Oh Yeah! Sure. The Lord God of Hosts does not have enough experience to keep humans and the earth going. He's not been able to do it so far, so, why should we think He can do it now? He's had a couple of years to prove He can administer the fixes needed, but, He just hasn't done what it takes to keep the earth [and humans] going.
By-the-way. What about this 'Global Cooling' weather we've been having? Hey, listen real well and You can hear the word 'correction'! Corrections are what Jesus Christ has used to keep this earth and humans viable. Try to read and comprehend...not just read. The operational 'buzz' word is.......CORRECTION. Yep, necessary and good for earth and people!
Jesus Christ said,[Matthew 16:25]
"For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it."
Yeah, like, requiring multiplied millions of tissue cells to die so our organs can continue to live. Wow...I mean, Wow! Go figure. Yep, I really need to get my analogies, comparisons and contrasts straight, right? kwo
"Sometimes You've got to give up what You've got to get what You want/need."
Well, I could probably go on for days with extremely cogent scientific refutation of the stupidity of a faith in 'EVIL'UTIONARY theroy. I just do not want to hog all the space.
Anti-Christs who want to live like immoral zoo animals will come up with most any contrived smoke screen reason to sear [“cauterize”] their conscience. Just be honest. You have dulled Your senses of moral right and wrong. You know Yourself, and, You know that is absolutely what it is all about!
Jesus Christ said through His Apostle, "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools".
Ken ORR...does NOT buy Your bag of goods.
With the development of molecular biology we are able to make a comparison of the same cells in different species, which adds a whole new dimension to homology. Unfortunately, for the evolutionists, molecular biology does as all other evidences do: presents greater argument against evolution theory.
According to evolution, if an organ has lost its value, it should, over time, vanish completely. There has been enough time to lose these "vestigial" organs, but we still have them.
If organs do become useless, this would back up the second law of thermodynamics and the degenerative process, not evolution, which requires adaptation of organs for new purposes.
Vestigial organs prove loss, not evolutionary progression. Evolution theory requires new organs forming for useful purposes, not "old ones" dying out.
Evolutionists have, for the most part, given up the argument over vestigial organs.
The second law of thermodynamics states that although the total amount of energy remains constant, the amount of usable energy is constantly decreasing. This law can be seen in most everything. Where work is done, energy is expelled. That energy can never again be used. As usable energy decreases, decay increases. Herein lies the problem for evolution. If the natural trend is toward degeneration, then evolution is impossible, for it demands the betterment of organisms through mutation.
Some try to sidestep this law by saying that it applies only to closed environments. They say the earth is an open environment, collecting energy from the sun. However, Dr. Duane Gish has put forth four conditions that must be met in order for complexity to be generated in an environment.
According to Emile Borel, a French scientist and expert in the area of probability, an event on the cosmic level with a probability of less than 1 out of 10, to the 50th power, will not happen. The probability of producing one human cell by chance is 10, to the 119,000 power.
Out of the millions of fossils in the world, not one transitional form has been found. All known species show up abruptly in the fossil record, without intermediate forms, thus contributing to the fact of special creation.
Going to breakfast now. I do not mean to 'bump and run'. I will return and respond. kwo