published Tuesday, July 1st, 2014

Hobby Lobby

about Clay Bennett...

The son of a career army officer, Bennett led a nomadic life, attending ten different schools before graduating in 1980 from the University of North Alabama with degrees in Art and History. After brief stints as a staff artist at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Fayetteville (NC) Times, he went on to serve as the editorial cartoonist for the St. Petersburg Times (1981-1994) and The Christian Science Monitor (1997-2007), before joining the staff of the ...

284
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
librul said...

Burn 'em. Burn 'em all.

July 1, 2014 at 12:04 a.m.

Bitter, Clay? LOL

Very wise ruling by the court. Of course anytime you libs are denied an opportunity to force someone to do something it just eats away at you. It seems to be one bitch slap after another or BO, the narcissist in Chief.

Let freedom ring!

July 1, 2014 at 12:04 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

It's the abortifacients Hobby Lobby rejected. Good for them.

July 1, 2014 at 12:05 a.m.

Yeah, librul, you don't get your way so you want to burn everything.

July 1, 2014 at 12:05 a.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++WE PREACH JESUS CHRIST CRUCIFIED+++

Clay Bennett has hit another home run with this one!

Malleus Deum

July 1, 2014 at 12:13 a.m.
gypsylady said...

I think everyone can start practicing saying, "Madam President." Good job five guys.

July 1, 2014 at 12:13 a.m.
Easy123 said...

Birth control does not cause abortion, Simple Jack.

That's the problem with folks like you and the folks at Hobby Lobby. You're ignorant. Birth control makes fertilization more difficult and keeps the egg from attaching to the uterine wall. That isn't abortion.

Plan B does the same thing as birth control and you can buy it over the counter, but it's an emergency contraceptive that shouldn't be used regularly. Thus, it's not covered on any insurance policy.

Morons.

July 1, 2014 at 12:14 a.m.
AndrewLohr said...

You really think the fornication hobby will suffer from this decision? Even for those poor people who get $14/hour at Hobby Lobby (the company's minimum wage) and find the insurance the company buys only pays for 16 kinds of contraceptives rather than 20?

And bureaucrats who tell Hobby Lobby what to do practice equality how? Bureaucracy is inequality; liberty IS equality. Jesus is libertarian; repent, liberals; fear Him who can devastate both soul and body in Hell.

July 1, 2014 at 12:17 a.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++WE PREACH JESUS CHRIST CRUCIFIED+++

It seems the human condition has changed little, if any at all.

Malleus Deum

July 1, 2014 at 12:27 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

The Green family has no moral objection to the use of 16 of 20 preventive contraceptives required in the mandate, and Hobby Lobby will continue its longstanding practice of covering these preventive contraceptives for its employees. However, the Green family cannot provide or pay for four potentially life-threatening drugs and devices. These drugs include Plan B and Ella, the so-called morning-after pill and the week-after pill. Covering these drugs and devices would violate their deeply held religious belief that life begins at the moment of conception, when an egg is fertilized.

July 1, 2014 at 12:28 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

The phantom War on Women is in full attack mode. It's bogus, egregious, and total BS. This, and the Race Card is all the Dems have. You pitiful lefties are good at ginning up false narratives. You need 'em I guess.

July 1, 2014 at 12:32 a.m.
Easy123 said...

Simple Jack,

That doesn't mean anything. A precedent has been set where any contraception can be opposed under the current ruling. These drugs ARE NOT abortion causing agents regardless of religious belief.

The War on Women is very real. It's very easily observed to any objective person. The fact that you and your ilk are willfully blind to this fact is typical. I wouldn't expect anything less from a geriatric, Republican male. You do the same thing with racism. Apparently, absolutely nothing is racist to you and your ilk. When, in reality, the hatred you hold for the President and liberals is steeped in racism and xenophobia. Deny it all you want, but it's the truth and you know it. That's why you make such an effort to disparage the "Race Card".

Call it a false narrative. Call it whatever you want. It doesn't make any of it less real or true. "Dems" have a lot more than you can handle. They have history, science, logic, and facts on their side. Those are things folks like yourself tend to have a strong aversion to. The truth always seems to have a liberal bias.

July 1, 2014 at 12:48 a.m.
scott6069 said...

Call it a "private business's right to choose". Or " Private Business Health".

July 1, 2014 at 6:35 a.m.
LibDem said...

I have a deeply held religious belief that Hobby Lobby is owned by Satanists.

July 1, 2014 at 6:52 a.m.
conservative said...

Inequality must be the new Liberal word for greedy.

Liberals love bigger government.

They always want more programs and more checks and more benefits that are paid for by someone else.

Before Obamination care they paid for many elective drugs and procedures themselves.

They are greedy.

July 1, 2014 at 7:05 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

There is nothing wise about a decision that acknowledges corporations have human rights. There is nothing wise about a decision that says the owners of a corporation have a right to trump the law and public policy. The decision itself is figuratively an abortion of the Constitution, how telling.

One justice on the Supreme Court in particular is allowing his religious beliefs to dictate constitutional law for all. Justice Scalia is a devotee, if not ideological Catholic and in every case he supports Catholic dogma over US Law. It is interesting that male Justices Thomas, Alito, Roberts and Kennedy also claim that religious denomination, one whose bishops threaten barring participation by elected officials in Communion with the Lord based on how they vote on laws.

Quite a sad state of affairs, John Calvin is rolling in his grave... so to speak. Shades of the Reformation!

But this too will pass after the decision is used for exclusionary purposes. So much for the rights of the human employees. Wags will say the employees can chose to work elsewhere, until all the companies dry up.

ACA is the law of the land. Hobby Lobby does not need to offer insurance if it offends the owners, let their employees fend for themselves. That is a perfectly nice way to split the baby.

July 1, 2014 at 7:38 a.m.
conservative said...

Inquiringmind

You can run from me but you can't hide from me.

Do you consider the practice of Homosexuality/sodomy to be sin?

July 1, 2014 at 7:49 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

Prov. 16:23 The mind of the wise makes their speech judicious, and adds persuasiveness to their lips.

July 1, 2014 at 8:02 a.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++We Preach Christ Jesus Crucified+++

This is truly a sensitive issue requiring open discussion.

Malleus Deum

July 1, 2014 at 8:02 a.m.
conservative said...

Inquiringmind

You can run from me but you can't hide from me.

Do you consider the practice of Homosexuality/sodomy to be sin?

July 1, 2014 at 8:06 a.m.
alprova said...

Connie wrote: "Do you consider the practice of Homosexuality/sodomy to be sin?"

Why don't you quote the words FROM GOD or his Son, contained in the Bible, which tell everyone that either one of them considers homosexuality a sin.

You cannot quote either one of them condemning homosexuality.

All you can quote are words written by mortal men, who had an opinion that it was.

God cannot be quoted and neither can Jesus Christ be quoted saying one word against homosexuality.

NOT ONE WORD!!!

Why cyber chase people in this forum when YOU cannot cough up the minimum proof needed to prove it to be a sin applicable to gentiles of today's world?

Moron.

July 1, 2014 at 8:22 a.m.

Yeah, gypsylady, that's what this country needs a woman president elected just because she's a woman. Other than that, she's just BO in a pantsuit. She's as big a fraud as BO. Her lame attempt to convince everyone that she and bill were nearly poor was pathetic.

She's a corporate whore and an elitist just like BO. She's has nothing to offer. The whole Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton is nauseating. We can do a lot better than that. BO is an utter disaster.

The ruling by the court, the third against BO in the last few days, will only embolden BO to go even more rogue. It's not going to help Hildabeast in the least.

They mythical "war on women" is a joke. Hildabeast looking the other way while bubba got his rocks off, so she could gain from it down the road, is a bad example for women. It was a bad example for her daughter.

She may not even run, then what will you Dems do? Her health is an issue.

You libs go haywire over a Christian owned private company that wants to run it the way they see fit. Why don't you take your crusade around the world and fight for women in places where they're really abused.

Whether it's male contraception, or female, no corporation/business should be forced to provide it.

You libs love to force, force, force. Obamacare is a big, massive intrusion into our private lives.

July 1, 2014 at 8:23 a.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, alprova wrote:

Connie wrote: "Do you consider the practice of Homosexuality/sodomy to be sin?"

Why don't you quote the words FROM GOD or his Son, contained in the Bible, which tell everyone that either one of them considers homosexuality a sin.

You cannot quote either one of them condemning homosexuality.

All you can quote are words written by mortal men, who had an opinion that it was.

God cannot be quoted and neither can Jesus Christ be quoted saying one word against homosexuality.

NOT ONE WORD!!!

Why cyber chase people in this forum when YOU cannot cough up the minimum proof needed to prove it to be a sin applicable to gentiles of today's world?

Moron.

July 1, 2014 at 8:30 a.m.
conservative said...

Inquiringmind

You can run from me but you can't hide from me.

Do you consider the practice of Homosexuality/sodomy to be sin

July 1, 2014 at 8:30 a.m.

Chic fil A, and now Hobby Lobby. What do you libs want? You want Christian owned companies to renounce their faith? You want them to do exactly what you say?

July 1, 2014 at 8:31 a.m.
Astropig said...

"I think everyone can start practicing saying, "Madam President."

Sign around the neck of a disgusting hobo out at the exit ramp:

Homeless, hungry Husband was 42nd president Please help. God Bless

July 1, 2014 at 8:48 a.m.
conservative said...

A fact that Liberals don't understand:

The more insurance covers, the more insurance costs!

July 1, 2014 at 9:02 a.m.
lkeithlu said...

So why cover Viagra, con? HL does.

July 1, 2014 at 9:05 a.m.
lkeithlu said...

Should a man get a permission note from his wife?

July 1, 2014 at 9:05 a.m.
conservative said...

Their argument seems to be against abortion not procreation.

I want to chose my coverage based on my needs.

I don't want a policy that covers sex change, mental counseling, birth control, Viagra etc.

Why is that so difficult to understand?

July 1, 2014 at 9:17 a.m.
lkeithlu said...

So you buy your coverage based on this? I hope your family never needs psychiatric care. It's pretty expensive. And I assume you plan on kids every year, right? And should your wife need treatment that is also a form of birth control (yes, these drugs are used to treat conditions such as ovarian cysts) she will just have to suck it up.

July 1, 2014 at 9:30 a.m.
Fryyo said...

All this posting, literally no one understands the Constitution or the real reasons or meanings of this ruling. Frankly, I have no political leanings one way or the other, but this is a good ruling. It is good because it restores balance between the belief systems. It reaffirms our values as a society that is based on balanced views and beliefs.

It makes no significant impact to a woman's rights, it only reaffirms that the owners of a CLOSELY HELD COMPANY (important to understand what that is) do have some protection of their belief system.

It is MINDLESS to use the word "corporation" in this ruling like it means all companies. It is equally MINDLESS to think that this is in anyway a support for religious doctrine. It is only about balancing two differing belief systems. When there are only a few owners, their personal beliefs matter. That is very different than when a million people own a company (publicly traded stock).

I find the ruling encouraging because it is consistent with our Constitution, the balance of rights in our society, and reaffirms that the Supreme Court continues to be that balancing force to the whims of political idealism on BOTH SIDES of debates.

We, as Americans, need to remember the old saying, "I may not agree with what you say, but I would die for your right to say it". If you meet people that cannot tolerate a differing opinion, suggest violence for those that they disagree with, then you are meeting the people that do not respect or support what this country is. There is nothing scarier to me than both the extreme left and extreme right of this country. Other than the basis of an idea - they act the same. No tolerance for other opinions, suggest violence, believe their belief system is the only belief system. Look up the word "Fascist", it is a word we applied to the Nazi's in World War 2. Millions have died so that we could have differing view points and differing opinions. I fear we are losing the RESPECT for differing opinions that our country is based on...

It is the 4th of July, I challenge you have a respectful dialog with someone that has a differing opinion in an exchange of ideas. That would be a GREAT AMERICAN thing to do.

July 1, 2014 at 9:37 a.m.
conservative said...

My family doesn't need psychiatric care.

My family is a Christian family.

We trust in God and his word not a heathen who is spiritually dead and does not have the answers of life.

Why can't you people understand this?

