published Sunday, June 15th, 2014

Cantor

about Clay Bennett...

The son of a career army officer, Bennett led a nomadic life, attending ten different schools before graduating in 1980 from the University of North Alabama with degrees in Art and History. After brief stints as a staff artist at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Fayetteville (NC) Times, he went on to serve as the editorial cartoonist for the St. Petersburg Times (1981-1994) and The Christian Science Monitor (1997-2007), before joining the staff of the ...

143
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.

Looks like Clay didn't do his homework. Dave Brat wasn't really supported by the Tea Party. He went at it alone. Brat is just a regular citizen who took down the majority leader. Scary, isn't it. Beware all incumbent Dems and GOP.

June 15, 2014 at 12:07 a.m.

He's depicted the Tea Party as a rat, and sinister looking. Sorry, Clay rats run the two major parties.

June 15, 2014 at 12:32 a.m.
librul said...

Dave Brat isn't "regular" anything. Listen to the garbage that has come out of his mouth and if you can muster any support for him, you're just as much of an oddball as he is. He's about as nuanced as a prune pit and if he can get elected even without the support of the country's crazy club, the future of our democracy is shrouded in particularly foreboding clouds.

June 15, 2014 at 12:38 a.m.

yeah, libs, sure. garbage to you. Our Constitutional Republic is already "shrouded in foreboding clouds"

June 15, 2014 at 1:10 a.m.
GameOn said...

Lamar Alexander needs to be retired too. He is supposed to represent "We the People" instead of the Chamber of Commerce.

June 15, 2014 at 1:29 a.m.

Yeah, GameOn, I'm for that. He's just taking up space and watching all of this crap go down.

librul, what's a regular citizen to you, a lefty with BO-like views of this country? When I say regular I mean not a politician, not backed by corporations and is willing to take on the powers in D.C. Whatever you think it's a really bid deal to defeat a majority leader who has been there a long time.

June 15, 2014 at 2:55 a.m.
fairmon said...

Will the silent majority quit being silent this November? There appears to be a building anger over the confiscation of more and more of each person's resources through taxes, fees and hidden cost to consumers. The governments revenue per person in the U.S. to pay for all the proposed spending is staggering with no end in sight. Progressives insist the encroachment on personal liberties and freedom are necessary but cannot adequately define why. The sad thing is the lack of understanding of what governments are doing with the conclusions of too many being a result of which TV network they watch or they parrot what their party of choice puts out.

June 15, 2014 at 7:32 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

The left says the Tea Party is waning. And yet...they can't stop fretting about it.

June 15, 2014 at 8:03 a.m.
Easy123 said...

Says the admitted sex offender, TheJackDennis.

Wake up, dumbass, the TeaBagged Party is losing at an alarming pace. The TeaBagged Party is dying.

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2014/06/13/eric-cantor-and-the-tea-partys-losing-record

June 15, 2014 at 8:19 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

1 reason USA is polarized is bcause of what MSM doesn't report. No NYT coverage of Lois Lerner's lost emails. How is that not a story?? -Ari Fleischer.. hugely important point that libs don't get

June 15, 2014 at 8:41 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

re:NYT, wrong jack.

June 15, 2014 at 8:46 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

wrong how?

June 15, 2014 at 8:49 a.m.
MickeyRat said...

”No NYT coverage of Lois Lerner's lost emails.”

Another BOGUS Jack Dennis assertion.

“Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt.”

Once –just once – try sticking to the subject twerp.

June 15, 2014 at 9:35 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Sticking to subject? Like this?^^^ You guys get nasty when things go south for your Redeemer. Very funny.

June 15, 2014 at 9:40 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

How long before all MS-13 guys in Mexico and Central America register as Democrats? Estimates, please.

June 15, 2014 at 9:46 a.m.

Exactly Jack. Funny how often, for a movement that's so irrelevant, you libs feel the need to put it down.

Easy, there is no "party". It's just people who want gov. accountability, our freedom respected, and our Constitution respected.

The fact is Brat took down the majority leader. A very powerful person.

BO's negligence on our borders has put us all in endanger. Any terrorist or terrorists sympathizer can walk right in. We let in suspicious people, and we release terrorists. And we're supposed to ok with this? He's simply not doing his job, and trying to convince us what we see, based on facts, is not what it is.

June 15, 2014 at 9:50 a.m.
fairmon said...

I hate to inform those that get their jollies attacking the tea party. It is like having to tell a kid there is no Santa but there is no tea party. In some areas of the country there may be a fraternity of people that support similar principles and band together on a specific cause or candidate. But, there is no third party "tea party".

June 15, 2014 at 10:11 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

^^ But Mon, the Left must have a boogerman.

June 15, 2014 at 10:13 a.m.
limric said...

I’m heartened to see a corrupt and truly disgusting individual get booted on his keester.

His opponent David Brat has said repeatedly: “I’m not against business. I’m against big business in bed with big government.” Also saying: ”All of the investment banks, up in New York and DC, they should have gone to jail.” Hmm…..yea I agree 100%.

While I’m encouraged that a Republican can say something like that and win as a Republican, I prefer to wait and see what becomes of his populist slogans once he is elected and subject to the same fund-raising pressure as other incumbents; and GOP insiders crush him for attempting to take on powerful elites in Rome...er...I mean Washington.

Hopefully, this kind of ass-kicking is exactly the out-the-door policy ‘progressives’ start doing to get rid of the corrupt Democrats. Then, our country might have a chance.

The Penis Bros attempt to distract with flags, gays, terrorists and commies can't keep suppressing/disguising blatant criminality and cronyism forever. But then again, there is an overabundance of the Jack Dennis types, so maybe they can.

One can only dream…

June 15, 2014 at 10:18 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

^ what type is that, Limmie?

June 15, 2014 at 10:20 a.m.

As long as people want accountability, our Constitution respected, our borders protected, and our guaranteed freedoms respected their will be a "tea party" of some sort. BO's actions are unacceptable, period. It has nothing to do with a specific party. screw both parties. They've failed and are corrupt. It has nothing to with FOX news, or some conservative radio talk show host. You can see what's going on for yourself.

We have two parties who are willing to put us in danger just so they can secure future voters and make the party more powerful.

BO, Valarie Jarrett, and Jeb Bush have profusely praised illegal aliens breaking into our country, making them out to be special, and even saying our future depends on them. What bull$hit.

How stupid do they think we are? As if we don't no the difference between immigrating to a country lawfully and properly, and breaking into a country/illegality.

The Taliban/Al Quada/ISIS are all capable of taking advantage of our borders. What the hell good is it for BO to send warships over to the Gulf, talk about funding rebels in Syria, influence thing in Libya and Egypt, but leave our borders open. Same with Bush, he unleashes hell on terrorists in the middle east, but left our borders weak.

June 15, 2014 at 10:23 a.m.
fairmon said...

In most cases it is damned if he don't, damned if he does. In Obama's case it appears we are damned if he don't do something and we are really damned if he does.

