published Sunday, August 10th, 2014

Much Better

about Clay Bennett...

The son of a career army officer, Bennett led a nomadic life, attending ten different schools before graduating in 1980 from the University of North Alabama with degrees in Art and History. After brief stints as a staff artist at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Fayetteville (NC) Times, he went on to serve as the editorial cartoonist for the St. Petersburg Times (1981-1994) and The Christian Science Monitor (1997-2007), before joining the staff of the ...

208
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
rick1 said...

The hypocrisy of progressives.

http://youtu.be/_Ugsv5u-sW0

August 10, 2014 at 12:09 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

get ready for connie, her hubbie left her for a guy and she is hot about it!

August 10, 2014 at 12:15 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

if you define a marriage as a relationship between a man and woman committed to having children, what do we call child-barren marriages?

If you define a relationship between two persons whose life-long intent is to have children who are productive, penitent Christians, what do you call it?

August 10, 2014 at 12:21 a.m.

inq, more sophistry from you. Worthless and silly questions.

Marriage is between a man and a woman, period. That's the way it will always be viewed. That's what marriage is. Anything else is a bastardization.

A man with a man, and a woman with a woman is what it is, but it's not a marriage as marriage was intended to be. Call it something else.

You libs think you're ground breakers, but you're really just jerks. You change things for the sake of changing them and call yourselves enlightened or evolved. LOL

Anyone is free to partner up with anyone they want in this country, and if the law states that the partner is entitled to benefits, so be it, but a marriage will always be between a man and a woman. Steve and Bobby standing at the alter will never be viewed the same as Steve and Susie. You can't win that battle.

August 10, 2014 at 12:47 a.m.

"if you define a marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman"

LOL.....barren or with children, doesn't matter. You're not that good that you can change the definition. Pretty arrogant on libs' part.

You libs are not that good that you can change the meaning of marriage. You succeeded in ruining a perfectly good word, "GAY", but it won't work with marriage.

August 10, 2014 at 12:52 a.m.
rengerry said...

You tell em zab! Everyone knows that marriage is all about how much of a dowry you can get outta the other family! Oh, you get a woman too.

August 10, 2014 at 1:03 a.m.
rengerry said...

Words can have many definitions zab. The meaning of words change too. It's been that way since before the beginnings of written history. Go look up the word faggot. (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faggot) Since when did it become something other than a bundle of sticks and who decided it was derogatory to women, then later gay men?

Now go look up marriage. It's already changed -again- and you're just trying to stop the tides with your hands.

August 10, 2014 at 1:22 a.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++WE PREACH CHRIST JESUS CRUCIFIED+++

Please behold as I show you how Jesus Christ of Nazareth, YHVH, thinks about Homosexuals joining/uniting to/with one another!

Homosexual, [bisexual/Homosexual], and other men who have sex with men (MSM) represent only 2% of the United States population, YET 72% of new HIV infections among all persons aged 13 to 24, and 30% of new infections among all Homosexual and [bisexual/Homosexual] men. 489,121 (56%) persons living with an HIV diagnosis in the United States are Homosexual and [bisexual/Homosexual] men....Citation: Your Friendly Center for Disease Control...Who CANNOT 'control' Homosexual HIV/AIDS.

Thus sayeth The Lord God of Hosts, "He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: The Lord shall have them in derision." (Psalm 2:4)

Malleus Deum Verum

August 10, 2014 at 2:28 a.m.
alprova said...

Z-man wrote: "Marriage is between a man and a woman, period. That's the way it will always be viewed. That's what marriage is. Anything else is a bastardization."

By whose or what standard? Don't offer the Bible, because Genesis 1:27-28 provided that God in a DIRECT quote, stated that he made man and woman, and was giving them carnal blessings without the benefit of marriage.

Marriage became a government institution. There are of course, many references to marriage in the Bible, but not one sentence is attributable to God or Jesus.

"A man with a man, and a woman with a woman is what it is, but it's not a marriage as marriage was intended to be. Call it something else."

If they want to call it a marriage, what business is it of anyone else's? Much of what ails this country is the fact that there are people sticking their noses into each other's business all the time.

If two men or two women desire to formalize their relationships, it's no one's business but the two desiring to marry and those they invite to witness it.

"You libs think you're ground breakers, but you're really just jerks. You change things for the sake of changing them and call yourselves enlightened or evolved. LOL"

Gay marriage will be legalized across the country. It's a matter of time. That's all. It's amazing logic you use there. We're supposed to be the jerks because we have no problem with people living their lives they way they want to and nobody is hurt because of it.

Offended? That's another issue and the simple fact is that no one has a right not to be offended in this nation. So if someone takes offense to two gay people marrying, that is their issue to deal with.

"...a marriage will always be between a man and a woman. Steve and Bobby standing at the alter will never be viewed the same as Steve and Susie. You can't win that battle."

Not with closed-minded people like you, you're right. But here's the thing; Sometimes in life, you don't always get to call the shots. You're among a majority now, but that's not going to hold.

Life is all about change. Some learn to deal with change, while others are not able to deal with change.

August 10, 2014 at 2:46 a.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++WE PREACH CHRIST JESUS CRUCIFIED+++

Please behold as I show you how Jesus Christ of Nazareth, YHVH, thinks about Homosexuals joining/uniting to/with one another!

AND! HOMOSEXUAL FEMALES! YOU CANNOT PLAY CHESS WITH JESUS CHRIST AND WIN!!!

I have been trying to tell you for years. Yet, you stubbornly listened to your beloved liberal Democrats! Then, "have it your way! Just go right on ahead and "have it your way!"

Citation: Your Friendly Center for Disease Control...Who CANNOT 'control' Homosexual HIV/AIDS.

One in four people living with HIV in the United States are women. Black/African American* and Hispanic/Latino women continue to be disproportionately affected by HIV.

Lesbian Homosexuals: 16% of all new HIV/AIDS cases are Lesbian-

Homosexuals. Women don't admit things: 16% more have HIV/AIDS and

don't even know it, afraid to get tested, or both!

Thus sayeth The Lord God of Hosts, "He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: The Lord shall have them in derision." (Psalm 2:4)

Malleus Deum Verum

August 10, 2014 at 2:49 a.m.
alprova said...

Orr wrote: "Please behold as I show you how Jesus Christ of Nazareth, YHVH, thinks about Homosexuals joining/uniting to/with one another!"

You couldn't possibly know what Jesus thinks about it. He never even once broached the subject of homosexuality throughout all of his quotes in the New Testament.

You're free to prove that factual statement incorrect if you can, but since it has remained untouched in this forum for years, I don't imagine you will be refuting it either.

God or Jesus, neither one, has been directly quoted condemning homosexuality. Every condemnation lifted out of the context it was written, either does not apply to gentiles of today, or it is strictly the opinion of the man who wrote it.

Your information regarding AIDS statistics is quite out dated. Black Americans is have the highest instances of diagnosis and that has been the case since 2010. Here in the South, it is 62% of all new cases.

August 10, 2014 at 3:01 a.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++WE PREACH CHRIST JESUS CRUCIFIED+++

Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?

2 Peter 1:21>> "For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost."

"We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts: knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost..."

Malleus Deum Verum

August 10, 2014 at 3:12 a.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++WE PREACH CHRIST JESUS CRUCIFIED+++

1 John 5:>> "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."

Hear now that which is true. Learn of Jesus Christ..."My Servants only wrote and preached those things which are from My mind and Spirit."

Thus sayeth The Lord God of Hosts, The Holy One of Israel.

Malleus Deum Verum

August 10, 2014 at 3:17 a.m.
alprova said...

Orr wrote: "Hear now that which is true. Learn of Jesus Christ..."My Servants only wrote and preached those things which are from My mind and Spirit."..."

That's a nice thought, but where does it come from? It's certainly not from the Bible.

August 10, 2014 at 3:40 a.m.
alprova said...

Orr quoted: "...2 Peter 1:21 - "For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost."..."

Well written by one of our fellow humans, who made the claim to know God's will as some do today.

Prophets are not Gods. Prophets ALL claim to be empowered to speak for God. The ONLY proof we have that they received instruction to write what the wrote, is by taking THEIR word.

I'm a bit more pragmatic than to just believe something because it is claimed to be God's word, from someone who was just as human as I am.

You're reaching for anything and everything to justify your discontent with a certain "sin" that neither God nor his Son ever directly condemned.

August 10, 2014 at 4:03 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

z-fister,

That's one way to "try" to win an argument, call it sophistry. The problem of course is you are claiming a logical argument is specious; therefore, all logical arguments are fallacious. The ultimate problem with it is that it backs you into a pretty tight spot that all arguments based on reason are wrong. This of course, is exactly the problem with all your arguments heretofore.

August 10, 2014 at 6:52 a.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"Lesbian Homosexuals: 16% of all new HIV/AIDS cases are Lesbian- Homosexuals."

Please post the reference for this statistic. It is almost impossible for HIV/AIDS to be passed woman-to-woman (unless they are intravenous drug users). If they don't shoot-up, then they got it from a man.

August 10, 2014 at 7:38 a.m.
conservative said...

I told you

I TOLD YOU!

I told you!

August 10, 2014 at 7:51 a.m.
rick1 said...

Very good article by Thomas Sowell on gay marriage.

http://humanevents.com/2005/01/03/gay-marriage-rights-are-nonsensical/

August 10, 2014 at 8:04 a.m.
ORRMEANSLIGHT said...

+++WE PREACH CHRIST JESUS CRUCIFIED+++

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636)TTY: (888) 232-6348

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/gender/women/facts/index.html

CDC Research Statistical Quote from referenced research document: "Most new HIV infections in women are from heterosexual contact (84%)."

My best advice is to get tested NOW. There is no cure for HIV/AIDS... none... but, you will probably not die as soon with treatment.

Thus sayeth The Lord God of Hosts, Jesus Christ, "Homosexual behavior is an ABOMINATION in my sight. See that you do not this. Flee youthful lusts. Resist the dEVIL and he will flee from you."

Malleus Deum Verum

August 10, 2014 at 8:08 a.m.
conservative said...

The same heathens defending Homosexuality/sodomy.

