"They do, however, cover stories the fawning MSM fail to cover."
How come Fox News hasn't reported on the the latest findings on the Benghazi "scandal"? I haven't seen one mention of the Benghazi final report on Fox News since it was released to the public.
"The final report, from Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Michigan, and ranking member Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, D-Maryland, concludes there was no intelligence failure prior to the attack, no stand-down order to CIA operatives trying to go assist at the besieged consular building and found conflicting intelligence in the wake of the attack about the motive and cause, which were reflected in early public comments by the administration."
I didn't say he was "guilty of anything". I am simply stating the fact that a non-indictment doesn't equate to Wilson being innocent. You guys can argue the details.
"Not the job of the Grand Jury to find guilt or innocence, Gassy. Surprised a man of your keen intellect didn't know that."
Didn't say it did. You are the one that commented that someone was wrong for sharing an opinion.
"Gauss, comparing OJ to Wilson is moronic."
No such comparison was made. You guys act like because the grand jury decided not to take the case to trial, this means Wilson is innocent. Just like when Zimmerman was found not guilty, many assumed this means he was innocent.
JackDennis, I suppose that since OJ was found not guilty, then he is innocent of murder?
Roland, "Not Guilty" and "Innocent" are not synonymous in the US legal system. OJ was found "Not Guilty" by a court of law, I don't believe by any stretch of the imagination he was "Innocent".
I am 96% certain that All is Conservative.
Why the need for multiple usernames?
"Free cell phone time" is not "funded" by SS. That money comes from a fee they tack on to everyone's cell phone bill.
"Don't mess up their little minds with facts."
You never cite facts. Only GOP talking points.
"Guass, again with the Koch brothers, you must be an MSNBC watcher.
And Zuckerberg, Soros and the like don't toss around their money to influence and make a profit?"
I rarely mention the guys (I don't think I have ever previously on this forum). But Fairmon was tossing around Warren Buffett. Why didn't you take the time to scold him?
"Profit bad, profit bad, profit bad."
Who said that? Again, Fairmon was criticizing Buffett because he profits from the transportation of the oil. Do you only selectively choose things to post about, ignoring the fact that I was simply offering a retort to Fairmon's contention?
Hey Fairmon, you continuously accuse us that are against the building of the pipeline of being duped by Warren Buffett. There is a flip side to that coin. The Koch brothers own a couple of million acres in Alberta and stand to profit substantially from the completion of the pipeline. By your reasoning, those that support this pipeline have been duped by the Koch family.