Is the border leaking like a sieve not a national emergency warranting calling out the national guard? Uh, oh the guards are weakened by being called to active duty, not available? Can you take the handcuffs off of the local police? No, they may try to enforce the laws that are now in force and refuse entry to new illegals.

Another key person, the head of homeland security, is strangely silent. Is she anticipating being the center of the next scandal with incompetence being a major flaw?

June 15, 2014 at 10:26 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Dept of Homeland Security is big gubmint gone bad. Yeah, I know, it came from Dubya.

June 15, 2014 at 10:36 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

In a letter to House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), Jan Brewer mentioned that illegal immigrants are actually flagging down border patrol agents so they can enter the United States, where the Obama administration has led them to believe they will receive amnesty. She said it was also their responsibility to do something about the crisis at the border. "As congressional leaders, you have the ability to take action, get answers and stop the lawlessness that is unfolding. On behalf of the State of Arizona, I ask you to do so," she said. "I urge you to use your voice, and the authority of your offices and the institutions you lead, to immediately and permanently terminate this atrocious policy and stop this massive, unfettered influx of illegal crossings into our country." Brewer said that the federal government's "primary and fundamental responsibility" is "protecting our nation and its citizens," "but it cannot be done as long as we have an unsecured border and a federal executive that invites and encourages illegal activity." 435 House Members, 100 Senators, perhaps a dozen sets of nads.

June 15, 2014 at 10:59 a.m.

fairmon, good points. I bet you she takes the fall, like the guy at the VA.

Gov. Brewer is dead on. She should take this to court. Why isn't this an impeachable act? What if it breaks down even more, and a terrorist actually does come through the border, or some Mexican gang commits some atrocity on US soil against US citizens. That's not far fetched or alarmist. That could actually happen.

June 15, 2014 at 12:15 p.m.

BO is very much to blame for this, but so is GWB.

June 15, 2014 at 12:16 p.m.
fairmon said...

zableedofisterix said... BO is very much to blame for this, but so is GWB.

True. It is actually a total government failure to accept responsibility and fulfill their obligation to the American people. How many have traveled to the border and observed first hand what is going on?

Why do those in D.C. insist on making illegal entry easy but do little to manage legal entry? Who accepts and believes the crap put out by politicians that we need them? What is the likelihood top of the class engineers and other disciplines are in those crossing the border illegally? Who believes those entering are all Hispanic with no middle eastern potential terrorist mixing in with the crowd?

Why do people's heart swell up like a pea for illegal kids while the children of millions of Americans go to bed dirty, hungry and without love and hope every night?

June 15, 2014 at 12:33 p.m.
GameOn said...

All of those politicians voting for the bail out should have followed Iceland. They correctly handled the financial crisis.

June 15, 2014 at 12:59 p.m.

Sounds good to me, GameOn.

Politicians get away with murder here because they can buy their way out, and the media won't go after them. Wall Street, Huge corporations and wealthy donors are making like bandits under BO.

June 15, 2014 at 1:07 p.m.
Plato said...

Brat is a interesting individual. Most of his positions are consistent with the Tea Party, you can go to his website and see that, even though he did not receive any funds from them (becasue they thought it would be money down the drain).

OTOH as pointed out by limric, he has an anti-big corporation stance which oddly is in sync with the Elizabeth Warren/left types. Both groups right and left are populists.

I think his victory has more to do with people in general getting fed up with business as usual in Washington and politicians being in bed with the mega-corps that fill their campaign coffers. Not so much immigration reform.

Lessons to be learn. You can win an election against all odds, even on a shoestring budget if you listen to your electorate.

June 15, 2014 at 7:50 p.m.
Plato said...

TheJackDennis said...

In a letter to House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), Jan Brewer mentioned that illegal immigrants are actually flagging down border patrol agents so they can enter the United States, where the Obama administration has led them to believe they will receive amnesty.


There is nothing this President has ever said that would lead anyone to believe that he would grant amnesty to someone that enters illegally. IN fact there has been more illegals deported under Obama then any other previous President. That kind of crap comes straight out of the mouths of the Coyotes who are collecting $5,000 a head to get them across the Rio Grande.

June 15, 2014 at 7:56 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

That ^^^ kind of crap?? Are you saying The Organizer doesn't plan to push for amnesty for millions of illegals? Are you serious?

June 15, 2014 at 8:06 p.m.

Plato, "immigration reform"? It's about illegal aliens and our BO led government using them to gain political power. The safety and well being of US citizens be damned. There's nothing wrong with our immigration policies or laws. We shouldn't have to change a thing just because some politicians want to gain from it and the invaders don't want to follow the rules.

They don't Coyotes anymore, they can just walk across when they see the welcome mat. BO and both parties are allowing this catastrophe to happen so they can gain from it.

Brat hammered home the illegal alien issue pretty hard.

June 15, 2014 at 8:08 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Plato, have you ever seen pics of the illegals? Do they look to you like they could've ponied up $5k each? Come on man!

June 15, 2014 at 8:35 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

Again, you guys are just clueless when it comes to illegal immigration. If there is no employment for illegals, they will not come. It's as simple as that. They don't come here to vote, unlike Fister believes, they come here to try to make money.

June 15, 2014 at 8:51 p.m.

There isn't enough employment for US citizens, apparently. Black unemployment is huge. There are millions unemployed here. I think you're clueless. This is different than in the past, yeah, they do come here for employment, and the rest, there's always that, but this is about politicians/two parties trying to coddle illegal aliens and get them to vote for them. They've flat out said so. "our future rests on dreamers" BO said. Well, that's all fine and dandy, but what about the 300 millions citizens in this country who work hard, need work, study hard to build a future etc.? Jeb Bush said they come here out of love. Isn't that special. So, we're supposed to elevate them over all law abiding immigrants? This is nonsense.

This isn't immigration, it's simply people invading a country and those that are entrusted to defend our borders are looking the other way for personal gain, meaning the government and corporations.

It's illegal entry. They're no more immigrants than burglars are guests in a home.

They are very much pushing for amnesty. They want their votes. BO wants their allegiance. They're ignorant, they'll be loyal to the person that gives them the most. GOP/J.Bush, or BO/Dems.

"Our future rests" with them? What kind of sorry ass country is this that our future is so bleak that our hopes rest on invaders from other countries? Our future rests on lawlessness? Think about that. The POTUS states that our future depends on them, and a jackass in the other party, Bush, say they come here out of love. This is madness.

June 15, 2014 at 9:40 p.m.

Terrorists are laughing at us. Our border is Swiss cheese and BO lets loose 5 America hating terrorists in a trade that he's know passed the buck onto Hagel for.

June 15, 2014 at 9:44 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

Illegals can't vote. Again, if they aren't coming here to work, why are they coming here? It's amazing how you honestly believe immigrants come to the US illegally, to vote for Obama and the democrats. Let us all know when you get back from Delusionville.

June 15, 2014 at 10:13 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

fairmon sez, "There appears to be a building anger over the confiscation of more and more of each person's resources through taxes, fees and hidden cost to consumers. " I only hear the tea party squawking about paying taxes and requests for charitable giving. Studies at UCLA show poor people give a larger percentage of their income to charity that the rich. Who'd a thunk it?

