needs to call..Debbie, Suzie, Mary and Rosie and pay some money to get that bad boy down, it would be cheaper than an operation.

March 5, 2012 at 3:44 p.m.
mountainlaurel said...

Harp3339 said: "Men should support providing birth control if in fact, as some claim, it makes women more promiscous or vulnerable to seduction. Heck it may even allow some to be more aggressive and over come their suppressed desires."

I believe you’re getting a little carried way here, Harp3339. Why can’t you just be straightforward for once and admit that all of this political contraceptive hoopla being promoted by these crazed Republican politicians is totally irresponsible? Does the U.S. really want to encourage employers to ban contraceptives and promote the only form of birth control that is sanctioned by the Catholic Church - the rhythm method?

Week 1: Safe for a few days

Week 2: Risky. Could lead to big trouble.

Week 3: Keep your fingers crossed and pray.

Week 4: Time to wait and see . . . and pray again.

March 5, 2012 at 4:46 p.m.
sangaree said...

Update on temper-tantrum-impotent-LIMPbrought.

He's now claiming those darn liberals made him do it!! LOL

No kidding/aol:

@"I descended to [the left's] level when I used those two words to describe Sandra Fluke," Limbaugh said. "I've always tried to maintain a very high degree of integrity and independence on this program."

Pssst! When has Limpbought ever shown any degree of "integrity" and "independence?" For years his show has been filled with hate and more hate. This recent hate just brought it all to a head, and hopefully a crashing hault once and for all.

March 5, 2012 at 4:53 p.m.
mountainlaurel said...

Sangaree said: "He's now claiming those darn liberals made him do it!! LOL."

As they say, another lie and another round for the devil. Personally, I think Limbaugh needs an exorcist. He just can't seem to help himself. You would think the Republicans would feel a little pity for Rush and would get one of those bishops to get rid those demons of the lie.

March 5, 2012 at 5:36 p.m.
BigRidgePatriot said...

MTJohn said... "way we practice capitalism in this country, the shameless parasites are at the top of the food chain"

So, since there are some problems with ineffective regulation of banking and big business, the answer is to create a "demokrat utopia" where everything is guaranteed to everyone?

Humm...

How about dealing effectively with the bad actors in the banking sector and big business instead of using that as a weak excuse to plunder taxpayers.

March 5, 2012 at 6 p.m.
News_Junkie said...

The headline from this news story is self-explanatory: Rush vs. Sandra Fluke: The fight Obama wants

http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/03/rush-vs-sandra-fluke-the-fight-obama-wants-116455.html

March 5, 2012 at 6:11 p.m.
MTJohn said...

BigRidgePatriot said...So, since there are some problems with ineffective regulation of banking and big business, the answer is to create a "demokrat utopia" where everything is guaranteed to everyone?

No, but I'm really not surprised that, like Rush Limbaugh, you would intentionally misrepresent what I said and then respond to your own fabrication.

The simple answer is to 1) prosecute the perps and 2) stop electing politicians who are bought and paid for by the parasites at the top of the food chain, e.g Bain Capital, Thomas H. Lee Partners, Rupert Murdoch, etc. etc.

March 5, 2012 at 6:23 p.m.
potcat said...

Rush Is A Big Fat Liar, by Al Franken, i read it lying on the beach in Gulf Shore Ala. next to the Republican in the family years ago. I read all the lies Al refuted that big fat boy had declared for years, aloud. Al did the Same with o'reilly.

I rode down to the beach with B in-law, but not back, hehe..

March 5, 2012 at 6:45 p.m.
MTJohn said...

It may be satire, but Andrew Borowitz got another one right.

http://www.borowitzreport.com/

March 5, 2012 at 7:23 p.m.
dude_abides said...

timbo... I would pay for your Viagra if it were of the auto-eroticism variety, and you took up yoga. Then you could go Kama Sutra yourself silly.

March 5, 2012 at 7:53 p.m.
John_Proctor said...

MTJohn @7:23.

Borowitz absolutely nailed it! Thanks for passing it along.