The same open anti Christ instructing the other heathens about the Bible.

One is getting closer to admitting he is a Homosexual attacking marriage.

It has been my pleasure to draw these out.

If you can get a Liberal to speak or write what is in his heart he will hang himself every time.

The best way to do that is to preach what God has said on any subject.

Those who oppose God will soon holler trying to justify their sins.

August 10, 2014 at 8:30 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

rick1, if thomas sowell wrote it, it must be truth. And, as one sad wag sez above, of course you are safe because no poor liberal will ever git into heaven because we are saved by our work (what we do) not by our faith.

I'll bet Imameanlight did not know you can get AIDS not only by shaking some guy's hand but by hugging a shaky lady...

You guys are too much

August 10, 2014 at 8:46 a.m.
fairmon said...

Many married people and Christians are hypocrites. They support and participate fully in the discrimination against single people but want to deny others the opportunity to do so. None are willing to give up the subsidizing of marriage but they want to deny those seeking to participate with them the right to do so.

The political and tax system panders to those married and it increases for those that think they are improving society by proliferating their gene pool. So, alprova is right, the day will come when more politicians see the advantage of adding to that pool of hypocritical discriminators.

August 10, 2014 at 8:53 a.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"CDC Research Statistical Quote from referenced research document: "Most new HIV infections in women are from heterosexual contact (84%).""

Ken, there you go with your dishonesty that I mentioned a few days ago. "84% of HIV infections in women from heterosexual contact" does not mean that the other 16% is from woman-to-woman contact. Shame on you Orr, using lies and deception to attempt to spread the "Lord's word". If you are half the Christian you claim to be, you will retract that statement and offer an apology.

August 10, 2014 at 8:58 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Lots of blather today from Alprova, aka The Fabricator, aka The Liar. The toad doesn't have the truth in him.

August 10, 2014 at 8:59 a.m.
MTJohn said...

Earth to Orrmeanslight

  1. The CDC report that you referenced says nothing about HIV transmission via female-female intimacy. Yes, 84% of new HIV infections among women are the consequence of heterosexual activity. That, however, does not imply that 16% of new HIV infections are the consequence of lesbian sex.

  2. If you are going to preach Christ crucified, please preach Christ crucified. A measure of the Gospel would be very helpful because the Gospel is the power of salvation for all who believe and not just for those who quit sinning and not just for heterosexuals. ALL have sinned and come short of the glory of God - that would include you and Conservative, not just homosexuals and those who think that homosexuals deserve partner benefits. There is no one who is righteous - NO ONE includes you. But, thanks be to God for Christ crucified because God's righteousness is revealed for all who believe. Also, please note that you have no excuse. Whenever you judge others, you judge yourself.

August 10, 2014 at 9:07 a.m.
Hunter_Bluff said...

Conned Man Good news - free candy! According to the AP, "In South Carolina, some homeowners found bags with candy and offers to join the Klan. Similar materials have been found in Tallahassee, Atlanta, and Chesterfield County, Va. In Harnett County, N.C., fliers appeared this week, marking the rally in Welcome. “Save Our Land, Join the Klan,” fliers said". But you already knew that...

August 10, 2014 at 9:07 a.m.
fairmon said...

The ancient justification of the woman attending to never ending household chores and educating and rearing children while the man farmed or foraged for food no longer exist. Either sex can and many do manage well without marriage and can do so without giving up any of the benefits of marriage other than those politically imposed with archaic laws and some society attitudes.

Commitment and love? Does a sate license assure anything more than revenue to the state? Can two people not commit to each other and in the eyes of the maker be married? A contract between two people can be just as valid without a state license.

August 10, 2014 at 9:08 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Same sex marriage isn't about rights. It's about changing the culture. It's about the tail wagging the dog. No pun intended.

August 10, 2014 at 9:17 a.m.

Yada, yada, yada. There is discrimination against single people by the government, that's a fact. Single heterosexual/normal people, and single "gay" people don't get the breaks.

It doesn't matter what you say, a man "marrying" a man is just not the same as a man marrying a woman. Sure, legally you can do anything and it's headed in the direction of anything goes, but you'll never change the perception, and you'll never be able to change the fact that there's normal and abnormal.

And, No, it's not comparable to the black struggle in this country to just be viewed as human beings.

To compare it is insulting.

August 10, 2014 at 9:18 a.m.
hotdiggity said...

Con, you are welcome to live in fear of your dictatorial deity if you wish.

You are welcome to prostate yourself before Bronze Age superstitions.

You can cower in your paranoia fear of divine retribution from a God who condoned all manner of murder, rape, and intolerance if you wish.

You can smugly wrap yourself in a belief system that says people will endure eternal torture if they don't follow the tenets of your beliefs.

But please don't expect us to take you or your blather seriously. I have no fear nor need to justify myself to YOUR deity.

August 10, 2014 at 9:25 a.m.

Jack, yeah, you put it best. It's about changing the culture. Changing it for the sake of changing it.

You libs act as if immigration was just invented and those that oppose our borders being overrun by illegal aliens from Mexico and central America stand against our country changing. LOL. Our country has had a steady flow of immigrants forever and our country has constantly been changing. You act as if homosexuals just came on the scene and it's vital that we revolve things around that 3.8%. You just want to change the culture because you think you're the most important people in the history of the world and you're going to change everything. LOL

"There's noting new under the sun"

August 10, 2014 at 9:26 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

diggity says "You are welcome to prostate(sic) yourself before Bronze Age superstitions. what?

August 10, 2014 at 9:32 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

z-fister, for what it is worth, approximately 10% of the population is homosexual, not 3.8%. In your 100 person congregation, there are probably 10 gays, except you all probably auto-select them out.

August 10, 2014 at 9:40 a.m.
Maximus said...

Clay Bennett the barely literate victimized military brat doodler is wasting his time and the TFP ink on this silly non-issue of GAY marriage. Remember, Obama's very own Director Of The Center For Disease Control issued a report based on an extensive long term study they had done showing that gay freaks only make up about 2% of the American population and we know that their are no gays in Iran. As for the bi- sexuals I don't know if they have a burning desire to marry two people if so I'm sure that useful idiots like Clay would be for it. As for transsexuals, wow, who gives a damn but by the looks of Clay Bennett's photo where he appears to have no muscle tone....Clay could very well be a tranny. How did the GAY movement become the G.L.B.T. Movement almost overnight anyway? I guess some Obama Democrat planner came up with the term to create a message that would attract a larger group of voters because before the Obama radical left regime NO ONE HAD EVER HEARD OF THE TERM G.L.B.T. Lol!

Really the whole Gay Movement thing just like the N.O.W. Gang which was created to give ugly and old women like Hillary Clinton relevance, the term GAY was created by Democrat Party Planners to provide a block of prospective voters that they could sell with targeted "messaging" and pull them into the Radical Idiot Leftist Democrat voting booth.....that's all.

August 10, 2014 at 10:01 a.m.
GaussianInteger said...

MaxiPad, Taco Bell just called, they said you are late for your shift.

August 10, 2014 at 10:10 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo states "Maximyth can always be depended on to be truthful, right?" now that's funny coming from The Toad

August 10, 2014 at 10:24 a.m.
Maximus said...

Come on NOW...the National Organization For Women was created to give ugly, fat, old dried up hags a voice. I thought Obama's foreign policy philosophy of leading from behind was about "following" others but who knew....it was about Gay Rights all the time! Lol,

I hope you bunch of victimized shut in social justice leftists have a fine day. Meanwhile, the welfare pimp in chief, is golfing with his 1%er friends in Maaaaaaaartha's Vineyard! Hope and change baby! Ole Barry fooled a LOT of gullible people. As I've told you fools...it's ALWAYS about the money and bombing Islamic terrorists of course! :)$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

August 10, 2014 at 10:56 a.m.
Maximus said...

Oh and as always for you radical Marxist redistribution of other people's money extreme idiot low expectation cynical disinherited Democrats the truth hurts.

August 10, 2014 at 11:17 a.m.

"10% is homosexual" Bull$hit..LOL there are almost as many homosexuals in this country as black Americans, which compose about 13% of the population? Idiocy. You'll never get an accurate number, but I guarantee you it's not the 10% to 13% you libs always quote.

Wow it's growing by leaps and bounds!! Hurray!! IT'S REALLY POPULAR!

It doesn't matter what the percentage is, it's not normal, and never will be.

It isn't good enough for pajama boy libs like you, inq, to change the culture to accommodate them. It's much much more than that to you and most libs. You want to punish those who won't accept it as normal.

Everyone is equal under the law in this country, as it should be, but this isn't about that for you libs, it's about changing the culture.

It won't work.

It will never be normal for a man to have sex with another man, never.

That's been around a long, long time and it wasn't normal then, and it will never be accepted as normal going forward no matter how vicious and nasty you libs are to those who don't hold your view point.

You libs expend so much energy trying to prove that abnormal is normal, illegal is legal, antisemitism doesn't exist, black Americans who aren't Democrats are "uncle toms", intrusion into our lives is a good thing, broken borders are good because we need "dreamers", the loss of freedom is good if we get free stuff, and Hillary is the smartest woman on earth. You come across like idiots.

inq, you accuse those of not accepting it as normal as being secretly homosexual, that's the best you can do? So, if it's a good thing, then why hurl that at someone as if it's a negative.

August 10, 2014 at 11:46 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Zab says "You libs expend so much energy trying to prove that abnormal is normal, illegal is legal, antisemitism doesn't exist, black Americans who aren't Democrats are "uncle toms", intrusion into our lives is a good thing, broken borders are good because we need "dreamers", the loss of freedom is good if we get free stuff, and Hillary is the smartest woman on earth. You come across like idiots." zab hit a 4 bagger

August 10, 2014 at 12:03 p.m.
Maximus said...

Delightfully ironic....the bombing missions going on now and ordered by Barry Obama The Marxist Welfare Pimp are being launched off of.......wait for it.....THE U.S.S. George H.W. Bush kick some Radical Islamic Ass U.S. Taxpayer Financed Aircraft Carrier. Soooooo sweet.....the Bush Boys are back in the form of an aircraft carrier doing Obama's heavy lifting while Barry is on vacation!

