published Friday, March 29th, 2013

Schools' condition traces to lax funding: Hamilton County Commission to blame

Chattanooga State Community College instructor Chris Willis, left, works on a media production editing assignment with students.
Chattanooga State Community College instructor Chris Willis, left, works on a media production editing assignment with students.
Photo by Staff File Photo.

Hamilton County's economic development goals and our community's progress have always been linked directly to the quality of our public education system, both in academic achievement and in the adequacy of our facilities. Yet as achievement levels and expectations have increased in recent years, funding for construction of new schools and maintenance of existing buildings continues to lag. The blame is due mainly to years of inadequate school funding from the County Commission.

As this newspaper's Kevin Hardy reported Wednesday, the result now can be seen in a number of woefully overcrowded schools, some with a wait list, and some which are crumbling, moldy and drafty from neglected maintenance, leaky roofs and loose windows. Hardy's report noted that there are 17 schools on the school board's phase one, two and three lists for replacement, renovations or additions.

Ganns Middle Valley and the magnet Chattanooga School for the Liberal Arts, grandfather-age schools with large student bodies and a wide following, have been continually dropped off the top priority lists for more than decade while newer suburban schools were built.

Parents of students and other patrons at the listed schools understandably are discouraged and angry over the lack of progress toward new schools. That's prompted some to band together and lobby school officials at meetings for their specific needs.

The school board clearly has a lot of say about the schedule and construction of new or replaced schools, but school board members rarely make those decisions alone. They are always subject to the inappropriate meddling of the County Commission, whose nine members typically use their funding authority as a club to force their political will on school construction issues -- never mind that school board members are elected independently from the same districts as commissioners.

Ironically, it is the County Commission that bears the bulk of the blame for the under-funding of school construction and maintenance that so disturbs school patrons. Were the parochial, penny-pinching County Commission members appropriately responsive to the school system's needs, its facilities and maintenance would be much improved.

Hamilton County's school system hasn't been adequately funded for at least two decades. Though the problem has worsened since the merger of the former city and county school systems 16 years ago, county funding for schools was already on the slide before that.

Twenty years ago, in 1993, the county property tax rate, from which the schools' share of funding comes, was $2.8132. Today, after two decades of inflation, that rate is $2.7652 per $100 of assessed valuation. If adjusted for inflation, the $2.8132 rate would have been $4.53 last year.

The school system, to be sure, doesn't get all of the county's property tax revenue. Its share of the current rate is $1.3726. County government, however, uses some of the $1.3816 general fund share to service the bonds that typically fund school construction.

The state's share of funding for county school systems has also declined on an inflation-adjusted basis. And Gov. Haslam has failed to adopt the state funding formula for schools that former Gov. Phil Bredesen partly instituted. Under that formula, Hamilton County schools have received an additional $12 million in state funding every year since 2008.

Regardless, the County Commission has basically turned its back on increased school funding to keep up with inflation. Since 1999, it has only implemented two 26-cent tax increases -- in 2005 and 2007. As a result, funding for county government and schools has declined sharply on an inflation-adjusted basis, even as construction costs have gone up at a faster rate.

State-mandated property reappraisals on four-year cycles blur the county tax picture to consumers whose homes appreciate between appraisals, but countywide reappraisal values as a whole are required to be revenue neutral in the tax rate.

County officials should be willing to raise property taxes more often for the school system. They should engage in land-use planning outside the county's municipalities, and they should consider impact fees for schools and services on development outside municipal boundaries. That would guide, and slow, the demand for new suburban schools. It would also be much fairer for students stuck in moldy, overcrowded schools. But voters here would have to raise their voices to see that done.

2
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
inquiringmind said...

It would be nice to dig into the relative costs of maintaining school buildings and operating costs across the county. For example, why are some schools 3x more costly to operate than others? Why do we use costly temporary trailers for classrooms rather than design in space for expansion later when needed? Why do teachers not turn off the lights when they leave the classroom rather than let the lights run all night? Why do they open the windows to cool things down letting the heat run rather than adjust the thermostat? What happened to common sense?

I think the lack of foresight and planning in the initial stages of drawing up a plan and contract for a new school creates a long-lasting higher cost to the entire school system that far exceeds the costs to build it the right way the first time.

Why do we end up with contracts released for school construction without state of the art HVAC systems and see elected officials (Cotton and Love) go to jail for kickbacks, etc that cost the county dearly for decades but not pursue financial penalties from them?

We can rightfully point to a short fall in tax revenue/funding relative to inflation but the problem goes far deeper that resistance to raising taxes. It goes down to a lack of public concern for excellence in education and as search for simple answers like "raise taxes but don't think."

March 29, 2013 at 1:21 p.m.
AndrewLohr said...

Try spending-cut scholarships. If it costs $10,000/yr/student, pay students in the system $5000/yr to leave and use home, private, other public, college, or even time out instead.

Every student who leaves leaves 5000 students in the system with another dollar each (if the laws are written that way), and with fewer students the system will be less crowded. Just pay students to leave, just as GM offers early retirement only to its own employees who leave, not to Ford's.

Instead of setting up a bureaucracy to oversee those who leave, require those who leave to get four Tennessee taxpayers (age 18+) to sign off that they approve whatever the leaver is doing, and require leavers to take a standardized test of their choice that's taken by at least 10,000 other students. The election commission could probably verify signatures, for a small fee; they're used to verifying signatures.

Pay for "time out" means the $5000 to leave would go into a scholarship fund until the leaver is ready to use it, or retires.

March 30, 2013 at 2:38 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.