Re. Your 4:58 p.m post
On this we can agree.
BUT, would the preacher listen to, or understand such a rational or intellectual counter?
Would it be immediately perceived as hostility?
Would it make any difference?
I don't know.
OR, how about this GaussianInteger,
An Atheist preaching on a public sidewalk at or near a Baptist church or Mosque. How fast until there was a freedom of speech/religion beat down on the Atheist?
Don’t try to change the subject honey.
You posited as fact Clay Bennett’s cartoon was quote: ”This toon is based on the recent confrontation at UTC.” You have NO EVIDENCE to back up such a claim. Nor does the cartoon in any shape or manner point to such to such a conclusion.
Your latest attempt at to bolster said conclusion is - devoid of the knowing the artists intent: ie. supposition!
”At this time, the campus has no legal basis upon which to deny permission for the speakers to access campus,” UTC Chancellor Steve Angle was added after your original premise. And, “Since UTC is part of the UT system where do you think they got the idea that produced that statement?”
Yea I walk into it. It being the pasture of horse sh!t teabaggers like you lay down as fact.
You are doing exactly what every Christian does; have a preordained answer and then try to find a question to justify it.
A serious handicap you do have is one that doesn’t prevent you from making illogical assumptions. ”Obviously UTC didn’t want to have the same situation there.” Really? Obviously? NOT. You made up your own premise base on supposition and arrived at a conclusion based a conversation with yourself.
“Political (your) language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” :George Orwell
I’ll err on the side of Limerick and Ikeithlu. ”One should approach such things as comedy.”And, ”There’s no pro or con (to the exclusion of Angela Cummings screeching) message in this cartoon at all.”
Jt6gR3hM said in her 1:28 p.m post,
”This toon is based on the recent confrontation at UTC.” Mmm yea, says you. Is that what Clay Bennett TOLD YOU?
The article you quoted from doesn’t mention Angela Cummings whatsoever. Thus your premise, as well as your conclusion is (but especially your premise) based on NOTHING!
What a hack!
WAAHHH!! I'm PlainTruth, and I want Obama care cartoons to criticize and attack. WAAHHH!!
”Nothing exposes the hypocrisy of liberals like a forum on a religion based topic.”
”Nothing exposes the closed minded ignorance of Conservatives like a forum on a religion based topic.”
Which is so wonderfully illustrated by your 11:35 post. Not too cognizant of what you say from one minute to the next are ya? There, is that better?
Thus; the latter of the two statements proves to the strength of its validity -- every time.
Ojanitsirk, I completely agree. Well said.
"Clays depiction of the preacher looks curiously like Libruls lesbian Mother. Hmmm."
Maybe so Max, except looks can be deceiving. She's a Republican...and a Conservative.
Well Conservative, that sure leaves Maximus standing at the curb in front of Alan Golds bar.
Nooo, I don't think so. I think it's about to be inundated with about 50+ posts about ObamaCare & all things Obama.
OR- A critical government spending issue.
Tick tick tick tick...BENGHAZI!!