published Friday, March 11th, 2011

Military leadership quotas?

Here is the beginning of a recent article by The Associated Press: “The U.S. military is too white and too male at the top and needs to change recruiting and promotion policies and lift its ban on women in combat, an independent report for Congress said Monday.”

Actually, what the U.S. military needs is to seek out the best leaders it can find without regard to race or sex — but it should not deliberately place women in combat roles.

Our military would be in trouble without the many female service members who ably fill a variety of roles in the armed forces. But the sad reality is, women captured in combat would be subjected to even crueler-than-usual treatment by our enemies.

That does not mean women should be denied ample opportunities for advancement in the military alongside men. But in no case should advancement be tied to racial or gender quotas. The U.S. military should be as close to a “meritocracy” as our nation can make it.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
sig4ever2 said...

Who died and left the Associated Press in charge? I agree totally that the best person for the job should be advanced to leadership responsibility. Unless they are willing to submit themselves to unspeakable acts of torture, women should not participate in active combat roles.

March 11, 2011 at 8:01 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.