August 10, 2014 at 12:11 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man wrote: "It doesn't matter what you say, a man "marrying" a man is just not the same as a man marrying a woman."

Aw...say it isn't so...

"Sure, legally you can do anything and it's headed in the direction of anything goes, but you'll never change the perception, and you'll never be able to change the fact that there's normal and abnormal."

IN YOUR MIND...it will never be normal. So what?

"And, No, it's not comparable to the black struggle in this country to just be viewed as human beings."

I see. So what you're saying is that LBGT's are not human?

"To compare it is insulting."

Insulting to who? You?

So what?

August 10, 2014 at 12:31 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie wrote: "The same heathens defending Homosexuality/sodomy."

The same heathens trying to be Gods on Sunday, always pretending to know what God thinks of things...

"The same open anti Christ instructing the other heathens about the Bible."

The same pretense driven pseudo-Christians who know absolutely nothing about the Bible.

"One is getting closer to admitting he is a Homosexual attacking marriage."

Who would that be, oh wise one?

"It has been my pleasure to draw these out."

If you'd spend more time drawing out some self-pleasure on that phallus of yours, the world would be a better place.

"If you can get a Liberal to speak or write what is in his heart he will hang himself every time."

You're another legend in your own mind.

"The best way to do that is to preach what God has said on any subject."

You are so painfully dishonest. God never preached one single word against homosexuality and that is a fact. Many mortal men did preach against it, but where is any PROOF that they were empowered to speak for God?

Don't you suffer from that same problem? Don't you think you're a God?

I assure you, you are not.

Those who oppose God will soon holler trying to justify their sins.

August 10, 2014 at 12:39 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man wrote: "..."You'll never get an accurate number, but I guarantee you it's not the 10% to 13% you libs always quote."

Number one, it's not as if you can look at someone and determine they are gay. Number two, it's not as if you would be looking for one yourself. And number three, because there are people like you out here, most of those who are gay keep that information private or between those they want them to know.

I'll guarantee you that the actual rate of LBGT in this nation and across the world as well, meets or exceeds 10%.

"Wow it's growing by leaps and bounds!! Hurray!! IT'S REALLY POPULAR!"

Now who's being stupid? No one can be convinced to becoming Gay. One is either straight or he is not. You never made a choice, did you?

"It doesn't matter what the percentage is, it's not normal, and never will be."

It will not be normal to you, and it never will be, but that does not mean that being gay is not normal to someone else. When it comes to sexual preferences, no one is normal, not even those who are straight.

Every single straight person on this Earth has sexual attraction to some very different physical aspects of the opposite sex. There is no absolute normal and there never has been.

"Everyone is equal under the law in this country, as it should be, but this isn't about that for you libs, it's about changing the culture."

If everyone is equal, under the law, as you maintain, then why is it illegal for two people of the same sex to marry? Prohibiting certain people from being allowed to do what they feel is right to them, is hardly equal.

"It won't work."

Of course it will work. Mind your own business and allow other people to live their lives as free as you do, and no one is harmed in the least.

"It will never be normal for a man to have sex with another man, never."

No one would ever expect you to believe otherwise, but when it comes down to it, it's none of your business.

"That's been around a long, long time and it wasn't normal then, and it will never be accepted as normal going forward no matter how vicious and nasty you libs are to those who don't hold your view point."

Will it be viewed as being normal for those who are straight? Of course not. But the tide is turning, in that most of America will one day be on board with LBGT being given the same rights to formalize their relationships as straight people enjoy.

"You libs expend so much energy trying to prove that abnormal is normal, illegal is legal, antisemitism doesn't exist, black Americans who aren't Democrats are "uncle toms", intrusion into our lives is a good thing, broken borders are good because we need "dreamers", the loss of freedom is good if we get free stuff, and Hillary is the smartest woman on earth. You come across like idiots."

Correct me if I am wrong, but don't you spend just as much energy whining about all these issues you disagree with in this forum?

August 10, 2014 at 1:03 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

^^^^ uber blather

August 10, 2014 at 1:18 p.m.
rengerry said...

Aww, the poor babies don't like homosexuals because they can't openly discriminate against them that well like the brown people. They just can't tell if that white guy standing next to them is gay.

August 10, 2014 at 2:04 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

^^^ Ultra stupid remark.

August 10, 2014 at 2:18 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

But is IS the default answer from the left. Millions of good, kind, well meaning people oppose SSM. But the default response is that they're haters. Unfair and just plain wrong.

August 10, 2014 at 2:21 p.m.

That's exactly the way it is Jack. The list is so much longer than that, unfortunately.

"exceeds 10%" LOL...wishful thinking.

If you listen to the liberal media, which is most of the media, and Hollywood/TV, you would think homosexuals make up 70% of this country.

August 10, 2014 at 2:57 p.m.

There is no crisis too big to interrupt BO's tee time, Maximus.

August 10, 2014 at 3:08 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

you two (z-fister and tjd) are entirely too preoccupied with "gay culture." Whether its 1% or 20%, so what? They deserve to be left alone like everyone else. It sounds like you would prefer we bring back laws outlawing non-hetero behavior.

You may disagree about infant baptism but we don't pass laws banning the practice. You may have a problem with religion itself but no one is going to force you to adhere to a creed you reject. You may feel personally that homosexual behavior is distasteful, no one is going to force you legally to change your feelings, but likewise you have no standing civilly to enforce your distaste on others.

People can practice and believe whatever they like concerning religious marriage in our particular churches/denominations, but civil unions (official legal marriages) ought to be the domain of the state.

You are advocating a religious issue not a legal issue.

And as far as "liberal" media where does this 70% number you keep tossing about come from? Mr Sowell? There may be some folks in the fringe that say there is a little homosexuality in everyone but in large, I've never heard a credible witness make such a claim or espouse such a percentage.

August 10, 2014 at 3:22 p.m.
conservative said...

I marvel at the lengths that Liberals will go to promote and defend Homosexuality/sodomy.

MT John writes:

"Also, please note that you have no excuse. Whenever you judge others, you judge yourself."

Well, the subject is Homosexuals/sodomites marrying, which he is for. However, God's judgment for Homosexuality/sodomy is set forth in Scripture and it is certain.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 specifically states that no Homosexual will inherit the Kingdom of God and the same is true for adulterers and fornicators.

This ridiculous statement of his is a futile and vain attempt to justify the gross sin of Homosexuality/sodomy.

August 10, 2014 at 3:25 p.m.
MickeyRat said...

Ok TheJackDennis, Millions of good, kind, well meaning people oppose Israeli bombing tactics; but the default response is that they're anti-Semitic. ”Unfair and just plain wrong.” It’s the default answer from the right.

Y’all are always trying to have it both ways. It trips you up every time.

Didn’t quite understand the ‘Bronze Age’ metaphor did you? Do you even know what ‘metaphor’ means? Your posts have the intellectual prowess of a mud puddle; with insights that have all the appeal of a paper cut.

What a Dick!

August 10, 2014 at 3:25 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Rat, my post was straightforward. What didn't you comprehend? I didn't even notice the Bronze Age reference. You just prove my point, dolt.

August 10, 2014 at 3:29 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

IQ, what have I ever posted that would indicate I'm preoccupied with the gay culture? Where the hell did that come from?

August 10, 2014 at 3:31 p.m.
conservative said...

Well I see that the brazen anti Christ, Mr. Anthony Provancher just keeps getting worse and worse.

Yes, I realize that you can't get any worse than an anti Christ who wants it known but he badly wants it known.

He writes today:

"By whose or what standard? Don't offer the Bible, because Genesis 1:27-28 provided that God in a DIRECT quote, stated that he made man and woman, and was giving them carnal blessings without the benefit of marriage."

That sure made my jaw drop.

I haven't looked, but my strong hunch is that even MT John and inquiringmind haven't defended that.

August 10, 2014 at 3:41 p.m.
conservative said...

The open and brazen anti Christ Mr. Anthony Provancher wrote:

"By whose or what standard? Don't offer the Bible, because Genesis 1:27-28 provided that God in a DIRECT quote, stated that he made man and woman, and was giving them carnal blessings without the benefit of marriage."

I don't want people to miss that one.

August 10, 2014 at 3:48 p.m.
conservative said...

MT John writes "Also, please note that you have no excuse. Whenever you judge others, you judge yourself."

IF he is sincere and not trying to bamboozle people, then he means that if one judges (agrees with the judgment of God on the homosexual/sodomite ) then you are to suffer the same fate as the Homosexual/sodomite.

Now, to be blunt, how stupid is that?

August 10, 2014 at 3:58 p.m.
conservative said...

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10

A reminder.

August 10, 2014 at 4:09 p.m.
conservative said...

inquiringmind said...

if you define a marriage as a relationship between a man and woman committed to having children, what do we call child-barren marriages?

==============================================

This has to be some silly attempt for justifying Homosexuals/sodomites marrying.

Under his premise you would call "child-barren marriages" child-barren marriages, answering his own silly premise.

August 10, 2014 at 4:20 p.m.
conservative said...

inquiringmind said:

If you define a relationship between two persons whose life-long intent is to have children who are productive, penitent Christians, what do you call it?

=======================================================

I guess he means by two persons, two Homosexuals/sodomites but will not say that.

Two persons of the same sex cannot have children.

Furthermore two Homosexual/sodomites are NOT penitent Christians!

Stated another way NO penitent Christian can be a Homosexual/sodomite.

Stated another way NO Christian can be a Homosexual period.

Stated another way Christ would have died in vain if one can still live a life of sin and go to heaven.

August 10, 2014 at 4:30 p.m.
lkeithlu said...

Of course this subject would bring out both con, with his usual no true Scotsman fallacy and Ken with his unhealthy and incorrect preoccupation with HIV.

Marriage equality is inevitable. Equal protection under law.

August 10, 2014 at 4:32 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

tjd, you and z keep talking about it, I can only assume it is because you are preoccupied with it.

By the look of it, it seems at least one pre-occupied wag around here never ceases trying to read other persons' minds. She alleges, "Under his premise you would call "child-barren marriages" child-barren marriages, answering his own silly premise," and she leaves implied but unstated, her definition is "failure," especially those who have no intent to bring children into her pernicious environment. At least she recognizes and admits her own status, that "the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God."