July 1, 2014 at 9:37 a.m.
tifosi said...

conservative is a liar and hypocrite. The epitome of what Jesus would not like or approve of.

July 1, 2014 at 9:39 a.m.
conservative said...

I am sure you are right about psychiatric care being expensive.

So then a policy that covers psychiatric care is going to cost more than a policy that doesn't.

My family doesn't need psychiatric care. We want the cheaper policy.

Why can't you people understand this?

July 1, 2014 at 9:44 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

So Tiffy, you want to retract that TP/Taliban ditty?

July 1, 2014 at 9:51 a.m.
moon4kat said...

There are a lot of mentally deranged people who are absolutely convinced they don't need psychological counseling or other psychiatric intervention . . . but, so often their actions prove otherwise.

July 1, 2014 at 9:52 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

I guess there will be a wave of pregnancies at Hobby Lobby now.

July 1, 2014 at 9:53 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

mooncat says "There are a lot of mentally deranged people who are absolutely convinced they don't need psychological counseling or other psychiatric intervention . . . but, so often their actions prove otherwise." True, Moon, and 2-3 of them are on this forum.

July 1, 2014 at 9:55 a.m.
tifosi said...

Great to see the person elected by the majority of Americans that got up off their dead-asses and voted, is going to stand up to the Teabaggers (the American Taliban).

July 1, 2014 at 10:18 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

See Religious Freedom Restoration Act...passed in 1993... introduced by Chuck Schumer and signed into law by Teflon Willie....oh yeah, vote in Senate was 97-3

July 1, 2014 at 10:19 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Tiffy, you should apologize for that.

July 1, 2014 at 10:20 a.m.
tifosi said...

No difference between the Teabaggers and the Taliban. Just another version of Sharia law.

July 1, 2014 at 10:23 a.m.
lkeithlu said...

I know arrogant people like con who were later 'blessed' with a psychiatric condition that required hospitalization and expensive lifelong treatment. Karma's a bitch.

July 1, 2014 at 10:36 a.m.
timbo said...

This has nothing to do with religion. It has to do with the government staying out of the decisions of a private business.

How is it "equal" when I have to pay for someone else's sex habits. These kinds of birth controls are for women only. Why do they deserve SPECIAL TREATMENT. If they don't want to get pregnant, they can cross their legs. A condom is less than .$25 cents. I think that most people can afford that without me paying for it. Oops, unless you are Sandra Fluck and want to screw 30 times a month. What a great example for our daughters.

This is not my responsibility. If the government thinks it is that important, they can pay for it themselves. Hobby Lobby pays the insurance and they say what they will cover and will not cover. That is why Obamacare is a socialist flop. Hobby Lobby is a responsible company that pays more than the standard rate and provides insurance to their employees when they don't have to do it. They have the right to dictate what happens at a business they payed for.

I own a small corporation. I invested my money, I sacrificed my time, etc. The government has no right to interfere with my business. Employees have no right to tell me what to do with my business. If they want say, they can help me with the next payroll.

I don't exist to serve the government. IT EXISTS TO SERVE ME. If some women are this stupid, emotional and easy to manipulate, it plays into the stereotype that they are unprepared for leadership positions. Conservative women dispel this stereotype but liberal women reinforce it.

We have to defeat these crazies before they totally ruin the country.

July 1, 2014 at 10:37 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Tiffy, sorry to see you've taken on the persona of some of the kookier posters here.

July 1, 2014 at 10:39 a.m.
tifosi said...

Tea Party doesn't like sex offenders. Who did you violate? You destroyed another human being. You took their innocence and scarred them for life.

July 1, 2014 at 10:43 a.m.
tifosi said...

Pretty much says it like it is.

http://youtu.be/_Pzqq9sxKkY

July 1, 2014 at 10:43 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Yeah, you're right Tiffy. I'll start turning to Hollywood for guidance.

July 1, 2014 at 10:55 a.m.
conservative said...

lkeithlu said...

I know arrogant people like con who were later 'blessed' with a psychiatric condition that required hospitalization and expensive lifelong treatment. Karma's a bitch.

=========================

Yes, you know/knew arrogant people, like the arrogant people who you deem Christians, who were/are not, just like arrogant Hitler who you also deemed a Christian.

I marvel at your lack of discernment and understanding.

Mental hospitals and psychiatrists offices are full of people who are trying to deal with the quilt of their sins.

The only one who can take away their/your quilt and give them/you peace is Jesus Christ through the forgiveness He freely offers.

Salvation is a gift offered to all.

Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden , and I will give you rest . Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light. Matthew 11:28-30

July 1, 2014 at 11:51 a.m.
timbo said...

tifosi....That was the dumbest thing I have ever heard. "No difference between the Teabaggers and the Taliban. Just another version of Sharia law."

You are obviously the type of liberal woman I described in my post. To compare someone who is willing to provide 16 forms of birth control for free, eliminating 4, to people that they provide employment to the Taliban is immature and idiotic. The Taliban would cut a woman's head off for just possessing any kind of birth control.

If you don't want to get pregnant, use a $.25 cent condom or cross you legs. Employers shouldn't be required to pay for your sex life or your bad judgment.

Comments like your cheapen any real argument. Grow up..

July 1, 2014 at 12:01 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Exactly, Tim.

Here’s a radical idea: If Washington wants to make birth control free, let Washington pay for it.

Here’s another radical idea: To paraphrase the U.S. Constitution, let Washington pass no regulations prohibiting the free exercise of religion. -EWTN

July 1, 2014 at 12:06 p.m.
lkeithlu said...

I don't quilt, but I'd like to learn.

Seriously, in what century do you live? Mental illness caused by sin?

July 1, 2014 at 12:17 p.m.
conservative said...

You admitted to having a conscience.

Why can't you see the connection to quilt?

You didn't get your conscience from a monkey any more than you did your DNA.

July 1, 2014 at 12:21 p.m.
alprova said...

Imagine that...

An admitted three time sex offender of children giving out advice on keeping one's legs crossed to avoid sex.

When he wants a little fun, it's perfectly okay for him to seek out a minor to play with.

Digusting, to say the least...

July 1, 2014 at 12:26 p.m.
lkeithlu said...

Again, it's guilt, not quilt.

Again, I ask you: do you think mental illness is caused by sin? Guilt? What is your evidence for this?

July 1, 2014 at 12:27 p.m.
lkeithlu said...

PS I did not get my DNA from a monkey. How silly is that? Where do you get such ideas?

July 1, 2014 at 12:28 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

An admitted three time sex offender of children giving out advice on keeping one's legs crossed to avoid sex.

When he wants a little fun, it's perfectly okay for him to seek out a minor to play with.

Digusting, to say the least...

Archived and noted, Alpy

July 1, 2014 at 12:44 p.m.

Hobby lobby won't provide an abortion pill, so you libs go bananas. What about all the other forms? Once again proving your obsession and slavish loyalty to abortion.

July 1, 2014 at 12:48 p.m.
conservative said...

It's not silly at all.

You didn't get your DNA or your conscience from a monkey and the guilt/quilt that comes when you violate it.

You got your conscience from God, not a monkey.

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident WITHIN them; for God made it evident to them. Romans 1:18-20

July 1, 2014 at 12:50 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

ALL POSTERS: Please note that alprova is again starting up the sex-offender ditty. Something very weird about an obsessional serial liar rehashing lies.

July 1, 2014 at 12:53 p.m.

Alprova, stop polluting this site with your baseless and defamatory comments. Your last post is absolutely foul.

July 1, 2014 at 12:56 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

Fryyoyo, it is farcical to cut the cloth so finely to say, "(no one) understands the Constitution or the real reasons or meanings of this ruling. ..It makes no significant impact to a woman's rights, it only reaffirms that the owners of a CLOSELY HELD COMPANY do have some protection of their belief system."

To parse corporation into those with "closely held" owners and those who have broad ownership is a little laughable. It means it is ok for a company run by a "small group" to discriminate on the basis of religious belief but not for a company with broad ownership. People like timbo forget that the government has a legitimate right to monitor and set standards for the bug spray he uses and flushes down the drain into the Tennessee River.

The decision is what is called "Pandora's Box." Scalia is just waiting for the next Catholic issue to come to the court.

The court could have made a conservative ruling that said Good "Christian" owners like timbo and hobby lobby do not offer health insurance if it violates their religious belief and their problem is solved, of course they may have some difficulty recruiting good cashiers and stock boys and girls.

Do not ignore the fact that religious fanatics are behind all this, seeking not to preserve their own end, but trying to force others into actions they believe will save others. They seem to forget who holds the cards. Their brazen nature will be what reverses this decision.

July 1, 2014 at 1:18 p.m.
alprova said...

The admitted Sex offender wrote: "ALL POSTERS: Please note that alprova is again starting up the sex-offender ditty. Something very weird about an obsessional serial liar rehashing lies."

His boyfriend wrote: "Alprova, stop polluting this site with your baseless and defamatory comments. Your last post is absolutely foul."

Jack Dana Dennis...you confessed on this very site that you were the man in question. It is categorically impossible for me to be able to lie about that which you confessed to being, and have refused to retract since.

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270586 http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270592 http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270593 http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270595

Z-man, you're in the same boat as well. Baseless? Bull crap. Jack Dana Dennis confessed to being a three time convicted online child enticer for sexual purposes.

You cannot call ME a liar, when the man himself has admitted to the crime and refuses to retract his confession.

He stands guilty and will forever remain so.

Your association with the man leaves you tarnished for life as well.

You're both equally disgusting, without any moral reputation, and pieces of crap.

You accuse me of lying, which anyone can see is a false charge, yet neither one of you can explain the archived confession that stands to this very day.

July 1, 2014 at 1:18 p.m.
conservative said...

Inquiringmind

You can run from me but you can't hide from me.

Do you consider the practice of Homosexuality/sodomy to be sin?

July 1, 2014 at 1:24 p.m.
alprova said...

Hey Connie...

Do YOU consider homosexuality to be a sin?

When are you going to confess your sin to God?

July 1, 2014 at 1:27 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo, it is absolutely astounding how evil you are. No one believes your fairy tale. Not even you. Why do you do it? Is it because I've outed your many lies?

July 1, 2014 at 1:28 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

z-fister is running scared again and his name calling is rising falling). Here is a selction of his mature comments (he is giving con-man a run for his money). Z-fister sez,

"what this country needs a woman president elected just because she's a woman. She's as big a fraud as BO. She's a corporate whore and an elitist The whole Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton is nauseating. BO is an utter disaster. It's not going to help Hildabeast in the least.

They mythical "war on women" is a joke. Hildabeast looking the other way while bubba got his rocks off, so she could gain from it down the road, is a bad example for women. It was a bad example for her daughter. Her health is an issue. You libs love to force, force, force.

Z, of course FDR's, JFK's, DDE's, LBJ's health was never a problem. Often as seen in sports, people with a health issue excel because it drives them to higher accomplishments. The only people being forced are the employees who now are forced not only to pay for their insurance but also for their own medical treatments the owners don't like.

July 1, 2014 at 1:29 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "Alpo, it is absolutely astounding how evil you are. No one believes your fairy tale. Not even you. Why do you do it? Is it because I've outed your many lies?"

Quite frankly, it's not MY fairy tale.

If it's anyone's fairy tale, it is yours. You typed your confession. If it was incorrect, then you lied your ass off, for whatever stupid reason you had for confessing to such a crime.

You can't call me a liar for attesting to that which you typed with your own fingers.

You STILL refuse to retract that confession, which makes it stand until the end of time.

You are a three time convicted sex offender, BY YOUR OWN WORDS YOU POSTED IN THIS FORUM!!!

There is no way you can walk away from that, no matter how many times you attempt to do so.

The day you "out" me for so much as one lie, is the day I go away forever.

You're a legend in your own mind, and that holds true for just about everything you type in this forum.

You are a delusional sex offender who is proud of his crimes.

July 1, 2014 at 1:34 p.m.
conservative said...

Inquiringmind

You can run from me but you cannot hide from me.

Do you consider the practice of Homosexuality/sodomy to be sin?

