published Thursday, December 29th, 2011

Movie crowds dip to 16-year low as apathy lingers

By DAVID GERMAIN

AP Movie Writer

  • photo
    From left, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint and Daniel Radcliffe are shown in a scene from "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2."
    Photo by Associated Press /Chattanooga Times Free Press.

LOS ANGELES — Hollywood has more tricks in its bag than ever with digital 3-D and other new film tools. Yet as the images on screen get bigger and better, movie crowds keep shrinking — down to a 16-year low as 2011’s film lineup fell well short of studios’ record expectations.

Through New Year’s Eve on Saturday, projected domestic revenues for the year stand at $10.2 billion, down 3.5 percent from 2010’s, according to box-office tracker Hollywood.com. Taking higher ticket prices into account, movie attendance is off even more, with an estimated 1.28 billion tickets sold, a 4.4 percent decline and the smallest movie audience since 1995, when admissions totaled 1.26 billion.

Just what has put the movie business in the dumps is anyone’s guess — though safe bets include the tight economy, rising ticket prices, backlash against parades of sequels or remakes, and an almost-limitless inventory of portable and at-home gadgetry to occupy people’s time.

The year got off to a dismal start with what could be called an “Avatar” hangover, when revenues lagged far behind 2010 receipts that had been inflated by the huge success of James Cameron’s sci-fi sensation.

A solid summer lineup helped studios catch up to 2010, but ticket sales flattened again in the fall and have remained sluggish right into what was expected to be a terrific holiday season.

“There were a lot of high-profile movies that just ended up being a little less than were hoped for,” said Chris Aronson, head of distribution for 20th Century Fox, whose sequel “Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked” has been part of an under-achieving lineup of family films for the holidays. “The fall was pretty dismal. There just weren’t any real breakaway, wide-appeal films.”

Big franchises still are knocking it out of the park. “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2,” the finale to J.K. Rowling’s fantasy epic, was the year’s biggest earner and the top-grossing film in the series at $381 million domestically and $1.3 billion worldwide.

“Transformers: Dark of the Moon” pulled in $352 million domestically and $1.1 billion worldwide, while “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part 1” has climbed to $271 million domestically and $650 million worldwide.

Other franchises did well in 2011 but came up short of their predecessors on the domestic front, among them “Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides,” “The Hangover Part II,” “Kung Fu Panda 2,” “Cars 2” and “X-Men: First Class.”

Strong overseas business has helped make up for shrinking domestic revenues and declining DVD sales. But 2011 was the second-straight year that domestic attendance declined sharply, and audiences generally have been shrinking since 2002, when admissions hit a modern high of 1.6 billion.

It could be a case of the same-old same-olds, with fans growing tired of over-familiar characters and stories. It could be overcrowded weekends such as Thanksgiving, when studios loaded up on family films that cannibalized one another’s audiences. It could be the economy, with fans growing more selective on how often they spend their spare cash to catch a movie, particularly at a time when so many films play in 3-D with premium ticket prices.

And it could be the times we live in, when audiences have so many gadgets to play with that they don’t need to go to the movies as much as they once did.

“It’s not any one thing. It’s a little bit of everything,” said Jeff Goldstein, general sales manager at Warner Bros., whose Robert Downey Jr. sequel “Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows” has done solid business, yet is coming in well short of the first installment. “But consumers are being more specific with their choices on how to spend their money. The options are a little greater than they were a few years ago with gaming and social-networking opportunities.”

The year’s animated slate failed to produce a $200 million hit, the first time that’s happened since 2005. Likewise, comic-book superheroes slipped in 2011, the genre unable to deliver a $200 million hit for only the second time in the last 10 years.

Even Adam Sandler, one of Hollywood’s most-bankable stars, had a mixed year, managing a $100 million hit with “Just Go With It” but barely crossing $70 million with “Jack and Jill.”

Studio executives typically blame slow business on “the product” — weak movies that leave fans indifferent. But during the first few months of the year, when business lagged as much as 20 percent behind 2010’s, studios were confident they had great product coming, with many executives predicting that 2011 would finish with record revenues, topping the all-time domestic high of $10.6 billion in 2009.

The movies themselves turned out fairly good, and surprise smashes such as “Bridesmaids,” “The Help,” “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” and “The Smurfs” boosted business.