August 10, 2014 at 4:48 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

IQ, Will wait for you to cite my post about gaydom.

August 10, 2014 at 4:52 p.m.
conservative said...

Regarding Homosexuals marrying, brazen anti Christ Mr. Anthony Provancher writes:

"You couldn't possibly know what Jesus thinks about it!"

Brazen anti Christ Mr. Anthony Christ doesn't have any idea what Holy, sinless Jesus Christ thinks about Homosexuals/sodomites marrying.

And I believe him.

August 10, 2014 at 5:25 p.m.
fairmon said...

Who cares or should care if some guy is a sucker that also likes taking it up the bum? I couldn't care less as long as I am not affected in any way. Considering making marriage legal for those making that choice does financially affect any hetero couples and singles.

To dumb it down for the greedy. If you have ten pieces of candy to divide among five kids they each get two pieces. But, if you have ten pieces to divide among 10 kids they each get one piece. Change the dynamics of who gets spousal benefits and you change who can get how much unless you take more from some to keep giving the same to all participants.

August 10, 2014 at 5:30 p.m.
conservative said...

The open and brazen anti Christ, Mr. Anthony Provancher implies that God approved of fornication!

"By whose or what standard? Don't offer the Bible, because Genesis 1:27-28 provided that God in a DIRECT quote, stated that he made man and woman, and was giving them carnal blessings without the benefit of marriage."

I don't want people to miss that one.

August 10, 2014 at 5:54 p.m.
MickeyRat said...

TheJackDennis,

Your 3:29 p.m post was a classic. Bravo.

Y’know, you should try to hang around smart, witty people; read smart, witty books (if indeed you know what library is); and watch some funny, intellectually witty shows or movies so you can develop your own funny, witty personality; because in that arena, you are sorely lacking.

Chirping out your usual crap on this page only illuminates your sub-standard brainpower. More importantly is to develop your own style and be able to think, not just react; thus ‘exposing’ (one of your favorite words) your underdeveloped amygdala.

The first step in developing that social skill is to expose yourself (there that word again) to people you want to be like. I can't really give you advice on how to associate with smart people you’d comprehend-- so just go out until you find one (not at a 7-11or elementary school) and then make friends with them. How do you make friends with them? Be nice, take genuine interest in things they like, and, what for you will be a VERY difficult task – don’t constantly insult or criticize them.

Dick!

August 10, 2014 at 6:34 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie, here's a couple for you;

This one's directly from Jesus;

Luke 6:37 - "Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven."

Romans 3:23 - "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God...."

That includes you, you insufferable snake who slithers on the ground all the time.

August 10, 2014 at 6:36 p.m.
alprova said...

Genesis 1:27-28 - "So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them."

"God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground."

How does one 'increase in number' without procreating? God is not quoted marrying them in the Garden, and he most certainly did not state that the two of them had to be married before procreating, so from all appearances, it was A-Okay with God to do it right then and there without the benefit of marriage.

I'm so surprised that this must be explained to one person who claims to understand the Bible but who clearly understands nothing about the Bible.

August 10, 2014 at 6:45 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

So RAT. LET ME GUESS. You consider your constant bitching about me to be intellectual. Right? Quite amusing. Prick!

August 10, 2014 at 6:49 p.m.
Ki said...

fairmon said: Who cares if some guy is a sucker that also likes taking it up the bum?

Some heterosexuals partake in those type acts too. Especially those diehard chri'tians.

August 10, 2014 at 7:06 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

^^ Quite intellectually profound, Ki.

August 10, 2014 at 7:10 p.m.
MickeyRat said...

Dude, you act as though your stupidity is a virtue. I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and sh!t out smarter statements than you proffer.

Constant bitching? Me? You’ve gotta be kidding. That is your expertise - your modus operandi – your raison d'être. 24/7!

There are several people in this world that I find obnoxious and you are all of them.

Dick

August 10, 2014 at 7:18 p.m.
alprova said...

Marriage is one of those issues that many people mistake as being a religious service. Some people might be surprised to learn that the word "marriage" only appears 29 times throughout the entire Bible, and contrary to popular belief, God nor his Son define it.

The word Marriage first appears in the second book of the Old Testament, Exodus 21:10 - "If he take for himself another wife, her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage shall he not diminish."

In Genesis, there is but one mention that even comes close but still falls very short of defining a formalized relationship between two people.

Genesis 2:24 - " That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh."

Unity is not a word that describes a wedding. Being united, for all we know and the Bible evidences, is that first time carnal relations seals the deal.

So...apparently all this crap about marriage being defined as being only between a man and a woman leaves a little to be desired, even in the Bible, which is supposed to be our moral guidebook.

There is no mention in the Bible, that I can find, instructing us to take part in a formal ceremony of any kind to be married.

Like so many other issues that people beat their Bibles about, this is yet another one not clearly addressed in the Bible.

It's all based on assumptions and vague wording that can easily mean something else.

Gotta love the Bible for making it so clear that there is nothing to doubt or anything to question, right?

August 10, 2014 at 7:24 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Maybe you can rat. But you don't. Not here anyway. All I see outta you is reaction.

August 10, 2014 at 7:25 p.m.
alprova said...

Poor Jackie...

You had your ass handed to you in a hat by MickyRat.

How does it feel to experience that which you dole out all the time?

"There are several people in this world that I find obnoxious and you are all of them."

Hilarious!!! He's got you pegged for sure...

August 10, 2014 at 7:29 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

I feel fine, Toad. How does it feel to be the champ liar on here?

August 10, 2014 at 7:36 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

TJD sez, "{IQ, Will wait for you to cite my post about gaydom." Sorry I missed it and do not want to sift through all the garbage to find it. What time did you post it and I'll look at it.

August 10, 2014 at 8:18 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

It would seem events happening now in Iraq/Bagdad are far more worthwhile to discuss than sexual preferences. Looks like Nuri al-Maliki is trying to pull another Saddam Hussein on us.

What is happening in Northern Iraq is a God-awful mess but all we are doing is pouring more gasoline on the fire. It is said the wages of sin are death, and certainly the wages of war are death, therefore war is the wage of our sin. I think Reinhold Niebuhr said something like that in the 1940's or so. War is a miserable activity with no winners and all losers, we ought to pull up the tent stakes and let the people choose the government they wish to live under.

After all, a literal reading of the OT says all governments are ordained by God, and a literal reading of Paul says everyone is obligated to obey their governmental authority. You can't get any more conservative than that.

August 10, 2014 at 8:30 p.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher open and brazen anti Christ, insists on giving Bible lessons.

He writes:

Luke 6:37 - "Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven."

Romans 3:23 - "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God...."

That includes you, you insufferable snake who slithers on the ground all the time.

==================================================

I forgive him and I won't judge or condemn Mr. Anthony Provancher as a snake in turn.

However, Mr. Anthony Provancher is liar and an anti Christ for many reasons, foremost for denying the deity of Jesus Christ. -

And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come ; and even now already is it in the world. 1 John 4:3

For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 2 John 1:7

Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 1 John 2:22

August 10, 2014 at 8:35 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

What a hypocrite. She squeals, "I forgive him and I won't judge or condemn Mr. Anthony Provancher as a snake in turn," and yet compulsively blurts out her judgment, "However, Mr. Anthony Provancher is liar and an anti Christ..."

Poor child, have mercy on her compulsion to judge in flagrant violation the Law.

August 10, 2014 at 8:39 p.m.
conservative said...

The judgment is already set in God's word.

You deliberately left out the Scripture I cited.

And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come ; and even now already is it in the world. 1 John 4:3

For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 2 John 1:7

Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 1 John 2:22

You can't overturn God's judgment inquiringmind, try as you may.

August 10, 2014 at 8:47 p.m.
conservative said...

Well I see that the brazen anti Christ, Mr. Anthony Provancher just keeps getting worse and worse.

Yes, I realize that you can't get any worse than an anti Christ who wants it known, but he badly wants it known.

He writes today:

"By whose or what standard? Don't offer the Bible, because Genesis 1:27-28 provided that God in a DIRECT quote, stated that he made man and woman, and was giving them carnal blessings without the benefit of marriage."

That sure made my jaw drop.

I haven't looked, but my hunch is that even MT John and inquiringmind haven't defended that.

August 10, 2014 at 8:52 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

IQ, In other words, you don't have squat.

August 10, 2014 at 8:54 p.m.
conservative said...

Inquiringmind

Your problem is that you keep defending and promoting the evil of Homosexuality/sodomy.

You think that by throwing the word judging around you can justify your behavior.

You can't. The guilt is always going to be there as long as you try to justify you behavior.

August 10, 2014 at 8:57 p.m.
conservative said...

The open and brazen anti Christ, Mr. Anthony Provancher implies that God approved of fornication!

"By whose or what standard? Don't offer the Bible, because Genesis 1:27-28 provided that God in a DIRECT quote, stated that he made man and woman, and was giving them carnal blessings without the benefit of marriage."

I don't want people to miss that one.

August 10, 2014 at 9:01 p.m.
Ki said...

inquire, looks like the west has reduced itself to accepting any tribal group who claims they want to ally themselves with america. America has gone through just about every tribal group there is in the region and none have proven to be trustworthy. From the Shiites and now the Kurds. The Kurds aren't even originally natives to Iraq. They were chased out of f southern Turkey decades ago and settled in northern Iraq. No health he has said for sure why Turkey ran them out of their country, but they, the Kurds, have been trying to ally themselves with the west and draw the west into a conflict on their side for quite a number of years. Who knows? They may have been the ones who gassed their own people then blamed it all on Saddam .'

August 10, 2014 at 9:06 p.m.
conservative said...

Known anti Christ Mr. Anthony Provancher keeps giving anti Bible lessons:

Genesis 1:27-28 - "So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them." "God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground."

How does one 'increase in number' without procreating? God is not quoted marrying them in the Garden, and he most certainly did not state that the two of them had to be married before procreating, so from all appearances, it was A-Okay with God to do it right then and there without the benefit of marriage.