July 1, 2014 at 1:35 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, a.k.a. alprova wrote:

"The idea that we are to accept a mass-murderer as an object of worship doesn't reflect well upon Christians at all. If he murdered nearly every human on the planet, God is far more heinous than Hitler. Yet Christians are to willfully worship him without question. Why?"

July 1, 2014 at 1:38 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie's too chicken to respond to me, for he knows he is trapped and exposed for the idiot he is every single time I post in his direction.

God nor his Son condemn homosexuality and I will forever challenge you to prove otherwise, as it may be found in the Bible.

God nor his Son will ever be quoted saying one word against homosexuality.

NOT ONE WORD!!

July 1, 2014 at 1:39 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, a.k.a. alprova wrote the following:

"I'm a Christian, and always will be" and "I am a practicing Christian"

"Get something through your thick head. I have NEVER blasphemed God."

"Jesus cannot be God"

"Jesus sinned"

July 1, 2014 at 1:44 p.m.
conservative said...

Inquirinmind

Do you agree with Mr. Anthony Provancher?

"God nor his Son condemn homosexuality and I will forever challenge you to prove otherwise, as it may be found in the Bible."

"God nor his Son will ever be quoted saying one word against homosexuality."

"NOT ONE WORD!!"

July 1, 2014 at 1:51 p.m.

inq, am i supposed to react to your post? All of what I said is pretty accurate.

yeah, Hildabeast will excel like a great athlete. Sure, that's what she'll do. She's nothing but a pantsuit.

Why the hell would she excel in the White House when she's never accomplished a damn thing before? She's just granted the title of smartest woman in the world, and the press follows up on it. Just like Bo. Oh, he's the smartest man to ever occupy the WH, said some presidential historian who believed the hype. Actually BO is nothing more than a narcissist and a dictator. He can't stand our Constitution because it prevents him from doing whatever he wants to us. "a charter of negative liberties" he said. What a jackass.

She's a terrible example for women. She allowed her husband to continue his horrible behavior in exchange for his future help. How's her behavior a good example to her daughter? She should've booted his ass out of her life. Why should a woman accept that kind of behavior in a marriage, or a man.

inq, think, you libs are so devoted to abortion that you can't stand that a Christian run company will not accept supporting abortion. You won't rest until they're forced to support it. What about all the other contraceptives they support? That's not good enough is it?

You libs bitch about Hobby Lobby but you're silent when it comes to Kermitt Gosnell, that butcher abortion "provider".

This ruling has nothing to do with women losing anything.

July 1, 2014 at 2:09 p.m.
timbo said...

Why don't you guys lay off JackDennis on the sex offender deal. This is looking like a coordinated character assassination. I think Alprova, Easy, and Tifosi are in cahoots.

What does any of this have to do with an opinion on this page?

July 1, 2014 at 2:10 p.m.

Exactly, timbo.

July 1, 2014 at 2:15 p.m.
timbo said...

zable...typical Saul Alinskey tactics....these people are evil.

July 1, 2014 at 2:19 p.m.

what boat is that, alprova??

July 1, 2014 at 2:21 p.m.

timbo, exactly. smear, toss out crap like a bunch of apes and see where it sticks. It's not the truth that matters, it's the seriousness of the charge.

July 1, 2014 at 2:28 p.m.
timbo said...

zable...they are so predictable. Not an original thought in the bunch.

July 1, 2014 at 2:34 p.m.

yep.

July 1, 2014 at 2:35 p.m.
timbo said...

We will barbeque Obama today at 4 pm on 1240 Am

July 1, 2014 at 2:35 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

timbo, will try to stream

July 1, 2014 at 2:37 p.m.
timbo said...

That is Hotnewstalkradio.com I forgot the s.

July 1, 2014 at 2:47 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Tim says, "Why don't you guys lay off JackDennis on the sex offender deal." Tim, it just shows the character (lack) of those 2 guys. They know it. Alps is pissed because he knows I have his number. The man would rather lie than tell the truth. Very disturbed.

July 1, 2014 at 2:48 p.m.
timbo said...

TheJackDennis...That is the problem by not using names behind these nutty comments. I have used my name many times. When there is a name with a comment, people are much more polite.

These people are cowards....

July 1, 2014 at 2:50 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

True Tim, but the downside of allowing your name is what they've done to me. If your name is even remotely common, they will search nationwide for some poor sod with a record....and ascribe it to you. knowing it's not you. Low down as it gets. But hopefully, most on here know these 2 guys are liars.

July 1, 2014 at 2:57 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Great news! Huh, Rengary-glenross?

July 1, 2014 at 3:10 p.m.
timbo said...

conservative...I am glad that you are who you are but forcing it on liberals doesn't help us making a logical argument.

I think there is something in Matthew 6:6, "But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly."

You aren't praying but your lack of respect for them is causing them to disrespect every conservative in return.

Could I ask you to tone it down a bit?

July 1, 2014 at 3:13 p.m.
timbo said...

rengerry...so what? They will all go down eventually. The problem is, if gays would call what they do something else...a union, contract, etc. it wouldn't rankle the traditionalists so much. Why do you want to flaunt it in the face of people who it makes uncomfortable.

The definition of "marriage" is "the formal union of a man and a woman, typically recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife." Whatever gay people do is not marriage. If they want a "union" call it something else. Be original...call it a coupling..whatever.

I might save some heartache for both sides.

July 1, 2014 at 3:18 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Tim rightly says "The problem is, if gays would call what they do something else...a union, contract, etc. it wouldn't rankle the traditionalists so much. Why do you want to flaunt it in the face of people who it makes uncomfortable." The undeniable answer is that if there were no kerfuffle, they couldn't use it as a political hatchet. It's all about giving the left ammo. They don't give a sh!t about gay marriage, one way or the other. Their strategery is very transparent. But they know how to sell it.

July 1, 2014 at 3:27 p.m.
lkeithlu said...

If gays called it something else, it would not be treated as equal, with the same rights.

July 1, 2014 at 3:40 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Lu, are you being sarcastic or do you mean that?

July 1, 2014 at 3:43 p.m.
lkeithlu said...

I mean it. Since when do partners in civil unions had the federal recognition of spouses? That has been tried.

I know this is off topic, but I don't think denying equal treatment under law because someone else thinks it isn't "traditional" or finds what they imagine going on in private "icky" is either right or American.

July 1, 2014 at 3:52 p.m.
lkeithlu said...

My gay friends and relatives have the same rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that any American has; that people still resist this is unfathomable, given that it harms no one.

July 1, 2014 at 3:55 p.m.
lkeithlu said...

PS, this is long after your comment, but one of the items rejected by HL is the IUD, which prevents fertilization and does not cause abortion.

July 1, 2014 at 4:07 p.m.
alprova said...

Timbo wrote: "Why don't you guys lay off JackDennis on the sex offender deal. This is looking like a coordinated character assassination. I think Alprova, Easy, and Tifosi are in cahoots."

Really? Did you read the references to his confessions? Who do you believe forced him to confess to being Jack Dana Dennis? Who?

There was no one more shocked than myself when he confessed to being Jack Dana Dennis.

Defend him, if you must, but the man REFUSES to recant his confession to be Jack Dana Dennis, TO THIS VERY DAY!!

You're defending a man who has publicly admitted to enticing a child for sexual purposes, not once, not twice, but THREE Times!!!

He was convicted of that offense THREE times!!

I cannot assassinate his character any more than he has done all by himself, without any provocation whatsoever.

HE ADMITTED to being the man in question!!!

No one forced him to do that.

What does any of this have to do with an opinion on this page?

July 1, 2014 at 4:19 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "Alps is pissed because he knows I have his number. The man would rather lie than tell the truth."

You are the liar. Did you not admit to being Jack Dana Dennis in this forum on May 18, 2014? Did you not further admit to the crimes he was charged with in a subsequent post and as for people to pray for you?

Who is the ONLY person to have lied about your admitted crimes?

YOU.

"Very disturbed."

Indeed you are. Deeply disturbed.

July 1, 2014 at 4:23 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

You will pay the piper, pal. book it.

July 1, 2014 at 4:26 p.m.
alprova said...

Timbo wrote: "That is the problem by not using names behind these nutty comments. I have used my name many times. When there is a name with a comment, people are much more polite."

You're totally out of touch Timbo. My full name is on my profile page and it's been there for quite some time. I don't hide at all behind my computer.

Per the child molester, he started this war by posting personal information on myself, which caused me to deg into his background.

How stupid he was to give up his real name, knowing he was a convicted Felon.

"These people are cowards...."

You are quite ignorant to the history of events in this forum, with the exception of some very recent ones.

I suggerst you dig through the archives to learn the facts and the truth to the man you have fallen in love with and are defending so ignorantly.

HE CONFESSED TO BEING THE MAN IN QUESTION.

No one forced him or even outed him. He chose of his own free will to admit to being the man.

READ my links to his May the 18th posts.

He wrote 'em.

July 1, 2014 at 4:30 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "You will pay the piper, pal. book it."

You're the only person I have ever had the displeasure to meet, who truly believes I have anything to pay for your confessions.

Those belong to you and only you and you will be the only person paying any price for being the sex offender that you have admitted to being.

July 1, 2014 at 4:33 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo says "Per the child molester, he started this war by posting personal information on myself, which caused me to deg into his background." Lie #1. YOU FIRST started posting personal stuff on me utilizing my twitter acct. YOU FIRST posted my city of residence. YOU FIRST posted my home address. YOU FIRST posted medical info about me. YOU FIRST posted an incorrect pic of my house. YOU FIRST began to post over a hundred posts regarding a fictitious bankruptcy. (I think you later admitted it was the wrong guy...after the bell was rung.) YOU FIRST started posting accounts of child molestation alleged to have been committed by me. As bad as all that is, the worst part is you know it's not me...I fear that your declining health problem has affected your little brain. You should apologize.

July 1, 2014 at 4:43 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

2, maybe 3 people on this forum with serious psychological problems. It ain't funny. You, Alpo, need help.

July 1, 2014 at 4:48 p.m.
tipper said...

It's amazing how much every issue turns around and gets muddled up in one's religious beliefs. As a result, nothing gets solved because religion is open to everyone's interpretation. No right, no wrong;just endless stalemate. A true waste of time and breath. What it comes down to is whether we are a democracy or a theocracy. Add to that a hypocritical plutocracy that uses religious fervor to gain control of a country for its personal gain. Today, a lot of ridiculous decisions are being handed down by the Supreme Court that grant over-reaching powers to corporations. Coupled with a very broken Congress, individual rights and freedoms are being lost. Even so, the most vocal extremists out there as well as our elected and appointed national officials are extremely out of touch with most Americans and their values. In the long run when a threshold is crossed the pendulum will swing back.

July 1, 2014 at 4:56 p.m.
conservative said...

timbo said...

conservative...I am glad that you are who you are but forcing it on liberals doesn't help us making a logical argument.

I think there is something in Matthew 6:6, "But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly."

You aren't praying but your lack of respect for them is causing them to disrespect every conservative in return.

Could I ask you to tone it down a bit?

===============================

Forcing? Care to clarify? That is your opinion. Every point made by anyone on this site could be seen as forcing their opinion.

In Matthew 6:6 Jesus is addressing hypocritical praying, NOT sincere praying. The Jews prayed at set times and continually in public and so did Jesus. It boils down to motive.

“When you pray, you are not to be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and on the street corners so that they may be seen by men. Matthew 6:5

Lack of respect? Please explain that.

You evidently don't understand why I don't roll over for the Liberals here. I have no idea that I am going to change their minds.

My goal is to expose their Liberalism (thus their errors) in order that others who may not be fooled by them. Some have been deceived and thus have become deceivers. Others are just professional haters.

Mr. Anthony Provancher is by far the worst. He professes to be a Christian while spewing the most blasphemous and vile and vulgar and hate filled rants.

I don't bother with many of the other Atheist Liberals simply because they self destruct when they write and don't claim to be a Christian.

Quoting Mr. Anthony Provancher is sufficient to open the eyes of any sensible person.

I have found that quoting people is quite effective.

July 1, 2014 at 4:57 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Tipper says "What it comes down to is whether we are a democracy or a theocracy. Add to that a hypocritical plutocracy that uses religious fervor to gain control of a country for its personal gain." Tipper, are you seriously worried about our government becoming theocratic? Really? What personal gain has the plutocracy achieved via religious fervor?

