This is not about CO2 levels; they've been higher. It's not about ice free poles; they have been ice free in the past. This is not even about rate of change; change has been fast in the past. This is about human population past the point of sustainable numbers. Shifts in growing zones, fresh water supplies, and coastlines will push already unstable political and economic conditions past being manageable. Can our collective world leaders respond? Somehow I doubt it, since we are doing a poor job of caring for a substantial part of the population now.
Blah, blah, Connie, you old fart. No one really cares what you think anymore.
That doesn't mean it didn't exist, con. It did. The bible was written by men. Pregnancy was managed, handled, treated, and terminated by women.
"as if the word abortion or the surgery were common or even known in biblical times..."
This coming from someone who treats Genesis as natural history. Yes, abortion was known in biblical times. "Surgical" methods were uncommon but herbal and medicinal abortions were used.
Women have been dealing with unwanted pregnancy for thousands of years.
Although I disagree with the contents of letters, I disagree more with any notion of censorship. Freedom of speech means being able to say what we wish, even if it is wrong. There are always consequences, but those need to spring from the content.
I have noticed from time to time the editors adding a note after a letter that clarifies or corrects a factual error. That is certainly okay in some circumstances.
Are Catholics TROO CHRISTIANS (TM), con?
Sorry, Meatballs, can't have it both ways. 9/11 is Bush's fault and HIV is Reagan's fault.
You know, fox online is not too bad. It's their broadcast stuff that sucks. Different audience?
So you hold Bush accountable for 9/11 and Reagan for HIV. Got it.
So I'm a heathen and atheist. So what? What if I were a Jew? A Muslim? A Hindu?