Z-fister sez, "As long as people want ... our Constitution respected, our borders protected," Z, can you tell me what the inscription on the Statue of Liberty says? That inscription is derived from respect for the world-acknowledged constitutional ideal this country is based upon. Where are the words "I'm selfish, keep out alien" written?

The terrorist we should fear are the minority tea party intent on forcing their ideas of right and wrong on the whole public majority, and who gouge the eyes of the downtrodden with their thumbs. They do the ISIS justice. The public should keep open their eyes especially If we let the teapartiers keep guns in their cold hands, as Charlton Heston once said.

June 15, 2014 at 10:22 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

So Gassy, there coming here to work. Is that reason enough to allow almost unfettered border crossings?

IQ: Open borders, anything goes. A good thing, right?

June 15, 2014 at 10:37 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

ok, so I meant they're

June 15, 2014 at 10:55 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

NYT WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is contacting hundreds of thousands of people with subsidized health insurance to resolve questions about their eligibility, as consumer advocates express concern that many will be required to repay some or all of the subsidies. yeah boy, good luck with that

June 15, 2014 at 10:58 p.m.
fairmon said...

inquiringmind said...Z, can you tell me what the inscription on the Statue of Liberty says?

im..legal entry is good, illegal entry is bad.

The inscription does not say sneak in illegally, we will alter and ignore the legal process to U.S. citizenship.

June 16, 2014 at 2:14 a.m.
fairmon said...

The tea groups will be active but unnecessary in the 2016 elections. There is no "tea party". There is no TNC to compete with or compare to the DNC and RNC.

June 16, 2014 at 2:17 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

Don't hide behind semantics boys, you fight even modification of the citizenship process because you don't want any aliens in this country. They work too hard to earn a buck, and do jobs of back-breaking manual labor that you don't want.

June 16, 2014 at 8:05 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

IQ, your gullibility knows no bounds.

June 16, 2014 at 8:16 a.m.
Maximus said...

The only RAT on this page is the hate filled, leftist bullying of Clay Bennett. On another front, the Iraqi front that is, it seems Barry The Welfare Pimp knows how to do one thing very, very well....tuck his tail and retreat! The United States Iraqi embassy in Baghdad is being evacuated.

I hope Obama had a good round to golf this weekend. Idiots like Clay Bennett put this joker in office TWICE. Wow,

June 16, 2014 at 9:04 a.m.
fairmon said...

IM said...They work too hard to earn a buck, and do jobs of back-breaking manual labor that you don't want.

I have no objection to legal immigration, the current process is not overly difficult, has been in place for years and worked fine. Why do liberals condone the slave labor process illegals and migrant workers are subjected to? Don't fill those jobs you say people don't want and the pay goes to a level people want them.

You know the buses delivering illegals, mostly kids, are going to the border patrol since they think the government has said they could come in unchallenged. Over 100,000 are anticipated coming in this way. The border patrol is so distracted by that dilemma there is no policing of the border so the drug cartels and criminals are just walking across at their leisure.

June 16, 2014 at 9:32 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

^^^ Mon, re the last paragraph...many on the left just flat-out don't care. Eh, IQ?

June 16, 2014 at 9:36 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

jack hasn't a clue, he ought to go out to Southern California and see the Hispanics living in caves dug in the sides of the arroyos and working all day on construction sites or picking avacados or strwaberries so they can send money home or to the family.

Actually the immigrantion process is pretty screwed up fairmon. Jobs go unfilled in the agriculture business because growers can't find people to work in the fields. Immigration in this country is based on an irony. We let in all sorts of immigrants in with MS and PhD in sciences and medicine because there isn't enough Americans going to grad school to fill the jobs.

We have historically relied on immigrants to fill the less desirable jobs, Africans, Irish, Italian, Spanish, Puerto Ricans, Vietnamese, Phillipinos, etc, then applied racial/ethnic bigotry towards them (list the derogatory terms applied to those ethnic groups) and watched as second/third and following generations became pillars in the community enhancing and expanding our cultural heritage and vision.

Fairmon, No, I don't know of "the busses delivering immigrants, mostly kids anticipate to be 100,000's" and so distracting the Border Patrol (sic) that " drug cartels walk across the border at their leisure." I suspect that is a distorted news story blown way out of proportion to the reality. Furthermore, we need young people in the US who want to succeed.

If the border patrol is so distracted, why don't you drive down to Mexico through one of the border crossings in Texas, AZ or CA, pick up some weed or coke and bring it back, let's see how porous the border really is.

June 16, 2014 at 9:55 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

IQ posts jack hasn't a clue, he ought to go out to Southern California and see the Hispanics living in caves dug in the sides of the arroyos and working all day on construction sites or picking avacados or strwaberries(sic) so they can send money home or to the family. I've been to SoCal as well as S. Texas. I've seen this blight. No one I know is against legal immigration. It's the "L" word that rubs you the wrong way, eh Q?

June 16, 2014 at 10:06 a.m.
Plato said...

TheJackDennis said...

"That ^^^ kind of crap?? Are you saying The Organizer doesn't plan to push for amnesty for millions of illegals? Are you serious?"

Pathway to citizenship as part of a comprehensive bipartisan bill, such as the one Marco Rubio introduced (and later ran from) or G.W. Bush floated before him - YES. Amnesty - NO.

There are 10 Million+ of these folks in the US living in the shadows. They are not going to be rounded up and deported. We need to find a way to bring them into the system so we can weed out the criminals and depart them, and have the remainder pay their fair share of taxes, and live by the same laws the rest of us do. The pathway to citizenship is a 13 year process that involves a background check as well as fines. Regardless of what the hacks at Fox call it, that's not "amnesty".

June 16, 2014 at 10:33 a.m.
Plato said...

zableedofisterix said...

"Plato, "immigration reform"? It's about illegal aliens and our BO led government using them to gain political power. "

Illegal have been coming into this country in droves for the last 4 decades and both political parties have looked the other way. The Republicans because many of their corporate backers wanted the cheap labor and the Democrats becasue they were a favorable voting block. Ronald Reagan DID give amnesty to over 3 million but no one bothered to put a stop to the influx.

Border security staff has doubled under Obama and more illegals have been deported under Obama then any previous president, but there is only so much a president can do by executive order. Therefore your attempt to lay the problem at the feet of the President isn't supported by the facts.

We DO need an immigration bill that would put stronger requirements on IDs to keep employers from hiring illegals which is the magnet, as well as added boarder security, allowing us to keep talented professionals who come here and get degrees from our best universities in science technology and medicine and told they have to leave. There has been some bipartisan support for such reform but unfortunately the intolerance of those on the far right have nixed the opportunity to make progress, mostly due to the misuse of the A-word.

June 16, 2014 at 10:44 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Plato, whether you like it or not, it is the A word. And what's the use with no border security?

June 16, 2014 at 10:52 a.m.
Plato said...

TheJackDennis said...

"Plato, whether you like it or not, it is the A word. And what's the use with no border security?"