July 1, 2014 at 5:03 p.m.
conservative said...

Timbo

Think about this, how many people would likely be swayed by these here who use so much profanity and call others obscene names?

How can you have a rational respectful discussion with such people who are obviously so disrespectful and full of hate?

You might pay closer attention to the disrespectful manner in which these address me, each and every one of them.

Even when I was a heathen I figured out that those who use profanity have a limited vocabulary and are filled with hate.

July 1, 2014 at 5:14 p.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++We Preach Christ Jesus Crucified+++

There are so many points of view. Some consider this a crown of humanity.

Malleus Deum

July 1, 2014 at 5:22 p.m.
lkeithlu said...

You, a heathen? No. I don't believe it.

July 1, 2014 at 5:33 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie...you STILL refuse to state that you are not Jack Dana Dennis.

You ARE JACK Dana Dennis, are you not?

Therefore, you are a convicted sex offending felon.

July 1, 2014 at 5:53 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

I don't dance to your fiddle, liar boy.

July 1, 2014 at 5:55 p.m.
alprova said...

I'm not about to converse with you, citing the personal information you posted in this forum about me, because you conveniently forget EVERYTHING you do to others.

I have no intention of debating with a sex offender and you Sir, are a convicted sex offender who preys on children.

You confessed to it, and you pretend you didn't.

You are a proven liar who pretends to project your sins on others.

Go to hell sex offending felon.

July 1, 2014 at 5:58 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "I don't dance to your fiddle, liar boy."

Only an idiot of the worst order would continue to hold onto an identity of a convicted sex offender, unless he was not the person in question.

You know you are Jack Dana Dennis and you know that your reputation is 100% fact. You are a convicted Child enticing chaser.

July 1, 2014 at 6 p.m.
alprova said...

Poor Connie. He can only quote my factual words, because he can never refute them at all.

It sure is fun to watch him make a complete fool of himself every time the subject of homosexuality comes up.

July 1, 2014 at 6:02 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, alprova, wrote all of the following:

"Get something through your thick head. I have NEVER blasphemed God."

"Jesus sinned"

"Get something through your thick head. I have NEVER blasphemed God."

"Jesus cannot be God"

"Get something through your thick head. I have NEVER blasphemed God."

"The Bible never has been the word of God and you will never make it so."

"Get something through your thick head. I have NEVER blasphemed God."

"I do not fear the Lord and nobody is ever going to convince me to fear God's "wrath."

"Get something through your thick head. I have NEVER blasphemed God."

"I do not and never will hold the belief that the Bible is the word of God. You will not shame me into such a belief, no matter how many times you try."

"Get something through your thick head. I have NEVER blasphemed God."

"And again, you fail to include the scripture I cited that proves that Jesus himself did not consider himself to be perfect and without sin."

July 1, 2014 at 6:24 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

You know, Alpy, with your history, I almost want to pull for Con-man.

July 1, 2014 at 6:31 p.m.
alprova said...

You know Jack Dana Dennis, with YOUR history, don't you believe that you have your hands full enough, trying to polish your turd of a reputation in this forum.

You confessed and you refuse to recant that confession, yet it is I who is accused of lying to everyone when I state categorically that you are an admitted sex offender of children.

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270586 http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270592 http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270593 http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270595

Why do you refuse to disavow your own words, if you are not the man in question?

Could it be because you ARE the man in question?

"Yep, that's me. Not a very good picture, though."

July 1, 2014 at 6:56 p.m.
alprova said...

Thank you Connie for posting your personal affirmations of all my truisms.

You'd think a man who claims to know God would have more to offer if there was any level of disagreement with my truisms.

Perhaps one day God will guide your fingers to write something.

July 1, 2014 at 6:59 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpy, I don't know of anyone on here believing you but your little flawed son.

July 1, 2014 at 7:07 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "Lie #1. YOU FIRST started posting personal stuff on me utilizing my twitter acct."

You previously posted information found on my Facebook page, remember?

"YOU FIRST posted my city of residence."

You posted my place of business, remember?

"YOU FIRST posted my home address."

That was public information that YOU provided through your Twitter account. Anyone could have found it, and still can.

"YOU FIRST posted medical info about me."

You posted it publicly on your Twitter page. It's fair game, considering all that you had posted about me that was not public information.

"YOU FIRST posted an incorrect pic of my house."

Argue with Twitter. One of those pics is of the shack you are holed up in 24/7/365.

"YOU FIRST began to post over a hundred posts regarding a fictitious bankruptcy."

Sir, I dropped the bankruptcy claim once your true identity was revealed by yourself and it is the least of your personal problems.

"(I think you later admitted it was the wrong guy...after the bell was rung.)"

I though you were related to Jack Dana Dennis, but you admitted to being the man. You did that of your own free will and you refuse to recant that confession. It still stands to this very day.

I cannot lie about that which you claim and refuse to recant.

"YOU FIRST started posting accounts of child molestation alleged to have been committed by me."

That is a blatant lie. Until you claimed to be Jack Dana Dennis, I merely accused you of being related to the man. I though you were his father.

Then you dropped that bomb on May the 18th claiming to be Jack Dana Dennis.

You cannot blame me for that which you have taken full responsibility of being. And you claimed you were the man.

"As bad as all that is, the worst part is you know it's not me...I fear that your declining health problem has affected your little brain. You should apologize."

How can I know that you are not Jack Dana Dennis when you simply refuse to recant your confession? For whatever reason, you seem to like being the man. It must thrill you for some reason to be thought of as a sex offender.

Why else would you refuse to admit you lied when you claimed to be the man?

There can be no other reason on the face of this Earth.

You like the controversy. You'd rather be a child molester than to admit you lied when you confessed.

Don't blame me for your reputation problem. You're doing nothing to improve it at all.

July 1, 2014 at 7:14 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, alprova, wrote all of the following:

"I have not expressed so much as one, anti-Christian view."

"Jesus sinned"

"Jesus cannot be God"

" He was not God and the Bible clearly supports it."

"Just so you know, I would not be ashamed for one second to be a Mormon."

"Sir...I have provided two instances of scripture that proves that Jesus did indeed sin."

July 1, 2014 at 7:15 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "Alpy, I don't know of anyone on here believing you but your little flawed son."

That's where you are wrong. Not many people join me in publicly condemning you, but I can list several people who totally ignore you completely, because they know the truth when it comes to your prior confession.

You have two defenders in this forum and they are not what I would call reputable people. They are known liars in their own right and they post worthless drivel day in and day out, like yourself.

July 1, 2014 at 7:18 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, alprova, wrote all of the following:

"Died for our sins? Sure. Resurrected? Perhaps. Jesus was God? Not a chance in Hell."

"Sir, I believe what can be proven by what can be found in the Bible. The belief that Jesus was God is not found in the Bible."

July 1, 2014 at 7:22 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

I think Jacko and Al ought to cool it.

July 1, 2014 at 7:25 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie, always remember, you're great at collecting and reposting my truisms, but you are coming up with a big fat zero when it comes to disproving so much as one sentence I have ever written that you have some disagreement with.

My sentences stand as facts until the day ever comes that you refute any one of them.

July 1, 2014 at 7:26 p.m.

LOL Alprova. "known liars" "not what i would call reputable people" Comical.

Bitter, bitter man.

July 1, 2014 at 7:28 p.m.
alprova said...

IQM wrote: "I think Jacko and Al ought to cool it."

I think you need to mind your own business unless you have any desire to take a side in the damn thing.

How 'bout that?

July 1, 2014 at 7:28 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, alprova wrote all of the following:

Connie wrote: "Do you consider the practice of Homosexuality/sodomy to be sin?"

Why don't you quote the words FROM GOD or his Son, contained in the Bible, which tell everyone that either one of them considers homosexuality a sin.

You cannot quote either one of them condemning homosexuality.

All you can quote are words written by mortal men, who had an opinion that it was.

God cannot be quoted and neither can Jesus Christ be quoted saying one word against homosexuality.

NOT ONE WORD!!!

Why cyber chase people in this forum when YOU cannot cough up the minimum proof needed to prove it to be a sin applicable to gentiles of today's world?

Moron.

July 1, 2014 at 7:30 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man wrote: "LOL Alprova. "known liars" "not what i would call reputable people" Comical."

I find it decidedly unfunny. You drop intentional lies in this forum every single day of the week.

And lately, you have chosen to come to the defense of a man who has confessed by his own fingers of being a convicted child predator.

It's up to you, but your reputation is already in the toilet. A bigger plunger won't help you at all.

July 1, 2014 at 7:32 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

Con-man sez, "In Matthew 6:6 Jesus is addressing hypocritical praying, NOT sincere praying" Wow!!! He knows the mind of God, in spite of ALL the scriptural statements that no one can know the mind of God. here we go again...

He forgets the next verses are instructions on how to pray, by none other than....it is not hard to appreciate his pillorying everyone for sin as anything but the sanctimonious behavior described earlier in 6:1, which point is lost on him!

If you are not a Christian, please do not measure us all by his behavior, some of us are gracious and humble enough knowing that we have too much sin in ourselves to go around pointing out others'...

July 1, 2014 at 7:34 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie has had that glaring point of hypocrisy pointed out to him many times, and he averts it every single time by claiming that "sincere prayer" is exempted, despite the fact that no such exemption will be found anywhere in the Bible.

He makes it all up as he goes.

I'd sure not want to be him when he meets God to answer for his hypocrisy and his misrepresentations of Biblical scripture.

He's good, but God will straighten him out, right before he casts him away.

July 1, 2014 at 7:39 p.m.

how is it "in the toilet"? this a thread on a newspaper site. snap out of it. you have an overblown view of yourself.

"defense" defend what? He doesn't need any help from me to defend himself. You come across like you're completely obsessed with this, and you won't let go until he says exactly what you want. You don't even know that you're being had.

All i know is he knows how to press the right buttons to make you foam at the mouth.

Everybody on here is sick of this crap.

"i drop intentional lies" LOL yeah, that's what i do. Is there a punishment that you suggest? You take yourself way to seriously.

July 1, 2014 at 7:42 p.m.
conservative said...

inquiringmind:

Just for you -

“When you pray, you are not to be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and on the street corners so that they may be seen by men. Truly I say to you, they have their reward in full. Matthew 6:5

But you, when you pray, go into your inner room, close your door and pray to your Father who is in secret, and your Father who sees what is done in secret will reward you. Matthew 6:6

Now, see if you can figure out that Homosexuality/sodomy is sin:

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor HOMOSEXUALS, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10

THE QUESTION IS INQUIRINGMIND:

Do you consider the practice of Homosexuality/sodomy to be sin?

July 1, 2014 at 7:51 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man wrote: "how is it "in the toilet"? this a thread on a newspaper site. snap out of it. you have an overblown view of yourself."

Sir, I've not been a part of any conversation lately, until today, for at least a week.

You and your minions on the other hand have dominated every thread for an average of 16 hours a day, each and every day, posting and reposting the same useless comments over and over, refusing to have one sentence of civil discussion.

It's personal attack after personal attack. It's lie after intentional lie. Until today, most of the regulars stayed out of it. It was pointless to post a damn thing.

""defense" defend what? He doesn't need any help from me to defend himself. You come across like you're completely obsessed with this, and you won't let go until he says exactly what you want. You don't even know that you're being had."

Is that what you believe? You're more delusional than I thought.

Who in their right mind would confess to being three time convicted sex offender and then refuse to admit he lied, if it was a lie to begin with?

He likes being a convicted child predator. It's apparently a reputation he likes. You like him. You defend him. You're just like him, at least as far as I'm concerned.

"All i know is he knows how to press the right buttons to make you foam at the mouth."

Sir, you couldn't push a button that would convince me that you know a damn thing truthful and factual, if your life depended on it.

"Everybody on here is sick of this crap."

You really ought not to speak for others. You have enough trouble speaking for yourself.

"..."i drop intentional lies" LOL yeah, that's what i do."

I'm glad you agree.

"Is there a punishment that you suggest? You take yourself way to seriously."

And you refuse to take anything seriously. That's why you are currently palling around with a known child sex offender.

It's your problem.