=========================

Mr. Anthony Provancher does not see the word "marry" and ignores the words "blessed them" so he concludes that God did not marry them!

Well, Mr. Anthony Provancher is a known anti Christ, he often wrongly concludes a lot about God.

Mr. Anthony Provancher has a sordid record.

Let us see if inquiringmind or MT John will agree with him.

August 10, 2014 at 9:07 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie, you've done a fine job of digging up some very condemning scripture, but not one of them applies to me or anything I have ever offered.

Your charge that I am an anti-Christ is false and nothing you can post that I have ever written will prove otherwise.

You can't even understand that most of that scripture you posted supports my stances far better than it does yours.

READ IT!!

I have never denied that Jesus was God's Son and that he lived here on Earth and is now at the right-hand side of God.

August 10, 2014 at 9:10 p.m.
conservative said...

Here we go again.

Mr. Anthony Provancher believes that God had sex with Mary!

He probably learned this blasphemy from his time with the Mormons.

Who else could have told him that Satanic doctrine?

And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come ; and even now already is it in the world. 1 John 4:3

For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 2 John 1:7

Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 1 John 2:22

August 10, 2014 at 9:14 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie wrote: "Mr. Anthony Provancher does not see the word "marry" and ignores the words "blessed them" so he concludes that God did not marry them!"

I see, so the next time I sneeze and someone in the room says "God Bless You" does that mean I am married to them?

August 10, 2014 at 9:14 p.m.
conservative said...

It is ALWAYS my pleasure and duty to expose anti Christs, liars and deceivers.

More to come tomorrow, stay tuned,

August 10, 2014 at 9:17 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie rote: "Mr. Anthony Provancher believes that God had sex with Mary! He probably learned this blasphemy from his time with the Mormons. Who else could have told him that Satanic doctrine."

Well, we now know that you consider Mormons to be Satanic, but what you will net be able to do deceiver, is to post any proof that I have stated that God had sex with Mary.

Why are you resorting to intentionally offering lies?

You do slither on the ground like a snake. You hide behind that computer monitor like a child, spewing your insanity and your childlike knowledge of religion, all while fashioning yourself as a God.

You are the worst example of someone proclaiming to be religious I have ever encountered. You're equally the biggest hypocrite I have encountered as well.

You're the only person who seems to be unaware of those facts.

August 10, 2014 at 9:24 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

ConMan, what you don't get is, NO ONE here thinks you have any clue of what you are talking about nor do they give one sh!t about what you have to say. You seem to think tossing a Bible verse around here and there somehow substantiates what you say. You hate homosexuality and think all of the gays are going to hell, great; nobody but you seems to care. You have as much credibility as any of us other posters and no one is forced to believe as you do. Worry about your own salvation and allow other people to do the same.

August 10, 2014 at 9:30 p.m.
fairmon said...

fairmon said: Who cares if some guy is a sucker that also likes taking it up the bum?

Ki said... Some heterosexuals partake in those type acts too. Especially those diehard chri'tians.

Wouldn't that make them bisexual? How do you know your statement is true? I don't care what no harm to others behavior anyone engages in but I damn sure don't want to increase the number discriminating against those preferring to be single. Gay marriage increases the number discriminating and reduces the number of singles to confiscate funds from to show favor to those discriminating against them. Eliminate the tax laws and other laws and policies that discriminate against singles and I will have no objection to gay marriage.

August 10, 2014 at 9:34 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

connie, you can run but you can't hide.

August 10, 2014 at 10:25 p.m.
alprova said...

Connie hides every day. He hides behind that computer monitor in fear of what he knows would happen if he were to out himself.

He's so tight with God that he refuses to be as forthcoming with his true name as I have done. God protects me Connie. You're too chicken to test that out for yourself, aren't you?

I don't hide. I have differing beliefs and I stand firm on those beliefs.

Connie slithers like a snake, taking potshots of religious self-righteousness and condemnation at everyone who does not agree with his beliefs.

Just remember Connie, you're zero for who knows how many of my truisms that still stand in this forum. You have never once been able to refute a single word I have offered. Not one.

You know dick about the Bible, but you seem to know lots about dicks because they seem to permeate your brain all the time.

I doubt there is anyone who does not consider you an extreme closet case, in that you'd make love to a phallus the first change you had.

Slurp...slurp...slurp!!

August 10, 2014 at 10:56 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie wrote: "How does it feel to be the champ liar on here?"

I can prove you to have lied in here several times. I'm betting that just about everyone knows you lie in here routinely.

You cannot prove me to have lied once.

You're welcome to try digging up some proof.

Good luck!!

P.S. - Don't go whining to the TFP staff because you got your ass handed to you in a hat by MickeyRat. You had that comin'

August 10, 2014 at 11 p.m.
rengerry said...

It's funny how what Connie says coincidentally happens to be what "god" says.

August 10, 2014 at 11:03 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

You're the whiner, Toad. I thought you were having me banned. What up with that, lie-boy. You posted at least 500 lies about the child molestation. Yet you had no proof. Why? Because it was your fabrication. So stop the bs about not lying. You the master of it here. And you're butt-ugly to boot. Oh, and you're fixate on phalluses. Interesting.

August 10, 2014 at 11:25 p.m.
rengerry said...

I love Al and Jack! It's like they're trying to decide who gets to be the dom for their next session of sweet, sweet love.

August 10, 2014 at 11:40 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

alpo says on 7/2: For whatever reason he has for doing so, he claimed to be Jack Dana Dennis, but to the best of my knowledge, he is not that man, therefore I no longer believe he has ever harmed a child. 7/2 so which is it toad? And btw, when you moved from N.C., did you re-register in GA as a pedophile? huh, huh, didya?

August 10, 2014 at 11:44 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie wrote: "You're the whiner, Toad. I thought you were having me banned. What up with that, lie-boy."

You're sinking your own little U-boat twerp. Keep it up. It's just a matter of time before you will be dumped from the site.

BTW - Are you a paying customer?

"You posted at least 500 lies about the child molestation. Yet you had no proof. Why? Because it was your fabrication. So stop the bs about not lying."

That issue is a closed book. I will only respond that I did not lie about a thing I ever typed into this forum, especially about you. You ruined your own reputation.

And like Forest Gump, that's all I've got to say about that.

"...you're butt-ugly to boot."

I'm glad you find me ugly. The way you stalk me every day, I've been afraid you wanted to get inside my pants.

August 11, 2014 at 2:12 a.m.
fairmon said...

hypocrites all. They want theirs and yours. There will be nothing left for those 40 and under when the spoiled greedy boomers get through. Politicians and the boomers are scamming you big time.

August 11, 2014 at 2:22 a.m.
alprova said...

Jackie, there would be no need for me to "re-register" in Georgia for anything, as I have lived here consistently for 39 years. I was 16 years old when I moved to Georgia.

I understand you are utterly butt-hurt over certain things, but because you whined hard enough, I was very nicely asked to drop certain kinds of posts and I agreed to do it.

I see that you have already violated the agreement you made. Why am I not surprised?

You're a glutton for punishment. This time, it will not be me doling it out.

Happy trails, Jackie

August 11, 2014 at 2:31 a.m.
Ki said...

fairmon 8/10 9:34pm post states: * Wouldn't that make them bisexual? *

No, fairmon. Only if they do it first with their heterosexual significant other then go out and do it again with a same sex one. Are you really that naive that you've never heard of heterosexual couples engaging in oral or anal sex?

August 11, 2014 at 3:14 a.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher now resorts to threats, he writes:

"Connie hides every day. He hides behind that computer monitor in fear of what he knows would happen if he were to out himself."

===================================

Yes, he and others would come after my family, property, or myself.

He has a record of this and I believe that is why many will not visit this site.

And no I am not forgetting his blasphemies and anti Christian rants and his open anti Christ statements and his very vulgar manner as turning many off either.

August 11, 2014 at 8:22 a.m.
alprova said...

Connie wrote: "Yes, he and others would come after my family, property, or myself."

You're afraid of a man currently missing a leg and confined to wheelchairs?

You coward.

"He has a record of this and I believe that is why many will not visit this site."

You vile lying bastard. I have never harmed a soul. I have been guilty of only wearing down trolls. You and one more are quite resilient, but you too will wear down one day.

"And no I am not forgetting his blasphemies and anti Christian rants and his open anti Christ statements and his very vulgar manner as turning many off either."

You wouldn't know a blasphemy or recognize an anti-Christ if one slapped you across the face.

My vulgar manner, as you call it, is retaliation for your stalking demeanor in this forum. You deserve it.

August 11, 2014 at 8:39 a.m.
conservative said...

Now the brazen liar writes:

"You vile lying bastard. I have never harmed a soul. I have been guilty of only wearing down trolls."

I never wrote that he physically harmed anyone.

He of course is the liar.

I know he has gone after a Jack Dennis for one. This has been going on for months, maybe years.

This is one arrogant brazen liar.

August 11, 2014 at 8:53 a.m.
conservative said...

Mr. Anthony Provancher now resorts to threats, he writes:

"Connie hides every day. He hides behind that computer monitor in fear of what he knows would happen if he were to out himself."

===================================

Yes, he and others would come after my family, property, or myself.

He has a record of this and I believe that is why many will not visit this site.

And no I am not forgetting his blasphemies and anti Christian rants and his open anti Christ statements and his very vulgar manner as turning many off either.

August 11, 2014 at 8:54 a.m.
Maximus said...

Again, the gay thing is way overblown. Obama has to keep the issue in the public eye in order to continue to DIVIDE the country into special interest groups, create protest and conflict in order to capture votes. That is what a thug community organizer does and the only real thing Obama is skilled at is campaigning. Really, the Democrats have done the same thing to the Tea Party which is not even an organized group. They have painted the Tea Party as primarily white, southern racists, illiterates, and have trashed key players like, Palin, Bachman, and Kane. No, Democrats are not about social justice for the small gay population, etc., they are about power and money. If you are waiting for the Democrats or any politician to make your life better then you are a loser. YOU are responsible for your own life and should depend on no one else to achieve whatever success in life you aspire to. Once you are an adult it's not Mommy and Daddy's job to build your life and it certainly ain't Barry The Welfare Pimps job although he would like to run everyone's life since he is a freaking Marxist.