You can call Candy Crowley "hot" too, but she's still Candy Crowley:)

Agree we need strong boarder security measures as a part of a comprehensive bill.

June 16, 2014 at 11:06 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Candy must have a good agent. ^

June 16, 2014 at 11:20 a.m.

Plato, the Democrats/BO are very much corporate whores. Both Dems and GOP want them in their camp, and both of them are in bed with big corporations.

The "A word" ?..They are what they are, illegal aliens. Both party are responsible for this mess, but BO has thrown gasoline on the fire.

Look, we're being led by an a-hole who thinks he can say something as dumb as, "our future rests on dreamers/illegals". And what are legitimate immigrants who come in lawfully and properly, chopped liver?

This is pure corruption by Dems, GOP, DOHS, Corporation, Chambers of Commerce and the media. It's about control, money, power, and using ignorant people to increase power.

June 16, 2014 at 11:23 a.m.
timbo said...

Bennett is still an idiot. Liberals just don't get it. We will never listen to your advice to become more like you to win. Conservatives have the house, they are getting ready to take the senate, and if Hillary dillary dock runs, we have a good chance for the presidency if we don't nominate an establishment liberal Republican like the last two.

If the tea party is dead, why worry your liberal little heads about it?

June 16, 2014 at 11:29 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

timbo, don't you get the point, the national electorate has already rejected your politics? I'm not worried about the "i-l" in illegal either, no one is trying to open the doors and say everybody just come on in. Well meaning folks are trying to solve an existing problem for people well established in our society. Where did your charity go? Only to your friends?

June 16, 2014 at 11:48 a.m.

inq, you're a tool, plain and simple. You're dead wrong about that. If not for an ignorant and duped electorate, let by that fraud BO, and with help from the media, you libs would have nothing. Cantors loss is stunning because it's very much a rejection of what BO is doing. Cantor who is backing BO on this, has his ass handed to him for doing do. Brat hammered home the illegal alien mess.

You libs are constantly putting lipstick on a pig and telling us that it's not a pig. You try and control the dialogue. You call illegal alien/criminals "dreamers" and you think you're being clever. The country is center right, just look at any map. Cantors loss is rejection of liberal policy because Cantor was going along with BO.

Look at you language, "charity"? what does that have to do with it? Why not just let illegal aliens in constantly and use the military to force tax paying citizens out of their homes and replace them with illegals.

June 16, 2014 at noon
TheJackDennis said...

IQ says "Well meaning folks are trying to solve an existing problem for people well established in our society." Does "well established" include the daily hundreds, if not thousands? Does it include those thousands that will continue to come in?

June 16, 2014 at 12:09 p.m.
Easy123 said...

zabledeedumbass,

So if "libs" didn't have the voting majority, the President, the Senate, the media, and history on their side, they would have nothing, right? LMAO! Do you proof-read your bullsh!t?

You do realize just because most of the map is "red" doesn't mean the country is "center right". There are a lot less people in those "Red" states. I guess you didn't know that. President Obama won the popular vote by nearly 10 million in 2008 and 2012. What part of that is "center right"? If anything, the country is moving center left, especially on social issues. Young people, minority groups, and women all tend to vote Democrat. Republicans/TeaBaggers will never win those demographics. EVER!

You just prove your simplemindedness every time you post.

Cantor's loss will hurt Republicans in the long run. Immigration reform is the only way you knuckle-dragging dipsh!ts have any chance at regaining any ground with minority groups. And you just screwed the pooch on that front, as usual.

President Obama is deporting illegal immigrants at a record pace. Why weren't you morons bitching about illegal immigration and amnesty when Reagan, GHW Bush, GW Bush were in office?

Your entire life is based on hypocrisy and ignorance. For everything you have to say against President Obama, anyone with a brain can bring up a similar, more egregious offense that happened under previous, Republican administrations.

June 16, 2014 at 12:59 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

Z-fister, you may call the electorate dumb, but it beats you imposing your minority will on the majority. You are on drugs to imply Cantor and Obama share anything in common, the tea party was just doing with Cantor what rugby players do best, eating their dead.

Gee, jack, I'll bet there will be a billion immigrants trying to squeeze through Laredo, all on one big bus. What skin is it off your back, anyway? They work, hold jobs you think are below you, pay taxes, the majority are strong family-oriented, moral catholics. Where is the downside?

June 16, 2014 at 1:19 p.m.

inq, they were on the same page on kissing up to illegal aliens. Cantor, is as a big a corporate whore as BO. He met with Zuckerberg and Soros both kiss ups to illegal aliens so they can gain from it.

Brat beat Cantor because Cantor was backing down to the lefties.

I don't have to proof read anything, you dick. I stand by what I say. BO is a fraud, and the media pushed it along. America is a center right country. I stand by that.

Once again, dick/easy, bringing up the incompetence, wrong doing and lawlessness of other presidents and politicians does not absolve BO and the current Dems of wrong doing and lawlessness. Nobody on here who is conservative let's Bush skate on anything. But you keep making it out to be that way.

The fact is BO is a rogue president, a lawless president, but it's ok with you libs because he's has your ideology.

Cantors loss is bad news for Dems as well. It has nothing to do with minorities, it has everything to do with lawlessness and corruption.

June 16, 2014 at 1:31 p.m.
timbo said...

Inquiringmind...The electorate didn't have a clear choice. Hopefully they will next time. As far as the "national electorate" if I remember right the House is elected "nationally."

The last two presidential elections were an aberration. Things happened that don't normally happen. The white vote was down from historic levels due to conservatives being sick of the candidates we are forced to vote for. The black vote increased over normal levels because they love their bro...and we get Obama for 8 years. The worst president in history. He will set the democrat party back 20 years.

June 16, 2014 at 1:38 p.m.
Easy123 said...

zabledeedumbass,

You stand by what you say because you are patently ignorant. You've been shown the error of your thinking, yet you cling to ideas that are quite obviously incorrect, misinformed, or blatantly wrong. America is not a "center right" country no matter if you stand by it or not. The facts prove you wrong. FACTS!

Who said anything about absolving anyone? Lawlessness? LMFAO! It's all bullsh!t with you!

Everyone let Bush skate then and now. I'm not making it out to be any way. That's just the way it is. You want to make everything President Obama does out to be "communism, lawlessness, incompetence, etc." when you were saying nothing of the sort when other President's were doing the same thing on a larger scale.

The fact is you're a fool and the inane garbage you spew is meaningless. It is not congruent with reality and no thinking person should even consider it.

Your last two sentences are just dumb. You're just parroting what your daddy Rush says. Your mindless without the Right WingNut echo chamber to tell you what to think.

June 16, 2014 at 1:43 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

You're simply presenting a whole lot of conjecture backed up by a load of hopes and wishes. Whites still accounted for over 70% of the total electorate in 2012 in case you were wondering. The White vote was down less that 5% from 2004. Historically down? Sure, but not by much. I bet you didn't know any of this though. You just like to carry that Fox News/Rush Limbaugh-made excuse with you because the minority vote finally became a problem for you Right WingNuts.

