published Saturday, October 26th, 2013

Fleischmann: Tax and spend; still the choice

By Chuck Fleischmann

It is time for Congress and the White House to find a better way to do business. For too long, we have pushed up against deadlines and waited to see who will blink first before sending our country off on the wrong path.

The uncertainty that occurs affects our economy and creates doubt that Washington is focused on the right objectives. The issues that separate us are not that much different from the issues in the 1980s that split Republicans and Democrats -- whether you raise taxes or reduce spending.

A tax-and-spend philosophy is as relevant today as it was in the 1980s. Government has a large appetite to spend more, and that means higher taxes. The discipline that is needed now as in the past is to go on a diet, reduce the appetite to spend, tighten the belt and avoid the urge to tax more.

Over the last three years we've been successful at reducing discretionary spending, and it's at its lowest level since 2007. This is a success, and we have been remiss in pointing out this significant shift. But we've failed to make an impact on mandatory spending. The 2011 debt ceiling agreement cut spending by $2.1 trillion over 10 years but failed to address mandatory spending.

Over the past 50 years, mandatory spending has grown from a small line item on our budget to over two thirds of the budget. And in the next 10 years, mandatory spending will nearly double in cost and consume most of our budget. This will squeeze funding for discretionary but important government functions like defense, highways, veterans and critical infrastructure like the Chickamauga Dam lock.

Congress has to decide to spend this discretionary money each year, and detailed budgets are hammered out. To make a real dent in our runaway spending, there have to be meaningful discussions on Medicare, Medicaid and other social welfare programs. For those in the Third District that need a helping hand, we have to be willing to provide assistance. However, what has happened over the years is that these mandatory spending programs have spiraled out of control, subject to waste, fraud and abuse. Mandatory spending is on autopilot, not subject to budgetary restrictions and challenging to control. Real reform means taking a hard look at these programs, tightening up the requirements and making sure that the dollars flow to those really in need.

If we want to stop these constant fiscal crises, we must be willing to put all issues on the table, including mandatory, automatic spending.

Tax increases merely disguise the real issue. In January 2013, taxes increased enough to cover about 6 percent of our 2012 deficit, proof that even a massive tax increase only makes a small dent. I was opposed to that short-sighted solution.

There is bipartisan agreement on the need for reform. President Obama proposed a chained CPI reform to Social Security, which would increase the solvency of the program for future generations. Congress should work with the president to make this a reality. Additionally, we can learn from bipartisan actions in 1996 to reform food stamps and Medicaid. My hope is that Congress will once more consider block grants to states, allowing more local flexibility, and making costs more predictable for the federal government.

Medicaid is a perfect example of a mandatory program with massive costs and poor results. The program cost $432 billion in 2012; and, due to high costs, states often reduce reimbursement rates, which limits care. Block granting Medicaid funds to states and providing flexibility means lower costs for the program and improved recipient outcomes.

Medicare is a critical program for our nation's seniors; however, it faces potential bankruptcy within the next decade. We have to reform Medicare to ensure no changes for seniors and to preserve the program for future generations. I'm proud to have supported a budget which ensures Medicare solvency by giving recipients insurance options similar to the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit.

Addressing spending instead of raising taxes is important if we are to ensure that programs Americans depend on will meet the needs of future generations. Solving these spending issues won't be easy, but few choices are. I am committed to putting politics aside and working to find bipartisan solutions to keep our nation on the right track.

Rep. Chuck Fleischmann is a Republican and Tennessee's 3rd District congressman in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
inquiringmind said...

The learned house member says, " We have to reform Medicare to ensure no changes for seniors and to preserve the program for future generations. I'm proud to have supported a budget which ensures Medicare solvency by giving recipients insurance options similar to the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit."

The learned house member says, "Addressing spending instead of raising taxes is important..."

I wonder how many bills he has voted for that used the Social Security trust fund money? Why do we need to change the benefit structure when we can simply refund the trust, if necessary by raising taxes and let those who have much pay a little more AND control spending? We could cut the defense budget 10=20% and lose no defensive capability other than maybe the NSA wiretap program.

I wonder if he voted for GB the Younger's $4+trillion war (sic) expenditures but without a tax increase so that we paid as we went? THat would have ended that exercise quickly. Or did he vote to spend without tax increase to fix the locks on the Chickamauga dam?

To be obsessive about not raising taxes only reinforces the perception the honorable representative has his head in the sand and/or is more devious and interested in pandering polemic than justice. But what else is new with him?

Also as the baby-boomers start dying off, I wonder what the equation looks like? What would restoring the taxes to pre-tax cut level do? What about honoring the graduated income tax? Control the spending but don't expect miracles like money from trees unless you also expect suffering from loss of support.

Block grants to the states already shows the poor suffer as a consequence because the states pull back on spending. It simply pushes the bill around on the table while we try to figure out which cup has the pea under it; and is a subterfuge for cutting benefits.

He is "committed to putting politics aside and working to find a bipartisan solution." (!) Don't be fooled. He is interested as long as the solution does not raise taxes, putting us right back where we were a couple weeks ago. Is his middle name "Ted" by any chance?

Are Tennesseans that gullible?

October 25, 2013 at 9:03 p.m.
John_Proctor said...

Yes it is unfortunately.

October 26, 2013 at 12:12 a.m.
SaraB said...

I extend my congratulations to the communications person who wrote this. But,the last line exposes this to be a piece to restate the obvious with no meaning. I have never known of this man to do anything except stick to his extreme talking points the entire time he has run for office and been elected. Mr. Fleischman you have no credibility.

October 26, 2013 at 9:31 a.m.
csharp said...

Rep. Fleischmann's op/ed reflects well-reasoned logic and a mature and positive attitude toward solving our Nation's budget and debt problem. Our problems are complicated; solutions will require both sides working together. It will take years to correct these problems and we need to start now. The recent shut down has been greatly blown out proportion. The sky is falling! Congress is in gridlock! The Republican are intransigent! In reality, the Republicans did what necessary - they took a stand and said this is enough. It was difficult as the liberal press called their tactics every negative term under the sun. In reality the Republicans, following their Lode Star of a smaller and less intrusive government, stood their ground. The result was for two weeks we as a nation were all focused on the issue. Government must control spending!

Thank you Chuck for standing up to the heat and following your conservative principles.

October 26, 2013 at 10:04 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

Please, it will be raining pigs when Flashman votes to raise taxes, compromise isn't in his ken, and your blithe comment validates the initial post. He stands for the dark side of human nature, the love of wealth that seduces many of the "haves." I will not advise holding your breath until he "works together" with the Blue Party unless it means capitulating to gutting programs and reducing taxes for you. Let us hear him promise to compromise his positions, then I'll begin to take him seriously.

October 26, 2013 at 11:33 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.