August 11, 2014 at 9:01 a.m.
alprova said...

Connie, you've proven today that you're nothing but a total lying piece of filth.

You have asserted twice that I have a "record of going after people's families, property, or posters."

That is a viscous lie and you know it.

For sure, you are a shining example of religious faith. NOT!!!

Like you, Jackie has been stalking me since the day he found this forum. He started it, just like you have.

You want to be in bed with Jackie? Be my guest. You're both trolling this forum daily, so why shouldn't the two of you hook up?

He lives in Knoxville, and he's currently very limited in where he can go at the moment, so you'll have to go see him.

August 11, 2014 at 9:21 a.m.
conservative said...

The arrogant, brazen liar Mr. Anthony Provancher just keeps burying himself:

His latest lie:

"You have asserted twice that I have a "record of going after people's families, property, or posters."

"That is a viscous lie and you know it

==============

Mr. Anthony Provancher now resorts to threats, he writes:

"Connie hides every day. He hides behind that computer monitor in fear of what he knows would happen if he were to out himself."

===================================

Yes, he and others would come after my family, property, or myself.

He has a record of this and I believe that is why many will not visit this site.

August 11, 2014 at 9:33 a.m.

I love BO's "Balkanization of the media" comment. LOL

I'm sure he'd be happy with an official state run media.

Projection from BO. An extremist accusing others of being extremist.

The GOP has a 30 or so majority in the House. There're 200 Dems in there. The Senate is Majority Democrat? Rinos control the House.

Glad to see a school system in Kentucky is rejecting MO's federal approved lunch program. Kids have described it as tasting like vomit. Good for them. "Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual". She got that right.

August 11, 2014 at 9:46 a.m.
alprova said...

If you believe that to be a threat, then you're more of a coward than I thought you were.

You hide behind your anonymity. That's a fact.

If your identity were known to all, like mine is, you'd sing a different tune while interacting on this site.

You are nothing but a common Internet troll. Religion left you many years ago. You hide behind religion like you hide behind your computer monitor.

The only thing genuine about you is your self-hatred of your own homosexuality.

August 11, 2014 at 9:51 a.m.
conservative said...

Whine!

WHINE!

WHINE!

August 11, 2014 at 9:56 a.m.
conservative said...

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor HOMOSEXUALS, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10

A reminder.

August 11, 2014 at 10:02 a.m.
alprovagator said...

HEY, AL:

Q: Where do one-legged people eat?

A: IHOP.

August 11, 2014 at 10:03 a.m.
alprova said...

I detest IHOP. It's been years since I've eaten in one of 'em.

August 11, 2014 at 10:06 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

alpo says "He lives in Knoxville, and he's currently very limited in where he can go at the moment, so you'll have to go see him." Knoxville, Toad? Actually I live in your head

August 11, 2014 at 10:17 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Even left-wing loons now turning on their messiah. NBC’s Todd, Mitchell Sour On Obama Over Iraq Excuses: ‘A Farce!’

August 11, 2014 at 10:30 a.m.
lkeithlu said...

"...trashed key players like Palin, Bachman, and Kane."

Those loonies hang themselves by their own words. Daily. BO doesn't have to lift a finger.

August 11, 2014 at 10:30 a.m.

Jack, who's the guy in your avatar?

August 11, 2014 at 10:31 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

<My hero, Wayne Allen Root. A great American.

August 11, 2014 at 10:37 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

It begins: Iraq crisis prompts Dems to dump on Obama’s foreign policy. aka, the unraveling of a president

August 11, 2014 at 10:42 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Even the Hilldebeast dropping her former boss into the grease. too funny.

No ‘organizing principle’ - In an interview with The Atlantic, Hillary Clinton was stark in her critique of President Obama’s foreign policy doctrine. With polls showing a precipitous drop in approval of the president’s handling of numerous global crises it’s no wonder Clinton would seek to widen her distance. Lest she be painted with the same brush, Clinton told the Atlantic, “Great nations need organizing principles, and ‘don’t do stupid stuff’ is not an organizing principle.” She went on to jab at her former boss noting his failure to arm Syrian rebels combating President Bashar al-Assad, “…You have more than 170,000 people dead in Syria,” Clinton said. “You have the vacuum that has been created by the relentless assault by Assad on his own population, an assault that has bred these extremist groups, the most well-known of which, ISIS—or ISIL—is now literally expanding its territory inside Syria and inside Iraq.”

August 11, 2014 at 11:09 a.m.
alprova said...

Irt sure is funny how people read more into a comment than is actually being said.

Hillary Clinton was not being critical of the President, who absolutely did the right thing in taking a hands-off approach to Syria.

It is not the job of the United States, under any criteria, to intervene in what is going on over there. If it were up to me, I'd take a hands-off approach to Iraq as well.

Enough of this crap. Nothing is ever going to be resolved and every time we intervene in those nations, we make more enemies, thus placing this nation in danger of attack.

Let them bomb each other until the best side wins.

August 11, 2014 at 11:47 a.m.
nocomment said...

Maximus said...

Again, the gay thing is way overblown. Obama has to keep the issue in the public eye in order to continue to DIVIDE the country into special interest groups, create protest and conflict in order to capture votes.

Actually most of the recent media attention has been focused on the various court cases around the country. Both Federal and State courts have been presented with challenges to state laws and state constitutional provisions prohibiting same sex marriage. Every court to rule in the past year has ruled that banning same sex marriage is a violation of the 14th amendment. Obama doesn't have a role in these cases.

August 11, 2014 at 11:51 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Funny, spinmeister toad lying Alpo. Every news outlet I've seen, including left wing outlets (most are) are saying Pant Suit is burning The Messiah. And yet, we have you, a registered sex offender, protecting her.

August 11, 2014 at 11:53 a.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Breaking news....President Obama, in an effort to further increase fund raising, has signed an Executive Order impeaching himself.

August 11, 2014 at 12:07 p.m.

Just saw a story on Jame O'keefe in a UK paper on Drudge. He dressed up like Osama Bin Laden and walked across the river from Mexico, twice. LOL

August 11, 2014 at 12:14 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Zab, how could that be? Our borders are secure.

August 11, 2014 at 12:17 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

Public Advisory!!!

Gov. Perry has called up all the Texas National Guard and the convoy is heading towards Washington, D.C.

Separately from an undisclosed location in Virginia, President George Bush, (The Younger) announced that he had not relinquished the Presidency. He has assumed the title, President of the United States, ex officio and is now heading to his temporary headquarters in Four Mile Creek Park, just east of the US Defense Supply Center, south of Richmond, VA. He appeals to all state governors to call up their National Guard and move towards Washington, DC to await further instructions from his office, once Regent Dick (sic) Cheney arrives.

In addition he has issued a number of executive orders. The two more important ones are that he has declared a state of emergency and suspended all local civill authority. Local governmental officials are to await further instructions from headquarters in Four Mile Creek Park and defer to National Guard commanders. Second, residents are advised to remain indoors except for emergencies or if reporting to your National Guard depot. In what is stated to be only temporary measures until he established protocols for national and state procedures, (1) anyone caught possessing a handgun or rifle is subject to immediate arrest, and if they resist, subject to immediate execution and removal of their heart that will be placed in a special cold storage for use by the Regant, (2) All lesbos and gays will be shot on sight. Evidence of infraction shall be holding hands or exchanging mooning looks accompanied by batting eyelashes...and suggestive gestures; furthermore, if your last name is Cheney and you are a female, you will only be spanked (and you will not enjoy it!). As an alternative you must promise to go to The Crossings Church every day for five years, or until you repent.

The last order announced by the President, ex officio is that all portrait artists within 100 miles of Richmond should immediately come to Four Mile Creek Park with drawing supplies. Be sure to bring red pencils.

August 11, 2014 at 12:22 p.m.

Yeah, Jack, astounding.

inq, I love seeing how much you libs hate Dick Cheney. I like how his comments about BO get under your skin. That heart transplant he got must really eat away at you? LOL

August 11, 2014 at 12:31 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

Public Advisory No. 2!!!

President Bush, ex officio, responding to left-wing criticism for his move, has cited the precedent of Nuri al-Maliki of Iraq, whom he installed as premier, to justify his move to restore law'n order to our blessed country. He was quoted to remark, "Thank God for Shiites!" Dick Cheney was heard to reply, "You aren't (censored) me are you!"

August 11, 2014 at 12:45 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

Public Advisory No 3!!!!

In an astounding turn of events, we have just learned that the President, ex officio has been mortally wounded after being in office for less than 4 hours. It appears the President, Ex Officio and the Regent decided to go duck hunting down on the Four Mile Creek as a break. The President ex officio seems to have stood up to fire his gun at some birds coming in when the Regent fired his gun at the same flock. The President's backside took the full brunt of the Regent's shot.

In a comment outside the emergency room in downtown Richmond, the Regent said, "This was a terrible, regrettable tragedy. We should never have started talking about ostriches, otherwise the head wound was avoidable."

He continued to state that under the protocols he and the President had just completed prior to the hunting event, he was taking over the authority of the President, ex officio and hence forth should be called Richard I.

He asked that as soon as the false prophet and pseudo-President Obama is captured he is to be brought to Four Mile Creek Park. He also announced that the call for artists now includes bringing white paint, preferably oil-based.

He concluded, "Things will be OK in a few weeks, but in the meantime stay tuned to more news on your local emergency frequency."

August 11, 2014 at 12:57 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Clueless in Martha's Vinyard: When he was running for re-election in 2012, President Barack Obama repeatedly took credit for ending the war in Iraq and bringing all U.S. troops home from that country. At the White House on Saturday, however, when talking about his decision to use military force against the al-Qaida-related ISIS terrorist group in Iraq, Obama said removing all U.S. troops from Iraq was not “my decision.” This fellow is a hoot*

August 11, 2014 at 12:59 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie wrote: "Funny, spinmeister toad lying Alpo. Every news outlet I've seen, including left wing outlets (most are) are saying Pant Suit is burning The Messiah."

And every one of those stories are cut and paste jobs.

