published Thursday, December 22nd, 2011

Red Bank police officers, dispatcher cleared in DUI case

An internal affairs investigation launched by Red Bank's police chief states that a police officer, supervising sergeant and Hamilton County 911 dispatcher did not conspire to let another dispatcher off the hook for drunken driving.

Chief Tim Christol started the investigation Dec. 12 after an anonymous email was sent to Christol alleging that Sgt. Jamie Thompson intervened during a traffic stop where Officer Mark Kaylor was conducting a DUI test for a woman who turned out to be 911 dispatcher Erica Reid.

The email alleged that Thompson and Kaylor showed Reid "preferential treatment because of her law enforcement affiliation" and called her father to pick her up instead of taking her into custody.

But Christol said while the "appearance of the situation looks bad," Reid passed field sobriety tests before Kaylor knew her position, and that Reid's job was not a factor in the officers' decision not to charge her.

Christol's investigation shows that Thompson, Kaylor and 911 dispatcher Amanda Davis did in fact discuss Reid's position as a dispatcher during her traffic stop early Dec. 10, and also shows that her father was called to pick her up from the scene as a precaution, since she had been drinking.

Kaylor told officials that though he noticed the smell of alcohol emitting from Reid's car, Reid already had passed a series of field sobriety tests before Thompson told him she was a dispatcher.

Reid was cited for speeding and for outdated insurance that night, court documents show.

Christol said Kaylor has made 11 DUI arrests this month and has made three additional DUI stops that did not result in arrest.

According to interviews, Davis called Thompson to discuss Reid's DUI stop shortly after Kaylor called dispatch requesting Reid's registration information.

Davis later told Christol it was "common practice to notify an officer if the dispatcher knew a 911 employee was involved in the event," the interview states.

Later during the conversation, Thompson told Davis to call him on an "unrecorded line," an act for which Christol issued Thompson an oral reprimand.

"He said he was not wanting to discuss personnel matters on an open line, but the perception could very well come across that they were up to something," Christol said Wednesday.

Christol said that at no point during recorded radio calls did Davis or Thompson directly ask Kaylor to change his course of action.

"We will not tolerate impaired driving on our highways from anyone, nor will I tolerate giving preferential treatment to someone because of their position in the community," stated Christol, who added that the "standard of probable cause must be maintained to ensure fairness within the justice system."

3
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
lookinfour said...

I don't believe it. No mention was made in this article about reviewing the video of the DUI tests. As the Chief stated, this looks bad. Yes it does and if I was to bet, there was preferential treatment given here. She was impaired enough to call and have her daddy pick her up. She was also handcuffed at the scene and placed into the back seat of the patrol car before being released. I don't believe that to be standard protacal for a stop like this.

December 22, 2011 at 8:27 a.m.
sangaree said...

This is why most laws in America are nothing but a joke. Become a cop, get a free ride. Beat your wife, girlfriend, significant other? Charged with statuatory rape? No problem. Charges dismissed, records expunged, receive a promotion. Continue on, just be more careful they're advised. Or, as in this case, drive drunk, no arrest, no record. Then later go out and kill someone while driving drunk, and there are no priors. So get another free ride.

I.A. {internal affairs} is the laughing stock of all police departments around the nation. Especially when it comes to policing their own. That's why no police department should be in charge of investigating their own. It's more of a case of the fox being placed in charge of the fox that was put in place to guard the hen house.

December 22, 2011 at 9:45 a.m.
mydixiewrecked said...

First off, have you ever been to IA? Its the same as an interrogation for murder. investigators with guns and recording equipment asking and twisting questions to break you. if you haven't been there then shut it. and yes they should get some extra treatment. these cops and dispatchers constantly put up with enormous amounts of bull sht every day. Review the tape if there is one. If she passes multiple field sobriety tests then whats the big deal. Just remember you may need these people someday, so dont assume they are looking out for their own all the time. Get over it you whinny f*k.

December 24, 2011 at 7:39 p.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.