here's a prime example of someone who wants to provide for the needs of those in poverty with tax dollars but refuses to use his own money. this individual in 2010 gave a meager 1.4% or 5,350 dollars on 379,178 dollars of adjusted gross income. who was it? none other than joe biden. Now does anyone really believe he cares for those in need?
Alright one more time, let me see if I got this right. You say individuals can't meet the needs to combat hunger and poverty but the government can collect taxes from those same individuals and somehow now after adding a middleman they can meet the needs. And you think you're sane.
You're not speaking out against a fascist government, you speak out against individual freedoms. The very government that you support is the one that demeans and punishes those at the bottom. The government you support makes the guy making 10. per hour contribute his tax dollars to support the vw worker making 22. per hour. You, Mr.Bodine and your progressive friends are the rich guy in the story, you have the means to meet many needs yet you don't but that doesn't stop you from taking and demanding of others. Do what you can do then and only then can you PREACH to others about the poor.
I'll continue to beat it until you put your money where your mouth is.
When Nathan the prophet told King David of a story where a rich man fed a traveler visiting his town with the sheep of the poor man from that same town, god didn't think it was too good. The rich man in his abundance could have provided for the traveler with his own resources but he didn't, he TOOK from the poor man to meet the travelers need. That is you and the epitome of the progressive ideology. You and the roo's and the alprovas on here refuse to meet the needs you see around you but demand others meet it with the assistance of the government and the tax code. You ideology is nothing more than the promoting and robbing of the poor. You are even forcing the poor to provide jobs for those better off them.
why don't you ask yourself, why are you giving the politicians this power with our tax dollars? politicians and these large corporations along with the chamber threaten taxpayers with the help of local media all the time, they threaten they will set up shop else where without our tax dollars. why are you not upset with these threats? this is exactly the reason we don't need to be giving any incentives to anyone.
why should taxpayers of lower economic status provide jobs for those who are earning more than them. does that really make sense to you? more good news this morning for VW.
on a different note, sorry about his blood pressure situation hope he can get it under control but I wonder if vw sales and particularly the passat are contributing to mr. harr's blood pressure. don't run off mr. harr you need to stick around and face the music.
I believe most agree mr. turley can read the constitution or is he now a bigot and a racist.
by saying we all have the same rights makes me a homophobe. by saying groups don't have rights, individuals do. interesting. and you were an educator. sad. hopefully you did not distort too many minds.
we get it, we get it. everyone that disagrees with you is a bigot and a homophobe.
typical. you can't answer the question(s)and you won't admit whites have no more protection under the law than anyone else so you resort to what progressives always do. the only bigots I see on this forum are people like you lkeithu. you are ate up with your life as a racist and you wish there was something you could do about it but there isn't, it is who you are, so you project your own racism on others hoping it will relieve your own conscience. the true racist have been revealed in the past 5 years and you know it.
I'll say it a little s l o w e r this time for you and i'll keep it simple. what rights do whites have that no one else has?
I guess you are suggesting gays can't marry? sure they can, just the same as you and me. in most states you can't marry people of the same sex and neither can gays. in all states you and gays can marry any person of the opposite sex that might be willing to have you. how is that not equal protection under the law?