published Tuesday, October 23rd, 2012

Return Richard Floyd to Nashville

The voters of the 27th Tennessee State House District face a thorny dilemma. The district, which encompasses roughly the western third of Hamilton County, will either be represented by the big government Republican incumbent or his outlandishly liberal Democratic challenger.  

The incumbent, Richard Floyd, is understandably beloved by many in the district for his church and community service endeavors. Still, many of the voters who elected him to three terms in the state House would be surprised at some of his illogical actions as a state lawmaker.

For example, before the recession, when the state government ran a surplus, Floyd was an advocate of increasing state spending. The result was a larger budget to fund when times got tight and less rainy day money saved to help cover state expenses when revenues fell.

Last legislative session, Floyd introduced a nonsensical set of rules, regulations, educational requirements and fees on locksmiths. Floyd also worked to empower cities with new authority to fine and harass people for minor property code violations.

Rather than employing state government as a tool to empower churches and community organizations to address issues of morality, Floyd apparently wants to use state government to beat people over the head with his values. For example, in a recent editorial board meeting with the Times Free Press and his opponent, Floyd admitted that he would like to ban alcohol and tobacco. While professing a commitment to empowering local governments, Floyd decried legislation that would allow the Hamilton County Commission to decide whether liquor could be produced in the county.

Instead of worrying about issues like improving Tennessee’s business climate or addressing flaws in the state’s educational system, Floyd is commonly at the forefront of controversial legislation that limits the rights of gay Tennesseans.

Still, Floyd’s numerous inconsistencies and imperfections are easily overlooked when compared with the positions of his opponent, Frank Eaton.

Eaton’s support of more taxes, more spending, more regulations, more subsidies for green energy and a living wage sound like talking points taken straight out of a union handbook for candidates.

Faced with a choice between two flawed candidates, Floyd clearly has more silver lining to his gray clouds. Floyd has a track record of working to reduce regulations on small businesses (except, apparently, locksmiths), he has pledged to work with other lawmakers to exempt Tennessee from as many oppressive Obamacare mandates as possible, he consistently votes to empower parents with the right to decide how best to educate their children, and he understands that Tennessee has weathered the economic downturn better than most states as a result of low taxes and right-to-work policies.

As a result, the Free Press endorses re-electing Richard Floyd to the Tennessee General Assembly.

We can only hope that Floyd one day realizes that it’s not state government’s role to be the moral authority for its residents. 

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
timbo said...

"We can only hope that Floyd one day realizes that it’s not state government’s role to be the moral authority for its residents."

There is about as much chance of that as Barack Obama embracing the Flat Tax.

Although you properly chronicled some of his crazy ideas, I don't think you captured his true nature. He is an old f_ _t. The guy is nuts.

Not only that, his jokes suck.

Although I don't know Frank Eaton, I don't see how he could be more ridiculous than Floyd. I guess being a democrat makes him worse but he would have to be a really bad democrat.

Basically, you say he is the better of two evils. All I would say is, who is more evil, Frankenstein or the Wolf man? Stalin or Hitler? I just couldn't make the distinction that you made.

Floyd gives conservatives a bad name. I would write in Forrest Gump. He was a lot smarter.

October 23, 2012 at 1:53 p.m.
tipper said...

I second that, timbo.

October 23, 2012 at 5:14 p.m.
ldurham said...

Love these in-depth editorials. Eric Stewart sucks, but vote for him anyway. Richard Floyd is awful, but we support him anyway. Stay classy, snark boy.

October 23, 2012 at 10:27 p.m.
PokRiehl said...

Wow! This can be one particular of the most beneficial blogs We have ever arrive across on this subject. Basically Wonderful. I am also an expert in this topic therefore I can understand your effort.

November 27, 2013 at 3:04 a.m.
LaurynGraf said...

i have been attempting to Acquire entry to this web site for a while. I used to be exploiting internet explorer then while i tried Firefox, it labored simply advantageous? Just needed to convey this to your attention. That is really good blog. I have a bunch myself. I really admire your design. I do know this is off subject however,did you make this design your self buy from somewhere?

December 19, 2013 at 4:06 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.