Maybe Limpballs has finally reached his tipping point. His latest cluster coitus has reminded me of an incident from the 1950's, the era that a lot of our Prozac-needy posters here want to return to; the time when black people knew their place and so did women. If you know about or remember the Army-McCarthy Hearings of 1954, then you can recall Joseph Welch's calling out McCarthy about his lies and deceit.

"You have done enough. Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?"

Maybe, just maybe, this is Limpball's McCarthy Moment. Maybe now others will see him for the playground bully that he is. I doubt it but one can always hope.

March 5, 2012 at 8:56 p.m.
328Kwebsite said...

Backing Fluke all the way.

March 5, 2012 at 9:08 p.m.
mountainlaurel said...

MtJohn

Thanks for the info. I guess my telephone call to the exorcist hotline wasn’t really needed.

March 5, 2012 at 9:33 p.m.
Oz said...

Bill Maher has called women every name in the book and I don't remember one cartoon from Clay or apology from Maher.

Every person on this board has said something they wish they could take back. Rush apologized. What else can he do? We have all thought about poorly chosen words for days, weeks, months, etc. and recanted.

March 5, 2012 at 9:37 p.m.
shifarobe said...

Check out mrctv.org and you'll see that fluke is a plant and a liberal activist, and she might be a slut too.

March 5, 2012 at 9:44 p.m.
MTJohn said...
March 5, 2012 at 9:51 p.m.
Oz said...

Birth control is $9 a month at Target, 3 miles from Georgetown. Georgetown needs a class on competitive shopping. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/9-price-months-supply-birth-control-pills-target-3-miles-georgetown-law

March 5, 2012 at 9:56 p.m.
shifarobe said...

Just another phony issue or phony crisis made up to distract from Obuttface's agenda and crappy job. For some who doesn't matter anymore you lefties sure have your undies in a bunch over him. Where was the outcry when Bill Maher talked about raping some conservative women? By the way, Clear Channel radio stands by Rush. Get over it crybabies. Harp you're an idiot. You may know a lot about economics, and you may be right about all that, but you don't know anything about Limbaugh except what you get third and fourth hand. Limbaugh plays y'all and the media like a violin. By the way, Limbaugh gives away more money and raises more money for charities than you can ever imagine.

March 5, 2012 at 10:19 p.m.
alprova said...

shifarobe wrote: "Just another phony issue or phony crisis made up to distract from Obuttface's agenda and crappy job."

Let us not forget that it was the Republican/Conservatives who brought this issue to a head as a means to attack Obama on the issue of religious freedom. It has backfired miserably on them. Rush Limbaugh's attack on Sandra Fluke was the icing on the cake.

"For some who doesn't matter anymore you lefties sure have your undies in a bunch over him."

Apparently, no less than eight of Rush Limbaugh's sponsors have found disagreement with his comments too.

"Where was the outcry when Bill Maher talked about raping some conservative women?"

Bill Maher does not claim to represent Democrats.

"By the way, Clear Channel radio stands by Rush. Get over it crybabies."

Who cares?

"Limbaugh plays y'all and the media like a violin."

That's pretty much why his audience share is sinking. He's lost 5 million people over the last decade.

"By the way, Limbaugh gives away more money and raises more money for charities than you can ever imagine."

Again, who cares? His good deeds and all the money in the world that he spreads around will not buy him a place in Heaven. He, like yourself, will have to answer to God for his words.

Good luck!!

March 5, 2012 at 11:02 p.m.
chet123 said...

HA HA HA THESE RIGHT-WINGS NUTS ARE CRAWLING FROM UNDER THE ROCKS TO DEFEND THEIR "GOD"..RUSH LIMBAUGH.....WHAT A SHAME....WHAT A SHAME!!!YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED AGAIN....JUST A BUNCH OF COWARDS!!!!