You speak for the entire white electorate? You speak for the entire black electorate? What about the hispanic electorate? Who would take the opinion of a known racist like yourself seriously anyway? "Bro"? You just can't help it, can you? Give you some rope and you hang yourself.

The Democratic party will still be 50 years ahead of the Republican party even if President Obama did set them back 20 years.

June 16, 2014 at 1:46 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

See no racism from Tim.

June 16, 2014 at 1:51 p.m.

50 years ahead of what? You libs just spew the same old crap. You're monumental hypocrites. Your brand of corruption is better than the GOP's, huh? You're insane.

And "our future rests with dreamers"/illegal aliens, makes any sense?

We're supposed to go along with that? Another liberal gem, like "we need to pass it in order to see what's in it" Boy, you guys just 50 years ahead. Brilliant.

June 16, 2014 at 1:54 p.m.
Easy123 said...

Who cares, admitted sex offender, TheJackDennis? Are you going to start talking like Tarzan again like you did during your "Rebus" days?

Plenty here have seen timboner's racism many times before.

June 16, 2014 at 1:56 p.m.

You'll lose the Senate, won't regain the House, and your hopes rest on old leftist bag who loves to scream. Good luck.

June 16, 2014 at 1:56 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) apologized today for referring to President Barack Obama as "light skinned" and "with no Negro dialect" in private conversations during the 2008 presidential campaign. **Racism, Easy? Like Reids?

June 16, 2014 at 1:58 p.m.
Easy123 said...

zabledeedumbass,

It's probably more like 70 years now. ALL you spew is the same old crap. YOU wrote the book on hypocrites. ALL you know is corruption. YOU set the tone for "insane".

Considering the latino population is the fastest growing population in the United States, YES! It makes a lot of sense.

Your record on predictions isn't very good. 2008 & 2012 Presidential elections ring a bell? You have no hopes. What could I wish you good luck on? Good luck being irrelevant!

June 16, 2014 at 2 p.m.
Easy123 said...

Admitted sex offender, TheJackDennis,

Do you want me to bring up the thousands of blatantly racist comments by any number of Republican/TeaBaggers?

I don't see any of you dipsh!ts apologizing.

June 16, 2014 at 2:03 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

^Why are you so nasty? This place was noticeably more civil for the few days you and your BFF were gone.

June 16, 2014 at 2:05 p.m.
Easy123 said...

LMFAO!

I'll copy and paste your nastiness on here until the cows come home if you don't get off your high horse, admitted sex offender, TheJackDennis.

You aren't civil. You're just doing your usual sanctimonious act. You aren't fooling anyone. You and your butt-buddy, zabledeedumbass, have been going a great job polishing each other off on here. I don't see you saying anything to him about his "nastiness". Wonder why?

June 16, 2014 at 2:07 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

His nastiness is minor league compared to you, junior.

June 16, 2014 at 2:14 p.m.

No, Easy, it doesn't make any sense. So what if they are.

It has nothing to do with lawlessness and not defending our borders. He's saying our future rests will them so it's ok that they come in illegally. They're so important that the law doesn't apply to them? Nonsense.

What about the Latinos already here who are citizens..who came in properly? The future doesn't rest with them? Are they more valuable if they came in illegally?

See, you libs think no one is listening to what you're saying, and no one sees what's going on. Cantor's defeat proved that people are catching on.

June 16, 2014 at 2:16 p.m.
Easy123 said...

I'll take that as a compliment considering it came from an admitted sex offender, like yourself.

June 16, 2014 at 2:16 p.m.
Easy123 said...

zabledeedumbass,

Of course it wouldn't make sense to you. I've already established that you are patently ignorant. You wouldn't be able to make sense of it.

Show me where President Obama said "our future rests will them so it's ok that they come in illegally". Otherwise, what you're saying is complete and utter BULLSH!T. You're making this stuff up!

I guess the President has to name every group in the US for you to be happy, right? Look up the word "context", moron.

Again, you're just talking out of your a$$. Your last two sentences don't make sense. YOU'RE MINDLESS! Cantor's defeat proved that Republicans/TeaBaggers will undoubtedly be on the wrong side of history regarding immigration.

June 16, 2014 at 2:20 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Nothing like being lectured by a junior college grad and student at a 3rd tier law school. Good luck with that bar exam, Bunky.

June 16, 2014 at 2:27 p.m.
Easy123 said...

You're too dumb to realize that "junior college grad" and "student at a 3rd tier law school" wouldn't be possible unless I attended a 4-year university in between. Can't go from junior college to law school, dumbass. It's not even a challenge any more to point out your stupidity. Good luck with your parole, admitted sex offender.

Funny, eh*? You just can't help but get smacked around, can you, TheJackDennis?

Any more zingers, coffin dodger?

June 16, 2014 at 2:30 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

people move on to 4 yr. colleges and graduate all the time, ignoramus. some of them can even qualify for real law schools.

June 16, 2014 at 2:33 p.m.
Easy123 said...

I already stated that, moron. Learn to read ALL the words, admitted sex offender, TheJackDennis.

Let me help you: "unless I attended a 4-year university in between". Did you miss that part, ignoramus? Bwahahahahaha!

It's too easy.

June 16, 2014 at 2:35 p.m.

You've established nothing. The only thing you're established is that you libs will do anything to make BO look good. Full time job, huh.

Easy, "dreamers" is you libs' label for illegal aliens.

All the young people in this country don't dream, or have any future? LOL

No, easy, it's not immigration, immigration is when people come in the right way/lawful way. You're on the wrong side of that. What you call immigration is illegal entry. They're illegal aliens. This is the only country in the world where illegal aliens storm in, walk about freely, and demand things from the government. Whether it was under Bush, or now under BO, it's madness.

It is amazing, though, that you can post/type so fast with one hand. Does your mommy bring you paper towels?

June 16, 2014 at 2:42 p.m.
Easy123 said...

zabledeedumbass,

Whatever you say, dipsh!t.

"Dreamers" can mean any number of things. Illegal and legal immigrants would likely fall under that category.

Like I said, CONTEXT! LOL! You're too dumb to converse with. When President Obama is talking about immigration, he isn't going to mention EVERY group in the United States.

It is immigration. If voting is any indication, YOU'RE already on the wrong side of it. I actually haven't given MY definition of immigration and not all immigrants are illegal.

Show me where illegal aliens "storm in, walk about freely, and demand things from the government". You're delusional beyond comprehension!

It's probably easier for me to type with one hand than you typing with Rush Limbaugh's nuts in your mouth, Fox News' thumb up your ass, while giving the admitted sex offender, TheJackDennis, a nice tug.

Your mommy has been bringing me a lot more than paper towels.

June 16, 2014 at 2:47 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

Anyone who claims Cantor and Brat are other than two peas in a pod or that Cantor and President Obama are alike is trying to pull the wool over your eyes.