July 1, 2014 at 7:53 p.m.
conservative said...

Inquiringmind:

How many of those quotes by Mr. Anthony Provancher, which I have provided do you agree with?

Please be specific.

July 1, 2014 at 7:56 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

The Liar Royale calling others liars. Rich.

July 1, 2014 at 7:57 p.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++We Preach Christ Jesus Crucified+++

I do agree, do not let this site degrade to a kindergarten playground name-calling venue.

Malleus Deum

July 1, 2014 at 8:01 p.m.
alprova said...

Do you really believe you are fooling anyone, calling other people liars?

You claim to have never lied in this forum.

You lied one way or the other on May 18. 2014 in this very forum.

You either lied when you claimed to be Jack Dana Dennis or you have been lying at various times when you hint that you are not Jack Dana Dennis.

Due to a lack of other evidence, you must be Jack Dana Dennis.

Which one is your intentional and provable lie, hypocritical Jackie?

You'd rather endure the reputation as a child predator than to admit you lied in this forum?

You are most assuredly the biggest moron on the face of this planet.

July 1, 2014 at 8:06 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie wrote: "How many of those quotes by Mr. Anthony Provancher, which I have provided do you agree with? Please be specific."

Connie agrees with every single one of them.

Why else would he post them repeatedly and allow them to stand the test of time, untouched and unrefuted?

Thanks Connie.

I do appreciate my fans.

July 1, 2014 at 8:08 p.m.

Yawn. Nobody cares.

Move on.

July 1, 2014 at 8:09 p.m.
alprova said...

I'm glad you're finally understanding the scope of your own comments, Z-man.

You're right as rain.

Nobody cares what you write about.

And since you have decided to defend the indefensible, your reputation is equally lost in the toilet.

Enjoy.

July 1, 2014 at 8:12 p.m.
Hunter_Bluff said...

So... Can you call your business 'Christian' when arguing before the Supreme Court, and then set aside Christian values when you're placing a bulk order for cheap wind chimes," wrote Christian author and columnist Jonathan Merritt???

Well what say ya?

July 1, 2014 at 8:13 p.m.
Hunter_Bluff said...

PS to Inquiring Mind and AlPro, Watch your back side. His insurance just covered the latest ED treatment and Con "Man" is looking for you. Don't pick up the soap.

July 1, 2014 at 8:16 p.m.
conservative said...

Inquirinmind

Let me give you an example of hypocritical public prayer and sincere public prayer.

I can't help but believe that you have seen an individual or family bow their heads, give thanks and ask a blessing before eating a meal at a restaurant or other public gathering(prayer).

Surely you would think Jesus would not be opposed to this or consider this hypocritical prayer, or would you?

Now, if they were loud, to put on a show like the hypocritical Pharisees then this would of course would be prayer that God would not approve of.

Do you see the difference?

Prayer for show is what Jesus is referring to in Matthew 6.

July 1, 2014 at 8:20 p.m.

LOL defend against what? Something you're obsessed with.

Who cares.

You're the Gladys Kravitz of this forum. You know, that snoopy neighbor on that old tv show Bewitched? Keeping track of who's on here, how long, spying on them, and keeping track of every single thing they say. You don't miss anything. LOL

July 1, 2014 at 8:26 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man, I pay little attention to that which you write on a daily basis in this forum.

Your ability to hold a reader's attention takes a second seat to your obvious ignorance.

It's pointless to read a thing you write. You don't half mean a thing you write on a good day.

You're life lately has become about as pathetic as it gets, considering that you and your newfound sex offending boyfriend spend 16 hours a day conversing about nothing, seven days a week, and the both of you have become worthless attack posters, driving off every serious poster that used to hang around in here.

You're both worthless and amazingly pathetic to have nothing better to do than to post in this forum for 16 hours a day, every day.

Pathetic...

July 1, 2014 at 8:35 p.m.
GameOn said...

No one is forced to work for Hobby Lobby. They choose to work for them and know the rules of the game at the time they are hired. Hobby Lobby does pay better than most retail stores. Full time employees are paid a minimum of $14 per hour and part time employees are paid a minimum of $9.50 per hour. They can afford $10 per month for birth control.

http://heavy.com/news/2014/06/david-green-hobby-lobby-supreme-court-decision-affordable-care-act-birth-control/

Clay do you have problem with unions forcing their political beliefs on members?

July 1, 2014 at 8:37 p.m.

LOL ignoring you from this point on.

GameON, good points.

July 1, 2014 at 9:02 p.m.
conservative said...

Inquiringmind

You once mentioned a Cardinal Timothy Dolan so you seem to be Catholic.

Have you ever criticized or disapproved of him or the Pope for praying in public?

July 1, 2014 at 9:05 p.m.

One more thing, Alprova, I forgot to add.

good luck, you "sawed-off jerk" LOL

July 1, 2014 at 9:50 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

I know it is pointless futility to expect our friend to read by the evidence of the loud clanging gongs and large fonts which remind me of 6:1:  “Beware of practicing your piety before others in order to be seen by them; for then you have no reward from your Father in heaven." It deals with more than prayer, doesn't it?

Let the readers be mislead, that passage is not about hypocritical and sincere prayer, it is about piety and ostentation, or humility and pride.

peace be with you.

July 1, 2014 at 10:27 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

The sh!t is deep today. Just to play devil's advocate, let's say a company/corporation says they don't want to provide any medical care as it violates their religious beliefs, what's to stop them? Oh, I guess since these wouldn't necessarily be "Christian" beliefs, they don't matter. The morals of the owners of Hobby Lobby don't matter when it comes to the cheap Chinese crap they bad that is produced by slave labor?

ConMan, answer my question. Is getting oral a sin?

July 1, 2014 at 10:36 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

GI, that was the argument (it is still true, regardless), HL does not have to offer health insurance if they feel it violates their religious beliefs OR for any other reason, the employees can go with ACA. Unfortunately, Archbishop Scalia did not agree.

HL and Scalia are not interested in protection of citizens under the law in this case, they are only interested in forcing their religious beliefs on others. And I doubt HL sees or cares about the hypocrisy of using products made by slave labor to make a buck. It is all about Matt 6:1. Or as HL would say, it is all about making a buck and ensuring likeminded folks come their way based on their public proclamation of self-righteousness.

We will survive, the decision will eventually be reversed, just like the ones on justified slavery.

July 1, 2014 at 10:49 p.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++We Preach Christ Jesus Crucified+++

Which carries more weight, sexual preference, or, religious convictions?

Malleus Deum

July 1, 2014 at 10:57 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Stump says "....and the both of you have become worthless attack posters, driving off every serious poster that used to hang around in here." name a couple we've driven off, Ahab. you give us far too much credit.

July 2, 2014 at 12:56 a.m.
rengerry said...

Jesus has spoken!

https://i.imgur.com/kKjdi8u.png

Amare et sapere vix deo conceditur

July 2, 2014 at 2:06 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo, June 2nd...."For whatever reason he has for doing so, he claimed to be Jack Dana Dennis, but to the best of my knowledge, he is not that man, therefore I no longer believe he has ever harmed a child. -Anthony Provancher

July 2, 2014 at 2:22 a.m.
conservative said...

GaussianInteger

You asked "Is getting oral a sin?"

Your question requires a yes or no.

Now, read this passage of Scripture and tell me what your answer is.

And while you are at it see if you can figure out if Homosexuality/sodomy is sin.

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10

July 2, 2014 at 8:36 a.m.
Ki said...

Conservy, if the bible is suppose to be the literal word of "god" can you explain why mere mortal man is allowed to change, delete its wording to suit his own agenda? I'm looking at a pre-1965 bible and reading that very verse right now you're quoting from, and the word "homosexual" is nowhere in the verses you're quoting from? Isn't it also a 'sin' to mislead the flock?

July 2, 2014 at 9:56 a.m.
conservative said...

Ki

The Bible was written mostly in Hebrew and Greek.

What we now have is translations into other languages of which English is but one.

Surely you are aware of other English words besides Homosexual that convey people having sex with others of the same sex.

Did you know that the word Homosexual does not appear in a Russian translation? However, they do have a word for the act as does other translations in other languages.

Did you know that the word sodomy came about from the practice of same sex (Homosexual) of the residents of Sodom in the Bible for which God destroyed those in that city.

Furthermore, don't let some Atheist deceive you by making a claim that Jesus never used the word Homosexual.The English language was not even in existence when the Scriptures were written.

You are right about mortal man changing the wording of the Scriptures to suit an agenda. The Homosexuals/sodomites have done so with their Queen James version.

July 2, 2014 at 10:27 a.m.

Ki, this world is not the kingdom of God. Man has free will, he can choose to do whatever he wants. Boy, does he.

Sin or no sin, Bible or no Bible, it's astounding to what lengths you libs go to normalize homosexuality and condemn those who believe it's simply abnormal.

Same goes for abortion. Even in the face of nearly 60 million abortions since 1973/RvW, you insist that it's all good. You deny that they're unborn human beings at whatever stage, even though at one point in your existence you were exactly that.

This Hobby Lobby thing is really about Hobby Lobby being a Christian run business, and freedom. You can't stand that Hobby Lobby has an issue with abortion.

July 2, 2014 at 10:36 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

I ❤ Hobby Lobby.

July 2, 2014 at 10:55 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

connie can't figure out if the crime was homosexuality or attempted rape...Z-bister can't accept that the Constitution is all about protecting us from people like connie and Z-bister. HL is about forcing adherence to the owners' religious belief on the employee, nothing else. Why do they sell products to people who do practice the 4 forms of birth control? You say they can't tell by looking at them? Oh, too bad it isn't like the color of one's skin. Maybe we can find some kind of marker to make them wear, like the star of David patch the Nazi's used on the Jews in Germany in the 1930's and 40's.

July 2, 2014 at 10:58 a.m.
conservative said...

inquiringmind

"connie can't figure out if the crime was homosexuality or attempted rape."

Who do you think you are fooling?

Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!

You must think everyone is an idiot.

Do you consider Homosexuality/sodomy to be sin?

July 2, 2014 at 11:05 a.m.
conservative said...

Inquiringmind

You once mentioned a Cardinal Timothy Dolan so you seem to be Catholic.

Have you ever criticized or disapproved of him or the Pope for praying in public?

July 2, 2014 at 11:07 a.m.

no, inq, the Constitution is about protecting citizens from the government. I said a bunch of times that "gays" are free to live as they choose. What you libs don't like is that some of us believe it's either a sin or abnormal. I have no right to intrude in the lives of homosexuals, but I Have the right to hold the opinion I have.

Nobody is forcing anyone to work at HL. It's a private company.

You libs, like your dear leader, Bo, believe the Constitution is "a charter of negative liberties?"

In other words, you will believe what you say we should, or you will be condemned for it.

July 2, 2014 at 11:11 a.m.

Abortion is an industry and nobody is stopping anyone from getting an abortion if they want, it's the law. Nobody is preventing "gays" from doing what they want to do with each other. There are laws that punish discrimination. "gay marriage" will be the norm soon.

Even then you libs won't be happy, though. What you really want is to punish anyone who believes homosexuality is abnormal. That's next.

You also want to find some way to punish churches that preach that homosexuality is wrong. You'll call it "hate speech" That's coming as well. Of course you won't go after Muslims for the believing the same because you fear them.

Freedom of religion and freedom of speech is under attack in this country.

July 2, 2014 at 11:22 a.m.
rengerry said...

Zab, go look up negative liberties. You'd be surprised how much it applies to all of us.

July 2, 2014 at 11:29 a.m.
conservative said...

Inquiringmind

The issue of Homosexuality/sodomy is not going to go away.

Mr. Bennett keeps bringing it up, I keep responding with the word of God and His judgment on it and you and others attempt to defend it and none of you are successful.

I suspect that you are a Homosexual and that is why you go to such great lengths to defend it.

You can't win the argument with God. His word and judgment on the matter is settled.

Your guilt (I almost quilt again) is only going to get worse as you try to justify it.

You see, I loathe Liberalism and I am always going to expose Liberalism.

July 2, 2014 at 11:33 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

punish churches? punish someone for their belief about homosexuality? really Z, you have it upside down. As usual.