But the year was littered with duds (“Happy Feet Two,” “Tower Heist,” “Cowboys & Aliens”). And with only days left in 2011, Tom Cruise’s “Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol” is leading a batch of holiday releases that so far has done only so-so business, despite generally good reviews and high marks from the fans that are showing up.

Hollywood is left right where it was 12 months ago, finishing the year quietly and looking ahead to a promising lineup to turn its fortunes around next year.

Even more so than 2011’s schedule once looked, the 2012 film list looks colossal. Among the highlights: the superhero tales “The Dark Knight Rises,” “The Amazing Spider-Man” and “The Avengers”; the latest in the animated franchises “Ice Age” and “Madagascar,” along with “Brave,” the new adventure from animation master Pixar; Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones’ “Men in Black 3”; Daniel Craig’s new James Bond thriller “Skyfall”; Johnny Depp’s vampire story “Dark Shadows”; Ridley Scott’s “Prometheus,” a cousin to his sci-fi classic “Alien”; and Peter Jackson’s “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey,” the first in a two-part prequel to his “Lord of the Rings” films.

That’s just a small sampling of 2012’s big-screen titles, which also include 3-D reissues of “Titanic,” “Finding Nemo,” “Beauty and the Beast” and “Star Wars: Episode I — The Phantom Menace.”

Looking ahead, there’s good reason for optimism in Hollywood. Looking back, though, the past year spells caution.

“I’m not prepared to be Chicken Little yet, but if the films coming in 2012 can’t reverse this trend, then I think we need to reevaluate our expectations,” said Hollywood.com analyst Paul Dergarabedian. “We are living in a different world today than we did in the mid-’90s in terms of the technology available to deliver media. That may finally be having an impact.”

about Associated Press...

The Associated Press

10
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
Pizzaguy said...

Maybe you ought to stop with 3 sequels and crappy stories? Soon as you make dime one, you start with a sequel to a mediocre movie. Or you try to rehash an updated version from your vaults with poor screenwriting.

Maybe people are tired of comedies designed for 12 year olds? I think it's the same writers of MTV garbage that you are using for scripts. For every decent movie hollywood comes up with, there are 25 that stink nowadays. I might go to one 1st run movie a year now.

December 29, 2011 at 7:35 a.m.
eeeeeek said...

MTV has writers?

December 29, 2011 at 7:42 a.m.
Chatt88 said...

Rather than remaking the great old movies, why don't they just show those movies in theatres? I'd pay (at MOST $7.50) to see them (or anything, for that matter) on the big screen.

December 29, 2011 at 8:26 a.m.
holdout said...

You know Chatt that is a really good idea. I would love to see Godfather 1 and 2 uncut and uninterrupted with a coke that didn't cost $5 and popcorn that didn't cost $7.

December 29, 2011 at 8:53 a.m.
memphisexile said...

Movies are overpriced, and as the article mentions, many are just poor remakes or bad sequels. I am not sure why Hollywood seems so determined to cram 3-D down our throats, but it seems that most people, like myself, are just not interested. Not to mention, at home I do not have to deal with some jerk who feels the need to answer a cell phone and talk during the movie. With an HD flat screen I do not miss the movie theatre much. I have not been since 2008, and I am not missing it at all.

December 29, 2011 at 9 a.m.
hcirehttae said...

I can explain in a few well-chosen words: - Adam Sandler - 3D reissues - $5 popcorn Those are three good reasons not to open your wallet for Hollywood. However, if you haven't taken a kid to see the 2D version of "Hugo," you've really missed something. Also, support the AEC film series here; some of the best movies in the world come here and are seen by 10 people in the audience. Give it a try - broaden horizons.

December 29, 2011 at 9:46 a.m.
Profile75i said...

Maybe another Rocky movie would help or a remake of Lassie come home :-)

December 29, 2011 at 10:33 a.m.
HermanMelville said...

I saw a High School production of "To kill a Mockingbird" this year that was better than what Hollywood put out on the big screen. Remakes or sequels, computer generated images, foul language, and bathroom humor are the product they make now. Film an original story about real people with great photography, that would be worth paying for.

December 29, 2011 at 10:51 a.m.
Pizzaguy said...

To Kill A Mockingbird is a fantastic film (and book). 12 Angry Men (the original), Guess Who's Coming to Dinner, The Bishop's Wife...they have done awful remakes of these classics.

December 29, 2011 at 12:20 p.m.
skyboxer said...

Who cares whether or not people are apathetic about going to see movies. Anyone? Get a life...

December 29, 2011 at 2:34 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.