The fundamental problem is folks such as Z-fister and this guy jack think everyone is either Satan or God. They refuse to acknowledge there is more than one reasonable position on an issue and paint themself in a corner with the claim it is either my way or the highway. Why are you afraid to listen to an argument that opposes yours, and why is compromise so frightening to you? From its very inception, the founding fathers understood the necessity of compromise, believing that led to a rational solution to intractable differences, you guys are trying to prove them wrong so you violate the very precept of the declaration of independence, the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Don't you believe in the form of government? Are you more interested in having it your way than peace and unity?

I can tell z-fister is having difficulty coming up with cogent arguments for his rigid position because he is starting to descend into the domain of potty talk and cat-calls operating on the idea that he may yell and name call until they go home.

And if you did not understand a previous post, Z, immigrants have always been a source of enrichment of our population and culture, but for some people all change is perceived as bad so they oppose anything new.

June 16, 2014 at 2:48 p.m.

Once again, libs, it's not immigration, it's illegal entry/illegal aliens. We're a country of immigrants, and everyone is welcome, but this' has nothing to do with that. Lawlessness isn't acceptable. Plain and simple.

Compromise to you libs is just giving you what you want.

It's like this, now concentrate, immigrants come into this country all the time the right way. Illegal aliens are coming into the country the wrong way. You want their votes so bad that you're willing to accept lawlessness.

Cantor lost, again, because of the illegal alien issue.

Citizens are more important than illegal aliens and their well being should be priority. Immigrants who come in the proper/ lawful way are more important than illegal aliens and their well being should be priority. Is that clear?

June 16, 2014 at 3:01 p.m.

Dems and GOP are so corrupt that they're willing to put our country in danger just so they can secure future votes to get more power, and enrich corporations.

June 16, 2014 at 3:03 p.m.

You call me dumb, but what's dumber than continually trying to convince everyone that something illegal is really not illegal, and it's actually a good thing. LOL "dreamers" you mean the ones humping each other, being bussed around the southwest, complaining that the government supplied burritos are making them sick and the eggs are cold, and the ones giving everyone the finger?

Not to mention the very strong possibility that terrorists could easily get in.

June 16, 2014 at 3:16 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

z-bister sez again, "Ir's my way or the highway, no room for other opinions."

It's all about doing everything the "proper" way no matter what.

June 16, 2014 at 3:16 p.m.

You can't have one standard for one group, and another for everyone else. Doesn't work. You can have any opinion you want, but the fact is both parties are fighting tooth and nail for the future vote of illegals, and both looking the other way. The welfare of American Citizens takes priority. Nothing wrong with that.

June 16, 2014 at 3:19 p.m.
Easy123 said...

Republicans/TeaBaggers are losing that "fight" in a rout.

You're delusional, zableedumbass. That's all there is to it.

June 16, 2014 at 3:23 p.m.
timbo said...

Easy123....Look at the actual election numbers. How is it racist to point out numbers? Blacks will not turn out for Hillary like they did Barry. According to ABC News (not exactly a leftwingnut news organization) "While the number of non-Hispanic white voters remained statistically the same, about 2 million more black voters, 2 million more Hispanic voters and about 600,000 more Asian voters showed up to the polls." 2008 set an all time record for black turnout.

In 2012 blacks surpassed whites for the first time ever. Another leftie propaganda sheet, the Huffington Post wrote, "WASHINGTON — America's blacks voted at a higher rate than other minority groups in 2012 and by most measures surpassed the white turnout for the first time, reflecting a deeply polarized presidential election in which blacks strongly supported Barack Obama while many whites stayed home.

Had people voted last November at the same rates they did in 2004, when black turnout was below its current historic levels, Republican Mitt Romney would have won narrowly, according to an analysis conducted for The Associated Press."

It is obvious that blacks turned out for Barry because he is black. It was racist. They wanted someone of their own race to win. On the other hand, if whites hated blacks so much, like you liberals constantly say, why was their turnout lower than ever. Wouldn't they have broken their necks to get to the polls to make sure Barry didn't win?

The fact is, as I said, it was a combination of historically high black turnout and historically low white turnout. Whites stayed home because Romney wasn't conservative enough.

I think in 2016 the black turnout will go back to normal and the white turnout will be up because of how terrible Barry has been. The wild card is the female turnout because of sexism and the fact that women want a woman president no matter how bad they are. Just like they wanted a black president.

HOW IN THE WORLD CAN EASY123 BE SO SPECTACULARLY WRONG ALL THE TIME?

June 16, 2014 at 3:33 p.m.

What rout? You do realize that in the fall there's a really good chance you'll lose the Senate. You have no chance of taking the house.

The GOP stands for virtually nothing, continually shoots themselves in the foot, gives token opposition to BO/just words, and yet you'll probably lose the Senate.

BO is coming across like he doesn't give a damn about the citizenry. The millions of people in this country who are unemployed, under- employed or hardly working, don't care about the plight of illegal aliens and how much it means to the future of the Democrat Party, or the GOP. It doesn't look good, no matter what you say, to have the POTUS say the future "rests on dreamers" meaning illegal aliens. Everyone else has to do things the right way, but they come illegally and all of sudden they're our most valuable commodity?

Laughable.

June 16, 2014 at 3:34 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

timbo, so it all about race: the only reason President Obama won is the minority black vote came out in numbers? If I recall, the Clintons were widely admired and strongly supported by African-Americans. Romney lost fair and square, the electorate didn't like his silver spoon always hanging out of his mouth.

Z-bister sez, 'The millions of people in this country who are unemployed, under- employed or hardly working, the millions of people who aren't working don't care about illegal aliens..."

How many of those unemployed signed up for picking veggies in FL is response to the add in the paper this week? How many stayed in school through college and got a degree in something other than basket weaving or English? How many of them are willing to move around to where there is work, like N. Dakota where the economy is growing at +10%. Your argument has lots of holes in it buster.

The economy is not in great shape but it is because you want to go to Wal Mart and buy things a cheaply as you can and the only way to do that is to move manufacturing off shore. Oh, you make enough so you don't have to shop at Wal Mart? Well then what an opportunity to help some of those less fortunate than you who don't have jobs or have to work flipping burgers at $14,400/year supporting a family, if they are lucky? Let's do it the right way. Or would you just laugh at them instead?

June 16, 2014 at 3:51 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

The numbers aren't racist. The things you say and have said are.

Whites still accounted for 70% of the total electorate. Black vote = 66% of 12% of the population. White vote = 64% of 63.7% of the population.

It's racist to say that all black people voted for President Obama because he was black. You just can't help yourself. Did all the white people voting for Romney do so because he was white?

As I already state, the white voter turnout wasn't that far below normal levels. And maybe the racists just didn't vote. Ever thought of that?

"Whites stayed home because Romney wasn't conservative enough"? Can you possibly be serious? You speak for every white voter now?

It's all speculation and conjecture. You're a racist and a mysogynist. It's simple.

What was I wrong about again? You haven't proven anything I've said wrong yet. I'll wait.

June 16, 2014 at 3:53 p.m.
timbo said...

inquiringmind...LOOK AT THE NUMBERS, READ THE COMMENTS IN THE HUFFINGTON POST...You think it was just a coincidence that blacks showed up in record numbers to vote for a black guy. Almost every article you read about that election since the census data came in agrees with me.

