chuckintn's comment history

chuckintn said...

April,

If its not bigotry what is it? The fact you cant see it in your own words but in mine is laughable. I suppose "the aggressors" is not name calling. That sounds so polite and kind. I suppose I should have said the ill informed. That would be so much better.

You fail to answer my question but act like I am wrong? Then, you are the one offended. A few new descriptives just came to mind but I wouldnt wont to hurt your feelings anymore. I can tell how sensitive and caring for your fellow man you are.

I dont care if we agree or not but your factless stance and repeated, rehearsed statements speaks volumes. I also dont care if you are a bigot or not but at least own it. You expect me too.

If it were about money I am sure I can come up with a huge list my taxes go for that I receive nothing in return for.

What exactly do you want the city to do? Give the lost benefits back? Always work based on yesterday? Why not go back to a time when only males could work for the city? That makes as much sense. Living in what was instead of what is leaves you behind not ready for the future. Wait that must make me a bigot too since I dont agree with you right. Same logic.

Andrew as to the biblical aspect that is more at the core of this, it is simple, its a civil issue not a biblical one no matter how much you may want it to be. Not every one in this country or the world follow christianity. To expect them to is a lot nuts

November 5, 2013 at 1:40 p.m.
chuckintn said...

April,

If its not bigotry what is it? The fact you cant see it in your own words but in mine is laughable.

You fail to answer my question but act like I am wrong? Then, you are the one offended. A few new descriptives just came to mind but I wouldnt wont to hurt your feelings anymore. I can tell how sensitive and caring for your fellow man you are.

I dont care if we agree or not but your factless stance speaks volumes. I also dont care if you are a bigot or not but at least own it. You expect me too.

If it were about money I am sure I can come up with a huge list my taxes go for that I receive nothing in return for.

What exactly do you want the city to do? Give the lost benefits back? Always work based on yesterday? Why not go back to a time when only males could work for the city? That makes as much since. Living in what was instead of what is leaves you behind not ready for the future.

Andrew as to the biblical aspect that is more at the core of this, it is simple, its a civil issue not a biblical one no matter how much you may want it to be. Not every one in this country or the world follow christianity. If they did you guys would have no other people to put down.

November 5, 2013 at 1:28 p.m.
chuckintn said...

April,

Since you contiue to attempt to hide your bigotry let me help you.

The 24 year employees you continue to mention lost thier benifits due to current funding at the time. Now that the standards have been raised the city can now provide for all with better services and a lower cost. In addition nobody can be dropped or refused, unlike the antiquated policy you seem to be clinging to. This was all also prior to ACA and even though our beloved Govenor has chosen not to help the people by taking the federal money, the city has to have insurance to comply. I suspect you are against ACA as well.

I have a suggestion. Since you dont think same sex and other none married couples should be covered, how about NO coverage for anyone except the employee. Of course then the spouse and children will need outside coverage which is far more than group. You neglected to point out how much more family coverage is costing? So you must be obsesed with only the cost of partners insurance? I will go so far as to suggest you would be against this plan because it would discriminate against straight peolpe. I bet you see that clearly. Also, I was married in CA but I cant be recognized in the state I reside but can still pay taxes at an increased rate to put other peoples kids through school. Oh yes it is all very fair?

This is 2013. Times and attitudes have changed and will continue to do so.

As for Charles Wysong not harming anyone. His hate speech harms. If you dont get that you may also be part of the problem. I consider what he has his children do and what he exposes them to, to be abuse. At this point however, being a fanaticle nut job is not considered so. I myself ask Wynsong what I had to do to elevate myself to his kind of christian and all he could do was walk away.

November 5, 2013 at 11:56 a.m.
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.