Gang, it's been an excellent week that has been filled with high-quality conversations. Take a bow.
And remember that Sunday is Father's Day, so get prepared.
From the "Talks too much" studios, you just got lesson No. 1 — don't think, it can only hurt the ball club.
From a slew of you (paraphrased)
What do you make the of Game 4, and which Heat should we expect in Game 5?
This is an excellent question and one that is nearly impossible to answer.
In Game 3, the Heatles looked worse than pedestrian. They looked downright Hawks-esque. They were disinterested and distracted. They were underprepared and overmatched. All of them, especially LeBron James.
In Game 4, they looked unbeatable and unstoppable. James was the lead dog and Dwyane Wade looked the part of the best second-banana since Tonto.
So what does this mean?
Well, let's start with what we know. We know that when they play well, the Heat are the best team in basketball by leaps and bounds. We know that a focused and intense and in tune LeBron is top shelf. We know that Wade looked five years younger Thursday night. We know that the swing in performance from Game 3 to Game 4 was so dramatic and so dichotic that it becomes somewhat clear that the issues with the Heat are created internally.
As for what we don't know, well, that list is long and distinguished. But let's start here. We don't know which Heat team will show up Sunday night. We don't know if anyone does know that — LeBron and Erik (Estrada) Spoelstra included. We don't know how a team can go from looking lost to looking supreme in 48 hours against the same competition.
We said the Heat in six before the series. We still believe in the Heat in six. But not unlike Schultz from Hogan's Heroes, we know nothing.
From TNBuck (and a few others — and again paraphrased a touch)
Dude, get off your can and post the US Open entries. Thanks.
Here you go (and if you don't see your name, let us know — that doesn't mean you can change your pick, it just means if we left someone out, please speak up):
HardCopy — Round 1 - Oosthuizen Round 4 - McDowell
Todd962 — Tiger, Tiger
BiSpy4 — Colsaerts/Donald
TNBuck — Schwartzel, Dustin Johnson
5-at-10 — Philly Mick, Dustin Johnson
Stuck — Stallings, Kuchar
McPell — Choi/Snedeker
Dawg747 — Dustin Johnson/Kuchar
Mr. Spud — Kuchar/Kuchar
Sportsfan — Snedeker/Stricker
Mrs. 5-at-10 — Mickelson/Mickelson
TFP golf writer David Uchiyama — Laird/Dufner
ThatIDoKnow — Adam Scott/Scott
OTWatcher — Ernie Els/Kuchar
Fred — Rory/Jason Day
Tiger — D. Johnson/Tiger
WarEagle — Scott/Kuchar
scole023 — Scott/Westwood
Jefe — Mickelson/Scott
I know where you went to college, but I want to see if you'll answer this question right or not: Who is the best coach in sports right now?
You know the answer, but will you admit it?
Nick Saban is far and away the best coach in sports. Better than Bellichick. Better than Poppovich. Better than every one else and it's not that close, really.
He's the best because he's always prepared and works tirelessly to get better and stay at the top. He is relentless, and every other program in college football wishes he was coaching their team.
That said, why do Alabama fans need the affirmation of the rest of us? You are rolling at levels that are historic in the modern era, and if Alabama wins it this year, it's the greatest dynasty in modern sports, and likely the greatest college dynasty this side of the UCLA hoops run.
OK, here you go smacktalk, Saban is the best ever. EVER. In fact, if Vince Lombardi was still alive, he would have a Saban poster in the East corner of his office and worship at it five times a day. Saban is the coaching Dalai Lama — long the Lama, big hitter.
You have made mention this spring about LeBron vs. MJ. I think MJ is way better, but that's beside the point.
My question is if you could go back through sports and get player X from his day against player Y of his day, who you got?
Thanks for the 5at10, it's a regular stop in my morning, and let us know when you & Paschall get back on the radio.
Thanks for the kind words and for the great question. And we think MJ has the better resume than LeBron and MJ is arguably the greatest competitor in the history of sports, but we think James would dominate him in one-on-one (not that means anything in the grand scheme of things, but there you go).
OK, here's our Marty McFly Time Machine Rushmore of the best all-time confrontations through the years:
1) At his peak Muhammad Ali vs. pre-Douglas Mike Tyson
2) 1972 Jack Nicklaus vs. 2001 Tiger Woods
3) 1921 Babe Ruth vs. 1973 Nolan Ryan
I have heard you love the draft. Can you confirm this rumor?
If that's the case, then why so little about the NBA draft? That's the best draft of them all.
Enjoy the 5-at-10.
We've been blessed with a plate full of stuff considering it's June. We'll get to the NBA draft next week and beyond, and yes, we can confirm that we are quite fond of the draft.
In fact, the NBA draft was the first one that we developed an affinity for, but it has since been passed by the NFL draft. (Not surprisingly, we grew up a huge hoops fan and football has moved to the No. 1 spot in our sports priorities overall. So it goes.)
In fact, in our early days of draft analysis, we nailed the future prospects of MJ and of Chuck Barkley. We can't remember liking a Hawks pick which makes sense since the Hawks don't like the Hawks' picks. (And no they did not draft Dominique, they traded John Drew and their first round pick to Utah for Wilkins back in the day.)
And our biggest draft miss was during the the 1980s NBA draft. Yep, after watching the highlights that made him look like a church-league all-star, we thought John Stockton was the worst first-round pick ever. Nailed that one, huh?
As for this draft, we'd likely take Nerlens Noel No. 1. That would be the third UK player taken No. 1 overall since 2010 (John Wall and Anthony Davis). It also would tie Duke at 3 with the most No. 1 overall picks in NBA history.
It's been a rough stretch and I have high hopes for the Butch Davis era.
But my question is not about that. My question is about ole orange pants. With the news that the Vols have the worst APR among SEC football programs, can we have a discussion about whether Derek Dooley the worst coach in SEC history?
Thanks, and why do you love Alabama so much (kidding).
Wow, the more we thought about your question, the more merit it gets. We think there is a reverse Rushmore of guys in the mix. Guys that include Ray Goff and Doug Barfield and John L. Smith and our front-runner Curley Hallman.
But the numbers that Dooley posted deserve consideration.
He was 1-14 in SEC games in his final two years. At Tennessee. Read that again.
Granted, any time there is coaching turnover, the APR is going to struggle because of players leaving or getting processed. It happens. But still, this is a low point for a very proud program that really has slid behind Vandy in the SEC East.
We'll give Dooley a pass over a couple of those above names in that dude did inherit a monster of a mess after the one-year Kiff-tastraphe.
And whether you think Dooley was the worst or just bad or if you're like OG and loathe the Big Orange and think Dooley did the Lord's work, this conversation leads us to another: Was Mike Hamilton the worst hiring AD in the history of sports?
That said, UTFan, we too have high hopes for Butch Jones. But we do not have expectations for these Vols. There's a ton of foundation work to be done, and the brick-by-brick slogan is as apropos as it is catchy.
Gang, whatcha think?
Jay was named the Sports Editor of the Times Free Press in 2003 and started with the newspaper in May 2002 as the Deputy Sports Editor. He was born and raised in Smyrna, Ga., and graduated from Auburn University before starting his newspaper career in 1997 with the Newnan (Ga.) Times Herald. Stops in Clayton and Henry counties in Georgia and two years as the Sports Editor of the Marietta (Ga.) Daily Journal preceded Jay’s ...
related articles »
Toto's "Africa" and Europe's "The Final Countdown" fall into the "weird, yet cool" category for me. However, if played too ...
We have a soft spot for a slew sports-related things.
Too much to get to today to waste time with small talk and introductions.