published Sunday, March 20th, 2011

Battery brownout in U.S. nuclear plants


• Eight hours in Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi

• Four hours at local TVA plants

As the plume of radiation touches the U.S. Pacific coast from Japan’s crippled and leaking nuclear reactors, nuclear officials here confirmed that battery-powered backups for most American reactors’ cooling systems—including three local ones—provide only half the eight-hour safety net Japan had.

“The primary problem this plant [Fukushima] faced was the loss of power and the loss of backup power — having batteries that lasted eight hours and then having the clock run out,” said Dave Lochbaum, director of the nuclear safety program at the Union for Concerned Scientists.

“In this country, most of our reactors are only designed with battery [backup] capacity for four hours, so we’re more vulnerable for a situation where we lose primary power and the backup generators,” said Lochbaum, a nuclear engineer who has worked both for TVA at Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant and for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency.

NRC spokesman Roger Hannah confirmed that federal regulations require only a four-hour battery backup to help cool reactor cores and spent fuel stored in pools. The power is necessary to keep cooling water circulating around the rods of uranium if both electric power and diesel generator backup power fail.

TVA spokesman Ray Golden confirmed that the utility’s battery backups at is Sequoyah plant in Soddy-Daisy, Watts Bar in Spring City, Tenn., and Browns Ferry in Athens, Ala., are rated to last only four hours.

“It’s possible they may last longer than that,” he said, adding that the plants’ diesel generator backups have a seven-day fuel supply.

Golden said the generators and batteries are routinely tested.

Just over a week ago, a 9.0 earthquake and tsunami threw reactors at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station into nuclear crisis. Americans living and working within 50 miles of the plant were ordered to evacuate.

On Friday, U.S. authorities confirmed that low levels of radiation had been detected in Sacramento, Calif. They said the very low detections of iodine-131 and cesium-137 — highly dangerous byproducts of reactor operation that in large amounts can cause cancer — would pose no danger to Californians’ health.

Experts tracking the plume said it will continue to move eastward and could arrive in the New York region early this week.

TVA’s Golden said contrasting the disaster in Japan with what could happen here is “is an apples and oranges comparison” because the region is unlikely to suffer a 9.0 earthquake and certainly not a tsunami.

But Lochbaum said the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, taught America that kind of thinking is shortsighted.

“While most of our plants may not be vulnerable to the one-two punch of an earthquake and then a tsunami, many of our reactors are in a situation where earthquakes or hurricanes in the Gulf or ice storms in the Northeast can cause an extensive blackout that puts us in a very similar situation,” he said.

After the terrorist attacks, the NRC required nuclear plant owners to stage more equipment at plant sites.

“One of things we learned from 9/11 was to be better prepared for tragedies than anyone in the area planned for,” Lochbaum said.

NRC’s Hannah said it’s too soon to know whether NRC will change the battery backup rating requirement, but he’s sure there will many “lessons learned” from the Japanese disaster.

But some utilities aren’t waiting for NRC.

On Thursday, Atlanta-based Southern Co. said it supports President Barack Obama’s call to the NRC for a safety review of all the country's nuclear power plants. Southern Co. operates six nuclear reactors in Georgia and Alabama.

Golden said TVA already is viewing the Japanese crisis as a game-changer and applying some of its lessons.

“We’re watching this very closely, and we’re right now — at each of our sites — taking any and all information from Japan and trying to see if it has application for our plants,” he said.

“This will be just like Three Mile Island, and it will be a very important event in the industry. And it will bring about change,” Golden said.

about Pam Sohn...

Pam Sohn has been reporting or editing Chattanooga news for 25 years. A Walden’s Ridge native, she began her journalism career with a 10-year stint at the Anniston (Ala.) Star. She came to the Chattanooga Times Free Press in 1999 after working at the Chattanooga Times for 14 years. She has been a city editor, Sunday editor, wire editor, projects team leader and assistant lifestyle editor. As a reporter, she also has covered the police, ...

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
moon4kat said...

Thanks for this timely report on a critical issue.

March 20, 2011 at 9:27 a.m.
TooCheaptoMeter said...

This is very good reporting--and shows how TVA and the nuclear industry (same bunch of buddies) all believe in the religion of technology. They have it all figured out: if the grid goes out in a tornado (common) the back-up generator won't fail (they do, often) but if it does, the batteries will handle it (for a bit) while those ready crews rebuild the power lines. What a perfect world, but not at all reality. Do we have to have a meltdown to see how ridiculous this is?

These plants are so risky that Wall Street won't fund them or insure them without government guarantess. That's our money. Tokyo Electric was planning to build two in Texas, seriously. If the Tea Party got the governemnt subsidies out of this business, the obvious dangers from these financial boondoggles goes away. Rates would go down, too.

I encourage the paper to look at the 'swimmiong pool' type storage of TVA spent fuel rods--racked and packed for a meltdown if they lose water. Germany moved all their spent fuel to dry cask storage over 25 years ago to not have the risk of meltdown in the less protected fuel pool. We should too. That would be a stimulus project that makes sense. It could save our region and lives. Radiation sickness is avoidable: don't make radiation. Cancer is a rough way to die, and children are most at risk, as we will see in years to come. Leukemia is the result of eating radiation--it's not like having an X-ray.

March 20, 2011 at 9:43 a.m.
mrredskin said...

You journalists pick the biggest extremists to interview for everything nuclear related. ridiculous article

March 20, 2011 at 9:39 p.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.