published Monday, January 23rd, 2012

Necessary state job cuts in Tennessee, Georgia

The governments of both Tennessee and Georgia continue to make or propose budget cuts that may not prove very popular but that are clearly necessary in this time of continued economic weakness.

In Tennessee, for example, it was announced recently that the Department of Education will be cutting scores of positions, some of which fortunately are not currently filled but most of which are.

There is no joy in laying off workers in either government or the private sector, and we hope that the laid-off Department of Education employees will be able to find other jobs promptly.

But with the economy still in poor shape -- and with Tennessee not exactly rolling in tax revenue -- the state has to take steps to make ends meet.

And those steps will not be confined to the Department of Education. Gov. Bill Haslam said there will be similar job cuts throughout state government in his budget.

"[O]ne of our responsibilities in government is we use taxpayer money as effectively as we can," the governor said. "And one of the things I'm constantly emphasizing, we're about providing the service. It's not about us as the employer. It's about how do we provide that service in the most effective way we can?"

That gets at the heart of the matter.

In order to provide services, state government -- or government at any level, for that matter -- obviously must have employees. But with involuntary taxpayer dollars supporting those positions, it is wrong to sustain any government job that is not truly necessary to performing the legitimate functions of government. Government is not an employment program, as Haslam seems to recognize.

Gov. Nathan Deal of Georgia appears to hold the same sound view.

He is proposing in his 2013 budget that the state consolidate or even get rid of a number of agencies, in order to boost the efficiency of Georgia government.

For example, he would get rid of the State Personnel Administration, which handles human resources, and shift its duties to the Department of Administrative Services. That would save taxpayers approximately $900,000, though it would cut 40 jobs.

We see no evidence that either Haslam or Deal takes pleasure in job losses that result from the necessary streamlining of government services.

To the contrary, we suspect that both governors are troubled by the knowledge that their plans could leave some state workers unemployed.

But they both also recognize that government cannot justify keeping employees that it simply does not need.

That will be of understandably little comfort to the affected employees, but it is the responsible way to manage the finances of state government.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
conservative said...

"Government is not an employment program, as Haslam seems to recognize."

Wouldn't it be wonderful if foremost in our mind was the thought government is not an employment program. What a great line to combat socialism. I vow to remember and use it often. Thank you so much Times Free Press!

January 23, 2012 at 9:12 a.m.
328Kwebsite said...

How many of those about to be laid off would have jobs if Governor Haslam had paid his taxes as he's supposed to? The first thing the Governor did when he took office was exempt himself from collecting certain types of environmental taxes on his gas stations. Now he's trying to tell us that employees need to be laid off. I guess we can see where the hypocrisy in his leadership has gotten us: closer to the unemployment line.

January 23, 2012 at 10:42 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.