I will quote the Huffington Post one more time, ".....Had people voted last November at the same rates they did in 2004, when black turnout was below its current historic levels, Republican Mitt Romney would have won narrowly, according to an analysis conducted for The Associated Press."

This was blatant racism, pure and simple. The Clintons didn't even get close to this black turnout.

Man, your arguments are usually wrong but better than that one.

Politics is all about numbers, they do not lie.

June 16, 2014 at 3:57 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

The black voter turnout was 64.7% in 2008 and 66.2% in 2012. That's up from just over 60% in 2004. And that was up from 57% in 2000. And that was up from 53% in 1996. The black voter turnout has been rising in every Presidential election. Why did it go up in 2004 and 200? There wasn't a black candidate then, yet blacks showed up in record numbers then too. Your argument is crumbling. Given the previous years of increased black turnout, it stands to reason that the black turnout would have been around those numbers in 2008 and 2012 regardless of whether there was a black candidate or not.

"Every article" doesn't agree with the assertions you are making about the numbers.

You're a blatant racist, pure and simple. Again, the black voter turnout has been going up constantly in Presidential elections. Every black voter didn't vote for President Obama and every voter that voted for him didn't do so because he was black. PERIOD.

It's quite obvious that you don't like it when blacks vote. Like I said, you just can't help yourself. It's sad and VERY TELLING that you're bitching about 12% of the population voting at a 2/3 rate.

You assertions and conjecture about the "numbers" do lie.

June 16, 2014 at 4:03 p.m.

OOO, timbo, now you're a racist.

Black Americans are on the Democrat Party plantation. If they ever leave then they'll be branded an "uncle tom" by leftist bullies like Easy.

June 16, 2014 at 4:10 p.m.
timbo said...

Easy123....So I guess your liberal press was lying? Do I think that all blacks voted for Barry because he was black? Of course not, some of them voted for him because he was a democrat that happened to be black. 98% voted for Barry in 2012...in 2000 for Gore it was 90%. In 2004 for Kerry it was 88%. 98% for one candidate says that almost every black voted for Barry, who is black. You think it was just a coincidence!!! If you believe that, you would believe that inquiringmind is a tea bagger.

If whites had voted 98% for Romney, you would be the first to say that it was racism. Romney got about 60% of the white vote and Barry got 40%. If whites were as racist, they would have voted for Romney in greater numbers. If whites were racist, as I said before, they would have jumped through fiery hoops to get to the polls. They stayed home for some reason....hmmmm...could it be the poor choice in Romney? Could it be there was a KKK convention that kept a few million whites at home? Maybe is was a Barry Manilow concert?

AS USUAL YOU HAVE NO COGNITIVE ARGUMENT. YOU ONLY RESORT TO NAME-CALLING. I don't have to prove you wrong, you are always wrong. You blew this one pretty bad.

By the way, what I am doing is analyzing the numbers. That is what smart people do. They don't just make stuff up like you do.

June 16, 2014 at 4:13 p.m.

timbo, "it's not the truth that matters, it's the seriousness of the charge" LOL

Libs tossing their poop around to see who it hits, like chimps.

June 16, 2014 at 4:14 p.m.
Easy123 said...

zableedumbass,

And Right WingNut dumbasses like you will ignore blatant racism by your knuckle-dragging colleagues.

It's very telling how easily you throw out the word "plantation" so flippantly regarding blacks that don't vote Republican. You accuse "leftist" of calling blacks that vote Republican "Uncle Tom", when you just implied that they were slaves if they voted Democrat.

Your ignorance is palpable.

June 16, 2014 at 4:15 p.m.

BO won two elections, and still you libs call America racist. BO plays off of that because his poll numbers aren't what he would like them to be. His poll numbers suck because he's doing a crappy job, and his corruption is self evident.

June 16, 2014 at 4:18 p.m.
timbo said...

Easy123...by the way, my numbers are based on people who actually voted not some cock-eyed poll.

Yea, I am a member of a race that voted twice at 40% for a black man and the black race voted 98% for a black guy and they are not racist. Do you know how dumb you sound?

June 16, 2014 at 4:18 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

So because 4% more voted in 2008 and 2% more voted in 2012, then they only voted because there was a black candidate, right? Then why was the percentage going up in 2000 and 2004? Explain that.

I wouldn't say it was racism if 98% of whites voted for Romney. Try again.

Or maybe the racist whites just didn't vote. I would guess racist whites might not like Mormon's either. And again, you're claiming to speak for the entire white electorate. It's insane.

My argument is cognitive. The name calling is warranted.

You CAN'T prove me wrong. You know this. That's why you act like I'm just calling you names. I've presented clear facts. You've presented your unfounded opinion on your "numbers". It's that simple. You've been blowing it for years now.

By the way, you're not "analyzing the numbers". It's clear-cut speculation and conjecture from a known racist.

Don't ever confuse yourself with "smart people". Literally, all you're doing is making stuff up. That's all you've been doing this whole time.

June 16, 2014 at 4:22 p.m.
timbo said...

zableedofisterix.....Barry wouldn't be president if he wasn't black. He would have been forgotten. It was "stylish" to vote for him. I feel sorry for people like Easy123. She probably goes out on the porch when there is a tornado watch.

I wonder if I can be an "Uncle Tim." I'd be singin'..Nobody knows the elections I've lost...

June 16, 2014 at 4:23 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

My numbers aren't from any poll. They are the real numbers. It's very telling that you're trying to discredit the real, in-depth numbers because they prove you wrong.

So none of that 60% that didn't vote for him is racist? I can name several here, people that I know, and several in office that specifically voted against Obama because he was black. Do you know how dumb you are?

June 16, 2014 at 4:24 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

timbo, the point is the majority voted for President Obama, you can't change that reality. You also have to fear the reality that any large voter block that a Blue candidate energizes will likely keep the white house where it is.

As best I can tell by the comments, your party is against Hispanics, against most immigrants getting citizenship, pro-war, against African-Americans, against Muslims, for taxing those persons who make more money less, for enforcing extreme conservative Christian dogma as law, for ending social safety net programs like ACA, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, SNAP, and for putting guns back in bars, schools and churches.

I don't think that platform is going to fly in this country, maybe in East Tennessee, Alabama, Ga, Mississippi, and ISIS-controlled Iraq, but not many other places.

But we shall see, boys and girls, we shall see.

June 16, 2014 at 4:25 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

President Obama would have been President if he was orange. He won going away. He's half white, remember?

I don't have the time to feel sorry for racist mysogynists like Tim Price. You discredit yourself when you call someone that you know is a man, a "she". It proves your mysogyny. And don't act like you didn't know. It's your go-to insult. It's the old, "Well, you play ball like a girl." line. You have the wit of a 12 year old, Timmy.

It's too easy. You're too dumb. It's like taking candy from a fat, racist baby.

June 16, 2014 at 4:27 p.m.
timbo said...