Nobody is forcing HL to offer health insurance, nor is anyone forcing anyone to adopt a particular sexual lifestyle, or religious dogma as far as I can see. Nor is anyone attempting to muzzle obnoxious people who spew bigotry in the name of Christ, rather are simply exposing the bigotry for what it is.

July 2, 2014 at 11:39 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

I should say, z, "no one opposing your and your compatriot's views are forcing" religiopus dogma as far as I can see; as you and your compatriots surely are.

July 2, 2014 at 11:42 a.m.
timbo said...

I am going to find a new hobby where I can spend some money at Hobby Lobby.

July 2, 2014 at 11:45 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

beware the creeping theocracy! Mwahahahahaha

July 2, 2014 at 11:52 a.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis, it doesn't matter who or what I think you are. You have claimed to be the man in question and you refuse to recant that confession, for whatever reason you have for not doing so.

Therefore, by YOUR admission, you are Jack Dana Dennis, the three time convicted child predator.

And until the day ever comes that you recant that confession and admit you lied to everyone in this forum, you will remain Jack Dana Dennis.

Jack Dana Dennis never filed for bankruptcy. So...if you are not Jack Dana Dennis, then I guess you did file for bankruptcy.

So which are you? A bankrupt idiot or a child molester?

You Sir are the only person who can clear up your identity. No one can do it for you.

Right now, you're fine and dandy being the child molester.

God only knows why that is. It must be a Catholic thang...

July 2, 2014 at 12:02 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie wrote: "You can't win the argument with God. His word and judgment on the matter is settled."

Sir, I have asked you repeatedly to post any quotation from God or his Son condemning homosexuality, as it may be read in the Bible, and you have failed to produce ONE WORD!!

How can the matter be "settled" when God nor his Son condemn homosexuality.

You are bearing false witness in a public forum. You are misrepresenting God and his Son.

You are lying your ass off due to your personal opinion and not due to any word from God or his Son.

You should be ashamed of yourself for your blatant bearing of false witness, in the name of God.

You will answer for it one day. That is assured.

July 2, 2014 at 12:11 p.m.
timbo said...

theJackDennis...why don't you sue these idiots? I would lodge a formal complaint to the TFP too.

alprova...give it a rest...you just look bad..don't you get it.

July 2, 2014 at 12:12 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, alprova, wrote:

"What supports Christianity in the first place? The Bible doesn't."

July 2, 2014 at 12:17 p.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++We Preach Christ Jesus Crucified+++

So many people change their minds over a lifetime about so many things.

Malleus Deum

July 2, 2014 at 12:20 p.m.

I think the term for that is "cyberbullying", timbo.

July 2, 2014 at 12:20 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Tim, working it thru the channels.

Alpo says "God only knows why that is. It must be a Catholic thang." what a backwoods hick statement coming from the liar.

July 2, 2014 at 12:22 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, alprova, wrote all of the following:

"I have not expressed so much as one, anti-Christian view"

"Jesus sinned"

"Jesus cannot be God"

July 2, 2014 at 12:26 p.m.
rengerry said...

Orr has the right idea about people changing their minds

https://i.imgur.com/gU1vARD.jpg

July 2, 2014 at 12:29 p.m.
alprova said...

Timbo wrote: "theJackDennis...why don't you sue these idiots? I would lodge a formal complaint to the TFP too."

I wish he would attempt to sue and lodge a complaint. One link to his public confession and he would be laughed out of court.

"alprova...give it a rest...you just look bad..don't you get it."

I'm not the one defending an admitted child molester. But you don't get that, do you?

July 2, 2014 at 12:35 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo, June 2nd...."For whatever reason he has for doing so, he claimed to be Jack Dana Dennis, but to the best of my knowledge, he is not that man, therefore I no longer believe he has ever harmed a child. -Anthony Provancher

July 2, 2014 at 2:22 a.m.

July 2, 2014 at 12:46 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, alprova, wrote all of the following:

"I have not expressed so much as one, anti-Christian view"

"Died for our sins? Sure. Resurrected? Perhaps. Jesus was God? Not a chance in Hell."

July 2, 2014 at 12:53 p.m.

Jack, clearly someone has lots their marbles.

July 2, 2014 at 1:20 p.m.

that should be lost, not lots.

July 2, 2014 at 1:21 p.m.

Looks like Murrieta CA is fighting back against the fed. gov. dumping illegal alien/invaders into their town. The Mexican gov. is granting visas to central Americans so they can pass through Mexico and flood our borders. This is a third world crap.

I suggest BO remove the fence around the WH. Let them camp out on the WH lawn. How about the let them live in the WH?

July 2, 2014 at 1:28 p.m.
timbo said...

alprova..if theJackDennis accused you of molesting a goat...no matter if it was true or not, I would defend your right not to be harassed.

You don't own any farm animals, do you?

July 2, 2014 at 2:21 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

^^^ He has sheep, Tim. And to him they're Montana Ladies.

July 2, 2014 at 2:58 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo, June 2nd...."For whatever reason he has for doing so, he claimed to be Jack Dana Dennis, but to the best of my knowledge, he is not that man, therefore I no longer believe he has ever harmed a child. -Anthony Provancher July 2, 2014 at 2:22 a.m. permalink

What's in gonna be Alpy? A confusing post from such a storied truth teller.

July 2, 2014 at 3:02 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Tim, caught you on the airwaves. Sounds like you guys had fun.

July 2, 2014 at 3:09 p.m.
timbo said...

Yea, we will start call-in's soon. Talking about local races and Hillary today. 1240 am

July 2, 2014 at 3:22 p.m.
timbo said...

Sheep huh? That choice doesn't suprise me. Just like a good little Muslim.

July 2, 2014 at 3:23 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Yup. Are you a regular on that show? What are times?

July 2, 2014 at 3:33 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!"

That's YOUR interpretation, ConMan. Sodomy is any sex act other then the missionary position. Pardon my crudeness but; BJ's, sodomy. Cunnilingus, sodomy. Woman on top, sodomy. Doggie-style, sodomy. Woman bent over hood of car, sodomy. Heterosexuals commit sodomy just as easily as homosexuals.

So again, if you have ever received oral pleasure ConMan, you are guilt of "sodomy".

July 2, 2014 at 3:45 p.m.
conservative said...

GaussianInteger

You seem to love running head first into correction.

"Sodomy is a term for anal sex: the kind of sex where a penis goes into an anus."

"Sodomy is a term for anal sex that is not neutral: it implies a point of view. Most often, sodomy is mentioned in religious and legal contexts, which have at various times insisted that anal sex is either a sin or illegal. Usually, someone with a positive view of anal sex won't call it sodomy. A medical term for sodomy is anal intercourse; a slang term is buggery."

http://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/sodomy

July 2, 2014 at 3:59 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

sod·om·y [sod-uh-mee]
noun 1. anal or oral copulation with a member of the opposite sex. 2. copulation with a member of the same sex. 3. bestiality ( def 4 ) .

July 2, 2014 at 4:07 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

Medical Definition of SODOMY

: anal or oral copulation with a member of the same or opposite sex

July 2, 2014 at 4:10 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

sod·om·y (sd-m) n. Any of various forms of sexual intercourse held to be unnatural or abnormal, especially anal intercourse or bestiality.

July 2, 2014 at 4:13 p.m.
conservative said...

"Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!"

"That's YOUR interpretation, ConMan"

You obviously love being corrected:

"Origin of SODOMY Middle English, from Anglo-French sodomie, from Late Latin Sodoma Sodom; from the homosexual proclivities of the men of the city in Genesis 19:1–11 First Known Use: 13th century"

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sodomy

July 2, 2014 at 4:13 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"You seem to love running head first into correction."

How so? I gave you three different definitions. Let me guess, your source is the definitive one.

July 2, 2014 at 4:14 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!"

Absurd. Maybe in your eyes. Of course, I don't sit around and worry about sodomy as a couple of you "real Christians" do. I imagine you and your male Bible study group has in-depth discussions, and perhaps demonstrations, of male-on-male sodomy. You are fascinated with homosexuality. Even gay dudes don't discuss being gay as much as you and Orr.

July 2, 2014 at 4:19 p.m.
conservative said...

"Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!"

"That's YOUR interpretation, ConMan"

Are you getting it yet?

Origin of the word sodomy

"SODOMY and SODOMITE are borrowed from סדם $'DoaM (Sodom) the sinful city of Genesis18-19. The fact that sexually aberrant behavior is not specifically mentioned in the Sodom story reinforces the point that even suggestions and connotations from Biblical place names or people names made their way into the English language."

http://edenics.net/english-word-origins.aspx?word=SODOMY

July 2, 2014 at 4:19 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

Nope, it doesn't work that way. You don't get to pick and choose which definition you choose to believe. This isn't the Bible. I gave you three different definitions. Sorry if the truth contradicts your argument.

July 2, 2014 at 4:22 p.m.
conservative said...

"Did you know that the word sodomy came about from the practice of same sex (Homosexual) of the residents of Sodom in the Bible for which God destroyed those in that city."

==============

inquiringmind said...

connie can't figure out if the crime was homosexuality or attempted rape

=================

"Sodomy is a term for anal sex: the kind of sex where a penis goes into an anus."

"Sodomy is a term for anal sex that is not neutral: it implies a point of view. Most often, sodomy is mentioned in religious and legal contexts, which have at various times insisted that anal sex is either a sin or illegal. Usually, someone with a positive view of anal sex won't call it sodomy. A medical term for sodomy is anal intercourse; a slang term is buggery."

http://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/sodomy

================

"Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!"

"That's YOUR interpretation, ConMan"

You obviously love being corrected:

"Origin of SODOMY Middle English, from Anglo-French sodomie, from Late Latin Sodoma Sodom; from the homosexual proclivities of the men of the city in Genesis 19:1–11 First Known Use: 13th century"

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sodomy

=================

conservative said...

"Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!"

"That's YOUR interpretation, ConMan"

Are you getting it yet?

Origin of the word sodomy

"SODOMY and SODOMITE are borrowed from סדם $'DoaM (Sodom) the sinful city of Genesis18-19. The fact that sexually aberrant behavior is not specifically mentioned in the Sodom story reinforces the point that even suggestions and connotations from Biblical place names or people names made their way into the English language."

http://edenics.net/english-word-origins.aspx?word=SODOMY

July 2, 2014 at 4:26 p.m.
conservative said...

GaussianInteger

I understand you, you are a Liberal, it interferes with your thinking.

Now, look closely at my statement that you failed to refute:

"Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!"

My statement is supported by history and dictionaries. Yours are not.

Now see if you can finally get it.

July 2, 2014 at 4:36 p.m.
alprova said...

Timbo wrote: "alprova..if theJackDennis accused you of molesting a goat...no matter if it was true or not, I would defend your right not to be harassed."

If I had ever CONFESSED to doing such a thing, it would be useless for me to complain about it.

Do you understand that the man CONFESSED to being Jack Dana Dennis and that the man has been convicted of lewd acts with children, three times?

Neither one of you two defenders have EVER addressed his confession and the fact that he has REFUSED to recant that confession.

He's rather be a child molester than known for offering an intentional lie into this forum.

He refuses to own up to his lies.

And he calls me the liar.

Do you begin to understand why you two defenders are full of sh!t when it comes to defending right from wrong?

You'd rather side with a child molester, who posts in political agreement with yourselves, rather than to call the man down for his intentional dishonesty and current status as an admitted child predator.

And no, I'm not going to let it go.

He is guilty of either being what he confessed to being or he lied through his bony fingers for some imaginary reason and seems to embrace his new reputation with glee.

July 2, 2014 at 4:38 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "What's in gonna be Alpy? A confusing post from such a storied truth teller."

What's it gonna be Jack? Where is your recantation of your confession to being Jack Dana Dennis and the admission that you lied to everyone on May 18, 2014 when you claimed to be that man?

You refuse to clear up your own identity and would rather be known as an admitted child molester, rather than to admit to your intentional lie on that date.

Why?

I guess for the same reason you're more concerned with whether or not people believe you filed bankruptcy rather than to have been convicted of child enticement...THREE times.

It's your life, your reputation, and definitely YOUR problem.

