War is the human condition. As long as we have people who want to take for themselves things they have not earned. People who covet the neighbors property, status and position. People who are never satisfied with what they can create for themselves with honest labor or design with their minds. As long as we have people who will go with the crowd and not bother to examine the motives of their leaders and the evidence for their cause, we will have sheeple, useful idiots, to do the bidding of those who seek to take from another without making the sacrifices to create it for themselves... We will have war.
Examine those who push to to redistribute wealth.
There are those among us who've come from a POLITICAL IDEOLOGY built on dominating others. For instance, those trying to get Rep. Rick Womick's head are politically motivated. The truth is this has noting to do with race, Islam is NOT a race. It also has far less to do with religion than it does political ideology.
Specifically it does have to do with an individual's ability to place any oath to any GOVERNMENT other than Islam. Islam not only advocates a religious superiority over the kafir—the kafirs go to Hell whereas Muslims go to Paradise—but also its doctrine demands that Muslims dominate the kafir in all politics and culture. This domination is political, not religious. As a result Muslims are for bidden to subordinate their allegiance to Islam except as a deception perpetrated on a Kafir (non-believer) for a time in order to get a POLITICAL ADVANTAGE. This is according to their Hadith written specifically for NORTH AMERICAN MUSLIMS TODAY, not written 1200 years ago. The Hadith are traditions and are currently being written by Muslim clerics.
We need not anyone in service to this country hold their oath to the United State of America subservient to other POLITICAL ENTITIES or as a temporary strategy to gain a position.
This is not a matter of religion, it is a matter of POLITICAL ALLEGIANCE.
If anyone proceeds to condemn Rep. Womick without fully examining these facts they are useful idiots. You can track, everywhere Islam goes it uses these techniques. It is a very successful technique. The end result is the elimination of the original culture and any political or religious forms that serve as a threat to full allegiance to their POLITICAL SYSTEM.
Examine the issue in detail at: http://www.politicalislam.com
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Could put your money where your mouth is... just mail in a check of 7 Million directly to pay on the national debt.
Attn Dept G
Bureau of the Public Debt
P. O. Box 2188
Parkersburg, WV 26106-2188
Problem is, libs know better than anyone the more you send the Government the more they waste.
While we are on the subject of "executive compensation" Let's talk about the people who actually caused the housing bubble and crash... Fannie and Freddie (a quazi government agency) execs, after getting a bail out of 157 Billion from tax payers getting over 100 Million in executive bonuses.
Bush 43 tried to look into this but the Dem Congress / Senate would not allow any investigation into their pet projects.
OWS will end November 2012, when their function of trying to re-elect Obama has failed.
you have nailed it. The trick is to find people to back to run against them that won't end up doing the same when they get there. An "R" next to their name is no guarantee of a conservative result. What that means is we must take part in local elections. We must find, vet and support the right people from the bottom up. If we wait until the primary to get active in the election we've missed the boat.
Politicians have created a wall of separation between the actual workings of budgets, law making and the truth.
When they talk about cutting spending they really mean cutting the expected increase in spending, they never expect the size of government NOT to increase.
When ever you talk about cutting anything the response is "well that is so small in comparison to the total there is no point to cutting that." Foreign Aid is one of those thing for which that excuse has been used frequently.
When the "Great Society" was created under LBJ they used a slight of hand to disguise the true cost. They brought the Social Security "lock box" fund into the general fund. That has allowed every (falsely so called) balanced budget since to be a myth. Now that Baby Boomers are coming of age and begin en mass to collect their social security benefits that trick is failing.
We need to follow Canada's example fiscally. They have brought their economy back from the brink by shrinking government, government services and lowering taxes.
There has been a cover up.
The cover up by the media about any details that might vindicate Herman Cain or the truth about those accusing him.
We now know that in spite of the cover story given Sharon Bialek, that she was not interested in money and she was well taken care of financially... the truth is she is NOT engaged, nor is she living with the guy the media claimed she was engaged to. She (Nor her supposed fiancee) have any visible means of support, he is filing for bankruptcy and she has not held a job in 2 years.
Tonight on Greta (Fox New at 9PM CST) we will hear from Gloria Cain herself. She stands behind her man.
The woman who is now working for the Obama administration, who got a severance pay after accusing Herman Cain at the NRA went on to her next job and tried to repeat the process there to extort money from them. They basically laughed her off.
No one is talking about the fact that the time frame in which these allegations occurred is shortly after some hefty settlements to women with similar claims and copy cat complaints were in abundance. My wife reminded me of this, she is a para legal and has worked on many such cases for the attorney's she worked for.
So YES THERE HAS BEEN A COVER UP OF THE TRUTH. And Herman Cain has been the victim of that cover up, not the instigator, not the beneficiary.
It is just so wonderful that the left is SOOOOOOOO tolerant. How they are so kind, forgiving. How they insist that everyone is innocent until PROVEN GUILTY. Well unless of course they happen to be a conservative Black man who challenges their power base. But no one is perfect.
If we are to put anyone on trial we must apply all the the same rules as the law requires in a court of law. Imagine you were hauled into court for something. Wouldn't you want:
(a) to be considered innocent until proven guilty. Even 100 accusations does not equal a conviction.
(b) Under our court system you would expect the right to face your accuser.
(c) Your attorney would be negligent if they did not ask for discovery. This requires those making their claims against you to provide all their evidence against you so you could reasonably defend against the allegations. Suppressed evidence is not permitted to be used in court. Full disclosure of all evidence is only fair.
(d) If there are two reasonable scenarios, one of which may tend to convict you and one which reasonably would indicate a "Not Guilty" verdict jurors are instructed that they must acquit you.
If you would expect these rights to be applied in any case brought against you... how dare you suggest that anyone else should not have the same rights?
It really get's their goat, doesn't it.
They heap up lies and make traps for Herman Cain, but none of it sticks:
The LORD protects and preserves them— they are counted among the blessed in the land— he does not give them over to the desire of their foes.