Easy123...So now your the name-calling monitor..I didn't call you a name..I stated that you didn't give a cognitive argument. There was no description of you whatsoever. It's grammar...try it sometimes.

Again, what was it called when ABC News and the Huffington Post did it? Was that speculation too? I was just quoting them.

As far as "smart" I am happy to just be opposite of you.

June 16, 2014 at 4:28 p.m.
timbo said...

inquiringmind...You and I agree...we shall see..what you do is sell conservatism to everyone because there lives will be better. More jobs, less taxes, more opportunity. When some of these groups finally get off the Democrat plantation everyone will be better off. Going after their votes like they are separate tribes in racist in itself.

This is where we fight for this country. I think some of you liberals mean well but the road to ruin is paved with good intentions.

June 16, 2014 at 4:31 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

yessiree, timbo.

June 16, 2014 at 4:33 p.m.

timbo, maybe so. Wow, timbo, You've hit the jackpot..you're now a racist and you hate women! "A fat racist baby"

Actually BO wouldn't have won if he was white, because Hellcat would have beat him. They're both lefties, but she wears pantsuits.

Why are you using his real name, easy?

June 16, 2014 at 4:33 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

I didn't say anything about calling names. I wouldn't care anyway.

I stated that I did have a cognitive argument. When did I say anything about a description of me? You mean "sometime"? Your use of an ellipsis makes no sense there, Mr. Grammar. Again, it's too easy. You're the same moron that messes up "your, you're". You have no room to talk about grammar, dipsh!t.

Show me where ABC News and the Huffington Post said blacks only voted because President Obama was black. Go on.

I'm glad you're starting to realize how dumb you are then.

June 16, 2014 at 4:33 p.m.
Easy123 said...

zableedumbass,

You're starting to show to awareness with your first statement.

Is "timboner" his real name?

June 16, 2014 at 4:35 p.m.
timbo said...

Easy123...You are a misandrist. Look it up...

June 16, 2014 at 4:43 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

It's "their", not "there", Mr. Grammar. "More jobs, less taxes and more opportunity" is the Republican/TeaBagger pipe dream.

More with the "plantation" comment? And that's not racist? Unbelievable.

You have the most skewed, backward, psychotic definition of "racist" I've ever come across. Appealing to the interests of specific groups is racist to you! Insanity!

You're fighting a losing battle.

June 16, 2014 at 4:43 p.m.
timbo said...

zable....I don't care if she uses my name..you shouldn't have an opinion without a name. Tim Price

June 16, 2014 at 4:44 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

Wrong again. Just keep talking out of your a$$.

Again, you know I'm not a "she". You can't help but prove you're a sexist. It's like you're oblivious or something.

LOL! I don't even have to post. You hang yourself.

June 16, 2014 at 4:44 p.m.
timbo said...

Easy123...I was pointing out the racist view of minority groups of liberals. YOU want to keep them on the plantation and tell them how to vote. By the way, you should get out more, at least half the country basically feels the same as I do.

June 16, 2014 at 4:46 p.m.

Well, easy, you must be female, how else do you explain your obvious pms rants? easy, huh, that name is pretty revealing

June 16, 2014 at 4:48 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

What would you know about any minority view?

YOU want to keep calling them slaves and tell them that they shouldn't vote or should vote differently than how they want.

By the way, half the country DOESN'T feel the same way you do. You should get a crowbar to pry your head out of your ass.

June 16, 2014 at 4:49 p.m.
Easy123 said...

zableedumbass,

And you wanted to prove your sexism/mysogyny too!? How delightful! Did you stop beating your wife yet?

"PMS rants"? Do you read your own posts? You are oblivious.

Your name is "zableedofisterix". And you are trying to say something about my screen name? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Pretty "revealing", indeed, Mr. Fister!

June 16, 2014 at 4:51 p.m.
timbo said...

inquiringmind... yea, and 6 million people have bought a pet rock. A quote attributed to P.T. Barnum but was said about Barnum by David Hannum “There is a sucker born every minute." Liberalism is full of suckers.

June 16, 2014 at 4:54 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

You're the Willy Wonka of suckers.

June 16, 2014 at 4:56 p.m.
timbo said...

zable...now you got her...she is getting nuts...watch out she will hit you with her pocketbook.

June 16, 2014 at 4:56 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

Nah, I've got you, fat boy.

"She is getting nuts"? Weren't you the one typing in all caps earlier? LOL!

It's far too easy to get you dipsh!ts to expose your true colors.

Like clockwork.

On a side note: I can understand why you might have an aversion towards women given your outward appearance, timboner. I'm sure you had many females turn you down over the course of your life.

http://www.chattanoogan.com/photos/2008/4/article.126526.jpg

June 16, 2014 at 4:58 p.m.
timbo said...

Easy123.. Read my post before commenting..you are lost in space. Wow..that last one was very hurtful. I am not sure if you were making fun of me, Willy Wonka, or suckers. I am really getting the sup sups.

So your not a a woman...for some reason I feel that is hard to believe.

June 16, 2014 at 5:01 p.m.
timbo said...

Easy123.. I don't try to hide my true colors... I am proud of my colors. I don't have white guilt or empathy to the point of being frozen.

June 16, 2014 at 5:03 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

I read it. You're lost on earth.

"I am not sure if you were making fun of me, Willy Wonka, or suckers"? Do you like making people think you're a moron? LOL! Who says stuff like that? It makes YOU look dumb. You're, literally, too stupid to insult.

It's "you're", dumbass. You don't find it hard to believe. You say it because you think calling someone a woman is an insult. It's the juvenile, Shoddy Daisy wit coming out in you.

June 16, 2014 at 5:05 p.m.
timbo said...

Out of here..got to do something productive..

June 16, 2014 at 5:05 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner,

I know you don't hide your true colors. That was my point all along. I can't believe I'm having to explain this. You make it known that you're a racist and a sexist/mysogynist. I've been saying that for the past hour. Pay attention.

You have a lot of black and female hate to the point of being dismissed by most reasonable people.

June 16, 2014 at 5:07 p.m.
Easy123 said...

timboner said...

"Out of here..got to do something productive.."

I'm sure you'll be back after your Klan meeting.

June 16, 2014 at 5:08 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

I warned you guys you were dealing with a pathological loon. He crazier that a sh!t house owl.

June 16, 2014 at 5:37 p.m.

Oh, my. You're right Jack, she is wacked.

June 16, 2014 at 6:53 p.m.
stanleyyelnats said...

operative word is brat... my bad.... i get it wrong again...rat not brat...

... you know, there is a reason Republicans are identified as GOP (h) ers

June 16, 2014 at 11:21 p.m.
timbo said...

Easy123....you are a miserable person..I feel sorry for you. If I were the other libs on this page, I would hunt you down and take away your computer. You are not helping...

June 17, 2014 at 8:42 a.m.
Easy123 said...

I guess you all have run out of "cognitive arguments". Bwahahahahahaha!

I take anything you knuckle-dragging dipsh!ts say about me as a compliment. It's quite obvious that I'm doing something right if I can get you morons this riled up.

June 18, 2014 at 2:23 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.