Leave me out of it. You created it all by yourself on May 18, 2014 in this forum and the proof has been posted repeatedly.

It is not my accusation. It is your confession.

July 2, 2014 at 4:45 p.m.
conservative said...

GaussianInteger

I have asked you before if you are a Homosexual.

You and Inquiringmind are very confrontational in defending the gross sin.

You can only dig yourself a deeper hole because the truth is the truth. The truth can not be refuted.

God's word on the matter is truth and settled.

You both are only in for a lot of guilt and misery if you continue to try to refute the truth.

God destroyed the city and people of Sodom and Gomorra for their wicked practice of Homosexuality.

This is how the English word sodomy came into existence. See my previous posted definitions.

July 2, 2014 at 4:48 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

So Alpy, you're not gonna address your admission that it wasn't me? Why is that?

July 2, 2014 at 4:50 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie has lost his ever-loving mind now.

He's arguing with the world about the definition of sodomy.

Everyone with a brain knows that sodomy laws include acts of oral sex. It is hardly limited to homosexual sex, no matter what Connie believes.

Ask our resident child molester about what happens when a man above the age of 18 has sexual contact of any nature with a child under the age of 18 in Tennessee. If the contact only involves oral copulation, one will be convicted of committing sodomy upon a minor.

July 2, 2014 at 4:54 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, alprova, wrote all of the following:

"I have not expressed so much as one, anti-Christian view"

"Get something through your thick head. I have NEVER blasphemed God."

"The belief that Jesus was God is not found in the Bible."

"Jesus sinned"

July 2, 2014 at 4:56 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "So Alpy, you're not gonna address your admission that it wasn't me? Why is that?"

Aren't you tired of running around in circles?

I most certainly HAVE addressed what I wrote. What does matter is your refusal to address it directly yourself, with either an admission of your own that you lied when you claimed to be the man, or a simple statement that you are not the man in question.

It would be real nice if you would explain why it was you chose to claim to be a man with such a history in this forum, and then explain why it is that for 6 weeks, you have refused to correct your false confession with clear language.

It doesn't matter what I believe or have posted. It's YOUR reputation. It's YOUR lie to admit to, and YOU are the only person who can clear it up once and for all.

Or you can sit there and wallow in your own lies and misery as an admitted child predator.

July 2, 2014 at 4:59 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Not wallowing, Tony. Almost enjoying you making an idiot out of yourself.

July 2, 2014 at 5:03 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher wrote:

"Everyone with a brain knows that sodomy laws include acts of oral sex. It is hardly limited to homosexual sex, no matter what Connie believes."

Now watch closely. I am going to dissect a lie and expose a liar!

I have made no such statement that sodomy is limited to only Homosexual sex.

I began correcting inquiringmind when he wrote that I "can't figure out if the crime was homosexuality or attempted rape" referring to the account in Genesis.

I wrote in response "Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!"

I have made no statement that limits sodomy to Homosexuality only.

Mr. Anthony Provancher lied!

July 2, 2014 at 5:12 p.m.

I smell a lawsuit.

July 2, 2014 at 5:13 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis, you are wallowing in a reputation you spawned yourself.

"allahsbuttbrother: Yep, that's me. Not a very good picture, though."

"Yes, Anthony. I really should thank you for exposing me. It's a great relief to rid myself of this burden. I'm struggling to make things right. Pray for me."

July 2, 2014 at 5:21 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie, it's always been pointless to debate even the most simple points with you, for you are bat crap crazy.

Your statement that "sodomy is synonymous with homosexual sex..." regardless of what follows it, is patently false.

Sodomy has never been synonymous with homosexuality except with people who have some of the same brain farts that propels your brain on a daily basis.

You're an idiot. You're ignorant. And you're anything and everything but a representative of God.

July 2, 2014 at 5:27 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

You knew I was joshing. How did you know I was joshing? Because you knew all along it wasn't me.

July 2, 2014 at 5:27 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher, a.k.a. alprova wrote the following:

"Get something through your thick head. I have NEVER blasphemed God."

"Your problems are not my problems. I rejected your brand of Christianity years ago. Nothing is going to change that."

"If you believe the Bible to be 100% accurate in all regards, then you by default believe God to be a mass-murderer."

July 2, 2014 at 5:29 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

but to the best of my knowledge, he is not that man, therefore I no longer believe he has ever harmed a child. -Anthony Provancher

So Tony, this is not advanced math. Did you post that ^^ or did gremlins hijack your keyboard?

July 2, 2014 at 5:32 p.m.
conservative said...

Professing Christian Mr. Anthony Provancher wrote:

"Sodomy has never been synonymous with homosexuality except with people who have some of the same brain farts that propels your brain on a daily basis."

"You're an idiot. You're ignorant. And you're anything and everything but a representative of God."

July 2, 2014 at 5:27 p.m.

July 2, 2014 at 5:36 p.m.
conservative said...

Professing Christian Mr. Anthony Provancher wrote:

"Sodomy has never been synonymous with homosexuality except with people who have some of the same brain farts that propels your brain on a daily basis."

==================

Well get ready for a "never"

"Sodomy is a term for anal sex: the kind of sex where a penis goes into an anus."

"Sodomy is a term for anal sex that is not neutral: it implies a point of view. Most often, sodomy is mentioned in religious and legal contexts, which have at various times insisted that anal sex is either a sin or illegal. Usually, someone with a positive view of anal sex won't call it sodomy. A medical term for sodomy is anal intercourse; a slang term is buggery."

http://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/sodomy

This is just to easy!

July 2, 2014 at 5:38 p.m.
rengerry said...

Con has some serious issues with sex, especially the sex that everyone else might be having. It's rather fun to watch him melt down.

https://i.imgur.com/n1oD7hP.gif

July 2, 2014 at 5:42 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man wrote: "I smell a lawsuit."

The only thing you're capable of smelling is your own upper lip, which I doubt you ever clean.

If you believe there is even a hint of a valid legal lawsuit, then you're as stupid as the man you defend.

He confessed. I never once accused him of a damn thing, until he confessed, and that I can prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

The only reason I continue to call the man a child molester, is because he has refused to recant his confession. He likes his reputation. The last thing he wants to do is to clear it up.

I sure hope you're not going to represent the man in court. It would be a shame to watch you laughed out onto the street.

You're apparently as stupid as he is, and just about as knowledgeable about legal matters.

July 2, 2014 at 5:43 p.m.
alprova said...

Poor Connie. He's really gone off the deep end this time.

Embarrassing to say the least.

He's the only man I know who protests that he did not say state something that everyone knows he did, and follows it up with a post making the same statement.

Help the man Jesus to see the error of his own ways...

July 2, 2014 at 5:46 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Wow, now Alpo is an Attorney. Bogus attorney, bogus CPA. You gonna answer my question Alpy?

July 2, 2014 at 5:47 p.m.
conservative said...

Professing Christian Mr. Anthony Provancher wrote:

"Sodomy has never been synonymous with homosexuality except with people who have some of the same brain farts that propels your brain on a daily basis."

==================

Well get ready for another "never"

It is Webster versus Mr. Anthony Provancher, who are you going to believe?

"Origin of SODOMY Middle English, from Anglo-French sodomie, from Late Latin Sodoma Sodom; from the homosexual proclivities of the men of the city in Genesis 19:1–11 First Known Use: 13th century"

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sodomy

July 2, 2014 at 5:50 p.m.
conservative said...

Professing Christian Mr. Anthony Provancher wrote:

"Sodomy has never been synonymous with homosexuality except with people who have some of the same brain farts that propels your brain on a daily basis."

==================

Well, get ready for yet another "never"

Origin of the word sodomy:

"SODOMY and SODOMITE are borrowed from סדם $'DoaM (Sodom) the sinful city of Genesis18-19. The fact that sexually aberrant behavior is not specifically mentioned in the Sodom story reinforces the point that even suggestions and connotations from Biblical place names or people names made their way into the English language."

http://edenics.net/english-word-origins.aspx?word=SODOMY

Again, this is just to easy!

July 2, 2014 at 5:55 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "Wow, now Alpo is an Attorney."

You're just full of lies today, aren't you? Please post a link to my post, making such a claim.

You know I can link to your post, claiming to be Jack Dana Dennis.

You need to learn to separate fiction from reality.

"Bogus attorney, bogus CPA."

Never claimed to be an Attorney. I would have made a fine Attorney, had I wanted to be one though.

My status as a CPA has lapsed, due to my current disabilities. The firm is in capable hands.

"You gonna answer my question Alpy?"

Mr. Child Predator, I have answered all your idiotic questions.

You refuse to answer even one of my questions.

Do you believe that goes unnoticed?

You're a PROUD child predator. You believe no one believes you are guilty as charged. You think your behavior is normal.

It's that Catholic Priest mind conditioning.

You will answer to God however one day, and that day gets closer and closer.

Every lie will be brought up for you to answer to. Every improper act of enticement with those minors will be brought up in front of others in the room.

Will you have an ounce of shame then?

Probably not.

July 2, 2014 at 5:59 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie, the origin of the word has absolutely nothing to do with modern day applications of the word.

And the scope and definitions of the word are not so modern as well, and they most definitely include heterosexual acts too, and have for many, many years.

So many years, in fact, that you weren't even a glimmer in your daddy's eye, when sodomy was used to describe oral acts of sex performed on women by men.

I'm sure you're going to continue to make a complete fool of yourself by posting homosexual references to the word Sodomy, but anyone with a brain knows you are full of crap and always are.

July 2, 2014 at 6:07 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

So you didn't write the post admitting that I wasn't a predator. Is that what you're saying? BTW, your pot shots at the Catholic Church really highlights your hick background

July 2, 2014 at 6:08 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpy says "My status as a CPA has lapsed, due to my current disabilities. The firm is in capable hands."

**BWAHAHAHAHA

July 2, 2014 at 6:15 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "So you didn't write the post admitting that I wasn't a predator. Is that what you're saying?"

It doesn't matter what I believe, if you refuse to clear up any doubt as to your identity and admit to your own lies.

"BTW, your pot shots at the Catholic Church really highlights your hick background"

I've never made it any secret that I hold very little regard or respect for the Catholic Church. It is not a valid religion according to Biblical scripture.

But then, Christianity isn't supported by the Bible either.

The Catholic Church's embracement of child predators has many people on my side as well. The church is an oddity on so many issues, they contradict the Bible in so many ways, that it is pointless to consider them valid in any manner.

But to each their own, and at their own risk of eternal damnation.

July 2, 2014 at 6:17 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher wrote:

"Connie, the origin of the word has absolutely nothing to do with modern day applications of the word."

What a brazen liar!

Everyone knows that sodomy refers to well sodomy when discussing homosexual conduct.

I most often write Homosexuality/sodomy.

Mr Anthony Provancher knows that I am referring to Homosexual sex not sex between men and women.

What a brazen liar!

July 2, 2014 at 6:22 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie, you're definitely in meltdown mode.

I sure hope you don't spontaneously combust.

July 2, 2014 at 6:24 p.m.
conservative said...

Not once have I mentioned sex between men and women when I used the term Homosexuals/sodomites, not once.

Not once have Mr. Anthony Provancher or others mention sex between men and women when I used the term homosexuality/sodomy, not once.

What a brazen liar Mr. Anthony Provancher is.

This is just to easy!

July 2, 2014 at 6:28 p.m.
conservative said...

At least GaussianInteger and Inquirinmind have enough sense to run when exposed.

July 2, 2014 at 6:31 p.m.
rengerry said...

Hey Con! You must really like sodomy as much as you talk about it.

July 2, 2014 at 6:35 p.m.
alprova said...

Good God Connie, you are totally incapable of reading and understanding simple English.

You are the ONLY person who believes that sodomy only involves homosexual conduct.

The fact of the matter is that heterosexual conduct of many descriptions are considered to be sodomy.

Your ancient definitions are mindless, ridiculous, and totally non-applicable to modern society.

You are ignoring legal statutes that still remain in law books to this very day.

No one is going to spend the time arguing with you about your beliefs about homosexuality. You're on your own island when it comes to that.

I'm equally convinced that there is no one who reads your posts, who is not firmly convinced that you are deep, deep in the closet, and among one of the most sexually frustrated people on this planet.

