published Thursday, February 10th, 2011

Obama seeks $53 billion for high-speed rail lines

by Andy Johns

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- President Barack Obama is calling for a six-year, $53 billion spending plan for high-speed rail, which local officials say can't hurt hopes to build a bullet train from Atlanta to Chattanooga and Nashville.

An initial $8 billion in spending will be part of the budget plan Obama is set to release Monday. If Congress approves the plan, the money would go toward developing or improving trains -- which travel up to 250 mph -- and connecting existing rail lines to new projects.

The White House wouldn't say where the money for the rest of the program would come from, though it's likely Obama would seek funding in future budgets or transportation bills.

During last month's State of the Union address, Obama said he wanted to give 80 percent of Americans access to high-speed rail within 25 years.

Joe Ferguson, who has spearheaded much of the effort to get a high-speed line from Atlanta to Chattanooga as manager of special projects for Chattanooga's Enterprise Center, said he didn't have any "inside information," but the president's announcement only could help the local project.

Not long ago on the White House website, the potential Chattanooga-Atlanta line was added to the high-speed rail map as part of the Miami-to-Chicago route.

"That's been the pitch we've had all along," Ferguson said. "That's what we've said this line should be."

Attempts to reach Georgia transportation officials and Senate Transportation Chairman Sen. Jeff Mullis, R-Chickamauga, were unsuccessful Wednesday.

Obama's call for increased spending on high-speed rail projects is nothing new.

His administration awarded $10 billion in federal grants for high-speed rail projects last year, including $2.3 billion for California to begin work on an 800-mile, high-speed rail line tying Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay area to Los Angeles and San Diego; and $1.25 billion to Florida to build a rail line connecting Tampa on the West Coast with Orlando in the middle of the state, eventually going south to Miami.

The Atlanta-Chattanooga line, which likely would run parallel to Interstate 75, is estimated to cost $5 billion to $6 billion, but Ferguson said the expense is smaller than the price tag of adding onto the region's increasingly clogged highways.

"It's mind boggling to see the high cost of the additional lanes," he said.

about Andy Johns...

Andy began working at the Times Free Press in July 2008 as a general assignment reporter before focusing on Northwest Georgia and Georgia politics in May of 2009. Before coming to the Times Free Press, Andy worked for the Anniston Star, the Rome News Tribune and the Campus Carrier at Berry College, where he graduated with a communications degree in 2006. He is pursuing a master’s degree in business administration at the University of Tennessee ...

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
ann said...

we don't need this it is just more money wasted,why not use it fo homeless people and those who are losing their homes and on the streets hungry,we have the most wasteful goverment that has ever been all they think about is this kind of junk when people don't even know where or if they will even have another meal,the people need to vote against all this and call obama and their congress and let them know they are fed up with all this waste

February 10, 2011 at 3:36 p.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.