I read English perfectly and I saw nothing to indicate that she was dissing the Prez for a second.

You idiots will believe ANYTHING that someone writes in a news story regardless of whether or not it is accurate.

And nothing in Hillary's comment gives me any reason to believe that she even had the President on her mind when she spoke.

August 11, 2014 at 1:09 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man wrote: "Just saw a story on Jame O'keefe in a UK paper on Drudge. He dressed up like Osama Bin Laden and walked across the river from Mexico, twice. LOL"

The story promised a video and there was no video.

No clearly identifiable evidenced video...I call BS on that one.

August 11, 2014 at 1:11 p.m.
alprova said...

The decision to pull all the troops from Iraq most certainly was not President Obama's.

On November 19, 2008, the U.S.-Iraq Troop Withdrawal Agreement was drawn up and signed by both the United States President George W. Bush and Iraq.

Jackie, I've told you repeatedly to stay out of adult conversations where you clearly have not done enough research to know what you're typing about.

August 11, 2014 at 1:19 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo says "And nothing in Hillary's comment gives me any reason to believe that she even had the President on her mind when she spoke." Apparently there is no cap on stupidity, Toad.

August 11, 2014 at 1:24 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Sex Offender says" On November 19, 2008, the U.S.-Iraq Troop Withdrawal Agreement was drawn up and signed by both the United States President George W. Bush and Iraq." So why is it, sex offender, that The Redeemer takes credit for "ending the Iraq war?" Hmmm? You should be banned from this site until you apologize for your exposing yourself to little boys

August 11, 2014 at 1:27 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

From the Organizer's own craven lips: "After taking office, I announced a new strategy that would end our combat mission in Iraq and remove all of our troops by the end of 2011,” he said. “So today, I can report that, as promised, the rest of our troops in Iraq will come home by the end of the year.”

August 11, 2014 at 1:35 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie wrote: "Apparently there is no cap on stupidity, Toad."

Quote the words that make it perfectly clear she was referring in any manner ot the Prez.

If you can't do that, then it is YOU who is eternally stupid.

August 11, 2014 at 2:10 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie wrote: "So why is it that The Redeemer takes credit for "ending the Iraq war?" Hmmm?"

Because he was the man in charge on the dates it was announced and on the date of withdrawal, but the timeline was indeed set in stone by GWB in November of 2008.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-u-s-iraq-troop-withdrawal-agreement-allows-us-troops-to-stay-in-iraq-until-2011/11071

August 11, 2014 at 2:16 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie, it's not my fault you cannot look things up to avoid putting your foot in your mouth when you post.

GWB signed it, Obama announced it within days of taking office and the rest is history.

You're a blooming idiot trying to discuss adult topics.

You're simply not qualified to do it.

August 11, 2014 at 2:18 p.m.

Looks like the WH isn't going to tolerate any criticism of BO's regime by Hillary. BO and MO don't like Hillary and Bubba.

What a loathsome foursome.

August 11, 2014 at 2:30 p.m.
Ki said...

alprova, lil jackeeD is so busy hating the president that attempting to explain what actually lead to ground troop withdrawal from Iraq is like talking to a 2 month old. Bush signed an order that all ground troops would have to be out of Iraq at the end of 2011 or any military personnel accused of committing crimes in the country would subject to punishment under Iraqi law. There's more to that order but to long and complicated to explain to lil jackzun at this time. Plus he still would not get it no matter how simplified it was made to him. He doesn't understand the danger of disobeying such an agreement. Which could lead to a world wide catasrophy, even a potential nuclear holocaust. Fate can only be tempted for so long, and luck has a way of running out. If Americans only knew how close and how often the world has come close to such a massive disaster, they would be protesting for peace and not more bombs dropped and more wars.

August 11, 2014 at 2:45 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man wrote: "Looks like the WH isn't going to tolerate any criticism of BO's regime by Hillary. BO and MO don't like Hillary and Bubba."

Rumor, innuendo and even outright lies are involved in the above. There is absolutely no proof whatsoever that trhere is any animosity between the four of them.

"What a loathsome foursome."

That is strictly your opinion and nothing more.

Hillary will win the White House in a landslide victory, you wait and see.

August 11, 2014 at 2:57 p.m.
alprova said...

James O'Keefe's Osama Bin Laden suit crossing video is likely a total fraud. I do not believe that the crossing he took was at an actual border crossing.

They actually showed a foot bridge in the same area that he crossed. No such foot bridge exists at the border.

It is funny as hell that the story disappeared for several hours and was then brought back.

That man is so full of sh!t.

August 11, 2014 at 3:42 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo the Fabricator and top hack defender of the indefensible. Weak beer, sex predator.

August 11, 2014 at 3:44 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo, did your boss at The Village fire you over your perversion?

August 11, 2014 at 3:46 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

White House deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes is now publicly responding to criticism from Hillary Clinton of Barack Obama’s foreign policy. “On the broad thrust of our foreign policy, she was fully on board,” Rhodes tells Politico. Yeah, Alpo. Sounds like a love-fest. Try to keep up, moron.

August 11, 2014 at 3:56 p.m.

LOL Hillary won't run. I know for you pudgy, eunuch, pajama boys having Mommy Hillary hand you an over sized cup of coca as you lay in front the boob tube in your footy pj's watching PBS is your dream come true, but it won't happen. You get hard thinking about her thick ankles brushing by your warm little toes as she goes back to the kitchen to bake you some cookies. You truly have some kind of mental illness to want her as POTUS.

As Jack has pointed out she's a liar and hypocrite. She an elitist who thinks we're all so stupid as to believe she's been struggling in anyway over the decades. LOL Sick narcissist.

August 11, 2014 at 4:08 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo, being a registered sex offender, can you even vote?

August 11, 2014 at 4:14 p.m.

Alprova nobody cares about your cheap, two bit assessment of the border. You're sitting comfortably in your house far, far away from the border. I'll go with people who live down there, regular folks/citizens, border patrol and law enforcement. Their experience matters down there, not your pajama boy opinion.

WHHHAAA..WHAAA..WHAA...MOMMY HILLARY I'M OUT OF COCOA AND COOKIES.

You're not a real man, a real American, if you want the fed government to take care of you. You can't be a real man and want Hillary. No real man, real American could possibly be comfortable with voting for that narcissistic, controlling, dishonest, and elitist bitch. I know you pajama boys would lick marmalade in between her pudgy toes just to get some free stuff, and have her punish anyone who doesn't agree with you, but there are still enough of use real Americans around to make sure you don't have your run of the place, you pu$$ies.

There's something wrong with you if you're comfortable with BO or Hillary in the WH.

August 11, 2014 at 4:24 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie wrote: *"Alpo, being a registered sex offender, can you even vote?"

Since I am not a registered sex offender of any kind, in any State, you poor, poor butt-hurt little man, I am welcomed with open arms at the polls every election.

August 11, 2014 at 4:40 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

No, I believe you to be an offender. Sure of it, in fact. I've posted the link, as you know.

August 11, 2014 at 4:42 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie, I guess you missed the following: "UPDATE: The author originally wrongly believed Rhodes's comments were a direct response to Clinton's most recent interview. In fact, Rhodes's comments were made in June."

The remarks were harmless and the author lied about who was responding when and to whom.

Try again you dimwit.

August 11, 2014 at 4:46 p.m.

Yeah, Alprova everyone is lying, there is no evidence of anything, BO and Hillary are victims, we're all just fine. Pathetic PJ boy.

August 11, 2014 at 4:49 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man wrote: "Alprova nobody cares about your cheap, two bit assessment of the border. You're sitting comfortably in your house far, far away from the border."

As are you, you idiot.

"I'll go with people who live down there, regular folks/citizens, border patrol and law enforcement. Their experience matters down there, not your pajama boy opinion."

I don't expect you to change your mind. You're a Matt Drudge groupie, plain and simple.

"You're not a real man, a real American, if you want the fed government to take care of you."

I'll guarantee you that you draw a check the same as I do.

"You can't be a real man and want Hillary. No real man, real American could possibly be comfortable with voting for that narcissistic, controlling, dishonest, and elitist bitch."

It doesn't matter what I want. She's the one to beat in 2016. The polls have been saying that for at least two years now. She is more popular than ever.

"I know you pajama boys would lick marmalade in between her pudgy toes just to get some free stuff, and have her punish anyone who doesn't agree with you, but there are still enough of use real Americans around to make sure you don't have your run of the place, you pu$$ies."

You clearly don't work for a living. You draw a check just like I do. You're a blooming hypocrite.

"There's something wrong with you if you're comfortable with BO or Hillary in the WH."

That's nothing more than your opinion, and you know what it's worth. As much as anyone else's.

August 11, 2014 at 4:52 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie wrote: "No, I believe you to be an offender. Sure of it, in fact. I've posted the link, as you know."

Post it again.

August 11, 2014 at 4:53 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Will do if the mood strikes me. Everyone's seen it. Proof positive you are a sorry sob kid flashing fool.

August 11, 2014 at 4:55 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man wrote: "Yeah, Alprova everyone is lying, there is no evidence of anything..."

Please feel free to post proof positive that which I challenge as being falsified.

I'm good to go so far, as you have yet to post a damn thing that disproves my statements.

James O'Keefe has a provable history of falsifying his films.

That foot bridge is proof that it was not a border location. It was likley a south Texas park.

But you keep swallowing that Drudge sludge.

August 11, 2014 at 4:57 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie wrote: "Will do if the mood strikes me. Everyone's seen it."

And everyone knows it is not me too.

You're a complete idiot and you're playing with fire.

August 11, 2014 at 5 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Drudge & O'Keefe are great americans. You, Toad, are a registered sex offender.

August 11, 2014 at 5:01 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

ole zfister sez, "You're sitting comfortably in your house far, far away from the border. I'll go with people who live down there, regular folks/citizens, border patrol and law enforcement. Their experience matters down there, not your pajama boy opinion.," yet the law enforcement and community leaders in Texas border towns told the Guv they did not need the guard, things were ok, in fact better than before.

August 11, 2014 at 5:04 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo, aka the fabricator: The offices at TFP are closed now. You can stop whining until tomorrow.

