published Friday, November 9th, 2012

Flawed Publix project passes

The North Shore debate over whether to finally approve an ill-fitting, big-box Publix grocery store on North Market Street, one that faces inwards toward the middle of a parking lot the size of two football fields, ended Wednesday night in favor of the store and the mayor's office. The latter, regrettably, greased the skids months ago for approval of a design that arrogantly, needlessly, violates the core C-7 building standards that other developers in the North Shore have willingly followed.

The flawed approval process raises questions: Why did approval go down this way, when the debate was not about acceptance of a Publix grocery per se, but rather about the character and property tax value of a design that fits the North Shore zoning plan? How can city planners improve their regrettable record on urban projects which demand more appropriate designs before they are prematurely green-lighted? Shouldn't the city establish an urban design and architectural/preservation office to assure that development proposals in the urban core meet key standards before they go for approval by appointed citizen boards, like the North Shore C-7 Design Committee.

Publix has amply demonstrated in other cities that it can meet higher urban standards. (Google the company's West Palm Beach and Tampa stores). It clearly could have delivered a higher-value store here: Up to eight-times higher in property tax return for the city's investment in urban renaissance and infrastructure, according to a new review of the Publix design approved Wednesday. And higher in value with regard to appropriate mixed-use enterprises that provide improved public and pedestrian use of urban space and quality of life.

The North Shore C-7 Design Committee's conversation about these values relative to the suburban-style proposal Publix presented for North Market Street was derailed from the start by Mayor Ron Littlefield. Publix apparently presented his office a prototype big box proposal that fit its convenient suburban pattern, and that wrongly channeled 18-wheeler tractor-trailers through the heart of the Frazier Avenue pedestrian district and adjoining residential streets. And Littlefield and his public works office rammed it through the C-7 design committee before the design and its truck-traffic pathway could be properly vetted.

Unfortunately, the store's design violates the values and strict legal requirements the C-7 guidelines were drawn to protect. But traveling on the design committee's premature conditional approval -- a vote made under Littlefield's persuasion -- every modification since then as been on cosmetic details and a partial facade of small retail stalls along a fraction of the site's North Market Street boundary. No multi-story/multi-use building for the store or for structured parking was seriously considered; neither was the requirement for sidewalk-oriented retail commerce along the full length of the North Market Street site north of Manning Street, which now will become just a big parking lot.

Weary advocates of a design that inched closer to the C-7 guidelines sought Wednesday at least to reserve a strip of land along the North Market frontage north of Manning Street for future retail store space. Using a study developed by Joseph Minicozzi to assess local property tax values here for various levels of development, they also showed the total annual city property tax return for the current Publix proposal was just $44,827 --an eighth of the value for a store built to accommodate surrounding mixed-use commercial and dense residential development.

Alas, their arguments were lost to a board that prematurely painted itself into the corner of conditional approval for small changes, and to a crowd ginned up to support the current proposal on the fear of losing a North Shore Publix option altogether. There's a good lesson to be learned here. A responsible business wouldn't want to build by downtown if wasn't considered a profitable site. And the city shouldn't rush to give away, on the cheap, a site made far more valuable by immense public investment in the city's rejuvenation of downtown and the riverfront.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
daytonsdarwin said...

Might want to check Littlefield and Friend's pockets for dead presidents. They have a record of pay-to-play on land and development deals.

November 9, 2012 at 4:35 a.m.
librul said...

Yeah, we're all waiting with baited breath for plans to emerge for a giant ferris wheel.

November 9, 2012 at 7:43 a.m.

On the balance, I'm happy with Publix moving into the area, I have some friends there who would benefit from it.

That said, I understand the concerns here, but I'm just not sure that the whole of North Chattanooga isn't something of a problem.

That said, they could go even further and do this:,-71.209055&spn=0.001618,0.002559&t=k,-119.815124&spn=0.001688,0.002559&t=k

November 9, 2012 at 9:25 a.m.
nucanuck said...

As one who devoted much of the focus my adult life to rebuilding downtown Chattanooga, I can only be disappointed that a much needed asset is being implemented in a way that is not neighborhood friendly in a tight urban setting. With a few changes, Publix could be a real contributor to the positive developments within their new neighborhood. As it now stands, the neighborhood will have to find ways to tolerate the problems that Publix brings with their suburban strategy forced into an urban setting.

Publix looks like a company without sensitivity for the communities where they do business.

Were I still living in downtown Chattanooga, I would not shop with a company that refused reasonable accommodation to the people surrounding their new store.

November 10, 2012 at 12:31 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.