GLAD I'M A DEMOCRAT.....YOU CAN SEE THESE FOOLS FOR WHAT THEY REALLY ARE...IDOLATERS.....THE REPUBLICAN RIGHT-WING BUNCH ARE SO INSECURE THAT THEY NEED A "DADDY" HA HA HA HA.....REPUBLICAN RIGHT WINGS ARE REALLY,REALLY,REALLY WEAK....THEY CANT STAND ON THEIR OWN...THIS IS SO FUNNY.....THEY TALK ABOUT GOD BUT THEIR ACTIONS ARE THOSE OF A PAGANIST OR HEATHENS.....SOMEBODY TELL THESE FOOLS WHO BLINDLY FOLLOW RUSH LIMBAUGH(INCLUDING POLITICIANS)THIS MAN IS NOT GOD ...HIS NAME IS NOT IN THE BIBLE,,,,,,

HOW CAN A WHOLE PARTY BE SO MIX-UP..Hmmmm...HOW CAN THEY MANAGE FORIEGN POLICIES...WHEN THEY CAN RELATE TO THEIR OWN FOLLOW AMERICANS......SHAME SHAME SHAME ON THE REPUBLICAN BUTT KISSERS

March 7, 2012 at 8:36 a.m.
chet123 said...

SHIFTAROBE....YOU SEEN TO BE OBSESSED ABOUT "SEX".....WHATS YOUR PROBLEM....CANT PERFORM AT HOME..HA HA HA.....

THIS IS ANOTHER THING ABOUT REPUBLICANS....WHY ARE THEY SO STUCK ON THE WORD "SEX"...HA HA HA HA...THESE ARE THE SAME PEOPLE WHO WATCH FOX TV EVERYDAY....BY THE WAY....FOX KEEP A SUPPLY OF SLUTTY WOMEN TO ARCHOR THE NEWS EXPOSING THEMSELVES WITH SHORT DRESSES.. HA HA HA HA.....YOU SAY ONE THING BUT DO ANOTHER.....WHATS YOUR PROBLEMS....HA HA HA....YOU ARE TOTALLLY PERVERTED

WE ALL KNOW ABOUT BILL O'RELLY.HA HA HA...MASTUBATION CHARGES THE YOUNG GIRL FILE AGAINST HIM.....AND RUSH LIMBAUGH SNEAKING VIAGRA CROSS THE BORDER WHEN HE VISIT THE WEST INDIES.HE PERFER BLACK WOMEN HA HA.HA HA HA HA.....WHAT WRONG REPUBLICAN MEN???NO CONFIDENT SO YOU LATCH OUT AT PEOPLE WHO CAN PERFORM..HA HA HA....LADIES THESE ARE NOT REAL MEN!!!!!! THIS IS WHY THEY HAVE SO MUCH HATE!!THEY HAVE A LOT OF BACK-UP HA HA!!THEY DONT HAVE NORMAL SEX LIFE HA HA HA!....THAT WILL MAKE YOU MADDDDD HA HA HA

March 7, 2012 at 8:54 a.m.
chet123 said...

SHIFTAROBE....IS AN EXAMPLE OF A WEAK MAN THAT NEED A PUPPETMASTER LIKE RUSH LIMBAUGH TO PULL HIS STRINGS....THIS MAN CANT THINK OR REASON ON HIS OWN....SO HE DEPEND ON PEOPLE LIKE RUSH LIMBAUGH TO GIVE HIM MARCHING ORDERS....THIS IS YOUR TYPICAL RIGHT-WING REPUBLICAN....90% OF THEM THINK LIKE THIS.....

SADLY THIS THINKING HAVE ENTER THE EVANGALICAL CHURCH....AND THEY HAVE LOST THEIR INFLUENCE AND SAVING POWER....WHAT A SHAME!

March 7, 2012 at 9:14 a.m.
mymy said...

Obomites are to our country like Termites are to your home!

Who is really backing Sandra Fluke?

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1496559347001

March 9, 2012 at 5:09 p.m.
stanleyyelnats said...

Republicans should really consider the source of their information.

Rupert Murdoc. Credible source? You do know who rupert is don't you?

March 10, 2012 at 12:38 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.