August 11, 2014 at 5:16 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Mine is conclusive, deviant.

August 11, 2014 at 5:39 p.m.

oh, yeah, inq, it's all good. Borders being overrun is a good thing, even though centuries of history proves otherwise. But this a new age with open borders and invaders are now "dreamer" LOL See what electing a pothead for POTUS has done?

The folks down there have taken matters into their own hands because the fed. gov. has failed to protect our borders. They own guns, lots of them, and thank goodness that they do. They don't want invaders there so BO and his lunatics are shipping them all over the country.

I'll go with the people's experience down there.. law enforcement, regular citizens and border patrol have said repeatedly that criminals, and gang members have crossed and crimes have been committed.

What you pampered libs think up here doesn't amount to a hill of beans.

National guard or no national guard, Texans are fighting back.

August 11, 2014 at 6:11 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Lefites are 1 worlders. Screw borders. Save the whales, coexist, blah blah blah

August 11, 2014 at 6:22 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie wrote: "Mine is conclusive, deviant."

Only in your own mind.

August 11, 2014 at 6:27 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Just make sure you're up to date on your registration, Toad. You're flat out guilty.

August 11, 2014 at 6:36 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man wrote: "The folks down there have taken matters into their own hands because the fed. gov. has failed to protect our borders. They own guns, lots of them, and thank goodness that they do. They don't want invaders there so BO and his lunatics are shipping them all over the country."

And yet, even those idiots cannot seem to catch any of these people allegedly slipping across the border.

"I'll go with the people's experience down there.. law enforcement, regular citizens and border patrol have said repeatedly that criminals, and gang members have crossed and crimes have been committed."

No...what you've been reading are falsified stories linked to by Matt Drudge and NewsMax. There isn't a shred of truth to them, including all those people allegedly guarding the borders.

Rick Perry sent his National Guard troops to Washington D.C. to stage a protest. I guess there wasn't enough action going on at the border, so they had to dream up something to try and keep this crap alive.

"What you pampered libs think up here doesn't amount to a hill of beans."

The brain power you Drudge groupies use will fit into a thimble.

"National guard or no national guard, Texans are fighting back."

Horse hockey. Not one of those clowns is allowed to point a weapon at an illegal that comes across that border. You're being spoon fed 100% crap and it must taste good in your mouth.

August 11, 2014 at 6:38 p.m.
alprova said...

Jackie wrote: "Just make sure you're up to date on your registration, Toad. You're flat out guilty."

You're the only person who has registration issues. In fact, you were arrested earlier this year for not keeping your registration current.

You confessed to being the person in question.

I am not the person you claim me to be.

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270586

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270592

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270593

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/may/18/ostrich/#c270595

August 11, 2014 at 6:46 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

^^^. BWAHAHAHA. YOU MORONIC LITTLE SHRIMP

August 11, 2014 at 6:52 p.m.
alprova said...

Whatever do you mean by that?

August 11, 2014 at 6:58 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

I think your issues started, Alprova, during your early teens when it became obvious you would never be north of 5'5"

August 11, 2014 at 7 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

O'Keefe a "great american", Jack? That video of him crossing the border with the bin Laden costume is a hoax meant to incite anger in conservative loons, such as Fister. A sheriff in one of the border towns helps him set up the whole thing. There were also Border Agents present while it was shot. Fear-mongering does not make one a "great american" in my opinion.

August 11, 2014 at 7:04 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

You know this how, gassy?

August 11, 2014 at 7:14 p.m.
alprova said...

"I think your issues started, Alprova, during your early teens when it became obvious you would never be north of 5'5"

Sir, and I use the term very loosely, I stand up to a solid 5'10"

In just a few more days, I'll be standing again.

I know you're under house arrest, but I'll be very happy to come see you in person, because we've just got to meet and determine who the better man truly is.

I know right where to find you.

How 'bout an invite?

Enough of this crap in the forum. Let's meet and have it out once and for all.

You're a big man behind that computer. Let's see how brave you are face to face.

August 11, 2014 at 7:15 p.m.
alprova said...

Anyone who would even suggest that James O'Keefe is a "Good American" doesn't have a brain firing on all cylinders.

Calling Matt Drudge a "good American" is like calling Bozo the Clown a "Good American."

They both have a lot in common, that's for sure. The three of them make a modern day version of the Three Stooges.

August 11, 2014 at 7:21 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

You're welcome anytime Alpo. Come on up.

August 11, 2014 at 7:24 p.m.
ibshame said...

Three who make the Three Stooges look like geniuses: First there's Z fister - Class Dunce, Gets all of his talking points from another dunce on talk radio. Next up ConMan - a freak that hides behind Biblical scripture condemning others for what he no doubt practices behind closed doors. To paraphrase he protests way too much over other people's lifestyles. Last but not least Jack Dennis, clearly one whose picnic basket is two sandwiches short. What else would explain an asinine decision on his part to admit to being a child molester in a PUBLIC FORUM, then get p!ssed off at others for a decision he made with the full knowledge he was posting in a public forum . Now instead of just writing the following: I lied in my admission to being a child molester. He searches through the Internet to find a name similar to another poster and then accuses that poster of being a molester. Never stopping to realize no one in their right mind is going to admit to something so heinous as a joke. The Three Stooges got wealthy playing stupid but Z fister, ConMan, and Jack Dennis aren't playing.

August 11, 2014 at 7:35 p.m.
rengerry said...

Now Al, don't be dissing on Bozo by comparing him to Drudge.

August 11, 2014 at 7:48 p.m.
alprova said...

Actually, I had Ronald McDonald in mind, but Bozo came out first.

August 11, 2014 at 8:14 p.m.

ibshame, and you're a racist. Any black man who does not hold your ideology or belong to your party is an "uncle tom" according to you. You would make a fine plantation owner.

Shameful.

O'keefe has made you Democrats and libs look so bad.

Love when you're exposed for what you are.

August 11, 2014 at 8:29 p.m.

Looks like violence has erupted in St. Louis because a black teen was shot by a police officer. I see Trayvn Martin's attorney is representing the family. The race industry vultures are swooping down in St. Louis. I wonder if BO had a son if would like that teen as well?

I guess the blacks rioting and looting there are acceptable to you, ibshame, as opposed to Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell, Ben Carson, and Clarence Thomas? All of whom experienced grew at a time when blacks were treated like second class citizens.

August 11, 2014 at 8:39 p.m.
alprova said...

Z-man , if James O'Keefe is someone you can hold out as a hero for the Republicans, you guys are in deeper sh~t than ever.

O'Keefe has been caught several times falsifying his evidence and was convicted of criminal offenses a couple of times.

O'Keefe doesn't make Democrats look bad. He makes himself look bad. He's an idiot seeking his fifteen minutes of fame and that's about it.

August 11, 2014 at 8:44 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

So Alpy, when can I expect you?

August 11, 2014 at 8:51 p.m.
rengerry said...

Jack's asking Al over. They mush have decided who gets to be dom. Let the sweet love commence!

August 11, 2014 at 8:54 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"You know this how, gassy?"

When Fister first mentioned it, I researched it. You should try it too. Just like last month when he mentioned "DHS was buying up all of the .22 ammo". That turned out to be an erroneous claim, as well.

"O'keefe has made you Democrats and libs look so bad."

95% of voters wouldn't know who that guy was if you mentioned his name. But...if you only get your news from one source I guess I can see how you could be so gullible.

August 11, 2014 at 9:32 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

GI, DHS, like weapons of mass destruction and the Patriot Act all need to disappear from American life.

August 11, 2014 at 9:35 p.m.

Never said O'keefe is a hero. Just said he makes you Dems and libs look really stupid.

He's done a great job exposing things. I find it damn funny.

Gassy, you couldn't be more wrong. I watch all kinds of news, or what poses as news, liberal news and conservative. I'd listen to liberal talk radio, if it existed! LOL

August 11, 2014 at 10:02 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

So where's the proof O'keefe staged river crossing not at Rio Grande?

August 11, 2014 at 10:10 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

Alpo belches "James O'Keefe's Osama Bin Laden suit crossing video is likely a total fraud. I do not believe that the crossing he took was at an actual border crossing. They actually showed a foot bridge in the same area that he crossed. No such foot bridge exists at the border. you have evidence of this, Fabricator?

August 11, 2014 at 10:19 p.m.
BigRidgePatriot said...

Argh, Bennett's favorite topic. Why is the definition of marriage so hard to comprehend for liberals? I have nothing against gays and lesbians but WTH? Why do they want government to sanction their relationships anyway?

This is just more proof that we are slaves of government entitlements. Until Bush put married couples on par with live-ins on a tax basis we never heard anything about this. They do not want some "special" government sanctioned relationship. Those that make a fuss about gay marriage are just looking for money that some sources have apparently set aside for procreators. How F'd up is that?

August 11, 2014 at 10:26 p.m.

Jack, Sharpton is ibshames's idea of the perfect black American success story.

August 11, 2014 at 11:20 p.m.
TheJackDennis said...

^ sounds about right

August 11, 2014 at 11:25 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

give it up guys, get on point

August 11, 2014 at 11:59 p.m.
ibshame said...

Z fister at least Al Sharpton does not hate the fact he is an African American. The same cannot be said of that "Uncle Tom" Sowell. And if you think for one minute that anything you have to say about me calling Sowell an "uncle Tom" means anything at all to me then you have me confused with someone who cares what an imbecile like you thinks. Sowell is a pompous, elitist, who hates the fact he was born Black and if he was standing on a street corner on fire, I wouldn't pour a bucket of p!ss on him to put it out. The same goes for Clarence Thomas, Walter Williams and any other "uncle Tom" . Not all Black Republicans are "uncle Toms", however most "uncle Toms" are Black Republicans.

August 12, 2014 at 1:43 p.m.
nocomment said...

BigRidgePatriot said...

Argh, Bennett's favorite topic. Why is the definition of marriage so hard to comprehend for liberals? I have nothing against gays and lesbians but WTH? Why do they want government to sanction their relationships anyway?

Probably for the same reasons that heterosexuals do.

August 13, 2014 at 3:11 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.