I urge you to find you a nice guy, allow him to blow you for all of the 10 seconds it will take to cause an explosion equal to the second coming of Christ.

July 2, 2014 at 6:40 p.m.
conservative said...

You need to get a grip on your problem

You have only misery ahead of you unless you repent.

July 2, 2014 at 6:42 p.m.
alprova said...

rengerry wrote: "Hey Con! You must really like sodomy as much as you talk about it."

I'm convinced the man manually manipulates himself with one hand, as he types with the other.

It could not be any other way.

July 2, 2014 at 6:44 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie wrote: "You need to get a grip on your problem"

Sir, I don't have any problems. My conscience is quite clear.

"You have only misery ahead of you unless you repent."

Pal...you had better look in the mirror, for you are totally delusional if you believe you know God any better than I do.

Don't believe me. Ask everyone in this forum what they think of your status as a Christian...

You're lower than whale sh!t....

July 2, 2014 at 6:47 p.m.
limric said...

Good job Clay. You're right on the money.

Corporations (in this case Hobby Lobby) are legal fictions (and please pipe down about their phony religious values) that are created specifically to be SEPARATE from their human owners and operators. Corporations can no more hold religious beliefs than they can have their feelings hurt. And as such, the concept of corporate personhood relies on exemption of liability for owners. If in fact the owners feel their moral convictions are not exempt of moral liability and court orders still confirm exemption for moral opinions of owners what then we have are corporate ‘personhoods’ exempt from laws and accountability based on owners opinions of law and laws outcomes on owners personal opinions. With this ruling, we see expanding corporate personhood rights over public opinions as presumed reflected in law. Once again we find that corporations are above laws and norms we all must live by. Corporations make the laws but are most often not accountable to them.

Some (just a few) posting here obviously understands that, the idiots on the Supreme Court do not.

July 2, 2014 at 6:51 p.m.
una61 said...

Question: Who paid for the contraceptives obtained by Hobby Lobby employees before Obamacare?

July 2, 2014 at 6:55 p.m.
conservative said...

Professing Christian Mr. Anthony Provancher wrote:

"Get something through your thick head. I have NEVER blasphemed God."

"The Bible never has been the word of God and you will never make it so"

"I have never denied one word that can be found in the Bible."

"Jesus sinned"

"Jesus cannot be God"

July 2, 2014 at 6:58 p.m.
rengerry said...

I LOVE Jesus! His company's yard work is exceptional!

July 2, 2014 at 7:01 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

ConMan, you are a phony. I didn't "run" from you. I went to the freaking grocery store, and yes I bought some evil alcohol (a 12 pack of Heineken). Though, I should. You are incapable of intelligible debate for two reasons:

1.) You refuse to admit when you are wrong. I have dissected your inaccurate belief that "sodomy" solely refers to homosexual behavior. My bet is that your wife maybe gave you a hummer many years ago. You don't want to admit that you, yourself are a sodomite.

2.) You have the mental capacity of a ten-year-old. You're a tool and a mental midget.

And quit asking me and inquiringmind if we are homosexuals. If I said I was, you'd probably message me wanting to hook up. I am way more comfortable in my sexuality then you'll ever be. I just don't give a sh!t how people choose to live their lives and who they choose to love. I wouldn't bash you if you were married to a 450 lb woman. To each their own.

Quick question, if gays choose to be gay, when did you ConMan choose to be straight?

July 2, 2014 at 7:18 p.m.
conservative said...

GaussianInteger

Your incredible! You read my statement and you quoted my statement - "Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!"

I responded to inquirinmind when he tried to make the judgment on Sodom and Gomorrah about RAPE instead of Homosexuality.

You quoted me - "Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!"

You in your haste provided definitions of sodomy that had nothing to do with inquiringmind's and my conversation.

Your definitions of sodomy had nothing to do with RAPE!

It is as if you were in a hurry to make a fool of yourself!

Your definitions have nothing to do with rape!

Do you get it now?

Maybe you will be more careful before you but into a conversation the next time although I doubt it.

One more time, our discussion had to do with Homosexuality not rape!

Your definitions of sodomy have nothing to do with rape either!

July 2, 2014 at 7:43 p.m.
conservative said...

Now, if you want to keep going with this I will gladly oblidge.

I make my living on the net, so I can correct you for days and weeks and months if you insist.

Make my days and weeks and months.

If you are not a Homosexual/sodomite then why do you keep defending it and addressing me about it?

Your choice.

July 2, 2014 at 7:49 p.m.
MickeyRat said...

Right on Limric.

One more of the many reasons employers should not be involved in any way in the providing of healthcare for Americans. Or anyone.

And anyway, the idea to bring the case was not Hobby Lobby's, but the work of the conservative 'Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.'

Here’s a turnabout for you Conservatives: "Why should my employer come between me and my doctor?"

Praise the Lord - And pass the prevarication.

July 2, 2014 at 7:50 p.m.

Nobody should come between me and my doctor, especially the fed. government. The fed. government is the largest employer of all, and the largest corporation, by my definition. Senators, Congressman, former Senators and Congressman, and especially bureaucrats are doing pretty well in their lives of "service"

Why should an employer provide anything other than a job, and good conditions for it's employees?

Why should the government have any say at all about what doctor I want to go see?

The government is thoroughly corrupt and incompetent.

July 2, 2014 at 8:08 p.m.

If any of you libs think the Gov. is just some benevolent or self- sacrificing entity that exists to serve us, you're nuts. They're a huge, huge corporation that enriches a relative few. Go to D.C. and see for yourself. The towns and suburbs surrounding D.C in a few states are booming/dripping in wealth.

The government is packed with corporate whores. You bash HL, but they're small potatoes compared to the corporation that is D.C.

July 2, 2014 at 8:18 p.m.
rengerry said...

zab said "Nobody should come between me and my doctor, especially the fed. government."

What about corporations like HL? They must be okay interfering in your medical preferences. Their views are obviously more important than your well-being. But then, maybe you're just a dudebro who doesn't give a crap about women's health.

July 2, 2014 at 8:37 p.m.
alprova said...

Definition of arguing with a brick wall:

Respond with anything to Conservative.

July 2, 2014 at 8:44 p.m.
conservative said...

You poor baby.

The truth is a brick wall.

I hope you repent before you meet Jesus in judgment.

July 2, 2014 at 8:48 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"You quoted me - "Sodomy is synonymous with Homosexual sex not rape!""

Let me try to put this as simple as possible; I don't give a crap about the "rape" part, I was not correcting that part of your statement. I am rightly pointing out that the first part of your contention is moronic. Sodomy is NOT synonymous with Homosexual sex. I have proved you wrong on that. End of story. Here's something else that may shock you; not all gay men have anal sex. And what's your hang-up with anal anyways? For someone that despises homosexuals as much as you, you sure do spend a great deal of time discussing their sexual behavior.

I defend "their behavior" because frankly, IT'S NONE OF YOURS OR MY BUSINESS. Worry about your own problems. You are a hypocritical scumbag. You and your ilk are the reason people turn away from God, that is also fact. You spend your life trying to "out-Christian" other Christians. If guys like you go to heaven, I'll take hell. I'd rather spend an eternity in the Lake of Fire, then spend eternity with self-serving lowlifes like you. You are the most evil kind of human being. Your line of thinking is eerily similar to Adolf Hitler, not Jesus Christ.

July 2, 2014 at 8:54 p.m.
MickeyRat said...

Quote zableedofisterix: ”Why should the government have any say at all about what doctor I want to go see?”

The government doesn’t. Unless it’s somebody like Dr. Mengele or Dr. Moreau, the government doesn’t have a say in it.

July 2, 2014 at 8:56 p.m.
GameOn said...

If you don't like the healthcare plan at Hobby Lobby, don't work for Hobby Lobby. It is pretty simple.

July 2, 2014 at 8:59 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie, you wouldn't know the truth if it danced a jig in front of your face.

The only truth you are aware of is that which you make up off the top of your head.

And that is not universally true, you brain dead moron.

I've been waiting for years for you to disprove just one of my truisms.

One.

How can you believe you know the truth when you cannot debate a simple point that you believe to be untrue?

Get back to me when you come up with a sane answer to that question, will ya'?

July 2, 2014 at 9:05 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

alpo says "Connie, you wouldn't know the truth if it danced a jig in front of your face.

The only truth you are aware of is that which you make up off the top of your head?

Provancher, you shouldn't ever use the word "truth" in any sentence. Your posts are the antithesis of truth. Such a low-life liar.

July 2, 2014 at 9:16 p.m.
rengerry said...

Dang, Jack broke my irony meter when he told Al not to use the word truth in a sentence.

July 2, 2014 at 9:20 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

Clay, it is time for a new lampoon. Maybe one on religious fanaticism and the declaration of independence?

July 2, 2014 at 9:22 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "Provancher, you shouldn't ever use the word "truth" in any sentence. Your posts are the antithesis of truth. Such a low-life liar."

Yet you cannot prove one lie I have allegedly posted into this forum. I can prove anything I have ever offered into this forum and presented as fact.

On the other hand, your confession is archived forever in this forum and it can be pulled up and read any day of the week.

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270586 http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270592 http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270593 http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270595

So who's lying, you self-confessed child predator?

Calling me a liar is quite silly, given the evidence against you, and your unwillingness to correct your public confession.

If...and I do mean if...you are not Jack Dana Dennis, then who are you?

So far, you seem content to be Jack Dana Dennis, the three time convicted child predator of Knox County, Tennessee.

July 2, 2014 at 9:23 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

I don't need to deny it, Stump. No one believes it. Not even your little fat ass.

July 2, 2014 at 9:32 p.m.
MickeyRat said...

Ha ha - Good call Rengerry.

July 2, 2014 at 9:37 p.m.
MickeyRat said...

If an employer's faith conflicts with contraception, there is no reason it cannot conflict with overtime pay, the minimum wage, religious discrimination, collective bargaining......

As was said earlier: "Corporations make the laws but are most often not accountable to them."

July 2, 2014 at 9:39 p.m.
alprova said...

Jack Dana Dennis wrote: "I don't need to deny it, Stump. No one believes it. Not even your little fat ass."

You're nothing, if not in complete denial of the truth.

I am curious though, how one can have a little, fat ass?

An ass can be little or fat, but not both that the same time.

I don't happen to think with my ass. You might, since you brought it up.

You think you don't need to deny being what you admitted to being, but I'm sure if you asked most people with a brain, at least those who aren't ignoring you altogether, you might find that your choice not to deny what you claimed to be, convicted you a fourth time in public.

You're a sick, sick man, and while you might believe that society accepts you, given half a chance, someone would clean your clock for what you have done to three children.

It's no wonder why you hole up in that shack you live in 24/7/365 and why you spend 16 hours a day in this forum.

You know you're a target.

Given the pride you display for being what you are, I hope someone plants a bomb and blows you to hell one day.

July 2, 2014 at 9:46 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpy says someone will "clean my clock". Would that be you, Alps?

July 2, 2014 at 9:54 p.m.
GameOn said...

This might be a bigger bombshell for healthcare according to liberal attorney Jonathan Turley.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0701-turley-obamacare-subsidy-halbig-20140701-story.html

July 2, 2014 at 11:07 p.m.

ren, "doesn't give a crap about women's health"? stupid comment from the Dems playbook. Predictable. Is that supposed to intimidate me?

HL offers, what, 16 forms of birth control, but not 4. How does that indicate they "don't care about women's health"?

The government is a corporation, like I said.

I'll trust a private corporation run by Christians any day over the fed. government.

July 2, 2014 at 11:09 p.m.

GameOn, good piece.

July 2, 2014 at 11:15 p.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++WE PREACH JESUS CHRIST CRUCIFIED+++

The total number of years this core subject has been discussed is in the hundreds. Should this encourage, or, discourage us?

Malleus Deum

July 2, 2014 at 11:18 p.m.
d2edwards said...

The Supreme Court decision in Hobby Lobby has ensured that corporate owners' religions trump your individual rights, and sets a dangerous precedent going forward. Damn the five justices and everyone who supports their decision. You undoubtedly worship a false god. I think it's fair to say that, like democracy, Christianity is dead in America.

July 3, 2014 at 11:21 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.